Jita Park Speakers Corner

This "pubbie" agrees with you there!

As opposed to the Mittani's position "The fact is that Incarna was a good idea, even if the execution was utterly botched."

Yes just over 1 moths prior to June 2011.

It also came with such wonderful statements like

"Yet Incarna is not something which we can ignore. Not only is it inevitable, it is a fundamental necessity if EVE is to achieve any status greater than that of an awkward niche MMO from a strange, sulfuric island where people eat sheep’s heads willingly and believe in elves."
- The Mittani

Also

"Having sunk millions into buying White Wolf and developing a WoD MMO, the code for ‘walking around with a pretty avatar amid beautiful environments’ is something which CCP is going to code come hell or high water;"
- The Mittani

Or are you saying he has not the conviction to stand for what he believes?

Said it before, I will say it again Issler Dainze has consistently run on the same platform for years and hasn't changed her mind just because it would be better to gain votes.

Ok I will agree I do generally come out on the offensive when ever I see the label Goonswarm

I admit, I would like to see a future for Wis, I honestly agree with those original statements of Mittens. I don't think it should be killed and as The Mittani points out they have outlayed millions on it. Bugger the Nex store.

It could and should be developed as Wis would make a great add on to EVE if done properly. But that's the big catch isn't it "If done Properly"

I don't believe it's a dead horse mostly due to the money CCP has put into it. Personally I think it should get a small development group to continue the work. Nothing large, definitely not anywhere near the size of what it was before with clothes designers and crap. Let them take their time and get it right, in 4 years the game will probably need a new lease on life and having a new game inside an already established one will give EVE the boost it needs to continue on for years more.

Personally I think the name Incarna should be classified as an offensive word and blocked by the forums and only leave a ******* behind.

Uh...no...I won't be saying anything about renouncing WiS to anybody, 'cause the taint is with incarna as CCP disasterously passed it off on us - the taint is not on the idea of WiS itself. Incarna was / is not WiS, and people (ahem) shouldn't mistake the two as being the same. Issler, like most eve players, was very disappointed with incarna, and has said so many times and in (written) detail.
CCP will be laying low awhile with their walking/ skimming around / driving / whatever in game efforts because of the huge player backlash over their horrible incarna junk, but I don't see them passing up making a bunch of money long-term (you know, them being a company and all). I think CCP rushing some half-baked stuff into the game to make money from expanding their base was one of the factors in them messing up so badly with incarna. I would rather not see any repeat of that sort of incarna mess. CCP is going to be at least laying the groundwork for whatever they are going to be doing in that area in the future (hopefully real WiS) now....seems to me that it would be in our, the players, interests to watch CCP's direction with (again, hopefully real) WiS through the CSM as much as is possible.
With Issler's extensive real-world experience in computer graphics and working with design teams in the gaming area, as well as her interest in having all areas of EVE be fun for all the players - I don't know why we wouldn't want her on our player advisory council to CCP...

I think that is a personal question between her and her significant other

Yes because after a year of Null sec and PvP improvements to the game with bugger all else besides and even the next patch being mostly to do with PVP, we really need more of that.

CSM6, a catch phrase for the minority ignoring the majority.

Ok I must have Missed something. POS fixes, does this mean the code for the POS's works now and you can use an alliance POS for invention (As they we originally supposed to) or that the standings for the weapons systems works correctly now?

Lived in Syndicate for a year. Three months in the drone region.

Was in the alliance tourney twice. Finished the first time in the upper 3rd.

I run multiple moon POSs to support our very profitable T2 ship production.

Owned a tech moon for a year in Tasti.

I live in low sec and have for 80% of my time in Eve.

Spent hours in CSM 2 discussing ways to fix null sov (they did nothing we suggested).

Set up an alt corp for FW when it first came out. Ended up finding it not my thing.

Supercaps, never had one, so all I can offer is observations.

I am not just a miner, I've spent 8 years in Eve and have done most all there is at one time or another.

So thanks for giving me a time to remind everyone I am one of the most rounded and experienced candidates in the race!

Issler Danze
The Miner's Friend but MORE!!
Csm 7 Candidate

So unlike the members of CSM 6 who have a proven record of getting CCP to listen to them your record is having CCP ignore you.

What makes you think anything would be different if you were elected to CSM 7?