These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New wardec system on Sisi

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#81 - 2012-02-27 21:18:01 UTC
Chiggy W wrote:
Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good.

All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it.

This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke.

Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? Ugh


Consensual war decks sounds better to me then all the effing griefing & exploiting of the current effed up system in play IMHO... (ie: how can a closed corp be allowed to carry on a wardeck when its impossible for anyone to join it anyways?)
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#82 - 2012-02-27 21:20:45 UTC
CCP Tuxford wrote:
errm what?

What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right.



lol ban OP for spreading riotous troll threads that next week get impletmented because they are a good idea TwistedTwisted
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Lexmana
#83 - 2012-02-27 21:20:55 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
Chiggy W wrote:
Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good.

All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it.

This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke.

Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? Ugh


Consensual war decks sounds better to me then all the effing griefing & exploiting of the current effed up system in play IMHO... (ie: how can a closed corp be allowed to carry on a wardeck when its impossible for anyone to join it anyways?)

Consensual wardecs is basically what we have today ... I expect it to change to the better.
Frontman 242
Doomheim
#84 - 2012-02-27 21:25:57 UTC
Xolve wrote:
We are absolutely not a externally based community on pay-to-play forums.

U R funny. U dont get pay to play joke. Go home. UR master is calling you.
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
#85 - 2012-02-27 21:31:41 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
Chiggy W wrote:
Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good.

All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it.

This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke.

Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? Ugh


Consensual war decks sounds better to me then all the effing griefing & exploiting of the current effed up system in play IMHO... (ie: how can a closed corp be allowed to carry on a wardeck when its impossible for anyone to join it anyways?)


So lets say a smacktalking nub enters your mission or mining area, steals all your stuff and suicides your ship. Now lets say you have a good alliance and a lot of good pilots, how are you supposed to get your revenge if he doesn't accept the wardec.

Do you smell what the Lock's cooking?
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#86 - 2012-02-27 21:35:56 UTC
CCP Tuxford wrote:
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
CCP Tuxford wrote:
errm what?

What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right.

YOU TELL'EM!

In fact the new default is to be at war with everyone. When you create a corp you are at war with everybody in the known universe and you need to declare peace.

also declare peace functionality may be broken.

...I want to believe

Want to go to war with everyone Big smile

Signatures should be used responsibly...
Aggressive Nutmeg
#87 - 2012-02-27 22:44:31 UTC
CATPAIN KIRK wrote:
TheBreadMuncher wrote:


Seriously though - "Cat pain" Kirk?


AWW - FECK! I just notcied!

notcied?

Never make eye contact with someone while eating a banana.
Xolve
State War Academy
Caldari State
#88 - 2012-02-27 22:54:38 UTC
Frontman 242 wrote:
Xolve wrote:
We are absolutely not a externally based community on pay-to-play forums.

U R funny. U dont get pay to play joke. Go home. UR master is calling you.



You remind me of the Russian Tears some pubbie gave me Saturday after I smartbombed his Bestower/Pod and said:

"Me love animals ******* **** mother condom over"
Sprite Can
#89 - 2012-02-27 22:59:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Sprite Can
Person A: I heard they're redoing the wardec system
Person B: would be awesome if wardecs had to be mutual
Person C: omg someone was talking about wardecs requiring mutual agreement?
Person D: WAT!? *posts on forum*

Refreshing Lemon-Lime~
Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
#90 - 2012-02-27 23:14:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Misanth
Sprite Can wrote:
Person A: I heard they're redoing the wardec system
Person B: would be awesome if wardecs had to be mutual
Person C: omg someone was talking about wardecs requiring mutual agreement?
Person D: WAT!? *posts on forum*


Ohnoes not the wardens systems, what will I do with my minmatar slavefarms now!!11!2

edit: Awww. That's rude, I had your post quoted before it was edited to correct spelling, and still it altered the quote to your edit.. not nice CCP not nice! P

AFK-cloaking in a system near you.
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#91 - 2012-02-28 00:25:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
Xolve wrote:
You remind me of the Russian Tears some pubbie gave me Saturday after I smartbombed his Bestower/Pod and said:

"Me love animals ******* **** mother condom over"


Aw, how nice ! You even thought of condoms ! :D
Sprite Can
#92 - 2012-02-28 00:28:56 UTC
Yeah, I typed that from my phone and it autocorrected all "wardec"s to "warden"s. Roll

Refreshing Lemon-Lime~
Cpt Syrinx
Jovian Labs
Jovian Enterprises
#93 - 2012-02-28 00:37:22 UTC
In the spring of YC 113, peace broke out in New Eden
Vyl Vit
#94 - 2012-02-28 04:10:08 UTC
CCP Tuxford wrote:
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
CCP Tuxford wrote:
errm what?

