These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Legacy Repost] A New Caldari Cause

Author
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#141 - 2011-09-20 18:18:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcolm Khross
Farel, I am a patriot but as stated above, I need not sacrifice the acceptance of reality to be a patriot. If a man claims that he is perfect, then he is a liar and the truth is not with him.

A government, any government, is filled with men (generalized term for humans, not gender). Therefore it cannot be perfect. To deny its imperfections serves no purpose, denies integrity and ultimately brings more harm than good.

~Malcolm Khross

Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#142 - 2011-09-20 18:23:09 UTC
Faelan Maris wrote:


For what it is worth, I see nothing incompatible with Khross-haan's statements and his position as a fellow supporter of Wiyrkomi and thus a so-called "Patriot". Being a Patriot, or for that matter a patriot, is not about denying reality and foaming at the mouth. We see the strength and preeminence of the State as being the principle goal for which we should strive, with trade and military might both being means to that end. Only the more extreme Patriots are rabidly pro-war and deny that anything is ever wrong in the State. Most of us accept that there are failings, and that we can address those over time, but those are either things that will take a long time to deal with or we may have other priorities in the short term.


You have my utmost appreciation, Maris-haani.

Independence and stability will lead us into a position where we may focus on infrastructure. When we are able to stand on our own, then we can look inward.

~Malcolm Khross

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#143 - 2011-09-21 11:32:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Khross haan, and Maris haani,

I agree with what you said. The fact that most of Khross haan messages often sound more liberal than patriot is still valid to my eyes, though. Compared to the usual patriot speeches. It does not mean that he is no patriot, and if this is what I unconsciously implied in my previous post, please accept my apologies.

Also, do not see any criticism in what I said. This was a remark of pure curiosity.
Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#144 - 2011-09-21 12:09:53 UTC
Now I'm curious,
I don't consider my comments on this discussion wildly off from Khross-haans thoughts.
What is the usual patriotic modus operandi you expect? Or are you, maybe, confusing vocal provists with patriots?

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Anwa Verall
Perkone
Caldari State
#145 - 2011-09-21 13:52:21 UTC
Anwa Verall wrote:
Maya Erena wrote:

Ms Erena, I would not presume to speak on behalf of Khross-Haan, so please do not take my comments as such. I will also only comment on what I feel I can address with suitable decorum.

With regards to your first point: Extremists exist in all societies. Their viewpoints are influenced by all manner of events and ills, both real and perceived, in their own lives and the lives of their families and/or friends. Just as Khross-Haan cannot, nor any other Caldari citizen or capsuleer, promise you that Heth-Haan would not be deposed by, or become a zealot, nor can you make the same promise of your Federation or Roden.

With regards to the State alliance with the Empire; It is exactly that, a strategic and military alliance. We have no direct say in the politics of the Empire, much as they have no say in the State. We act as sovereign nations in New Eden and act toward our own goals. I believe neither can be held accountable for the actions of the other. An alliance does not mean that the actions of one nation are condoned by the other, just that there is mutual benefit to joint strategic and military efforts. I would be interested to hear why you feel this is not the case.



I don't see what's all that complicated about it. By offering support to a group commiting a wrong, even if you don't commit the wrong directly, you give them greater ability to commit it themselves. To use a intentionally over-the-top example, every Caldari ship on the Amarrian front supports their goals by freeing up another ship elsewhere for slave raiding. To use a more realistic one, every shipment of Caldari steel shipped to the Empire allows them to build a few more ships, which might allow them to hold a system for a few days longer, which might allow them to "Reclaim" a few more Matari from their homes. Etc, etc.

You can't claim not to be responsible just because you don't have a say in what the policies are. Because, I mean, you know what it is they do. It's not a secret. If a serial murderer asks to borrow a knife and goes on to stab someone to death with it, you're at fault for enabling him to do so - even if he made a half hearted attempt to tell you he was planning to slice bread.



