These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Issler Dainze for CSM7! Hear the bears roar!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#381 - 2012-02-28 20:31:59 UTC
So again I am challenging the other CSM 7 candidates to reply in my debate threads. Mining and ambulation. So far only on candidate has taken up the challenge. Thanks to Alekseyev Karrde for stating a position on ambulation.

So voters, if you mine or care about ambulation (one way or the other) demand the other candidates come clean about what you can expect from them!

Issler Dainze
The Miiner's Friend
CSM 7 Candidate
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#382 - 2012-02-28 20:45:16 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
So again I am challenging the other CSM 7 candidates to reply in my debate threads. Mining and ambulation.


Their silence tells you everything you need to know.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#383 - 2012-02-28 20:57:42 UTC
Shame you didn't make it to the podcast debate. It might of improved your chances.

The wishlist is pretty much complete...
Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#384 - 2012-02-28 21:24:21 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
So again I am challenging the other CSM 7 candidates to reply in my debate threads. Mining and ambulation. So far only on candidate has taken up the challenge. Thanks to Alekseyev Karrde for stating a position on ambulation.

So voters, if you mine or care about ambulation (one way or the other) demand the other candidates come clean about what you can expect from them!

Issler Dainze
The Miiner's Friend
CSM 7 Candidate


"other csm candidates should waste their time on the most unimportant of issues so I look like less of a dolt for making them the focus of my campaign"
Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#385 - 2012-02-28 21:25:03 UTC
Issler Dainze: so in touch with the miners of new eden, she can spell "miners''
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#386 - 2012-02-28 22:05:34 UTC
Maybe actual miners didn't want to be associated with her. Somebody will have to check with the miiners since she's their friend now.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#387 - 2012-02-28 23:08:15 UTC
Rek Seven wrote:
Shame you didn't make it to the podcast debate. It might of improved your chances.


I made every effort and restructured my entire Sunday to participate but for some reason the moderators couldn't see me in Skype. I hope there will be other debates that I can participate in.

Issler
Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#388 - 2012-02-29 14:54:34 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
Rek Seven wrote:
Shame you didn't make it to the podcast debate. It might of improved your chances.


I made every effort and restructured my entire Sunday to participate but for some reason the moderators couldn't see me in Skype. I hope there will be other debates that I can participate in.

Issler


Sad
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#389 - 2012-02-29 14:57:54 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
Skippermonkey taught me how to run missions using just defender missiles and a cargo scanner. If i wasnt running for CSM i'd vote for him!

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#390 - 2012-02-29 18:46:59 UTC
Skippermonkey wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
Skippermonkey taught me how to run missions using just defender missiles and a cargo scanner. If i wasnt running for CSM i'd vote for him!



I'm pretty sure I never said that but Skippermonkey, the CSM would be a lot more interesting if you are elected, as to if that's in a good way we'll have to let the voters decide! Big smile

Skippermonkey, I hope you'll post in my ambulation and mining debate threads!

Issler Dainze
The Miner's Friend
CSM 7 Candidate
A Skippermonkey Fan
Revolution Rising
Last-Light Holdings
#391 - 2012-02-29 22:00:27 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:


The currentl CSM seemed however to want a stake dirven through the heart of ambulation, somehow trying to make the argument that it can't be worked on in any way without destroying FiS. Of course most of these same folks would like CCP working on all manner of nul sec mechanics and features that 80% of the Eve player base couldn't care less about while ignoring most FiS content those 80% would love to see.

Issler Dainze
Voice of Reason Party CSM 7 Candidate.


This.

Not that I care about ambulation in the least, but FiS is a fine platform to form on as long as it's Mittani's FiS.

I'm actually wondering about this.

If Trebor and Seleene and Two Step have been on CSM some of them for YEARS. How is it that these more serious issues to do with Industry and FiS that people have complained about it for those same years (including the last CSM).... are still not being addressed.

Instead we get nerfs to drakes, t3 bc's (useless for missions or low-sec where the gate guns are - 0.0 once again), nerfs to empire POS fuel prices - meaning more profit for t2 bpo holders. Another zero effort to industry expansion.

.
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#392 - 2012-02-29 23:46:31 UTC
Revolution Rising wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:


The currentl CSM seemed however to want a stake dirven through the heart of ambulation, somehow trying to make the argument that it can't be worked on in any way without destroying FiS. Of course most of these same folks would like CCP working on all manner of nul sec mechanics and features that 80% of the Eve player base couldn't care less about while ignoring most FiS content those 80% would love to see.

Issler Dainze
Voice of Reason Party CSM 7 Candidate.


This.

Not that I care about ambulation in the least, but FiS is a fine platform to form on as long as it's Mittani's FiS.

I'm actually wondering about this.

If Trebor and Seleene and Two Step have been on CSM some of them for YEARS. How is it that these more serious issues to do with Industry and FiS that people have complained about it for those same years (including the last CSM).... are still not being addressed.

Instead we get nerfs to drakes, t3 bc's (useless for missions or low-sec where the gate guns are - 0.0 once again), nerfs to empire POS fuel prices - meaning more profit for t2 bpo holders. Another zero effort to industry expansion.



It seems clear that we haven't seen a CSM member in some time that really pushed for content for industrialist and miners.

I hope to have the chance to change that!

Issler Dainze
The Miner's Friend
CSM 7 Candidate
Iris Bravemount
Golden Grinding Gears
#393 - 2012-03-01 00:30:09 UTC
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:
As a VOR candidate running for CSM7 I will specifically address my stance on the aformentioned issues and how I will represent them.

