EVE General Discussion

Can't see why CCP couldn't publish the in-game names of the toons that got warned. In game infraction, in game reaction.

Name and shame them.

(would also serve to show who tolerates botters in their corp!).

I don't see the point of 'name and shame'.

They'll probably be out of the game anyway, and if for some reason the character is still used then they would be discriminated against regardless of the reasoning for them still being ingame.


So if CCPs policy is not to name and shame they should just stick to it.

Awesome ideas..

And totally meaningless..

What is the point of having some list of names public to everyone, providing exactly nothing informative and having no consequences whatsoever.

Awesome meaningless ideas, You should be in parliament.

It appears you may have some difficulty understanding the meaning of “Shaming” although I recon you are only trolling as some other couple figures in this thread.





I was hoping you would troll away, however, sadly you keep on infesting this thread, this is a game, no one gives a rats ass to RL lawyers and other pathetic RL suggestions you have written, there's an EULA if someone break it there will be consequences, identifying someone that committed an infraction in a spaceship game has nothing to do with RL, what it seems to me and to others is that you are so much interested in not having a tag on these actions, makes me wonder...


In any case, CCP tags me if I do some pirating there will be a nice little skull to identify that I am a bad pixel, that also goes along side with SS.

I just edited the OP to reflect that instead of having a thread and or Forum section, please use some sort of tag, just as you do with pirating, I don't see any problem with that whatsoever, in fact I only see advantages, for CCP it will back their work on bots and to the ones thinking in doing these activities will be discouraging.

In closing, I only request that CCP put a Tag on these players, make them identifiable, thank you.

What a bunch of mindless follow-bots you all are.

The idea is to make botters see the error of their ways and continue being paying customers. You don't do that by any of the stupid methods you animals keep coming up with. Tagging? Name and shame? LOL

Locking the character is good enough.

It's not in CCP's interest to make people leave the game. It's in their interest to educate them so they become normal scamming, griefing asshats instead of EULA breaking asshats.

Mr Epeen

No, CCP will probably not implement a mechanic with the sole purpose of letting people harass other players for their past sins. That would kind of go against their own EULA.

ROFL!

I should sign up as your straight man.


I'd be content with PIG branded on mine.

Mr Epeen

I believe most of those here arguing against or justifying CCP's failure to do so, fail to grasp that we are not wanting REAL names, but character names, and not characters temp-banned, but those perma-banned.

There is only one reason we want this, and it doesn't involve shame at all. What we want is some concrete evidence that CCP is actually doing what they say they are doing. Notice I said concrete evidence, not hearsay from some other forums, not "I have noticed...", not "say, the overall concurrent player numbers seem to be down", not anything at all like that.

If CCP says they have banned 1000, provide a list of those character names so that we, the non-cheating players, can at least be able to tell if that character is still logging on or be able to act in coordination to come to the conclusion that such a player name never actually existed in the first place.


We want the names so that we can have faith, based on verifiable evidence, that CCP is not just paying lip service to the many who detest botting and botters.

Without that, none of their words or alleged actions means a damn thing.

This will just be abused in the same way the "Report Isk Seller" button is used against more scammers then isk sellers

Just so its clear, I am and always was referring to In-Game characters only, never RL names, I thought that my statement about RL issues was a clear indicator of this, I apologize if that was not very clear.

I do not care for who the player is in RL, that is between them and CCP, nothing to do with me, everything I state on this thread is referred to the in-game player and their actions while in-game.

Nothing nor any actions “by us or to us players” should be taken when it comes down to compare and/or attach anything to the person behind the character, hope that now I made my stance more clear on these issues.