These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Riverini for CSM7 - The EN24 Party is Here.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
riverini
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#261 - 2012-02-18 01:52:21 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
I am curious about your candidacy however before I can support you (Or anyone) I need to know some things.

#1 What is your thoughts about incursions? Will you be pro grouping in hisec and only suggest changes that can benefit the fun experience (More sites, Better pay for the large Assault and HQ groups) Or join the rather clueless brigade that wants them nerfed because it competes with the BS known as nullsec CTAs? Considering the hostility shown by several CSM candidates I consider this my #1 issue


I fully support the current state of high-sec incursions and would be willing to discuss expanding it into a wider audience. I invite you to read my view on Incursions here
http://www.evenews24.com/2012/02/14/rvrnicsm7-the-carebear-nation-rats-incursions-and-miners/

The rest of your answers will be answered in less than 24 hours. I promise :)

Feel free to write me in-game or via riverini@gmail.com if you want to discuss specific views. Am open to feedback and opinions.

R

RIVERINI / EVENEWS24 @evenews24
Endeavour Starfleet
#262 - 2012-02-18 02:28:58 UTC
Quote:
The easy, immersion-based, solution would be for the sec status of a system to drop. However, that is a huge can of worms on many levels. I would push for CCP to come up with a solution, and happily brainstorm with them on this if asked.



Please consider removing this from your platform. You KNOW this will just lead to gankfests and people leaving incursions in droves.

RP needs to happen from CCP appointing a volunteer board to puppet more live incursions. (You can pick time and to an extent story but not know where until you start) Not from game breaking sec status drops.
riverini
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#263 - 2012-02-18 12:24:20 UTC  |  Edited by: riverini
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Quote:
The easy, immersion-based, solution would be for the sec status of a system to drop. However, that is a huge can of worms on many levels. I would push for CCP to come up with a solution, and happily brainstorm with them on this if asked.



Please consider removing this from your platform. You KNOW this will just lead to gankfests and people leaving incursions in droves.

RP needs to happen from CCP appointing a volunteer board to puppet more live incursions. (You can pick time and to an extent story but not know where until you start) Not from game breaking sec status drops.


My view on security drops:

riverini wrote:
Incursions should be buffed up in the way there is more freedom within the site. When I ran an Incursion with Darius, the incursion runners started sending saboteurs, I totally loved that. Shouldn't had they been popped by Concord, it would have created ruckus for our fleet. (and still they did got us in trouble). A buff up isn't always in the form of increased payouts, but in this case increased freedom of action for both sides.


As you can see am not calling for it to be gank-central, I want to allow incursion FCs to asses the situation and be allowed to engage should they wish to. I feel ECM and Ewar should be treated as flagging as criminal the perpetrator within the Incursion sites. An FC should consider whether to attack the perpetrators or just ignore them.

RIVERINI / EVENEWS24 @evenews24
Paxton Brimstone
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#264 - 2012-02-19 02:49:57 UTC

Quote:
This guy is probably one of the most dedicated people to ever play the game. His knowledge of game mechanics and issues related to 0.0 and Empire are unsurpassed.

My vote goes to Riverini because he has all of our best interests in mind and not just trying to ruin the game like the Mitani has been doing…..
.


Love it !!!!! it's like an endorsement from a convicted pedophile for the next pope or your children s daycare lol.... another epic reason to not elect Riverini to CSM. It's so comical your media machine pumps out so much of its content about nul sec (fictional mostly) and yet you continually court the empire pubbie vote to rally its conestoga wagons to circle and elect you.

Oh what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive!
Endeavour Starfleet
#265 - 2012-02-19 04:50:00 UTC
Now what do you mean "Ran with Darius" ? That is a huge red flag for me right there as in my opinion him and traitor Ammzi do anything BUT represent the best interests of the community.

I really hope this does not mean you were part of the incursion interdiction fleets.
riverini
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#266 - 2012-02-19 05:48:17 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Now what do you mean "Ran with Darius" ? That is a huge red flag for me right there as in my opinion him and traitor Ammzi do anything BUT represent the best interests of the community.

I really hope this does not mean you were part of the incursion interdiction fleets.


I ran one of the Head Quarters since as I was invited to it after covering the HQ fleets in eve news24. I joined the fleet, the incursion runners started attacking us and jammed one of my oneiros and lost it. The second one (on riverini) stayed until the bitter end.

The whole experience was pretty good, the incursion runners were good sports at sabotaging the competition of the HQ and GFs were shouted in local.

I love how in your view running incursions HQ as CCP intended is a huge red flag. Shame on you. Troll. Bear

RIVERINI / EVENEWS24 @evenews24
Endeavour Starfleet
#267 - 2012-02-19 06:05:32 UTC
If you were covering it you would know that the intention was to harm incursion runners NOT to run them as intended. Care to explain why the group you were running with were running fake logi fleets that got billions upon billions of isk worth of ships destroyed? How was that running HQs as intended?

Considering you are getting ALOT of flak on this topic considering your reporting style and neutrality I would seriously suggest not lowering yourself to the level of a child calling a serious question trolling. If you looked for five seconds you would see that I am pressing a number of potential candidates on the issue. If my intention was to troll I would be doing nothing but empty quoting BUTTS now would I not?

IF you intend to ask for my and other's vote you are going to have to learn to accept that we are going to call red flags when we see them. This is politics and your past WILL come to haunt you if you are not prepared to defend yourself in a serious manner.