Miners: By removing NPC Corps and making pilots individually wardeccable, highsec can no longer be flooded with minerals to the degree that only botted up NPC corp miners can. Trit and pye will only increase in value as supply decreases to meet demand. Ban NPC Corps.

Low-Sec: By banning NPC Corps and making pilots individually wardeccable, lowsec's 'safety' will increase in relation, making it more sensible for players to move there in a calculated risk/reward move. Ban NPC Corps.

Industrialists: By banning NPC Corps and making pilots individually wardeccable, industrialists will no longer have one option - to undercut thousands of other industrialists with max skills and max safety. By forcefully decreasing the supply, industrialists' work is valued more individually. Ban NPC Corps.

Traders: Traders benefit the most by banning NPC Corps and making pilots individually decable. Imagine the potential profit determined traders could make if the non-stop fleet of AFK autopiloting NPC freighters were made vulnerable. Ban NPC Corps.

WiS: Ban NPC Corps


Nicolo 2012
CSM VOR High Council
Ban NPC Corps


At first, I thought you may have a good point here.

But seriously. Removing NPC corps would only make it worse. The big alliances could then easily claim the highsec tradehubs for themselves by camping the gates and shooting every hauler not blue to them. Be it with suicide ganks or through wardecs.

And, as stated earlier in this thread, being in a NPC corp is restrictive enough as it is. High taxes and no POS.

"I will not hesitate when the test of Faith finds me, for only the strongest conviction will open the gates of paradise. My Faith in you is absolute; my sword is Yours, My God, and Your will guides me now and for all eternity." - Paladin's Creed
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#394 - 2012-03-01 01:52:23 UTC  |  Edited by: DeMichael Crimson
Ladie Harlot wrote:


I'm more than happy to bump your thread. I want to see it on page one at all times so you think you have a chance of getting on the CSM. I also want to remind people that you are the space pants candidate no matter how much you try and deny it.


Gawd, you're quite the blowhard windbag, aren't you?. All I ever see from you is 'Yada, yada, yada' when in fact all you ever really say is 'Nada'. All of the statements you keep spouting in this and various other threads is nowhere even close to being factual.

Your continued harassment of Issler Dainze proves that you're nothing more than a fail excuse of a troll trying to boost your pitiful little EPEEN while hiding behind the anonymity of the internet.

What is really ironic is the fact that you constantly bellow about how you're against WiS yet you surely spent a lot of time with the character creator. Don't even bother saying it was created with a quick random roll. Getting that look required a lot of time and effort. Either that or you're in dire need of a long overdue eye examination.

So please, spare us your stale long winded repertoire and just put a cork in it.

'The Plan' | California Eve Players | Proposal - The Endless Battle
Taiwanistan
#395 - 2012-03-01 08:27:07 UTC
you cannot expunge your taint of wis by misrepresenting yourself as purely a "Miner's Friend"!
i fear you may alienate fans like DMC here!
i hope you get on another podcast! your no-show at the lost in eve debates was a great disappointment!
on wis you should be out and proud! do ask! do tell!
aint it annoying when i end all sentences with !

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
Taiwanistan
#396 - 2012-03-01 08:29:17 UTC
and personally i find issler's slit eyes more offending, with harlot i get it, issler, idgi

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
Vile rat
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#397 - 2012-03-01 08:42:10 UTC
Issler Dainze wrote:
So again I am challenging the other CSM 7 candidates to reply in my debate threads. Mining and ambulation. So far only on candidate has taken up the challenge. Thanks to Alekseyev Karrde for stating a position on ambulation.

So voters, if you mine or care about ambulation (one way or the other) demand the other candidates come clean about what you can expect from them!

Issler Dainze
The Miiner's Friend
CSM 7 Candidate



I'm not a CSM 7 candidate but I've responded in your debate thread with what I think is a salient point.
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#398 - 2012-03-01 16:46:37 UTC
Vile rat wrote:
Issler Dainze wrote:
So again I am challenging the other CSM 7 candidates to reply in my debate threads. Mining and ambulation. So far only on candidate has taken up the challenge. Thanks to Alekseyev Karrde for stating a position on ambulation.

So voters, if you mine or care about ambulation (one way or the other) demand the other candidates come clean about what you can expect from them!

Issler Dainze
The Miiner's Friend
CSM 7 Candidate



I'm not a CSM 7 candidate but I've responded in your debate thread with what I think is a salient point.


Thanks! A rational dialog is all I can ask.

Issler
Aquila Draco
#399 - 2012-03-02 17:55:09 UTC
In the light of new dev blog, I want to ask you your opinion on botting, botts and anty-botting techniques that CCP is applying (or not applying). Do you think this is sufficient or there needs to me more anty-botting measures?
Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#400 - 2012-03-02 19:09:06 UTC
Aquila Draco wrote:
In the light of new dev blog, I want to ask you your opinion on botting, botts and anty-botting techniques that CCP is applying (or not applying). Do you think this is sufficient or there needs to me more anty-botting measures?


They need to add some technology barriers to their efforts, They can change the UI to make scraping harder and modifiy the client internals to again, increase the difficulty in creating bots. They can also regularly change these things on a regular basis to break any bots that circumvent the anti-botting measures. This alone isn't enough but it will thwart the less sophisticated bots and that is a start.

Issler