These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Dear Devs, thank you for spending 5 minutes to explain a game mechanic

Author
Yvella
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2012-03-11 20:33:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Yvella
ECM is poor game design, any mechanic that leaves a person completely useless Evil

Yes this is an argument as old as the hills, but to summarise:

1. It is common for people to have dedicated ECM alts. This is a typical sign of an OP mechanic
2. ECM does not scale in fleet fights, but completely ruins, solo and small gang engagements
3. Has anyone seen the sabre/falcon gate camp. Did you just say risk free pvp.....

Seriously address this now please

EDIT:
OK missed one because I was mad

4. ECM does not have an effective counter, (lol sensor strength)..

So far the only pro-current-ECM answer that I can actually agree with is:

"ECM was designed to hurt solo and small scale PvP. It worked perfectly.

Learn to blob or gtfo.

<-------------- WoW is that way."

Would love for a dev to comment on that.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#2 - 2012-03-11 20:35:02 UTC
Poasting in ECM whine thread #78965.



There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Yvella
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2012-03-11 20:38:15 UTC
and why do you think people keep whining.... Is it because ECM is a thoroughly beautiful balanced mechanic, that brings a fun dynamic to the game?

er.. no.

Also I have never seen CCP's position on ECM (expcept when they nerfed the falcon's range) and would be interested in engaging in iterative discussion with them, now they have discovered internet spaceships again.
Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#4 - 2012-03-11 20:41:47 UTC
CSB, there's an app forum for doing that: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=topics&f=270

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Yvella
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2012-03-11 20:44:51 UTC
Ha Ha Ha Ha, you're a funny guy. Post with your main.
Arec Bardwin
#6 - 2012-03-11 21:04:24 UTC
Yvella wrote:
Ha Ha Ha Ha, you're a funny guy. Post with your main Falcon alt.

Fixed. Looks like someone was just permajammed. I'll admit though; posting a rage thread on EVE forums is a great way to vent steam Big smile

Lek Arthie
Doomheim
#7 - 2012-03-11 21:04:25 UTC
Fit 1 ECCM, or maybe 2 ECCM, or maybe 3 ECCM, or maybe 4 ECCM. Problem solved you are immune to ECM.
Buuuuuuuuuuuuuut waaaaaaaaaaait, you dont fit ECCM because you want to do damage AND have nice tank AND have a scrambler AND have damage mods AND have tracking mods AND have a sweet damage control for your hull AND have a webber AND have a MWD AND ... AND ... AND ... AND ... AND. So you prefer ANOTHER ECM nerf to make the module useless (ECM nerfs have already happened). You just want to do anything and not be able to get jammed.

Pilots that are good at pvp know that ECCM is almost a must much like MWD or AB is a must. Maybe tomorrow you dont even like that (having to fit a MWD) and ask for a nerf on that also. L2pvp imo.
Yvella
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2012-03-11 21:16:59 UTC
Lek Arthie wrote:
Fit 1 ECCM, or maybe 2 ECCM, or maybe 3 ECCM, or maybe 4 ECCM. Problem solved you are immune to ECM.
Buuuuuuuuuuuuuut waaaaaaaaaaait, you dont fit ECCM because you want to do damage AND have nice tank AND have a scrambler AND have damage mods AND have tracking mods AND have a sweet damage control for your hull AND have a webber AND have a MWD AND ... AND ... AND ... AND ... AND. So you prefer ANOTHER ECM nerf to make the module useless (ECM nerfs have already happened). You just want to do anything and not be able to get jammed.

Pilots that are good at pvp know that ECCM is almost a must much like MWD or AB is a must. Maybe tomorrow you dont even like that (having to fit a MWD) and ask for a nerf on that also. L2pvp imo.


I think you may never have actually PVP'd. ECCM being broken is a major issue with ECM...

Some practical examples.

1. I use a dual rep myrm with a low slot and a mid slot ECM + implant set. I have many times jumped it into falcon sabre camps, the normal outcome is that 1 jam cycle means i loose tackle and get no kills. Or I sit there and tank while the happy people bring moar falcons. Really true risk free PVP, as if anything like a real threat comes they all dock.

2. I used a 4 ECCM mod (+ implant) ferox (yes a ferox, did not want to look scary) and just wanted to nuke 1 guy. BUTROFL perma jammed by 2 falcons, for the 4-5 jam cycles that their pathetic DPS took.

3. Don't get me started on my dual ECCM anti-falcon abaddon being perma jammed by EC-300s

...

Any more practical examples?
Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
#9 - 2012-03-11 22:58:42 UTC
Yvella wrote:
Any more practical examples?


Oh feel free. After all, anecdotal evidence beats real math any day of the week, as exemplified by your EC-300s permajammed my dual ECCM Abbadon example.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#10 - 2012-03-11 23:03:10 UTC
ECM has been fixed already.
Aiwha
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#11 - 2012-03-11 23:18:56 UTC
ECM is fine. Bring more friends.