If I might borrow your metaphor; The State is not simply giving a knife to a murderer. It is a fair and amicable trade. The knife in exhange for another item/s or service. It is a profitable business transaction. He might use it to stab someone or as you said, slice some bread. At the end of the day, It is simply no one else's business what he chooses to do with the knife once the trade is complete, morally objectionable or not. When a consumer purchases any item, whether this be a knife, musical instrument or a Cruise missile, what the consumer decides to do with their purchase is not the responsibility of the salesperson. Perhaps it should be, but that is for another discussion entirely.

To leave the metaphor behind, this is much in the same vein as the Gallente-Amarr free trade agreement in which the Federation have also done business with the Empire and left well enough alone. It wouldn't be a stretch to imagine that food could have been traded between the Empire and Federation, food that could have been used to feed soliders used in either nation's war efforts.

As I said in my previous post, we need not condone each other's private practices or policies to remain allies or trade partners. This does not make us responsible for the action of others. You could argue that perhaps, given past dealings, it makes us all equally responsible. That is not for me to decide.

Lyn Farel wrote:



Do not forget the commercial side of this too. Trade agreements between Khanid and the State are legion and extremly profitable, and the recent colossal money streams between the Tash Murkon family and the State economy are another layer to that fact. While the State is a new source of technology for the Empire, the Empire is - especially during the State economical crysis - a good source of economical help for the megas, and thus for the welfare of the Caldari people.

I do not want to imply judgements of values here. One can see it as a purely practical alliance, when another one will see it as a mutual ideological and sociological help.




The economics of the situation was a rather large omission on my part however unintentional. For filling in the blank spaces. Thank you, Ms Farel.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#146 - 2011-09-21 14:16:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Desiderya wrote:
Now I'm curious,
I don't consider my comments on this discussion wildly off from Khross-haans thoughts.
What is the usual patriotic modus operandi you expect? Or are you, maybe, confusing vocal provists with patriots?


I do not think I am confusing both. I am merely refering to the universal standard descriptions that can be found all around the cluster, like this one :

Generally regarded as the most powerful faction, the Patriots are an alliance of Lai Dai, Wiyrkomi, and the mighty Kaalakiota, who between them and their subsidiaries possess capabilities rivaling those of the other two Caldari political factions combined. They are genuinely patriotic and extremely proud.

However, that rather jingoistic pride has been mortally injured by Heth's politically vicious rise. As a result, they generally refuse to admit, even to each other, that many of the things Heth has done are exactly what they themselves have wanted to do all along. While the wounds are still too fresh for them to feel anything but hatred for him, they realize that to defy him openly would harm the State (and their dominant position within it) immeasurably, so for now they play along with him and pretend (as much to themselves as to anyone else) that they're not immensely enjoying giving the Gallente a black eye.


The only difference I see with provists is the methods used for the same goal (on which they drastically disagree), which has always been Caldari Prime and the State economical and military superiority.

And, as you have seen in my previous post, I noted in Khross-haan words a lot of similarities with the usual patriot speech, and some other with the liberal side. As I said, maybe I was wrong.

Mr Khross, do you believe in free relations with other empires, in an united cluster where trade and mutual benefits would improve the global prosperity of everyone ? Because this is what I have always read of the liberal mindset.

Please excuse me in advance for my curiosity, which is, I can assure you, genuine before all. I have lived a little in the State, but am definitly not as informed as a true caldari citizen.
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#147 - 2011-09-21 14:35:17 UTC
I will answer your inquiry in brief.

First, however, I will refer to your quotation: What you have referenced is a simple generalization of the perception of the Patriot mindset. Not every patriot is going to believe what Heth has done is what they have wanted along, I would go so far as to suggest to you that only the most extreme among us would do so.

To your inquiry:

I believe that every house should see to its own affairs before becoming involved in its neighbors'. That is to say that I believe the Caldari people, and by extension the State, should see to its own security, prosperity, integrity and infrastructure before looking outside of its own borders.

The existence of trade and international business relations are a necessary part of establishing stability and infrastructure. They should not be priority, however.

