These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

SHIP SPINNING RETURNS! Really? Now We Move Backwards?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
T'Laar Bok
#21 - 2011-09-21 06:20:22 UTC  |  Edited by: T'Laar Bok
I want a roll back to before they started coding. No code == No bugs. YaY!

I guesstimate a 95% certainty that CCP will screw up the reintroduction of ship spinning.

Most likely by spinning the station while the ship sits still.

But it will be fixed soon™

Amphetimines are your friend.

http://eveboard.com/pilot/T'Laar_Bok
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2011-09-21 07:02:21 UTC
Phizban wrote:
CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.

Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.

Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!

So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.

Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.

Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.




This is a horrible post. Don't ever do this again.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Grey Stormshadow
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2011-09-21 07:50:58 UTC
Congrats OP. You're the 1st person I add to my forum block list.
That is reward from the brilliance of that highly intelligent post you made :)

Get classic forum style - custom videos to captains quarters screen

Play with the best - die like the rest
Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
#24 - 2011-09-21 08:21:24 UTC
CCP Manifest wrote:
I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize.


No need to apologize Manifest... the OP must be roleplaying a moron, because nobody with the mental capacity to use a keyboard would post such a usless post or show such a lack of understanding of what the return of the hangar means to the Eve community as a whole.

Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.
Sofia Bellard
Doomheim
#25 - 2011-09-21 08:22:24 UTC
CCP removing ship spinning was moving backwards.

Poor sad little pirates,  why you so mad?
Ciar Meara
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#26 - 2011-09-21 09:23:50 UTC
CCP Manifest wrote:
I apologize


CCP aplogizes, OP is now happy and has decided to give up his life of trollish ways we can all leave this thread content and furfilled.

- [img]http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/corp/janus/ceosig.jpg[/img] [yellow]English only please. Zymurgist[/yellow]
Vyl Vit
#27 - 2011-09-21 09:56:54 UTC
'T is the way of civilization son. Read up on your Western Civ.

Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.
Meryl SinGarda
Belligerent Underpaid Tactical Team
#28 - 2011-09-21 10:05:41 UTC
Ladie Scarlet wrote:
Phizban wrote:
CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.

Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.

Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!

So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.

Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.

Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.




This is a horrible post. Don't ever do this again.


Not that I agree with the OP, but every single time I see you post something, it's this.
hired goon
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#29 - 2011-09-21 10:07:34 UTC
I bet you all think Manifest's post was genius and funny. Well personally I had a few moments of excitement on the news that the slow auto-spin was coming back. Shame on you all Sad
The Apostle
Doomheim
#30 - 2011-09-21 10:14:20 UTC
hired goon wrote:
I bet you all think Manifest's post was genius and funny. Well personally I had a few moments of excitement on the news that the slow auto-spin was coming back. Shame on you all Sad


it was, but what more can you expect from a hired goon?

Question: Did you complain when ship-spinning was removed?

If yes, then here it comes.

If no, stay on CQ and no change...

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]
BLACK-STAR
#31 - 2011-09-21 10:15:36 UTC
hired goon wrote:
I bet you all think Manifest's post was genius and funny. Well personally I had a few moments of excitement on the news that the slow auto-spin was coming back. Shame on you all Sad

no....If you undock from station within CQ you load CQ back when you dock. If you're in the Hangar and undock, you'll load the Hangar when you dock again.
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#32 - 2011-09-21 10:22:03 UTC
I DEMAND WE HAVE SHIP FLIPPING!


I want to flip my ship UP AND DOWN not just clockwise and anticlockwise
Thorn Galen
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#33 - 2011-09-21 11:03:13 UTC
non judgement wrote:
Headerman wrote:
CCP Manifest wrote:
I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot.


Oh good. Cause down under here, the water spins counter clockwise, so a spinning ship going <-- that way <-- will remind me of "Back to the Future", an awesome film.

PS: Everyone war dec the OP and pod this PoS.


The confusing part of how water spinning would remind someone of Back to the Future was sadly ignore.
Isn't water spinning in different directions north or south of the equator a bit of a fallacy?



It's called the Coreolis effect.
In terms of North/South spinning :

(from http://stratus.ssec.wisc.edu/courses/gg101/coriolis/coriolis.html)
"As to whether there's a conspiracy among sink manufacturers to sell only clockwise-encouraging faucets south of the Equator and counterclockwise faucets north of it is a topic for another day. The reader is encouraged to search the journal Science where I am told a pair of serious studies are presented (unfortunately, I don't know which issues the articles are in, or even which year...my information is still secondhand). The results were that after you carefully control all the variables (use a large wooden tub, control the temperature throughout the tub, have the drain be a tube extending up into the tub to avoid friction effects with the tub walls, start the water off spinning the "wrong" way, etc) and wait 18 hours for the water to settle down, water does indeed spiral down the sink opposite directions in the two hemispheres. But this effect is so subtle that it wouldn't ever be seen in your bathroom sink."

COO - Bene Gesserit Chapterhouse  CEO - Sanctuary Pact Alliance
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2011-09-21 11:05:39 UTC
Meryl SinGarda wrote:
Ladie Scarlet wrote:

This is a horrible post. Don't ever do this again.


Not that I agree with the OP, but every single time I see you post something, it's this.

I know...there is so much bad posting. People should have to get some sort of posting license before they can post here.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#35 - 2011-09-21 11:08:02 UTC
Ladie Scarlet wrote:
Meryl SinGarda wrote:
Ladie Scarlet wrote:

This is a horrible post. Don't ever do this again.


Not that I agree with the OP, but every single time I see you post something, it's this.

I know...there is so much bad posting. People should have to get some sort of posting license before they can post here.



Your avatar needs a license.
My Postman
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#36 - 2011-09-21 11:23:56 UTC
By making CQ NOT optional from the beginning, CCP did it wrong. Now they are correcting it, and you call it a step backwards.

Usually i´m a friendly, polite person, but you sir, are an idiot.
Chaos Incarnate
Faceless Logistics
#37 - 2011-09-21 11:24:14 UTC
Miilla wrote:
Ladie Scarlet wrote:
Meryl SinGarda wrote:
Ladie Scarlet wrote:

This is a horrible post. Don't ever do this again.


Not that I agree with the OP, but every single time I see you post something, it's this.

I know...there is so much bad posting. People should have to get some sort of posting license before they can post here.



Your avatar needs a license.



ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooh, burn!

haha, just kidding, that was really weak and you should be ashamed
AlleyKat
The Unwanted.
#38 - 2011-09-21 11:34:07 UTC
Phizban wrote:
CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.

Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.

Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!

So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.

Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.

Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.





You'll be glad to hear that a WireFrame version of EVE is being discussed, then. This will move EVE so far back, it will receive a round-house kick to the face and land in the 80's.

AK

This space for rent.
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#39 - 2011-09-21 11:35:18 UTC
AlleyKat wrote:
Phizban wrote:
CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.

Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.

Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!

So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.

Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.

Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.





You'll be glad to hear that a WireFrame version of EVE is being discussed, then. This will move EVE so far back, it will receive a round-house kick to the face and land in the 80's.

AK



Do not mock Elite, EVER.
Cailais
The Red Pill Taker Group
#40 - 2011-09-21 12:15:44 UTC
Phizban wrote:
Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs.



This is actually quite a good idea.

C.
Previous page123Next page