What info are you referring to because this doesn't sound right.

YOU TELL'EM!

In fact the new default is to be at war with everyone. When you create a corp you are at war with everybody in the known universe and you need to declare peace.

also declare peace functionality may be broken.


Like going to watch hockey and a game breaks out in the middle of the fight!

Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.
Hainnz
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#95 - 2012-02-28 04:54:42 UTC
poasting in ccp tuxford thread
Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2012-02-28 05:22:13 UTC
Lexmana wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:
Chiggy W wrote:
Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good.

All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it.

This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke.

Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? Ugh


Consensual war decks sounds better to me then all the effing griefing & exploiting of the current effed up system in play IMHO... (ie: how can a closed corp be allowed to carry on a wardeck when its impossible for anyone to join it anyways?)

Consensual wardecs is basically what we have today ... I expect it to change to the better.


Not really. What we have today is people who know the game mechanics very well beating up on people who don't. Sorta like Genghis Khan running apeshat all over Eurasia. Cept, he never had 10 neut reppers and didn't dock up at the first sign of trouble.

Don't ban me, bro!
Durie
WORLDSTAR HIPHOP
Brotherhood of Spacers
#97 - 2012-02-28 05:34:00 UTC
THE L0CK wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:
Chiggy W wrote:
Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good.

All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it.

This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke.

Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? Ugh


Consensual war decks sounds better to me then all the effing griefing & exploiting of the current effed up system in play IMHO... (ie: how can a closed corp be allowed to carry on a wardeck when its impossible for anyone to join it anyways?)


So lets say a smacktalking nub enters your mission or mining area, steals all your stuff and suicides your ship. Now lets say you have a good alliance and a lot of good pilots, how are you supposed to get your revenge if he doesn't accept the wardec.



Something tells me that he will accept your wardec...
Toto Zinny
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#98 - 2012-02-28 05:43:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Toto Zinny
DarthNefarius wrote:


Consensual war decks sounds better to me then all the effing griefing & exploiting of the current effed up system in play IMHO... (ie: how can a closed corp be allowed to carry on a wardeck when its impossible for anyone to join it anyways?)


I agree. Consensual war decks should be the norm especially in high sec. These bored out-of their-brains griefers, have it to easy, and ruin the game for a awful lot of people.
Keep the griefing and pvp to low-sec where it belongs, and let the more creative, get on with their game.

High-sec should be for carebears, and low-sec for those that want to spend the day blowing each other up.
Valentyn3
Deep Core Mining Inc.
#99 - 2012-02-28 05:58:41 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
Micheal Dietrich wrote:

Priceline negotiator is yes, Shatner is doing fine.


born 1931 o_O

hard to believe the guy is 80, and still doing things...


It probably helps to be rich as balls.

I don't always use hax. But when I do, it's because I'm an NPC.. http://i.imgur.com/PUZou.jpg
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
#100 - 2012-02-28 06:02:37 UTC
Durie wrote:
THE L0CK wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:
Chiggy W wrote:
Well, it seems that CCP are testing the new wardec mechanics on Sisi right now, and it doesn't look good.

All high sec wars have to consensual between the two parties. IE Corp A dec's corp B, and the war only goes live is corp B agrees to it.

This is so $1000-pant's-on-insane that I really hope it's a joke.

Seriously CCP, the removal of non-consensual wardecs in Eve? What are you guys smoking?? Ugh


Consensual war decks sounds better to me then all the effing griefing & exploiting of the current effed up system in play IMHO... (ie: how can a closed corp be allowed to carry on a wardeck when its impossible for anyone to join it anyways?)


So lets say a smacktalking nub enters your mission or mining area, steals all your stuff and suicides your ship. Now lets say you have a good alliance and a lot of good pilots, how are you supposed to get your revenge if he doesn't accept the wardec.



Something tells me that he will accept your wardec...




bzzzzt wrong answer! With consensual wardecs a player can grief your corp one at a time and unless you find a way to bait him he may continue to grief you into oblivion without repercussions. If I can think it, you are guaranteed that others will as well. Just remember that the wardec door swings both ways. Thank you and good day.

Do you smell what the Lock's cooking?