Relations with other nations should not be discouraged, but again are not a priority.

The priority is the Caldari people and the stability and prosperity of the State that governs and protects them. All else is secondary but not, by necessity, discouraged.

~Malcolm Khross

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#148 - 2011-09-21 14:40:50 UTC
Thank you for the clarification. It would seem that I took your words slightly differently, and for that, I apologize.
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#149 - 2011-09-21 15:41:25 UTC
No need to apologize, Farel.

There is no harm in seeking clarification for words, miscommunication happens regularly. Having the clarity to seek clarification speaks highly of you, as opposed to simply resolving you perfectly understand me immediately and start with the challenges, arguments and other nonsense on a misunderstanding.

~Malcolm Khross

Faelan Maris
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#150 - 2011-09-21 16:03:18 UTC
"Malcolm Khross" wrote:
Not every patriot is going to believe what Heth has done is what they have wanted along, I would go so far as to suggest to you that only the most extreme among us would do so.

*grins and claps her hands once in glee*
I appear to have won the "Most Extreme" award. It is my first public label, as far as I know. Do I get a button to wear?
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#151 - 2011-09-21 16:25:35 UTC
Faelan Maris wrote:
"Malcolm Khross" wrote:
Not every patriot is going to believe what Heth has done is what they have wanted along, I would go so far as to suggest to you that only the most extreme among us would do so.

*grins and claps her hands once in glee*
I appear to have won the "Most Extreme" award. It is my first public label, as far as I know. Do I get a button to wear?


Congratulations! Would you like one?

As a side note, our differences aside, please do not consider me to have vilified you. While we may not agree on everything Heth has done, we are kindred and our differences sharpen us.

~Malcolm Khross

Faelan Maris
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#152 - 2011-09-21 22:30:57 UTC
Malcolm Khross wrote:
Congratulations! Would you like one?

As a side note, our differences aside, please do not consider me to have vilified you. While we may not agree on everything Heth has done, we are kindred and our differences sharpen us.

I did not consider myself vilified. There are a few capsuleers with whom I would jump to that conclusion, but you are not one. I may have lowered myself a notch or two in your opinion, but you recognize that some good has come out these policies so I know you would not discard me completely even if what I said were 100% accurate. It is mostly accurate, but I played it for a bit of humor too and I hope that comes across in the recording. For what it is worth I hold you in high regard - I sometimes wonder if you have some measure of the line of the Seituodas in you.

I do not agree with every action and policy taken by Heth-haan, but I do agree with a great many. There were even a few of which I was skeptical at first but I have come around since. When his workforce reforms were announced I thought they were going to be little more than another set of empty promises from distant executives, until I saw the first few successes at our station, and how those lit hope in so many more. I know that being pro-Heth is not a popular line to take here, but I have to stand by what I have seen. Where even fair-spoken Gariushi-haan's good example failed to move a dozen executives from their decline, Heth-haan's bold vision has re-set the eyes of entire generations on the far horizon.

My one main dissent is that I do not agree with his choice to hold Caldari Prime. I am proud that we proved that we could, of course! Yet I worry that it is a drain that will funnel out every last drop of prosperity in the State, and that his regard for his birthplace is overriding reason in this. However I am sure that the CEO of Kaalakiota and the CPD has more and more accurate information than I have, and try not to assume that I can make better decisions looking at trees than he can looking at forests.

As for the button: Yes.
Alain Octirant
Doomheim
#153 - 2011-09-21 22:32:01 UTC
Maya Erena wrote:


Nationalist party? Please. You assume just because I'm pro-war that I'd put a bunch of facists at the helm of our country?

And don't tell me to bite my tongue. I'll express my opinions as I see fit, and not sugar-coat them for your benefit.


My dear lady,

You appear to be sadly misinformed . The National Party of the Federated Union of Gallente Prime could not be further from fascism. We affirm the primacy of Gallentean-style democracy as the most preferable form of government. We do not advocate totalitarianism in any form.

