These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

How to get rid of most of scammers

Author
Ngaio
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2012-02-24 12:49:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Ngaio
There's an idea. Remove 'Min Volume' from the market, that will prevent people from doing contract/market scams where for example: they sell 10 items for 100mil, in a station, and at the same station they will buy minimum 10 for higher price like 200mil - but they would cancel Buy order as soon as somebody buys. There's also a contract usually with similiar amount of items to buy for 600mil.

If there was no Min Volume, they would loose the opportunity to sell a lot, and would allow others to legitimately sell their stuff.
If there's a need for Min Volume, then there's always a contract system in place, and min volume could be there in place.

What's your opinion on that ?
Greg Valanti
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2012-02-24 12:55:46 UTC
Horrible idea.

First of all, I would say an extremely small minority of scammers use margin scamming, so this would not stop "most" scammers from scamming.

Secondly, margin trading scams are a supported game mechanic and not something that needs correcting.

Thirdly, there are plenty of traders who legitimately utilize the "min volume" option and this would really only serve to punish them.
Ngaio
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2012-02-24 12:59:35 UTC
Greg Valanti wrote:
Horrible idea.

... an extremely small minority of scammers use margin scamming...



LOL, go to The Forge, and check for yourself. - Jita being the absolute nightmare. What's marginal there is called legit sale.
Greg Valanti
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2012-02-24 13:03:07 UTC
Ngaio wrote:
Greg Valanti wrote:
Horrible idea.

... an extremely small minority of scammers use margin scamming...



LOL, go to The Forge, and check for yourself. - Jita being the absolute nightmare. What's marginal there is called legit sale.


Just because there are 3 people of the 1800 in system spamming their margin trade scams in local does not mean most scammers are margin trading. Roll
Julian Koll
The Kollektive
#5 - 2012-02-24 13:24:27 UTC
Well, since no one with half a brain will ever be margin scammed, i dont really see the need for changing anything. if stuff gets changed, the scammers will find new ways to get isk from the stupid and the greedy.
simple as that.


oh, almost forgot: HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Bumblefck
Kerensky Initiatives
#6 - 2012-02-24 13:31:58 UTC
Yes, let's turn the wonderful sandbox, Butterfly Effect game that we know and love that promotes freedom of choice and interaction into a horrible game where nothing is more than a hand-holding exercise.

Perfection is a dish best served like wasabi .

Bumble's Space Log

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#7 - 2012-02-24 13:44:49 UTC
The most important part of EVE, from my point of view, is freedom.

That includes the freedom to be stupid.
AureoBroker
Perkone
Caldari State
#8 - 2012-02-24 14:29:21 UTC
Oh, to be honest, having to have enough money to be able to cover the minumum order would make sense.
Anything beyond that fudges with problematics beyond margin scams.
Ninyania alCladdyth
McLuvin AstroDynamics
#9 - 2012-02-24 14:32:41 UTC
Ngaio wrote:
Greg Valanti wrote:
Horrible idea.

... an extremely small minority of scammers use margin scamming...



LOL, go to The Forge, and check for yourself. - Jita being the absolute nightmare. What's marginal there is called legit sale.


There's more to EvE than Jita 4-4. You need to get out more often.
Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2012-02-24 15:10:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Vera Algaert
Ngaio wrote:
There's an idea. Remove 'Min Volume' from the market, that will prevent people from doing contract/market scams where for example: they sell 10 items for 100mil, in a station, and at the same station they will buy minimum 10 for higher price like 200mil - but they would cancel Buy order as soon as somebody buys. There's also a contract usually with similiar amount of items to buy for 600mil.

If there was no Min Volume, they would loose the opportunity to sell a lot, and would allow others to legitimately sell their stuff.
If there's a need for Min Volume, then there's always a contract system in place, and min volume could be there in place.

What's your opinion on that ?

my opinion is that you have no idea how the escrow system works.

the margin trading scam would be perfectly viable without setting min volume > 1, just slightly more hassle.

.

flakeys
Doomheim
#11 - 2012-02-24 15:45:22 UTC
So because people with half a brain are so stupid to fall for this scam we should punish people who for example set up regional orders with a minimum volume added?

Sure makes sense ...... jEEZ talk about being a selfish **** Roll



I

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

Vespa EC-600
The Wakizashi
#12 - 2012-02-24 15:54:09 UTC
Not that I agree with any of this but....

What about a penalty for failed margins? possibly a % of overall shortfall?

