These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

Forum Index

EVE Forums » Council of Stellar Management » Jita Park Speakers Corner » PsychoBitch for CSM 7 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Topic is locked indefinitely.

First pagePrevious page678910Next pageLast page

PsychoBitch for CSM 7 !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! First post
Author

Previous Topic Next Topic

Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo 465
PsychoBitch Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo Likes received: 465	#141 - 2012-03-10 18:52:31 UTC 4 Yes, it would be a great way to diversify the factional warfare landscape.

Redemption Road Affirmative. 23
chrome diopside Redemption Road Affirmative. Likes received: 23	#142 - 2012-03-10 20:00:21 UTC 1 Bump for a buddy. :)

Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo 3
Ace'o Spades Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo Likes received: 3	#143 - 2012-03-10 20:34:57 UTC Should CCP devote an expansion cycle to revamping the User Interface?


PsychoBitch Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo Likes received: 465	#144 - 2012-03-10 20:36:32 UTC 4 No. User interface improvements are one of the few things that should be rolled out piecemeal with other expansion efforts. God knows that we have experienced the SNAFU of mass improvements. Given CCP's record, making the game unplayable due to a mass "interface improvement" could be catastrophic.


Ace'o Spades Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo Likes received: 3	#145 - 2012-03-10 21:18:46 UTC Should players be able to modify the Eve user interface (for example: as is possible in World of Warcraft)?


PsychoBitch Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo Likes received: 465	#146 - 2012-03-10 21:21:16 UTC 4 No. Disagree. I didn't know we were playing WoW. Grow up! We already can thank CCP's new and improved horrible neocom. Don't make me beat you with a rake!

Andoya Spaceport 7
Baldur Smart Andoya Spaceport Likes received: 7	#147 - 2012-03-10 21:47:44 UTC 1 Vote for an Eve Veteran Gamer, unstoppable since 2003 ! He is real, he is tough, he is knowledge, and he is fair ! Independent of any of the big blocks, he speaks for us all ! For a well balanced play, and for sensible game mechanics ! As an entrepreneur, he will freely speak his mind to CCP ! Cheers all !

Eyes Dark

The Icarus Expedition

Solyaris Chtonium

Likes received: 1

#148 - 2012-03-10 22:02:07 UTC

PB

Im interested in a User Interface enhancement, not so much as in changing it or altering it, but more like how Adobe Photoshop allows you to move your tools / tool bars off of the primary workspace. I can have my chat windows and fittings and or market windows pulled to a second monitor or off of the main gameplay screen. What are your thoughts?

I already VOTED for your butt too! Smile

Eyes


chrome diopside Redemption Road Affirmative. Likes received: 23	#149 - 2012-03-11 00:38:11 UTC 1 User Interface stuff I'd like includes: Shortcuts for tagging Personal hangar tabs and wallet tabs Being able to drag a character out of contacts/chat and straight into the private section of a contract. Any chance of those?


Ace'o Spades Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo Likes received: 3	#150 - 2012-03-11 01:37:53 UTC Are static income sources like Tech moons are a good game mechanic for creating conflict and wealth?

PsychoBitch

Playboy Enterprises

Dark Taboo

Likes received: 465

#151 - 2012-03-11 01:40:07 UTC

Yes. However the ability to do alchemy to obtain the same materials NEEDS to be added. When the price of tech goes from 20k isk to over 100k isk per unit, something has gone sideways. While moon mining remains a mainly nullsec industry - especially for the most profitable moons - which is as it should be - there ought to be a lower return way of making moon mats in hisec. Nullsec alliances should not be able to control entire markets. This argument could also be applied to the question of whether or not to remove all ice from hisec - only the most basic ice can be found in hisec and, despite the likely activity of mining bots, it should remain.

DarkstarRed Elementium Alliance 4
Darkstar Warrior DarkstarRed Elementium Alliance Likes received: 4	#152 - 2012-03-11 02:47:49 UTC 1 Please vote for PB - I need moar stuffs built!!!!!


Ace'o Spades Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo Likes received: 3	#153 - 2012-03-11 06:22:43 UTC Should 0.0 infrastructure should only be vulnerable to large fleets of organized players supported by (super)capital ships?

PsychoBitch

Playboy Enterprises

Dark Taboo

Likes received: 465

#154 - 2012-03-11 06:24:11 UTC

Disagree. Infrastructure should be available to be destroyed or damage by every size and shape of fleet in eve without discrimination. If they can actually do it is another question. I am NOT saying that you need to lower the hitpoints, and it is bad enough that something so important to your sovereignty should be left to players alone to defend instead of help from guns akin to pos guns. I think that if players want to attack iHubs with bombers, knock yourselves out.

Mad Hittle

School of Applied Knowledge

Caldari State

Likes received: 1

#155 - 2012-03-11 09:22:26 UTC | Edited by: Mad Hittle

hes got my vote

and on a side note, almost surprised nobodies said 'and my axe' yet i almost feel a little let down if there were appropriate posts recent enough for me to make the comment myself i would have, but someone seems to be pulling the Q&A from the votematch thing(or whatever other 'original source of questions')

now somethin i dont think i seen asked yet,

How do you feel about the devblog released with the proposed POSSIBLE changes to ship skilles/reqs? (dest and bc skills become requirements, cutting the ties between t2frigs and t2 cruisers and t2 battlecruisers and the sort, creating 'ship lines' and 'line skills' to ballance out the field)
any thoughts/opinions/questions/comments/concerns/bitches/moans/complaints in regards to what was being fielded as a possible solution?

*edit* link to said devblog, for those who may have not seen it and or need a refresher
http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=9129

Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire 15,906
Chribba Otherworld Enterprises Otherworld Empire Likes received: 15,906	#156 - 2012-03-11 10:33:03 UTC 1 I think I saw a comment by you in another thread regarding bots, and I agree they should burn. I'd like to know your views on this linkage though. /c ★★★ Secure 3rd party service ★★★ Visit my in-game channel 'Holy Veldspar' Twitter @ChribbaVeldspar


Ace'o Spades Playboy Enterprises Dark Taboo Likes received: 3	#157 - 2012-03-11 13:33:30 UTC Should jump bridges and Titan bridges be nerfed to reduce power projection?

PsychoBitch

Playboy Enterprises

Dark Taboo

Likes received: 465

#158 - 2012-03-11 13:36:12 UTC

Disagree. Jump Bridges are fine. It is bad enough that the poor titan has gone from being a mobile outpost, to a limited tactical weapon with logistics, to a limp mobile jump bridge. The current state of the Dooms Day weapon is pale and unexciting. FFS, don't make come down there and beat you with a rake!

However, that said, it should be more difficult to attain.

Andoya Spaceport 5
Shadowsmid Andoya Spaceport Likes received: 5	#159 - 2012-03-11 15:05:00 UTC 1 go go go Psychobitch ! ! ! bump bump bump CCP, 2003 Eve Gamer experience, willing to represent us ! ! ! We Players independent, free of all big coalitions. Vote for Psychobitch ! ! !