These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Official Raiden. CSM 7 Statement

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
D Derp
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#81 - 2012-02-25 07:59:42 UTC
Akelorian wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Harold Tuphlos wrote:
So this is where the bad posting is. I now know why raiden. never posts.

But they're posting NOW save us---


So what happened yesterday? 204 of you vs 98 of us, 0 supers used, 134 cfc killed to 2 raiden. lost. I'm certain that the "mythical" titan nerf from Goonswarm Gm Soundwave will aid you in turning these humiliating loss's around. Whats next, Nerf Abaddon's? Nerf Logistics, Nerf everything?

Here have a tissue, btw nice dramiel kill with that rag

Now back to the thread content, Elise for CSM :)


Goons are bad at EVE, film at 11.


Snype~
Killer Gandry
The Concilium Enterprises
#82 - 2012-02-25 12:59:35 UTC
Johnny Marzetti wrote:
. Tell us more about what you know of goons.


I don't think it needs to be listed because the important parts are already out there.
People start to realise more and more how great EVE will be once we get rid of Goons completely.
Shadako
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#83 - 2012-02-25 22:06:49 UTC
So when is Finfleet finally going to get Stoffer arrested? I mean the investigation has to be complete by now right?

I do like that Finfleet (the ex best corp in Bob) is now the best corp in Raiden and spokesperson for Raiden (and PL?) way to go!
Akelorian
FinFleet
Northern Coalition.
#84 - 2012-02-26 02:00:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Akelorian
Shadako wrote:
So when is Finfleet finally going to get Stoffer arrested? I mean the investigation has to be complete by now right?

I do like that Finfleet (the ex best corp in Bob) is now the best corp in Raiden and spokesperson for Raiden (and PL?) way to go!


I will give you a shoulder to cry on, a bucket to let the tears fall into, and a hug to comfort you.
Bliswonowon
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#85 - 2012-02-26 03:16:10 UTC
Oh, Akelorian is clearly a goon alt.

I see I have much to learn about posting-fu.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#86 - 2012-02-26 03:29:43 UTC
Shadako wrote:
I do like that Finfleet (the ex best corp in Bob) is now the best corp in Raiden and spokesperson for Raiden (and PL?) way to go!

BoB 4.0 is staying true to its roots?

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Kyle Myr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#87 - 2012-02-26 04:11:18 UTC
D Derp wrote:
Akelorian wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Harold Tuphlos wrote:
So this is where the bad posting is. I now know why raiden. never posts.

But they're posting NOW save us---


So what happened yesterday? 204 of you vs 98 of us, 0 supers used, 134 cfc killed to 2 raiden. lost. I'm certain that the "mythical" titan nerf from Goonswarm Gm Soundwave will aid you in turning these humiliating loss's around. Whats next, Nerf Abaddon's? Nerf Logistics, Nerf everything?

Here have a tissue, btw nice dramiel kill with that rag

Now back to the thread content, Elise for CSM :)


Goons are bad at EVE, film at 11.


Snype~



Masterful snipe.

I congratulate RaidenDOT aka BoB Reloaded: The Revenge: Electric Boogaloo on your support of Elise Randolph. Elise is a cool dude who once gave me a bridge home for the blood sacrifice of a POSshot Geddon, and you should all support him - the CSM indicates he's very good to work with. To the dissenters throwing in for Seleene, I urge you to concentrate your votes on supporting Elise's position.
Levy Break
State War Academy
Caldari State
#88 - 2012-02-26 04:14:44 UTC
Was this sarcastic? I can't see this announcement doing anything but hurting the PL candidate's position.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#89 - 2012-02-26 04:31:03 UTC
Levy Break wrote:
Was this sarcastic? I can't see this announcement doing anything but hurting the PL candidate's position.


"why vote for elise when he's backed by three alliances now?"

great job dudes!

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#90 - 2012-02-26 05:36:59 UTC
Andski wrote:
Levy Break wrote:
Was this sarcastic? I can't see this announcement doing anything but hurting the PL candidate's position.


"why vote for elise when he's backed by three alliances now?"

great job dudes!


Why do Goons feel the need to dictate how people should vote?

Bounty Hunting - Soon (™): Retribution (Winter 2012)

It's just criminal - Smuggling
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#91 - 2012-02-26 05:44:26 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Andski wrote:
Levy Break wrote:
Was this sarcastic? I can't see this announcement doing anything but hurting the PL candidate's position.


"why vote for elise when he's backed by three alliances now?"

great job dudes!


Why do Goons feel the need to dictate how people should vote?


why do nameless forum alts feel the need to dictate how people should vote?

