These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Issler Dainze for CSM7! Hear the bears roar!

First post
Author
Taiwanistan
#521 - 2012-03-09 10:38:13 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Taiwanistan wrote:


DAMN DAWG.... wow-like wis and legalization of bots in the same reply, that aint cool yo, ISSLER U GONNA ROLLE WIT DAT?


No what I said is that if they are unable to remove the Bots and these bots ARE destroying the industry side then legalise botting. Why should isk sellers and the like who can cover there tracks get an unfair advantage over other players? As for the Wis what Im saying is that it would increase newbie populations there by giving CCP more money, so this game will live longer. If you just go down the same road you will get the same results.

Albert Einstein
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

I for one dont want to see a repeat of the last 12 months.

Tallian Saotome wrote:


Just to be clear, goons are newbie friendly, but they consider the recruitment scam to be part of a filter to keep people who are dumb enough to fall for it out of the corp. If you look up goon recruitment, it clearly says anyone asking for a security deposit is scamming you. If you are not smart enough to look it up, they don't want you anyway.

Also, most newbie goons are recruited from the SA forums, and are already goons when they join eve.


This doesnt really prove to be newbie friendly then if they are goons before they enter EVE nor does it really help the CCP bottom line with such a small pool of people. Goonswarm only having 7983 members with 300,000 subscriptons all up.

Frying Doom

while i don't claim to be an expert to be on bot-eradication i certainly don't think legalized botting will help the situation. right now botting still has certain barriers:
- you can get banned, and this risk has increased due to the fact that now characters flagged with bot infraction cannot be traded.
- you have to have a level of expertise
- many botting software costs RL $

without these barriers everybody and their 2 cats would start botting, and you will see exponentially more destruction to industry than existing RMT motivated botters. do you think the average player using the legalized bots stand a chance in the botting arms-race with the organized RMTers?

abuse of schedule one narcotics is a really big problem in USA, would you combat that with legalization? no you combat that with rehabilitation, prevention, education, and most of all regulation and busting dealers.

as for other noob friendly places there are eve university and Red vs Blue, and why don't your corp take a bigger part in welcoming new players? since we are the "bad" guys you "good" guys should start doing your part to better the new player experience, every bit counts. and i don't see people complaining about PL and how elitist they are sheesh. whose fault is it when i see so many people posting here lamenting the lack of new player experience when they all seem to be in their 3 alt corps. i just find this very strange, even if they are all casual players doing the odd handful of missions on the weekend why do they refuse to stay with a corp even if they never fleet together, just stay for the chat channels, the corp mails and forums, as in like being part of a group community. how many corps do you see with descriptions like "we are casual, we do pvp pve industry basically anything if you are not a trial we will take you". they only have themselves to blame.

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#522 - 2012-03-09 10:53:43 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
This doesnt really prove to be newbie friendly then if they are goons before they enter EVE nor does it really help the CCP bottom line with such a small pool of people. Goonswarm only having 7983 members with 300,000 subscriptons all up.


Newbie != stupid enough not to do some research, those people are n00bs of the terrible kind. Goons are fairly friendly to newbies tho, even if they reject you the chats I have seen usually direct you to a decent home(any good recruiter has a couple friendly corps/alliances to refer rejects too)

Most of the CFC has similar procedures on recruitment, and are similarly accepting of newbies(my corp requires you can fly at least one of the doctrine ships we use, but no other real skill checks) so that more like 25k of the 300k. Still not a huge fraction, but we can't force the rest of EVE to be friendly(tho we do make war on the elitists quite regularly).

I also know for a fact that there are plenty of newbie friendly high/lowsec corps that do recruiting. Check recruitment adverts, and you are likely to see a few.

Just never think recruitment channel is worth a damn.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Frying Doom
#523 - 2012-03-09 10:56:44 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:

abuse of schedule one narcotics is a really big problem in USA, would you combat that with legalization? no you combat that with rehabilitation, prevention, education, and most of all regulation and busting dealers.

And how is that going for the USA? as opposed to countries that have legalized? TBH the main reason drugs arn't legalized in Australia is actually due to tax.

Taiwanistan wrote:

as for other noob friendly places there are eve university and Red vs Blue, and why don't your corp take a bigger part in welcoming new players? since we are the "bad" guys you "good" guys should start doing your part to better the new player experience, every bit counts. and i don't see people complaining about PL and how elitist they are sheesh. whose fault is it when i see so many people posting here lamenting the lack of new player experience when they all seem to be in their 3 alt corps. i just find this very strange, even if they are all casual players doing the odd handful of missions on the weekend why do they refuse to stay with a corp even if they never fleet together, just stay for the chat channels, the corp mails and forums, as in like being part of a group community. how many corps do you see with descriptions like "we are casual, we do pvp pve industry basically anything if you are not a trial we will take you". they only have themselves to blame.