I believe negative wallet prevents someone from placing new orders?

Anyone feel free to correct me if I am wrong
Bath Sheeba
Another Success Story
#13 - 2012-02-24 17:02:11 UTC
Vespa EC-600 wrote:
Not that I agree with any of this but....

What about a penalty for failed margins? possibly a % of overall shortfall?

I believe negative wallet prevents someone from placing new orders?

Anyone feel free to correct me if I am wrong



I like this......there should be a penalty for this......too bad CCP cannot have a "negative balance" to only 1 corp at a time.

This means that if you margin scam in Jita 4-4 you would owe a debt to the Caldari Navy corp. I.E. you have to pay them the penalty for a failed margin order to be able to place any new orders in any Caldari Navy corp station. Nothing else would be effected.

Catho Sharn
Don't Die Interstellar Enterprises
#14 - 2012-02-24 17:48:59 UTC
If you want to eliminate "most" scams, remove contracts from the game. Done. P

If you don't want to get scammed, learn trade mechanics and how to read the market. You wouldn't go into a ship to ship PvP fight without understanding how your ship-based skills work, why would you enter market PvP without taking similar precautions?
Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
In Tea We Trust
#15 - 2012-02-24 18:03:20 UTC
Catho Sharn wrote:
You wouldn't go into a ship to ship PvP fight without understanding how your ship-based skills work, why would you enter market PvP without taking similar precautions?

The vast majority of EVE players do go into every PvP fight without understanding how their ship based skills work.

Some people can't be helped, some people aren't worth helping, the rest help themselves.
PlatinumMercSEAL
Center for Advanced Studies
#16 - 2012-02-24 22:06:42 UTC
WTF!!! That is rediculous. I like it there. I use it to sell in bulk at a cheaper price. This is how economics work. People sell less with a requirement to sell in bulk to sell faster. I vote against the removal of the min.

Captain PlatiumMercSEAL, Deep-Space Wraiths (Independent Null Sec Mercenary Corporation)

Gregory Brunswick
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#17 - 2012-02-24 22:35:22 UTC
I'b surprised that most people are pro margin scamming. Since when did open sand box mean the right to exploit every broken game mechanic?

The problem with a properly set up margin scamming is that it can be tricky to spot if the does not put a minimum buy order. This does bring more risk to the scammer however so most do put a minimum buy order. This minimum buy order maks the scam riskless, outside of losing escrow fees, and basically guarantees that the scammer will make a good deal of isk. Guaranteed profit for no risk. Seems like risk vs reward is broken to me which is something that I constantly hear people harping on.
Adunh Slavy
#18 - 2012-02-24 23:04:41 UTC
Ngaio wrote:
There's an idea. Remove 'Min Volume' from the market, that will prevent people from doing contract/market scams...


No thanks. The Min Volume is a necessary tool for large scale operations and it creates more diversity in the market, there should be a Min for Sell orders as well, but that is another issue.

I too don't like the margin scam, though I have never been caught by it or use it. There are better ways of dealing with it.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Dane Eham
Negative Density
#19 - 2012-02-25 00:26:43 UTC
PlatinumMercSEAL wrote:
WTF!!! That is rediculous. I like it there. I use it to sell in bulk at a cheaper price. This is how economics work. People sell less with a requirement to sell in bulk to sell faster. I vote against the removal of the min.


You fail at the Eve market. Since the logistics of having to handle each individual sale are taken off your hands, there is no reason to sell for less. Sell it all in 1,000 transactions or 1 it takes the same effort and you get the same profit.

On negative balances, that's a bad idea too. That's opening a door to print isk. Say I create your typical margin trading scam alt and have him post a buy order worth 100s of billions. I fulfill that order, CCP has to create isk to pay me and my alt gets hit with billions in negative balance. Biomass alt and repeat.

Bottom line is the margin trading system works. Where you're getting scammed is they're using the margin buy order to entice people into overpaying for a junk item. A little bit of market research would point out that something fishy is going on.




David Forge
GameOn Inc.
#20 - 2012-02-25 00:36:49 UTC
This case has been made elsewhere. The simple fact of the matter is that the ability to have a minimum number of items required prior to a purchase serves an important and legitimate in-game function (I might want to have a region-wide buy order but I don't want to waste my time picking up individual items rather than sizable stacks) and the margin trading scam only hurts the careless (which is not meant to insult those that have fallen victim to the scam).
12Next page