Now do you want to try that again?
Widemouth Deepthroat
Pink Sockers
#268 - 2012-02-19 09:03:28 UTC
I usually vote for the cripple goon out of pity but seeing as he isn't in the running this year I guess I'll vote for your fat ass. Good luck!
riverini
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#269 - 2012-02-20 01:10:32 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
If you were covering it you would know that the intention was to harm incursion runners NOT to run them as intended. Care to explain why the group you were running with were running fake logi fleets that got billions upon billions of isk worth of ships destroyed? How was that running HQs as intended?


Uhh you mad TwistedTwistedTwisted. I wasn't involved on those. Nice try. Tool.

Endeavour Starfleet wrote:

Considering you are getting ALOT of flak on this topic considering your reporting style and neutrality I would seriously suggest not lowering yourself to the level of a child calling a serious question trolling. If you looked for five seconds you would see that I am pressing a number of potential candidates on the issue. If my intention was to troll I would be doing nothing but empty quoting BUTTS now would I not?


Lot of flak? I sit at both Incursion channels and talk to the guys on it on a daily basis, they seem to have no problem with it.

You need to keep taking your pills more often... Roll

Endeavour Starfleet wrote:

IF you intend to ask for my and other's vote you are going to have to learn to accept that we are going to call red flags when we see them. This is politics and your past WILL come to haunt you if you are not prepared to defend yourself in a serious manner.

Now do you want to try that again?


0/10

I don't want your vote, you are the kind of dip-**** who thinks the world owes him something. Take your pubbie tears elsewhere, shame Ankh is not running, u are definitively her kind of material.

RIVERINI / EVENEWS24 @evenews24
Taiwanistan
#270 - 2012-02-20 02:11:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Taiwanistan
oh STFU already endeavor butthurt imaginary red flags filling you every which way? makin you sore?
you whine whine oh god they are headshotting the MOM, they always more shiney than you therefore elitism,
oh god they nerfing your drake tank!

your posting history basically defines what a scrub is,
get out scrub. nobody cares.

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."
Endeavour Starfleet
#271 - 2012-02-20 04:54:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Endeavour Starfleet
Very well. You have chosen to not take the topic seriously therefore I will not take your candidacy seriously. The CSM does not need more candidates that has little respect for the voting public in my opinion.

I will not give you my vote not should anyone who cares about what the CSM can actually do with candidates that take the position seriously and not a free plane ticket and meal in my opinion.
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#272 - 2012-02-21 16:12:25 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting


Reiterating request.

Bounty Hunting - Soon (™): Retribution (Winter 2012)

It's just criminal - Smuggling
Snow Axe
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#273 - 2012-02-21 17:29:18 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting


Reiterating request.


He's waiting until he sees Mittens address it directly so he can take the exact opposite stance. Be patient!

"Look any reason why you need to talk like that? I have now reported you. I dont need to listen to your bad tone. If you cant have a grown up conversation then leave the thread["
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#274 - 2012-02-21 20:52:52 UTC
Snow Axe wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting


Reiterating request.


He's waiting until he sees Mittens address it directly so he can take the exact opposite stance. Be patient!


Have to be very patient then, as Mittens was simply dissmissive of my enquiries.

Bounty Hunting - Soon (™): Retribution (Winter 2012)

It's just criminal - Smuggling
Zwo Zateki
Doomheim
#275 - 2012-02-22 20:35:53 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting


Reiterating request.

It was mentioned in Riverini's program that bot activities (hunting most of all) got to be phased out and incursions buffed instead.

Supported, btw

http://cvmkr.com/R4JG
Therios3000
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#276 - 2012-02-22 21:00:10 UTC
I just came across you're from Panama.
Thats nice !

As minhas saudações desde Portugal. Mi saludo desde Portugal


¿Qué piensa usted de este tema? Eve Online debe ser traducido al portugués y español.
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#277 - 2012-02-22 21:29:30 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Snow Axe wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting


Reiterating request.


He's waiting until he sees Mittens address it directly so he can take the exact opposite stance. Be patient!


Have to be very patient then, as Mittens was simply dissmissive of my enquiries.

That's because Bounty Hunting is a feature that maybe a couple hundred EVE players will take part in, if any. It would require a rework of several core game systems (crimewatch, bounties, locators, standings, GCC) to implement and is not a 'sucking chest wound'.

Everyone 'gets' that you're hot on doing bounties, probably fresh off the SWtoR BH campaign and incredibly disappointed that it didn't live up to your Boba Fett fantasies, but the truth is that there isn't a huge pressing demand for that feature in EVE right now while there are dozens upon dozens of other existing features that touch thousands of players daily that could use the developer attention.
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#278 - 2012-02-22 21:30:14 UTC
oh god why am I seriousposting in a Riverini thread?
Johnny Marzetti
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#279 - 2012-02-22 22:13:19 UTC
Hey riverini, what's up? I haven't been reading your thread but I saw that all of "Team Tech" has gotten behind Elise Randolph for CSM. After you've spent months fellating them in EN24 that has got to feel like a cockslap in the face. Any comments?
riverini
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#280 - 2012-02-23 00:21:51 UTC
Therios3000 wrote:
I just came across you're from Panama.
Thats nice !

As minhas saudações desde Portugal. Mi saludo desde Portugal


¿Qué piensa usted de este tema? Eve Online debe ser traducido al portugués y español.


Muito obrigado pela reposta!

Definitivamente hermano! hay tantos webones jugando WoW y el otro juego de starwars, los hispano-latinos podermos ser un powerbloc si nos lo proponemos.

Chekea el ultimo address donde hablo sobre los language pack:

http://www.evenews24.com/2012/02/22/rvrnicsm7-new-blood-finders-keepers/

Saludame a las Garotas!

R

RIVERINI / EVENEWS24 @evenews24