These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Robotics Price Drop

Author
Slavemaster
ICC - Information Control Corporation
#21 - 2012-02-21 11:42:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Slavemaster
........ I belied its duped in some way. It might be bc i am paranoid and lost 2 bil on a speculation.

No matter there is no logic to the price of Robotics.

Oo

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#22 - 2012-02-21 16:40:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Slavemaster wrote:
........ I belied its duped in some way. It might be bc i am paranoid and lost 2 bil on a speculation.

No matter there is no logic to the price of Robotics.


The logic does not matter.

The first week of December shown a large pin bar (PB) that should have warned any stock holder that many were taking profit. I mean, it's a whole week worth of people selling twice as much than what was bought. Plus it closes below a BRN (big round number) which means buyers lost strength.

You then had the 2nd week of december warning you about the supply and demand change: Robotics

At the 3rd week, the 2 week pin bar is an huge DUMP NAO !signal that would not make anyone lose more than 4.5k a piece.

The 4th week, the IPB closing below the 2 W PB means that sellers are winning, it could only go worse if it closed below the 1st Dec week tail (buyers minimum accepted liquidity level).

The next week, the "could only go worse" happened. The thick bearish bar closes below the 1st December PB => sellers have eradicated all the remaining buyers. Anyone still holding stock that day have exclusively themselves to blame.


Edit:

No excuse about only me having access to decent analysis tools: everyone in EvE can type "Robotics" in EvEMarketeer.com and click "Trends". He would see the same things, I even put an arrow next to the PB.


Edit 2:

No excuse about not knowing what to do either, it's all freely explained with pictures by me on this forum: Experiment #01: RL finance analysis applied to EvE and even in a RL trading forum.


Remember, trading is a PvP game based on asymmetry of information. If you don't upgrade your tools to Tech 3, the other traders will stomp you.
Slavemaster
ICC - Information Control Corporation
#23 - 2012-02-21 17:06:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Slavemaster
I get what you are saying, but here is the problem..

If I get this right we are at at stage where high sec PI for Robotics has 0, isk in value more or less, or close to
nothing. There are not that many out there who will go on producing it when there are better options. And I dont believe for a sec, that there is a bonaza of PI producers in low sec with that pity amount of isk they get for it.


The only reason its falling is that someone has found a way of duping it.
is not many months ago that Megacyte was duped, there is a thread about it. Edit: verified by CCP

I can understand that is a question of supply, and demand, but Robotics have nothing to do with that if you
look at the marked history you can "easy" see that something is very wrong, and my bet Is Duping

Oo

Acac Sunflyier
The Ascended Academy
#24 - 2012-02-21 18:11:06 UTC
Gillium Rooke wrote:
Does anyone know why the price of robotics has dropped over 10k in the last week?

I'm assuming either one or more of the following, but it would be nice to know for sure:

1) a few big corps/players have dropped a glut onto the market.
2) with the increased player base there's more people doing PI.
3) alliances have started producing more for themselves thus killing the demand.
4) there's been a change in rules that I am blissfully unaware of.

Thanks

What happened was fuel blocks came out. They were a new fuel introduced that required robotics to make. So, pos owners gobbeled up a crap ton to make a good stockpile to augment the on hand and outdated pos fuels they had. Now, since pos owners have a good stockpile, the demand has returned to their previous levels.
Kiss me quickly
Doomheim
#25 - 2012-02-21 18:17:06 UTC
VV hindsight best hindsight.
Esan Vartesa
Samarkand Financial
#26 - 2012-02-21 18:28:51 UTC
Kiss me quickly wrote:
VV hindsight best hindsight.


That's the magic of technical analysis. There are enough formulas in the TA's toolbox that there's always one or two to match every historical graph.

I'm not knocking TA entirely, just pointing out that it's often abused.
Slavemaster
ICC - Information Control Corporation
#27 - 2012-02-21 18:29:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Slavemaster
Acac Sunflyier wrote:
Gillium Rooke wrote:
Does anyone know why the price of robotics has dropped over 10k in the last week?

I'm assuming either one or more of the following, but it would be nice to know for sure:

1) a few big corps/players have dropped a glut onto the market.
2) with the increased player base there's more people doing PI.
3) alliances have started producing more for themselves thus killing the demand.
4) there's been a change in rules that I am blissfully unaware of.

Thanks

What happened was fuel blocks came out. They were a new fuel introduced that required robotics to make. So, pos owners gobbeled up a crap ton to make a good stockpile to augment the on hand and outdated pos fuels they had. Now, since pos owners have a good stockpile, the demand has returned to their previous levels.


The production time of making fuel blocks is long. Why does that matter?
The reason is that now days of PI production is lost in a limbo land while its being produced. In other words
3-4 days of PI production is lost in EVE.

Another ting that is lost is the waste factor of PI stuff laying around since you now cant use it directly.
- There should have been a Spike in prices, but clearly not.

