These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The 1 change you'd make
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#61 - 2012-03-09 00:28:44 UTC
The change I would make is to increase balance.

I am not talking about just ships, or weapons, but everything. Especially CCP Dev effort on the game. The effort put into fixing bugs, improving features and adding new features should be balanced. The types of features added should be balanced: stuff should not be added just for one group of players, but a balanced mix of features for the industrialist, the low sec players, null sec players, and even those who want to Wis.

Rather than ping-ponging back and forth between different parts of the game: Balance.

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction
IsTheOpOver
#62 - 2012-03-09 02:12:29 UTC
Have the forums keep track of the last post you read in a forum thread.
Nylith Empyreal
Sutar Rein
#63 - 2012-03-09 02:23:50 UTC
Wage war on the Highsec empires and start true civilizations in space. A nice ole' Eden darkage.

Who's the more foolish the fool or the fool who replies to him?
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#64 - 2012-03-09 02:45:59 UTC
Xyla Vulchanus wrote:
I think we all appreciate the improvements to Eve over the last few months but there is still so much that requires attention.

CCP now seem to be focused on renaming modules in the most annoying way possible and fiddling about with how best to allow us to fly the ships we already own.

So let's help them get back on track and focused on aspects of the game that will have the largest benefit once fixed.

If you could make CCP change just one thing in Eve what would it be?


For me, I think I'd make incursions a bit more profitable but restrict them to low-sec only - people would then have a reason to populate lowsec and pirates would follow them there.

What would yours be?




Simple change. Bring back Black Market Trading skill and fix the bug that made it useless, then let us smugglers slip about like the naughty folks we are!

Issler
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#65 - 2012-03-09 08:30:59 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Fix the wardec system so that it's relevant again.


Funny there's no problem with the wardec system if you leave high sec.

Loeave high sec.
Xen Solarus
Furious Destruction and Salvage
#66 - 2012-03-09 08:33:16 UTC
How about actually fixing the bounty system? Ever thought about that CCP??????

I guess you're too busy improving the website to show new players how cool they can be playing eve as a bounty hunter!

Sigh.....

Post with your main, like a BOSS!

And no, i don't live in highsec.  As if that would make your opinion any less wrong.  
Vyl Vit
#67 - 2012-03-09 08:33:37 UTC
I'd have all stations in a system refuse entry to anyone with a criminal flag. It is aiding and abetting, or accessory after the fact. Commit a criminal act, you get no refuge. Nada. None. And, there would be no time limit - since there's no court to extract a fine, or imprisonment...you're a criminal, you're stuck. No gate. No station. Just you and the pittance you managed to steal.

Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#68 - 2012-03-09 10:38:40 UTC
bring back thee Sanctums, so null sec players does not have to have alts in empire doing incursions Big smile

And we carebears will have something to do in null
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#69 - 2012-03-09 10:42:00 UTC
Emiko Luan wrote:
Xyla, that's not how you make people go to lowsec, people don't stop bearing because of better rewards, everything you can do in lowsec is already worth way more than highsec.

No amount of isk is going to make people leave hisec that weren't already going to leave hisec.


A surprising amount of Incursion-bears headed out to low sec to run incursions when the Incursion interdiction was running. So apparently Incursions are "enough" ISK to get some folks out to low sec.

Day 0 Advice for New Players
Aida Nu
Perkone
Caldari State
#70 - 2012-03-09 11:03:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Aida Nu
I changed my mind.

Make all carebears explode in glorious explosions when they undock.

Reason? Sparkly fireworks!!
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#71 - 2012-03-09 11:18:33 UTC
Aida Nu wrote:
I changed my mind.

Make all carebears explode in glorious explosions when they undock.

Reason? Sparkly fireworks!!


What about RNG mechanism, which will autodestruct anything include your pod at any time if RNG output is "some number+" Big smile
It is well balanced, as everyone is included.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#72 - 2012-03-09 11:24:50 UTC
I don't mean to speak bad about any of the current CCP staff but i would like CCP to either hire an experienced UI designer or give the current UI team the resources to make eve play like a video game and not a spread sheet... It's the thing that holds EVE back the most.

The wishlist is pretty much complete...
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
#73 - 2012-03-09 11:26:21 UTC
Gogela wrote:
I would add a 300% alignment penalty to warping cloaked.


Translation: I am fed up of those covert ops ships and blockade runners fulfilling their function and oh, performing covert ops and running blockades. I wanna double click on them and decloak them.

Your tears amuse me. Get a sabre.
Trdina Rasputin
Man-dingo
#74 - 2012-03-09 11:30:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Trdina Rasputin
Boarding enemy ship with action in fps (dust) style.
Elder Ozzian
Perkone
Caldari State
#75 - 2012-03-09 12:05:49 UTC
Open the door, thanks

I disagree!
Parthonax
#76 - 2012-03-09 12:45:27 UTC
Xyla Vulchanus wrote:
I think we all appreciate the improvements to Eve over the last few months but there is still so much that requires attention.

CCP now seem to be focused on renaming modules in the most annoying way possible and fiddling about with how best to allow us to fly the ships we already own.

So let's help them get back on track and focused on aspects of the game that will have the largest benefit once fixed.

If you could make CCP change just one thing in Eve what would it be?


For me, I think I'd make incursions a bit more profitable but restrict them to low-sec only - people would then have a reason to populate lowsec and pirates would follow them there.

What would yours be?



you dare to call them improvements , they are just the last attempt in saving their own game
the game they so skillfully killed themselves
CCP is probably losing more subscribers now than the whole incarnia debacle and the latest bot purges together

Their failure to give new players a meaning ful purpose to extend their subscription
CCP activily encouraging griefing
the biased and the pro null sec alliances favouring policies , while neglecting and ignoring the majority of their subscribers

it doesn't matter how well you dressup a death body , it stays a death body
so this is permanence
Bischopt
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#77 - 2012-03-09 13:48:34 UTC
Valei Khurelem wrote:
No more micro-transactions.


hear hear
Doc Severide
Doomheim
#78 - 2012-03-09 13:59:33 UTC
NO more whiny children allowed to post (Valei Khurelem) on the forums....

Or give us the ability to block their crummy posts...
Valei Khurelem
#79 - 2012-03-09 14:09:18 UTC
Doc Severide wrote:
NO more whiny children allowed to post (Valei Khurelem) on the forums....

Or give us the ability to block their crummy posts...


The ironic thing about you derailing in this thread is if I put any effort into my posting you'd just ignore it, that said, I was ranting not whining :)

"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP."   - CCP Ytterbium
Ann133566
Doomheim
#80 - 2012-03-09 14:16:38 UTC
The end of the pointless, irrelevant entity known as the CSM. Instead of being a channel for communication between players and CCP they are just a distraction.