These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Some changes I could live with (items icons, inventions)

Author
Fly byNighter
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2012-03-16 03:31:29 UTC
1. Because CCP has been changing module names I believe a few in the science and industry could use a little bit of LOVe from the DEVs.
For example: the decryptor's could use the same color scheme that is carried on throughout most the game. Caldari blue, and so on. It would also be more convenient if the decryptor's were named Caldarian prototype diagram, so when individuals remotely install an invention they can easily find what they need to.

2. A solution to the invention process.
So after the invention process we should be able to add runs to the copy, but receive some kind of reduction in quality in the copy. Perhaps adding a new element to any fresh invention, the copy would come out of the oven having a quality adjustment factor of 100%, new decryptor's for multiplying runs on new inventions could be used that would change the quality adjustment of the invention. So if one new decryptor adds 10 runs but penalize you 95% on the quality adjustment factor leaving you unable to make any other adjustments. But once the blueprint has been used there's no additional changes allowed. It would be nice if a successful invention could be put back under the microscope for one last upgrade before it hits the manufacturing line.
Anyone have any thoughts to idea 1 or 2


Anyone have any thoughts to idea 1 or 2
Fly byNighter
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2012-03-16 20:46:34 UTC
Anyone have any ideas to even the playing field with tech 2 BPO Vs Invention????
(i don't think ccp will ever remove tech 2 BPO but to make the invention process better is something we all need to push if we want to see something happen!!!!

Ajita al Tchar
Doomheim
#3 - 2012-03-17 00:41:33 UTC
Fly byNighter wrote:
Anyone have any ideas to even the playing field with tech 2 BPO Vs Invention????
(i don't think ccp will ever remove tech 2 BPO but to make the invention process better is something we all need to push if we want to see something happen!!!!



Overhauling the S&I interface would be enough. Although I wouldn't say that T2 BPOs are a problem. Invention is fine (minus the clickfest, but that's where overhauling the interface thing comes in).
Fly byNighter
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2012-03-17 05:58:37 UTC
Ajita al Tchar wrote:
Fly byNighter wrote:
Anyone have any ideas to even the playing field with tech 2 BPO Vs Invention????
(i don't think ccp will ever remove tech 2 BPO but to make the invention process better is something we all need to push if we want to see something happen!!!!



Overhauling the S&I interface would be enough. Although I wouldn't say that T2 BPOs are a problem. Invention is fine (minus the clickfest, but that's where overhauling the interface thing comes in).


THe clickfest has gotten a lot better ....Thanks CCP!!!!