These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

So, Where are the "50 new DED sites" ?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Sade Onyx
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#21 - 2012-03-13 13:15:35 UTC
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:


So where are those 9/10-rated 'plexes, now that you mention it?


Jove, which presumably is where the other 47 sites are too
FlameGlow
Perkone
Caldari State
#22 - 2012-03-13 13:21:25 UTC
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
St Mio wrote:
Beats me vOv

They're just filling in the blanks on http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/DED_Complex_List


So where are those 9/10-rated 'plexes, now that you mention it?


Only 7/10s were added to null for every race and 8/10 for races that didn't have them(bloods and sansha?)
I wonder if those 8/10s are as bad as guristas one and only drop box in 50% of the cases(54/112 trip reports saved on our wiki)
Sade Onyx
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2012-03-13 15:17:45 UTC
So looking at that Wiki page I suppose we can conclude one of two things

a] Its a typo, there arnt 50 New sites at all
b] Its as Tippia said, 50 more sites spawned at any given time

Either way, very disappointing.
Zircon Dasher
#24 - 2012-03-13 15:31:13 UTC
The features page says "over 50 new.." which could also mean that 16-19 of each new 2/10 are now in play.

vOv

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.
Sade Onyx
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#25 - 2012-03-13 15:35:52 UTC
It doesnt say "new" it just says "50 sites have been added"

it also says "bringing an array of new high-end modules"

but surly the 'high-end' modules wont be in 2/10 sites!

The more I read that paragraph the easier I find comparing it to the excrement of a bull.
Zircon Dasher
#26 - 2012-03-13 15:42:29 UTC
You are correct. The word "new" appears in the sentence before that.

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.
CCP Navigator
C C P
C C P Alliance
#27 - 2012-03-13 16:00:18 UTC
Hello there,

I would like to take this opportunity to explain the discrepancy that was announced in the Crucible 1.5 patch notes page and features page.

We released Crucible 1.5 with three new DED sites, however, in the previous months over 50 sites have been added, fixed or changed.
Luba Cibre
Global Song Setup
#28 - 2012-03-13 16:17:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Luba Cibre
CCP Navigator wrote:
Hello there,

I would like to take this opportunity to explain the discrepancy that was announced in the Crucible 1.5 patch notes page and features page.

We released Crucible 1.5 with three new DED sites, however, in the previous months over 50 sites have been added, fixed or changed.

And for one moment, i though you were cool ccp.

"Nothing essential happens in the absence of noise." 
Zircon Dasher
#29 - 2012-03-13 16:21:26 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:
Hello there,

I would like to take this opportunity to explain the discrepancy that was announced in the Crucible 1.5 patch notes page and features page.

We released Crucible 1.5 with three new DED sites, however, in the previous months over 50 sites have been added, fixed or changed.


LolLolLolLolLol

+1 to the marketing dept.

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.
Melina Lin
Universal Frog
#30 - 2012-03-13 17:09:20 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:
... added, fixed or changed.


so bad
Alara IonStorm
#31 - 2012-03-13 17:17:14 UTC
CCP Navigator wrote:
Hello there,

I would like to take this opportunity to explain the discrepancy that was announced in the Crucible 1.5 patch notes page and features page.

We released Crucible 1.5 with three new DED sites, however, in the previous months over 50 sites have been added, fixed or changed.

Can you explain this as well?

Crucible Page wrote:
bringing new challenges and an array of new high-end modules

I don't see any notes on new module release.

You seemed to have oversold this one...

Just a bit. Ugh
CCP Greyscale
C C P
C C P Alliance
#32 - 2012-03-13 17:43:32 UTC
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
St Mio wrote:
Beats me vOv

They're just filling in the blanks on http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/DED_Complex_List


So where are those 9/10-rated 'plexes, now that you mention it?


Angel 9/10: Cache, Curse, Detoroid, Feythabolis, Great Wildlands, Immensea, Impass, Insmother, Omist, Scalding Pass, Tenerifis, Wicked Creek

Blood Raider 9/10: Delve, Period Basis, Querious

Guristas 9/10: Black Rise, Branch, Deklein, Geminate, Pure Blind, Tenal, Tribute, Vale of the Silent, Venal

Sanshas 9/10: Catch, Esoteria, Paragon Soul, Providence, Stain

Serpentis 9/10: Cloud Ring, Fade, Fountain, Outer Ring, Syndicate

Hope this helps!
Shogun Archer
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2012-03-13 17:45:36 UTC
So much better to have the Dev tell us than to actually go out and explore... /sarcasm off

If you run into more than 2 a**holes in a day, you should probably look in the mirror.
Avid Bumhumper
Beekeepers Anonymous
#34 - 2012-03-13 17:48:21 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
CCP Navigator wrote:
Hello there,

I would like to take this opportunity to explain the discrepancy that was announced in the Crucible 1.5 patch notes page and features page.

