These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE New Citizens Q&A

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Rules of engagement (how can this be fair?)

Author
Thabiso
Merchants of the Golden Goose
#1 - 2012-02-26 14:25:49 UTC
We are currently at war with a corp that uses a trick, that I think is a bit unfair .

What happens is they will try and bait (which is fine), if you show up for a fight and start shooting and they see they are in trouble, they will warp in their out of corp alts (NPC corp as I recall) and have them start to remote repair - this of course will trigger aggresion timers on their alts and allow us to shoot at the alts - that is however a pretty moot point since they just turned the fight massively in their favor - when fight is over they can warp out and hide their alts wherever for the duration of the aggresion and at no point be truly in trouble.

Now these toons can basically go hide in a NPC corp, which makes it impossible for you to try and get back at them - so my question is, how can this be fair? The war is between us and their mains, why isn't remote reparing during active engagement triggering a concord response, sure as hell seems to be an aggresive move to me?

Moving your industrials etc. into NPC corps during wars make sense, but moving an alt into an NPC corp and still using them for the war should be against the rules.
Kip Troger
Exiled Kings
Pain And Compliance
#2 - 2012-02-26 15:08:08 UTC
There are quite a few mechanics about high-sec warfare that can be manipulated. As for your argument about it not being fair - no one is stopping you from doing the same thing to them... That seems like it would even the playing field some.

However, the next patch EVE Online: Inferno coming out this summer is addressing high sec warfare and i think they plan to take a look at a lot of these mechanics and refine them. This mechanic might be adjusted - or maybe not, i cant say.

But to be honest, PVP is EVE is never fair... Any time you think about engaging someone - you should always assume the worst.
Plan for them to not reveal all of their cards, and by doing this, you can set your own traps as well.
Grikath
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#3 - 2012-02-26 15:17:35 UTC
"Should be" doesn't come into it. It's a valid game mechanic, and something *you* can use just as well.

Life is actually a hell of a lot better than it was, because there used to be a time where you could not shoot those "Neutral" RR toons. At all.

There's many, many tricks to highsec warfare, and this is simply but one of them. There's also many ways to make peeps pay for using neutral RR, if you have a decent FC and people actually listen to orders. After all logi ships tend to go *poof* nicely when you point/web them and change primary after they've shown their hand.

One important thing to realise is that in EVE, you are not up against "mains". You are up against players who can and will use the multiple accounts/alts options to their fullest extent, including dual- or even tripleboxing if their setup is sufficient.

Simply adjust your tactics, assuming their more than : "we fly out , and shootz stuff, then we lose our ships" is applicable here, and learn.

Highsec isn't "Safe".  Neither is it a playground for bullies and bottomfeeders. So stop complaining and start playing the game already.

mxzf
Shovel Bros
#4 - 2012-02-26 15:49:18 UTC
Is it a lame tactic? Yes. Is it unfair? The word 'fair' doesn't exist in the Eve dictionary; fights are only as 'fair' as you can make them (by bringing more friends of yours than they did).

TBH, the whole wardec system is fairly broken right now; ATM it's used more as a tool for greifers than for people who have a real reason to want to kill the wartargets (I mean, right now my corp and atleast one other is wardecced by a guy who myself and some other posters called out for being an idiot on the forums, he doesn't try to attack us, he's just attempting to scare us with a wardec). However, it sounds like wardecs will get some much-needed attention and iteration this summer, so here's hoping that it gets better.
Cameron Zero
Sebiestor Tribe
#5 - 2012-02-26 16:25:46 UTC
Any high-sec war will (almost always) include neutral alts to remote rep one or both sides. It's a fact of high-sec wars. "Fair"? No, but then Eve isn't fair.

Sad, yes.

"I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. …"

Banechild
Arctic Light Inc.
Arctic Light
#6 - 2012-02-26 19:20:17 UTC
You can always scan the alts from the system after fights or even have a few guys scanning their safe spots while keeping out of the fight and simply waste their guys when they warp to safe.
Failing that get a logis of you own and/or enough tackler to keep their little logis there until fight is done for.

Also you can take any non-corpie buddy with you and they can shoot them as long as they stay in the fleet with you, sharing the wardec (just like they can and do), so it's not like you're out of options either.
Matalino
#7 - 2012-02-26 20:11:29 UTC
Banechild wrote:
Also you can take any non-corpie buddy with you and they can shoot them as long as they stay in the fleet with you, sharing the wardec (just like they can and do), so it's not like you're out of options either.