Oo

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
#28 - 2012-02-21 21:22:39 UTC
Slavemaster wrote:

There should have been a Spike in prices, but clearly not.


Welcome to investing.

The issue with your understanding is that you're underestimating stockpiles. 3-4 days volume is absolutely nothing compared to what people have stacked away in hangers. The only way to 100% predict prices is to predict when people will sell and when people will buy. In my opinion, lots of PI was bought up for fuel blocks, and now that demand gap has been filled. Also, many people will stop producing fuel blocks for various reasons (no profit, too lazy, etc), and some of the robotics that was bought up will now find its way back on the market and depress it slightly.
Slavemaster
ICC - Information Control Corporation
#29 - 2012-02-21 21:57:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Slavemaster
mechtech wrote:
Slavemaster wrote:

There should have been a Spike in prices, but clearly not.


Welcome to investing.

The issue with your understanding is that you're underestimating stockpiles. 3-4 days volume is absolutely nothing compared to what people have stacked away in hangers. The only way to 100% predict prices is to predict when people will sell and when people will buy. In my opinion, lots of PI was bought up for fuel blocks, and now that demand gap has been filled. Also, many people will stop producing fuel blocks for various reasons (no profit, too lazy, etc), and some of the robotics that was bought up will now find its way back on the market and depress it slightly.


The hole story of people,corp stacking in hanger etc is a absolution based on thin air, and rumors with no facts to
support it.

There are around 19k Pos and 4 days lost is 30 ( small/medium + large) per h.
19k x 30 x 24 = 13.6 mil blocks. 342k Robotics Lost. + Waste


Again: Today you get close to 0,- isk for making Robotics in high sec. And to low for but the few to make them in low.

To repeat my self. Yes, I believe robotics is duped. When they duped Mega ( CCP confirmed) I dont se why then cant
do it with Robotics.

Oo

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
#30 - 2012-02-22 02:29:07 UTC  |  Edited by: mechtech
Slavemaster wrote:

The hole story of people,corp stacking in hanger etc is a absolution based on thin air, and rumors with no facts to
support it.


This is where your argument ends. Stockpiles are very real, and the fact that you think that 3 days of Jita market volume has any long term significance shows a lack of understanding, especially considering Robotics has had traders popping in and out of the market constantly.

Hell, with the waffles I play with I can cover Jita volume for about 6 months. I'm just 1 player out of hundreds of thousands, and every trader probably has a giant stockpile of their current "item of choice".

Of course what I'm saying has just as much evidence as your duping accusations (zero), but if you've ever tried to manipulate a market yourself you can feel the stockpiles first hand. If you just buy up all of the items on the market, enough stock gets instantly dumped to bring the price even lower than it was originally. You can then buy up the entire market again, and within a few minutes giant stacks of random item X from god knows where will once again start popping up. I bet most of the traders reading this thread have a stack of something, be it from lazyness or used as an investment.

Also, I hate to tell you, but there are tons of people who produce items for themselves and for sale even though the value of the end product is lower than the sum of the component prices. It's sad but oh so true.
Scrapyard Bob
EVE University
Ivy League
#31 - 2012-02-22 04:26:07 UTC
Acac Sunflyier wrote:

What happened was fuel blocks came out. They were a new fuel introduced that required robotics to make. So, pos owners gobbeled up a crap ton to make a good stockpile to augment the on hand and outdated pos fuels they had. Now, since pos owners have a good stockpile, the demand has returned to their previous levels.


The only weird thing is that, unless all the robotics and sub-components were being produced in null/low/w POCO planets with next to zero tariffs - prices should have gone up roughly equivalent to the hi-sec tariff on P3 (7000 ISK/u). And if you count in at least 1 prior level of tariffs, probably more like 10-12k ISK/u increase.

OTOH, last summer they were down in the 42-43k ISK/u range, and the current bottom seems to be right around 50k ISK/u (maybe 52-54k long-term). This pattern shows up in the (4) P1 sub-components as well which are still 50-100 ISK above last year's slump price. So maybe the market is somewhat rational regarding the tariff increase.

I really expected the 60-65k Robotics to stick and for it to go up by 7-10k ISK/u (so 70-75k long-term, if not 80-85k).
Slavemaster
ICC - Information Control Corporation
#32 - 2012-02-22 06:58:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Slavemaster
mechtech wrote:
Slavemaster wrote:

The hole story of people,corp stacking in hanger etc is a absolution based on thin air, and rumors with no facts to
support it.


This is where your argument ends. Stockpiles are very real, and the fact that you think that 3 days of Jita market volume has any long term significance shows a lack of understanding, especially considering Robotics has had traders popping in and out of the market constantly.

Hell, with the waffles I play with I can cover Jita volume for about 6 months. I'm just 1 player out of hundreds of thousands, and every trader probably has a giant stockpile of their current "item of choice".