We released Crucible 1.5 with three new DED sites, however, in the previous months over 50 sites have been added, fixed or changed.

Can you explain this as well?

Crucible Page wrote:
bringing new challenges and an array of new high-end modules

I don't see any notes on new module release.

You seemed to have oversold this one...

Just a bit. Ugh


Why are people surprised. CCP is sloppy, they have been sloppy since the start. They have lots of ideas, but their implemetation is suspect.
They do not have a proper testing department, and getting people to test Sisi can be a chore. What?
They fix things that weren't broken, and seem to have an issue dealing with bugs that have been in game for years.
So, to expect anything other than "the usual" would be naive....


"I've never been quite sure if CCP understands the difference between a bug and a feature"

My Tinfoil hat has been sugically implanted, so no,it is not for sale.....
Bloodpetal
Tir Capital Management Group
#35 - 2012-03-13 17:52:30 UTC

Can we get a revisit and optimization of the Low Sec Complexes (3/10-5/10) in the near future please? As low sec dwellers, one of my guys has learned the mystic arts of making some good money, but some of the sites are total crap and totally unreliable and are always avoided. Personally, I've been caught in doing 3-4 hours of escalations to get almost NOTHING in value for that time and really left away never wanting to do them ever again.

Because low sec sites don't have a lot of Battleships for the Bounty rewards (which I'm fine with) at least give us more reliable income from other drops/effects/goodies to make up for the total reliance of a random drop at the end that may not appear (overseer effects don't help that much).

That's the issue with any low sec exploration, although some of the 4/10 and 5/10 faction drops can be really respectable with some luck - there isn't a consistent level on some of the lesser sites and signatures and I know it's exploration and not supposed to be predictable, at the same time having SOME knowledge that you'll get at least something worth your time will help promote it a little more on the LOWER end sites (which you can walk away with hardly a few million ISK with no luck - which is me)

CCP, Thanks for reading.

Where I am.
Sisohiv
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2012-03-13 17:56:20 UTC
The new serpentis one isn't for me. All I got was some T2 Mindlink Blueprint. It said I would have to run it 10 times but ME 100 and I threw it away. Why would it make ME run it 100 times but everyone else only 10?
malaire
#37 - 2012-03-13 17:58:00 UTC  |  Edited by: malaire
CCP Greyscale wrote:
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
St Mio wrote:
Beats me vOv

They're just filling in the blanks on http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/DED_Complex_List


So where are those 9/10-rated 'plexes, now that you mention it?


Angel 9/10: Cache, Curse, Detoroid, Feythabolis, Great Wildlands, Immensea, Impass, Insmother, Omist, Scalding Pass, Tenerifis, Wicked Creek

Blood Raider 9/10: Delve, Period Basis, Querious

Guristas 9/10: Black Rise, Branch, Deklein, Geminate, Pure Blind, Tenal, Tribute, Vale of the Silent, Venal

Sanshas 9/10: Catch, Esoteria, Paragon Soul, Providence, Stain

Serpentis 9/10: Cloud Ring, Fade, Fountain, Outer Ring, Syndicate

Hope this helps!

When were those added? I only see mentions of 2-4/10 sites being added in recent few expansions?

New to EVE? Don't forget to read: The Manual * The Wiki * The Career Options * and everything else
Rukia Taika
Allied Operations
Mechanicus Macabre Immortale
#38 - 2012-03-13 18:02:59 UTC
OMG!!! new DED sites for you big alliance nubs out in 0.0 to run behind your blue shield. maybe youall will stop whining like little school girls about the empire incursion runners
Bloodpetal
Tir Capital Management Group
#39 - 2012-03-13 18:03:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Bloodpetal
Alright.

CRUCIBLE was released in NOVEMBER.

In November, they added new sites, they added new modules (T2 Ganglinks, all kinds of T2 modules) - and a bunch of other things.

THIS PATCH is Crucible 1.5 - and in THIS PATCH they added a few new DED sites and everything else listed.

The only thing "sloppy" is your comprehension and attention to detail.


Avid Bumhumper wrote:

Why are people surprised. CCP is sloppy, they have been sloppy since the start. They have lots of ideas, but their implemetation is suspect.

Where I am.
St Mio
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#40 - 2012-03-13 18:08:22 UTC  |  Edited by: St Mio
Shogun Archer wrote:
So much better to have the Dev tell us than to actually go out and explore... /sarcasm off

Bah, all he was doing was listing the null regions by rat faction, subtle dev trolling FTW =p
Previous page123Next page