Yes I agree we should all do more to help newbies, lets face it the older EVE players are like bar flies they may ***** and complain but they will stay. Just like a bar however The bar flies cover your base costs and the new customers are what gives you profit and allows you to grow.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Taiwanistan
#524 - 2012-03-09 11:29:33 UTC
notice i said schedule one, the fun stuff like heroin and cocain. where is that legal?

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#525 - 2012-03-09 11:42:39 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Taiwanistan wrote:

abuse of schedule one narcotics is a really big problem in USA, would you combat that with legalization? no you combat that with rehabilitation, prevention, education, and most of all regulation and busting dealers.

And how is that going for the USA? as opposed to countries that have legalized? TBH the main reason drugs arn't legalized in Australia is actually due to tax.

Taiwanistan wrote:

as for other noob friendly places there are eve university and Red vs Blue, and why don't your corp take a bigger part in welcoming new players? since we are the "bad" guys you "good" guys should start doing your part to better the new player experience, every bit counts. and i don't see people complaining about PL and how elitist they are sheesh. whose fault is it when i see so many people posting here lamenting the lack of new player experience when they all seem to be in their 3 alt corps. i just find this very strange, even if they are all casual players doing the odd handful of missions on the weekend why do they refuse to stay with a corp even if they never fleet together, just stay for the chat channels, the corp mails and forums, as in like being part of a group community. how many corps do you see with descriptions like "we are casual, we do pvp pve industry basically anything if you are not a trial we will take you". they only have themselves to blame.


Yes I agree we should all do more to help newbies, lets face it the older EVE players are like bar flies they may ***** and complain but they will stay. Just like a bar however The bar flies cover your base costs and the new customers are what gives you profit and allows you to grow.

I've actually been trying to brainstorm an idea that will allow newbies to somehow reward corps that take them in in their first day or 2, and teaches them the game. Some sort of command they can issue once the account in a month or 2 old, if they have been in the corp continuously for that time since their first week. This would provide incentive to recruiting true newbs to a good active corp and teaching them EVE.

Maybe some kind of temporary tax multiplier(tax is set to 10%, corp makes 11% for the month after the newbie clicks the reward button)?

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Frying Doom
#526 - 2012-03-09 11:46:08 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:
notice i said schedule one, the fun stuff like ****** and cocain. where is that legal?



Sorry I will admit the schedule one bit threw me as I'm not really sure what the USA classifies as this but cocaine is legal in Mexico, Columbia, Portugal to be honest I cant say what effect this has on the particular countries as I have never looked at it.

With out going into a big speal on drugs, as has been pointed out over the last several decades the main problem with drugs isn't the suppliers but the users. No users and the suppliers go away. Maybe there is an answer in that for the boting problem as the RMT funds from boting and the super cap production(alleged to be supplied by bots) maybe be even harder or more effient if possible on the end users so there is no one left to buy the proceeds of their ill gotten gains.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#527 - 2012-03-09 11:55:31 UTC
Tallian Saotome wrote:


I've actually been trying to brainstorm an idea that will allow newbies to somehow reward corps that take them in in their first day or 2, and teaches them the game. Some sort of command they can issue once the account in a month or 2 old, if they have been in the corp continuously for that time since their first week. This would provide incentive to recruiting true newbs to a good active corp and teaching them EVE.

Maybe some kind of temporary tax multiplier(tax is set to 10%, corp makes 11% for the month after the newbie clicks the reward button)?


TBH What I thought was a reasonble idea was to give people a mentor role, so one on one time with a newbie for the first 30 days of the characters life, with the ability for either the newbie or the mentor to drop placing them back in respective pools (Mostly becuse sometimes personalities clash). During this time give the mentor a bonus to the SP they gain 10% or so(Most people seem to value SP above all else). This way the mentors gain something and so does the pupil and at the end of the term give the pupil a questioner to rate the mentor and post this list so future pupils can get a gauge on who to select.

I hope I was clear on what I was saying. Still coming off an illness and strangely the doctor put me on opiates for the pain lol

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
#528 - 2012-03-09 12:10:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Ispia Jaydrath
Taiwanistan wrote:
notice i said schedule one, the fun stuff like ****** and cocain. where is that legal?


'Legal' might be too strong a word, but a few countries have decided to focus on treatment instead of punishment. Switzerland's heroin program comes to mind -- addicts are able to receive twice daily doses in government clinics, and are aggressively rehabilitated.