Sanity is fun leaving the body.

Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2012-03-11 23:25:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Vertisce Soritenshi
Calling the OP out for using "k thanks" at the end of the title.

Nothing wrong with ECM.

Edit: OP changed the title. Cheater.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821

Sebastian N Cain
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#13 - 2012-03-11 23:56:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Sebastian N Cain
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Yvella wrote:
Any more practical examples?


Oh feel free. After all, anecdotal evidence beats real math any day of the week, as exemplified by your EC-300s permajammed my dual ECCM Abbadon example.

Well, according to real math you will get jammed with ECCM, too

Because ECCM doesn´t reduce the effect of ECM, but it merely reduces the probability of occurence. And the probability is even with ECCM high enough to successfully jam the target

Because no one uses a single ECM module, everyone -being aware that this is game mechanic relying on probability- uses several to make sure it will have an effect. And unfortunately the math makes it clear that you don´t need that much to get a satisfying result. A flight of light ecm-drones will still retain a 70% chance of jamming you, even if you try to use ECCM to protect you. And they aren´t exactly the most effective ECM weapon available

This is the reason no one uses ECCM. In any conceivable pvp situation that is really happening on a regular base in eve, it is completely useless, you waste a slot or more and get jammed anyway. Of course you can get lucky, but you can get lucky without ECCM as well, and it doesn´t have enough of an effect to make much of a difference.

I got lost in thought... it was unfamiliar territory.

Willl Adama
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#14 - 2012-03-12 00:02:02 UTC
While I don't think ECM is a huge issue atm, it's definately not the most well thought-out and balanced mechanic in the game atm. There's been plenty of threads on this subject already though.

Hi

Reilly Duvolle
Hydra Squadron
#15 - 2012-03-12 00:07:33 UTC
Sebastian N Cain wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Yvella wrote:
Any more practical examples?


Oh feel free. After all, anecdotal evidence beats real math any day of the week, as exemplified by your EC-300s permajammed my dual ECCM Abbadon example.

Well, according to real math you will get jammed with ECCM, too


Yes. thank you for sharing with the rest of us that ECM is chance based. And the probability of a flight of EC-300 jamming a dual ECCM Abbadon is 6.2%. Now you calculate the chance of it beeing permajammed (say 10 cycles in a row).
Valentyn3
Deep Core Mining Inc.
#16 - 2012-03-12 00:28:38 UTC
Yes I demand less creative game play and more winmatar blobs plz.

I don't always use hax. But when I do, it's because I'm an NPC.. http://i.imgur.com/PUZou.jpg

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#17 - 2012-03-12 00:33:51 UTC
Reilly Duvolle wrote:


Yes. thank you for sharing with the rest of us that ECM is chance based. And the probability of a flight of EC-300 jamming a dual ECCM Abbadon is 6.2%. Now you calculate the chance of it beeing permajammed (say 10 cycles in a row).


I had two falcons set their jammers on my poor liitle bomber that had no ECCM. They failed to get a single jam and I killed the hulk anywayTwisted
Valentyn3
Deep Core Mining Inc.
#18 - 2012-03-12 00:37:09 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:


Yes. thank you for sharing with the rest of us that ECM is chance based. And the probability of a flight of EC-300 jamming a dual ECCM Abbadon is 6.2%. Now you calculate the chance of it beeing permajammed (say 10 cycles in a row).


I had two falcons set their jammers on my poor liitle bomber that had no ECCM. They failed to get a single jam and I killed the hulk anywayTwisted


They should have done the honorable thing a Falconer can do in that situation and self destruct for such a dishonor.

I don't always use hax. But when I do, it's because I'm an NPC.. http://i.imgur.com/PUZou.jpg

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#19 - 2012-03-12 00:42:25 UTC
Valentyn3 wrote:


They should have done the honorable thing a Falconer can do in that situation and self destruct for such a dishonor.


I considered killing them too but I felt the shame of not only failing to jam me but having their lives spared to be the greater punishment.
Sebastian N Cain
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-03-12 00:47:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Sebastian N Cain
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
Sebastian N Cain wrote:
Reilly Duvolle wrote:
[quote=Yvella]Any more practical examples?[/quote

Oh feel free. After all, anecdotal evidence beats real math any day of the week, as exemplified by your EC-300s permajammed my dual ECCM Abbadon example.

Well, according to real math you will get jammed with ECCM, to


Yes. thank you for sharing with the rest of us that ECM is chance based. And the probability of a flight of EC-300 jamming a dual ECCM Abbadon is 6.2%. Now you calculate the chance of it beeing permajammed (say 10 cycles in a row).

That wasn´t calculated for a dual eccm abbadon, but for the ruppy i´m currently flying with one eccm (which is why i´m not using this module)
And i think you miscalculated the chance for your dual eccm abbadon, by the way.

I got lost in thought... it was unfamiliar territory.

123Next pageLast page