Of course what I'm saying has just as much evidence as your duping accusations (zero), but if you've ever tried to manipulate a market yourself you can feel the stockpiles first hand. If you just buy up all of the items on the market, enough stock gets instantly dumped to bring the price even lower than it was originally. You can then buy up the entire market again, and within a few minutes giant stacks of random item X from god knows where will once again start popping up. I bet most of the traders reading this thread have a stack of something, be it from lazyness or used as an investment.

Also, I hate to tell you, but there are tons of people who produce items for themselves and for sale even though the value of the end product is lower than the sum of the component prices. It's sad but oh so true.




"This is where your argument ends. Stockpiles are very real, and the fact that you think that 3 days of Jita market volume has any long term significance shows a lack of understanding, especially considering Robotics has had traders popping in and out of the market constantly."

- There will be no more Robotics in the marked with re selleres. I sell 10, you buy 10 will not make 30 Robotics. To be honest that is a bit sad that the Only data in you logic is pure fail

"Of course what I'm saying has just as much evidence as your duping accusations (zero), but if you've ever tried to manipulate a market yourself you can feel the stockpiles first hand. If you just buy up all of the items on the market, enough stock gets instantly dumped to bring the price even lower than it was originally. You can then buy up the entire market again, and within a few minutes giant stacks of random item X from god knows where will once again start popping up. I bet most of the traders reading this thread have a stack of something, be it from lazyness or used as an investment."

Wall of text with no logic. Might look convincing for a few, but then they might be into. PI. This clearly shows that you have a lack of basic understanding day trading. If you day trade in robotics that has had a fall from 80- 42 (50) you will lose isk no matter, it has gone down to fast.. If you are really good can earn is when a product is going down in price. The Problem, is that the fall was to fast.

- IF you are a - 100 mil trader at Jita, your way, or how you do it , how you get you isk. A small fish can sell, and buy fast and make isk even on robotics. If we are at that level of Trade talk, that we talk about a few millions per day, then... I suggest you stop here -----> X

I do play the marked, and did lose 2bil on robotics (1 month ish ago, in for 4 days , took my losses. And moved on.

You have arguments that sounds convincing, and is build around an illusion of logic. I bet many here will take your words over mine. But, what you call facts is rumors with no base to it.. It don't matter how many time you say "I heard this" "Many are... All this "facts" are irrational arguments.

The conclusion that many are idiots that do stuff for 0,- isk, or even have to pay to click on that boring PI planet, might be true for a week or 2, but even a Idiot gives up after months.

So..... "I Believe, I have heard of dupes, someone in local channel told me. " to put them in to words that your logical , analytically mind can comprehend. That Pi stuff is duped.

The Numbers don't add up.

Oo

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#33 - 2012-02-28 21:34:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Kiss me quickly wrote:
VV hindsight best hindsight.


Esan Vartesa wrote:


That's the magic of technical analysis. There are enough formulas in the TA's toolbox that there's always one or two to match every historical graph.

I'm not knocking TA entirely, just pointing out that it's often abused.



Let's do a little game

This week Robotics graph is this. Everyone can retrieve it at this link by selecting "Trends" and then "Week".

If and only if price will exactly match one of the 4 scenarios I link later in this post:

- if the next closed candle(s) will NOT respect the buy / sell signals I have put in the pictures to the swing above (buy) or below (sell) then I will send Kiss me quickly 500M.

- if they do, Kiss me quickly will send me 500M. Ofc in case Kiss me quickly won't reply or not accept the deal, I won't send anything.


Definitions

Respect means: price at closed candle will have gone up or down (dojis are neutral and won't count).

The "If PA => buy" means: price will pull back to the upper blue line (support), form one of: bullish pin bar (1 or 2 weeks) or BUOB or DBLHC. If this happens and the pattern does not close at the next swing then buy at the top of such pattern.

The "If PA => sell" means: price will pull back to the lower line (resistance), form one of: bearish pin bar (1 or 2 weeks) or BEOB or DBHLC. If this happens and the pattern does not close at the next swing then sell at the bottom of such pattern.


Scenarios

Scenario 1: price drops to lower support, bounces back up and it's close breaks the resistance, then bounces down to the same line and creates the "If PA => buy" definition above.


Scenario 2: price ranges between the two lines for a while then it's close breaks upwards then bounces down to the same line and creates the "If PA => buy" definition above.


Scenario 3: price breaks and closes below the lower support, bounces back to the line as shown on the graph, then creates the "If PA => sell" definition above.


Scenario 4: price ranges between the two lines for a while then it breaks and closes below the lower support, bounces back to the line as shown on the graph, then creates the "If PA => sell" definition above.


Any other scenarios (there could be a lot) won't be covered and will void the deal.

Edit: the same phenomenon could be visible in higher detail on the daily chart, but the candles will be much less "noisy" (big shadows / tails).
Previous page12