I don't really have good data, but what I hear is that it has a marked impact on usage rates, drug related crime, and disease transmission. If you're interested, there is a study out of Switzerland with some usage and crime statistics.

EDIT: Turns out there are a bunch of statistics from Portugal, which decriminalized (still different from legalizing) all drugs in 2001. Figure 5 is pretty impressive.


On topic, I think the real life drug war is very not useful as a metaphor for botting. People want to bot, so using similar tactics to try and fight it would increase bot use, and the detrimental effects it causes.
Tallian Saotome
Nuclear Arms Exchange Inc.
#529 - 2012-03-09 12:19:20 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Tallian Saotome wrote:


I've actually been trying to brainstorm an idea that will allow newbies to somehow reward corps that take them in in their first day or 2, and teaches them the game. Some sort of command they can issue once the account in a month or 2 old, if they have been in the corp continuously for that time since their first week. This would provide incentive to recruiting true newbs to a good active corp and teaching them EVE.

Maybe some kind of temporary tax multiplier(tax is set to 10%, corp makes 11% for the month after the newbie clicks the reward button)?


TBH What I thought was a reasonble idea was to give people a mentor role, so one on one time with a newbie for the first 30 days of the characters life, with the ability for either the newbie or the mentor to drop placing them back in respective pools (Mostly becuse sometimes personalities clash). During this time give the mentor a bonus to the SP they gain 10% or so(Most people seem to value SP above all else). This way the mentors gain something and so does the pupil and at the end of the term give the pupil a questioner to rate the mentor and post this list so future pupils can get a gauge on who to select.

I hope I was clear on what I was saying. Still coming off an illness and strangely the doctor put me on opiates for the pain lol

Same idea as mine, but you want to reward individuals. I am of the belief that the game itself is not going to keep people here(space really is pretty boring, no matter how many shinys) but rather the community. By rewarding corps, and in a way that rewards larger, ore active corps more than smaller, less active ones, you encourage people to accept newbies into their communities, where they will not only learn, but they will have a team to fall back on when they get ganked or whatever.

Ultimately, 2 core problems tho.

1) Easily exploitable. I could keep a 100% SP boost going for a 1 time investment of a single plex(You can get a plex back from a buddy referral, where the referral is activate by a plex, with 10 buddy invites per month to all have mark me as mentor)

2) Easily manipulated to turn newbies into personal slaves and be rewarded for it. If I go pick a random newbie, tell him I am gonna get him started in the game, give him 50 mil, and use him as my slave til the mentor bonus goes away, then tell him to bugger off, that is going to reward me for behavior that will ultimately make that newbie leave the game.I can make 50 mil in roughly an hour, but to a newbie its gonna seem like I am the richest man in eve, so he will think its legit.

If EVE were not the cut-throat game it is, your ideas would be wonderful, but CCP encourages us to abuse and exploit mechanics. (The rule is that unless its an obvious bug, we can use it til they change the mechanic)

A corp isn't as likely to do this, as they don't want dead weight screwing up their numbers(unless it is a newbie training corp) so they will teach the newbie to survive so they can help the corp.

Inappropriate signature removed, CCP Phantom.

Taiwanistan
#530 - 2012-03-09 12:24:42 UTC
i serious doubt that any of the schedule one drugs (to clarify the really hard drugs) are legal anywhere in the world, some places readily available, out right legal, no way. in any case similar to drug demand, maybe ccp will nerf supercaps and titans into useless to kill RMT demand but there will be a huge shitstorm... CFC Conspiracy and etc
ccp can control the extant of boting but i doubt they can ever eradicate it. to be frank it may be a terribly bad sign when there is zero market for RMT isk it means that eve online is a dying game. legalized botting would almost surely kill in front of keyboard mining.

i just disagree with the theory that sanctioned botting is the way to combat RMT. it will make bot hunting just that much harder, which is the illegal bot, which is the legal one.

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

Ispia Jaydrath
Reib Autonomous Industries
#531 - 2012-03-09 12:36:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Ispia Jaydrath
Taiwanistan wrote:
i serious doubt that any of the schedule one drugs (to clarify the really hard drugs) are legal anywhere in the world, some places readily available, out right legal, no way


Yes, I'm well aware of what schedule one drugs are. And although there is a difference between schedule one opioids being legal and the government handing them out for free, I would say it's a pretty thin line.

tl;dr somebody is wrong on the internet~
Frying Doom
#532 - 2012-03-09 12:38:47 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:


i just disagree with the theory that sanctioned botting is the way to combat RMT. it will make bot hunting just that much harder, which is the illegal bot, which is the legal one.