This is false! Fleet memebership has no impact on the rules of engagement. It does not matter in the least bit if your non-corp buddy is in a fleet or not. You are certainly welcome to use non-corp buddies to help in your war, but they will be limited to shooting at those who shoot at them (and those who rep those who shoot at them).
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2012-02-26 22:28:47 UTC
Let's just ask Willy Wonka what he thinks

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKG07305CBs&feature=player_embedded

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny

KrakizBad
Section 8.
#9 - 2012-02-27 03:55:38 UTC
Take heart, this is extremely likely to be nerfed into the ground this summer.
J'Poll
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#10 - 2012-02-27 08:27:39 UTC
You complain about it, but you should be happy. About a year ago you wouldn't be able too shoot the neutral repair ships at all, they could sit there and repping your wartarget and you couldn't do anything about them as shooting them would get you killed by concord.

And what they do, you can do it too. Why not get your own neutral alts to help you fight.

Remember:

All's fair in love and war.

Personal channel: Crazy Dutch Guy

Help channel: Help chat - Reloaded

Public roams channels: RvB Ganked / Redemption Road / Spectre Fleet / Bombers bar / The Content Club

Raiz Nhell
State War Academy
Caldari State
#11 - 2012-02-27 11:39:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Raiz Nhell
EVE isn't fair...
I'm not going to start shooting unless I'm reasonably certain I have overwhelming odds and a dirty trick or two...

The first rule of a gun fight is to bring a gun, the second rule is to invite all your friends and have them bring guns....

EDIT: Underwhelming odds... who wants underwhelming odds... Fixed it.

There is no such thing as a fair fight...

If your fighting fair you have automatically put yourself at a disadvantage.

Chal0ner
Hideaway Hunters
The Hideaway.
#12 - 2012-02-27 11:54:29 UTC
Thabiso wrote:
this of course will trigger aggresion timers on their alts and allow us to shoot at the alts - that is however a pretty moot point


"Primary is X in a scimi - all damage on X now" ... .... *poof* problem solved.

Of course not everyone listens to a FC, heck not everyone *has* a FC, in that case you have more of a problem.
This of course, supposes you have a fleet in the first place, not just a couple of random pilots panicking all over the place.
gfldex
#13 - 2012-02-27 13:15:25 UTC
Thabiso wrote:
We are currently at war with a corp that uses a trick, that I think is a bit unfair.


War decs are not meant to be fair. They are merely a compromise. In the beginning EVE don't got CONCORD or sentry guns. As a result good players farmed bad players like mad. The carebear faction in CCP argued that this will hinder the growth of EVE and the compromise came about. As any compromise this one sucks too.

Reaching for low hanging fruits was and ever will be the main source of bad game design.

If you take all the sand out of the box, only the cat poo will remain.

Velicitia
XS Tech
#14 - 2012-02-27 14:11:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Velicitia
Thabiso wrote:
...this of course will trigger aggresion timers on their alts.


I'm assuming it's a logi chain of 2-3 ships here.

Once they go red, switch primary/secondary/tertiary to the logis. Get points/ECM/neuts on all three so they can't rep chain each other (or warp out), and go to town.

Once the logis are down, take out the other guys (you did keep them pointed, yeah?)

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Kraven Stark
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#15 - 2012-02-27 16:35:31 UTC
The last corp I was in got War Decced by a merc group using the same mechanic. Our corp officers filed a petition and were told that this is something that CCP does not condone, has intentions on changing and actually removed the wardec status from us, which took 24 hours later.

This was probably 4 or so months ago.
Thabiso
Merchants of the Golden Goose
#16 - 2012-02-28 11:22:06 UTC
Kraven Stark wrote:
The last corp I was in got War Decced by a merc group using the same mechanic. Our corp officers filed a petition and were told that this is something that CCP does not condone, has intentions on changing and actually removed the wardec status from us, which took 24 hours later.

This was probably 4 or so months ago.


Nice to know. Our current war-dec is over, but I'll keep it in mind.

Other posters seem to argue the tactic is ok, since it's better than what it used to be - to me thats a bad argument.