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#92 - 2012-02-26 05:52:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Grumpy Owly
Andski wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Andski wrote:
Levy Break wrote:
Was this sarcastic? I can't see this announcement doing anything but hurting the PL candidate's position.


"why vote for elise when he's backed by three alliances now?"

great job dudes!


Why do Goons feel the need to dictate how people should vote?


why do nameless forum alts feel the need to dictate how people should vote?


I dont think they should, but if you can site someone who does other than personal support for a candidate I'd equally see it as an attempt to discredit voter choice.

I mean people are calling for voters rights and to go to the ballot box in a fair manner. Such that the representation should be afforded by this process. And each time someone throws out a thread about our diplomatic process and changing it, the argument is to select a candidate using the voting process.

Now I see Goons feel sufficiently arrogant to judge other people's voting choices as invalid. So on the same token should we now go back to these representation arguments and re-discover opinions about any power bloc voting?

I don't think you'd like to somehow. So why the double standard?

Bounty Hunting - Soon (™): Retribution (Winter 2012)

It's just criminal - Smuggling
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#93 - 2012-02-26 07:07:37 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
I dont think they should, but if you can site someone who does other than personal support for a candidate I'd equally see it as an attempt to discredit voter choice.

I mean people are calling for voters rights and to go to the ballot box in a fair manner. Such that the representation should be afforded by this process. And each time someone throws out a thread about our diplomatic process and changing it, the argument is to select a candidate using the voting process.

Now I see Goons feel sufficiently arrogant to judge other people's voting choices as invalid. So on the same token should we now go back to these representation arguments and re-discover opinions about any power bloc voting?

I don't think you'd like to somehow. So why the double standard?


two alliances publicly state support for a candidate

other voters decide that said candidate doesn't need their votes because of the two alliances backing said candidate

this is not hard

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#94 - 2012-02-26 07:21:16 UTC
Andski wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
I dont think they should, but if you can site someone who does other than personal support for a candidate I'd equally see it as an attempt to discredit voter choice.

I mean people are calling for voters rights and to go to the ballot box in a fair manner. Such that the representation should be afforded by this process. And each time someone throws out a thread about our diplomatic process and changing it, the argument is to select a candidate using the voting process.

Now I see Goons feel sufficiently arrogant to judge other people's voting choices as invalid. So on the same token should we now go back to these representation arguments and re-discover opinions about any power bloc voting?

I don't think you'd like to somehow. So why the double standard?


two alliances publicly state support for a candidate

other voters decide that said candidate doesn't need their votes because of the two alliances backing said candidate

this is not hard


No it's not hard at all. You simply want to influence voter choice.

Presumably as your equally hoping to establish the Mittani's call for an unparralled victory to ensure his chairmanship. So why can't alliances equally tactically vote for an alternative candidate? See, still a double standard.

Not sure wether it's fair to build your big pile of hubris in this thread however, perhaps we should start a new thread about it in the CSM forum?

Bounty Hunting - Soon (™): Retribution (Winter 2012)

It's just criminal - Smuggling
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#95 - 2012-02-26 08:40:55 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
perhaps we should start a new thread about it in the CSM forum?

Please give a link, this is quite a relevant discussion on the democratic process in EVE, an internet titans game.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#96 - 2012-02-26 13:18:43 UTC
Klezz wrote:
Mittani's reign of terror has been persistent for too long


I'm quite sure those thousands high sec players perfectly understand what you just said here. Are you going to be better?
I doubt but I'd like to be surprised.
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#97 - 2012-02-26 15:31:36 UTC
ahh here's where I remember your name from klezz: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1m7f3tWOk_E

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.
Berke Negri
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#98 - 2012-02-26 22:06:42 UTC
Killer Gandry wrote:
Johnny Marzetti wrote:
. Tell us more about what you know of goons.


I don't think it needs to be listed because the important parts are already out there.
People start to realise more and more how great EVE will be once we get rid of Goons completely.


Remember, there have been no goons since July 27, 2006.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#99 - 2012-02-26 22:14:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Berke Negri wrote:
Killer Gandry wrote:
People start to realise more and more how great EVE will be once we get rid of Goons completely.

Remember, there have been no goons since July 27, 2006.

Please report to the BoB ministry of re-education. Mention of Goons is heresy.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Killer Gandry
The Concilium Enterprises
#100 - 2012-02-27 01:56:15 UTC
Horsepoo, dogpoo, chickenpoo. Just a small namechange but it still is crap.

Goons, Goonswarm, Goonwaffe. Yup, small namechange but in the end the same pile of dung.