Sorry I must have not made that clear what I was saying is go after the people who buy the supercaps and other RMT goods with everything they can. If its so nasty to buy the goods no one will want too (Well no one with half a brain). So if there is no demand the supply will go away or dwindle to nothing. I only brought up legalised botting if they cant get rid of the majority of botting. When your mining for hours on end it stinks when you think someone else is not even in their house making money. So yes it would remove people from sitting their while mining which I actually like, but at least I would be on the same playing level as the botters.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#533 - 2012-03-09 12:49:50 UTC
Tallian Saotome wrote:

Same idea as mine, but you want to reward individuals. I am of the belief that the game itself is not going to keep people here(space really is pretty boring, no matter how many shinys) but rather the community. By rewarding corps, and in a way that rewards larger, ore active corps more than smaller, less active ones, you encourage people to accept newbies into their communities, where they will not only learn, but they will have a team to fall back on when they get ganked or whatever.

Ultimately, 2 core problems tho.

1) Easily exploitable. I could keep a 100% SP boost going for a 1 time investment of a single plex(You can get a plex back from a buddy referral, where the referral is activate by a plex, with 10 buddy invites per month to all have mark me as mentor)

2) Easily manipulated to turn newbies into personal slaves and be rewarded for it. If I go pick a random newbie, tell him I am gonna get him started in the game, give him 50 mil, and use him as my slave til the mentor bonus goes away, then tell him to bugger off, that is going to reward me for behavior that will ultimately make that newbie leave the game.I can make 50 mil in roughly an hour, but to a newbie its gonna seem like I am the richest man in eve, so he will think its legit.

If EVE were not the cut-throat game it is, your ideas would be wonderful, but CCP encourages us to abuse and exploit mechanics. (The rule is that unless its an obvious bug, we can use it til they change the mechanic)

A corp isn't as likely to do this, as they don't want dead weight screwing up their numbers(unless it is a newbie training corp) so they will teach the newbie to survive so they can help the corp.


Sorry I will admit Im not very good at the EVIL side of the game (What I do in RL differs from what I will do in a game becuse its a game).

I was implying a 1 on 1 mentor scheme so a max 10% bonus but I think your idea is better looking at it. if it was done well enough people would actually fight over newbies rather than ignoring them. What about a corp xp system just based on the help provided to newbies, say 10-20 lvls (Yes its a bit WOW ish) to a corp and give them bonuses for each level higher tax for one maybe a better inertial rating. So then a corp who gets alot of newbies (Straight accounts not buddy or other deals) might be week in the SP of their members but will actually be harder to kill than non-newbie friendly corps?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Snow Axe
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#534 - 2012-03-09 14:23:19 UTC
Honestly, the idea of assigned mentors is a good one, though rewards become an issue. That said, I doubt you'd even need to reward them with anything concrete - maybe an in-game and in-forum tag, similar to the DEV and CSM tags you see on people now. This may sound presumptuous, but remember we're posting in a forum where people are literally trying to get elected to help the game for free, so I don't think it's much of a stretch that enough people would be willing to help out just for a vanity tag or w/e.


"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread["

Kimiko Nodachi
The Actinic Agency
#535 - 2012-03-09 15:23:43 UTC
No time to swap accts before I head off for the day.

Friendly bump to the top and confirmation of yet another Mr Epeen vote for Issler.
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#536 - 2012-03-09 19:01:42 UTC
I just want to again help everyone for the support and also point out I get some of the most diverse and interesting folks in my threads!!

Thanks all!

Issler Dainze
CSM 7 Candidate
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#537 - 2012-03-09 19:23:08 UTC
Again I want to thank you for your support, but I find myself having to ask more of you.

Getting folk in game that ignore the forums to vote is key to me having any chance of success. I need you all to help spread the word in game. Some other candidates have seen the momentum of the miner and are trying to jump in late and claim to be the miner's candidate as well.

They see the power the miner's really hold!

So please tell your corp mates, your alliances and your friends to support the miner's candidate! Please ask them to lend their support to my efforts to make sure miners are no longer neglected sub caste of Eve!

So please help spread the word throughout the 'verse that there is a miner that needs their help to get us a seat at the table! A long overdue and earned seat!

Miners Unite!

Issler Dainze
The MIner's Friend
CSM 7 Candidate
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#538 - 2012-03-09 19:25:38 UTC
i will be v. sad when you're no longer here to punt around like a dumb little football

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#539 - 2012-03-09 19:26:11 UTC
you could hold a miner march to gather support!!!!!!!!!!!

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Ovidia Rhianon
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#540 - 2012-03-09 20:04:10 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:
notice i said schedule one, the fun stuff like ****** and cocain. where is that legal?


But cannabis is a schedule one drug, and we all know how dangerous pot is.