Yeah, it might be better, but that doesn't make it right and while it's within the mechanics of the game it's abusing the system (to me at least). It's like going into a boxing match and when it turns out your opponent is about to win you have some sniper in the audience take your opponent out and claim victory.

Velicitia
XS Tech
#17 - 2012-02-28 14:31:05 UTC
Thabiso wrote:
Kraven Stark wrote:
The last corp I was in got War Decced by a merc group using the same mechanic. Our corp officers filed a petition and were told that this is something that CCP does not condone, has intentions on changing and actually removed the wardec status from us, which took 24 hours later.

This was probably 4 or so months ago.


Nice to know. Our current war-dec is over, but I'll keep it in mind.

Other posters seem to argue the tactic is ok, since it's better than what it used to be - to me thats a bad argument.

Yeah, it might be better, but that doesn't make it right and while it's within the mechanics of the game it's abusing the system (to me at least). It's like going into a boxing match and when it turns out your opponent is about to win you have some sniper in the audience take your opponent out and claim victory.



That's a bit drastic ... but one of the low-numbered rules of eve (IIRC, it's 3) is "if you're in a fair fight, someone did something wrong".

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Kraven Stark
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#18 - 2012-02-28 14:32:49 UTC
Thabiso wrote:
Kraven Stark wrote:
The last corp I was in got War Decced by a merc group using the same mechanic. Our corp officers filed a petition and were told that this is something that CCP does not condone, has intentions on changing and actually removed the wardec status from us, which took 24 hours later.

This was probably 4 or so months ago.


Nice to know. Our current war-dec is over, but I'll keep it in mind.

Other posters seem to argue the tactic is ok, since it's better than what it used to be - to me thats a bad argument.

Yeah, it might be better, but that doesn't make it right and while it's within the mechanics of the game it's abusing the system (to me at least). It's like going into a boxing match and when it turns out your opponent is about to win you have some sniper in the audience take your opponent out and claim victory.



It's a BS tactic plain and simple. If you decide to jump in on a fight with a warring group, regardless of which corp you are in, you should be flagged as a target as long as the war is ongoing.

If they make that change, I can live with it.
Grikath
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#19 - 2012-02-28 16:45:02 UTC
Thabiso wrote:
Other posters seem to argue the tactic is ok, since it's better than what it used to be - to me thats a bad argument.


Actually, they don't.
They, including myself, argue that it is a valid game mechanic, that in the past was patently unfair, and which has been adressed well over a year ago.

The result is that you can now happily shoot at "neutral" RR, as soon as they start aiding your opponents, because they will be flagged towards your whole corporation, not just the fleet you are in.

here if you don't believe me.

There is no "Unfair" about the whole thing anymore: under a wardec the moment neutral RR begins, the ship/pilot involved becomes an eligible target for your corporation. Since the flag is "criminal" , not "war", it includes the pilots in NPC corps, so that hole was closed, even though the time you can shoot him for is relatively limited.

Which is a whole damn sight better than the old situation, where you could only fight fire with fire , and bring your own neutral RR.
Oh wait, that would imply that as a "carebear" corp in highsec you need to actually employ/train/prepare pvp techniques... Shocked [/sarc]

Between being able to shoot neutral RR and the insurance nerf for gankers, the two most obvious holes in highsec (warfare) griefing have been plugged. Everything else can be solved by actually learning to play the Game beyond shooting rocks and rats, even quite casually.

The "unfair" is in your perception, not in actual game rules/mechanics.
To paraphrase an EVE Dev: EVE is not a nice place, nor is it intended to be. If you want rainbows, go play Hello Kitty Online.

Please HTFU.. All you're doing now is filling the tear-jar of the highdec griefers while giving the anti-highsec lobby more ammo.

Highsec isn't "Safe".  Neither is it a playground for bullies and bottomfeeders. So stop complaining and start playing the game already.

FeralShadow
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#20 - 2012-02-28 19:07:23 UTC
As many have said the war deccing mechanic is being taken a look at by CCP right now for the next expansion. The mechanic is as old as the game itself and hasen't been modified much, leading to many different problems and vulnerabilities.

Only thing I can suggest for the short term is to bring a friend or two in falcons. Logis dont work well against ECM, and while they're jammed you're free to pwninate the people they're repping.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

12Next page