These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Leboe for CSM

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#21 - 2012-02-17 02:39:57 UTC
Aloe Cloveris wrote:
Also, wasn't there some bullshit about shooting the local rats reducing your standing with the NPC station owners to the point you'd not be able to use their services? I'm probably mistaken, but iirc that was an Actual Thing that was being considered*. :wtc:

Leboe on CSM would be great. He 'gets' NPC 0.0.

That's wonderful. We should totally implement this.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Carthiasis
Sirius Cybernetics Inc
Rote Works
#22 - 2012-02-17 02:54:18 UTC
I like your platform, small gang PVP definitely needs some love.

You'll be getting my vote
Gorion Wassenar
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#23 - 2012-02-17 03:05:35 UTC
Official CSM candidate of Starsi.

Rote Kapelle - NOW IN SLIGHTLY MORE LAW ABIDING FLAVOR!

"DRINK STARSI!" ©®™Ownership Group Chairman
Funkert
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#24 - 2012-02-17 10:44:09 UTC
So i noticed you are the ingame equivalent of a DRUG DEALER

would you say you are able to make ethical decisions and have the best interests of the players in mind, even though you make a living DESTROYING LIVES?
Tyzzara
Stimulus
Rote Kapelle
#25 - 2012-02-17 21:23:03 UTC
This candidate has my full support. Will be voting for you brother!

AFK Time Zone
Devilish Ledoux
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#26 - 2012-02-17 23:49:37 UTC
I never even heard of this *******.
Celedris
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2012-02-18 03:34:57 UTC
Leboe is the only named candidate from Syndicate.
Endeavour Starfleet
#28 - 2012-02-18 04:34:59 UTC
So what do you plan to do to help incursions as part of CSM7?

Do you plan to push hard for implementation of the modular Corp and POS system so that smaller corps can isolate potential spiez without shutting them out of everything if they are indeed legit?

Could we count of CSM7 to SERIOUSLY push the botting and RMT issue? I am sick of tired of hearing people say "Nothing CCP can do bout it" And even alliances having rules against reporting Blue Bots.
Mfume Apocal
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2012-02-18 21:02:57 UTC
How do you reconcile a desire for small gang objectives (a means of compelling sovholders to form and fight on your terms) while denying them an equal ability to compel your roaming alliance to fight them on their terms? It should be give and take; if you have means for forcing them to fight your nanogang, they should have means of forcing your alliance to fight 120 Maelstroms backed by 15 Huginns and 30 Scimis.
Darius III
Interstellar eXodus
The Initiative.
#30 - 2012-02-18 21:17:45 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:


Could we count of CSM7 to SERIOUSLY push the botting and RMT issue? I am sick of tired of hearing people say "Nothing CCP can do bout it" And even alliances having rules against reporting Blue Bots.


CCP doesnt care about botting

Hmmm
leboe
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2012-02-18 21:24:12 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
So what do you plan to do to help incursions as part of CSM7?

Do you plan to push hard for implementation of the modular Corp and POS system so that smaller corps can isolate potential spiez without shutting them out of everything if they are indeed legit?

Could we count of CSM7 to SERIOUSLY push the botting and RMT issue? I am sick of tired of hearing people say "Nothing CCP can do bout it" And even alliances having rules against reporting Blue Bots.


Incursions are odd, in highsec they're an isk faucet, in lowsec/nullsec they're an annoyance to people who are trying to pass through the systems through conventional gates. I don't want PVE who's rats are just beefed up EHP, DPS, and EWAR effectiveness messing with my attempts at PVP. A never ending attack by a single NPC group seems kind of silly when theres so much backstory to the sansha and other pirate factions, being unable to help them is a shame.

I think the recent POS iteration is enough to give CCP some breathing room for the next expansion, fuel pellets and reduced online/anchor timers is huge. As a Regular POS manager these changes have been invaluable. Spies are something you need to deal with, and people have dealt with them for many, many years. On the other hand, an improved corporate interface should be a priority, its old and clunky.

I don't live in a region of eve where botting is prominent, therefore I take a stance where no botting is acceptable. This is contrary to the current CSM where people like UAxDEATH maintain the position of "if ccp don't care, why should I?" I think this is the wrong attitude, especially when a large profit goes to people at the top of the chain. We shouldn't tolerate it in any form. 3 day temp bans for botting accounts are a joke, they know what they're doing and that its against policy.

http://rotekapelle.com/killboard/
leboe
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2012-02-18 21:38:47 UTC
Mfume Apocal wrote:
How do you reconcile a desire for small gang objectives (a means of compelling sovholders to form and fight on your terms) while denying them an equal ability to compel your roaming alliance to fight them on their terms? It should be give and take; if you have means for forcing them to fight your nanogang, they should have means of forcing your alliance to fight 120 Maelstroms backed by 15 Huginns and 30 Scimis.



The same infrastructure for both NPC 0.0 residents and sov holders is already vulnerable to the other, with customs offices and towers. If more small objectives are added for roaming gangs to hit in sov space, make something similar for them to own and have attacked in retribution while maintaining player sov as the superior option (more effort, more reward) If Sov holders want to do big station reinforcing fleets, they can look to the neighbouring player-sov regions. A roaming entity chooses not to be a sov threat, so they shouldnt be forced into the sov game.

http://rotekapelle.com/killboard/
Sudden Eye
Sudden Industries
#33 - 2012-02-19 07:11:52 UTC
Mfume Apocal wrote:
How do you reconcile a desire for small gang objectives (a means of compelling sovholders to form and fight on your terms) while denying them an equal ability to compel your roaming alliance to fight them on their terms? It should be give and take; if you have means for forcing them to fight your nanogang, they should have means of forcing your alliance to fight 120 Maelstroms backed by 15 Huginns and 30 Scimis.


If the large gang can't use their available resources to catch or camp the small gang then they are terrible.
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2012-02-21 16:03:24 UTC
leetcheese
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2012-02-21 16:29:32 UTC
lol you're bad at bf3 m8
leboe
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2012-02-22 02:35:53 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Requesting candidacy view on Bounty Hunting.




It would make sense to do over bounty hunting during sweeping lowsec pass, which I am pushing for. The lack of a working bounty system isn't as pressing as other things (0.0 in general)

I'd support scrapping it in favour of more fleshed out pirate/antipirate mechanics and some wardec tweaks.

http://rotekapelle.com/killboard/
Cephas Boaz
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#37 - 2012-02-22 02:54:26 UTC
+1 for leboe
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#38 - 2012-02-22 04:25:24 UTC
leboe wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Requesting candidacy view on Bounty Hunting.




It would make sense to do over bounty hunting during sweeping lowsec pass, which I am pushing for. The lack of a working bounty system isn't as pressing as other things (0.0 in general)

I'd support scrapping it in favour of more fleshed out pirate/antipirate mechanics and some wardec tweaks.


ty, comments added to linked thread

Bounty Hunting - Soon (™): Retribution (Winter 2012)

It's just criminal - Smuggling
LeoniaTavira
Pure Avarice.
Rote Kapelle
#39 - 2012-02-22 06:08:26 UTC
Unexpectedly posting in a Leboe thread. I sent you likes :)
leboe
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#40 - 2012-02-23 00:51:19 UTC
LeoniaTavira wrote:
Unexpectedly posting in a Leboe thread. I sent you likes :)


obviously I'm a good person if a VLA dude is supporting my thread.

http://rotekapelle.com/killboard/
Previous page123Next page