If you want to know more, please contact me for a membership form.
Malcolm Khross
Doomheim
#154 - 2011-09-22 10:32:11 UTC
Faelan Maris wrote:

As for the button: Yes.


You have honored me with many of your sentiments, Maris-haani.

No, I do not think any less of you, it takes more than a few differences of belief for me to think less of someone. You have proven, throughout the short time I've known you, to possess integrity, courage and honor. This matters infinitely more to me than your standpoints on the State.

Though, I must thank you for your clarification on your stance.

I will see if I can petition to have you a button made!

~Malcolm Khross

Zagamesh
Doomheim
#155 - 2011-09-22 17:18:11 UTC
It has always been a dangerous mistake to confuse the politics of military nationalism with what it means to patriot. To abandon the virtues of rationality, dignity, pride and love for ones own Homeland and fellow citizens in the waving of flags and fiery but empty rhetoric until the only virtues extolled are viciousness and vengeance. When violence and force is no longer an act to be abhorred and an option of last recourse but indeed held as the first and only political action to be pursued. Diplomacy and moderation of thought and action stifled with fear and hatred for perceived enemies. This confusion it appears has taken hold both in the Federation and the State. Patriotic ideals are debased to serve and advance the agendas of corrupt men who seek to profit from the blood of their fellow countrymen.

It is forgotten that good men will never seek to hide behind either ideology, their flag or their uniform as justification to commit evil for then they shall cease to be good men. That is the truth of what it means to be patriot for when the concepts of duty, honour, courage and loyalty to ones nation and fellow citizen are values so deeply held then no amount of petty politicking will deter them from acting in a manner contrary to their conscience. It is heartening to see that in the State there are still those guided by their conscience and a respect not only for their fellow citizens but also for their fellow men. Enough, that the cause of the Minmatar people and the Republic in freeing themselves from Amarrian oppression and subjugation would warrant the attentions of private State citizens and a discussion here on the IGS.

That said, I would say a far more pressing issue for the State and the Federation is an effective resolution to the current conflict. Whilst CONCORD and the CEWPA have so far contained the violence, a flashpoint and further escalation of the war is not an unlikely scenario. Such a development, I believe, is not in the interests of either the State or the Federation. The costs of such an escalation in lives, infrastructure, and ISK will far surpass anything encountered in the fires of the first conflict and the Caldari secession. Only the most vociferous Caldari Provist or Gallentean Ultranationalist would believe it bring about anything but the complete ruin of both our nations.

If the true patriots of both the State and Federation are unable to find common ground and mutual respect in this most critical period in the lives of both our nations then we do nothing but surrender not to each other but the madness of bitter and hate-filled men. We will stain ourselves in the blood of our young men and women. Sacrificed on the altar of an unnecessary and pointless war. If a solution to the Caldari Prime issue is not reached and respect as to our mutual borders is not maintained then the only outcome is total war.

What remains to be seen is which will prevail in the State and Federation:

Patriotism or Military Nationalism.
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#156 - 2011-09-24 10:27:56 UTC
Maya Erena wrote:

Ilsenae Alexandros wrote:

Who lit the fuse on your tampon?

Did some Civire workaholic stand you up at the altar or something?


Petty anti-feminist insults from an Achura. Cute. I expect no less from the State. Do you hate your own culture as much as your gender? Certainly a shame, since it was far more developed then the Caldari's before they swallowed you up.

And Mister Triton, when you said "I have never met a Caldari who did not show great pride in his people, his government, and his corporation." I chose to see nothing but "In his corporation."

I'm not even going to bother addressing the rest of your post, since it quickly devolves into name-calling and anecdotes.


Fixed your post, relevant part emphasised.

Harken, and make obeisance, all:

The feminist has spoken!

You know the same group that once said--I misremember exactly where or whom now--that (paraphrase) "logic is inherently male, therefore a tool of oppression?"

All politics aside, lovely, why don't you just admit you're a man-hater, as well as a stereotypically bellicose feminist anti-intellectual and have done with it?

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.