These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

RE-ELECT DARIUS III FOR CSM 7

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
L Olonnais
Yarrbear Inc.
#221 - 2012-02-17 11:47:44 UTC
-
Xenuria
#222 - 2012-02-17 11:58:41 UTC
Vile rat wrote:
Breaking NDA isn't a reason not to vote for somebody honestly. That's a legal determination and between CCP and the CSM member. Being a CSM who never participated and was largely AWOL for the vast majority of his term is a bigger reason to not consider him.


Your one to talk...

CSM 12 Candidate
Third Flower
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#223 - 2012-02-17 12:17:37 UTC
Xenuria wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
Breaking NDA isn't a reason not to vote for somebody honestly. That's a legal determination and between CCP and the CSM member. Being a CSM who never participated and was largely AWOL for the vast majority of his term is a bigger reason to not consider him.


Your one to talk...


It'd be nice if you didn't.
Drake Blob
Doomheim
#224 - 2012-02-17 14:48:08 UTC
Woo Glin wrote:
About time for another d3 alt post.


good one, I marvel at your wisdom and creativity.......oh wait am I talking to a Mittiani alt? isn't all goons mittaini alts/puppets

D3 adn I are two different people in real life, unlike the whole goon centiped with Mittani at the front
Endeavour Starfleet
#225 - 2012-02-18 02:08:49 UTC
Quote:
Rebalancing Incursions: I would urge CCP to take ISK out of Vanguards and into Scout and Assault sites as well as rescale difficulty in all three. I would like to see players ability to end all incursions nerfed as well. Ideally there would always be at least one Hi-Sec incursion available and no single small group of players could remove this popular and dynamic content.


In my opinion the whole incursion thing was between you and the traitor Ammzi due to hate of high sec content competing with null CTAs and your chances for reelection but lets just call you out on this and see what you say to be fair.

Detail that stance.

# 1 Do you intend to remove vangaurds, remove payout, nerf payout, Force complete, etc... when it comes to Vanguards. What about the nonshiny fleets?

#2 You say Scout sites. Why not make them content that single players can do with Drakes to compete with Lvl4s I don't see anything less than a complete overhaul of those sites can help in my opinion.

#3 You say Assault... What about HQs? Detail this. Do you intend to call for better payout and few other changes to Assaults and Hqs that draw large amount of community PVErs?

#4 Do you intend to support ways to help fleet forming such as show skills in fits? Cap showing for logis? Shortcut tagging?
Maru Utama
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#226 - 2012-02-18 03:27:23 UTC
He won't do anything but make blanket statements, Endeavour. The majority, if not all, of his responses have been screaming goon conspiracy against him.
Endeavour Starfleet
#227 - 2012-02-18 03:36:18 UTC
Maru Utama wrote:
He won't do anything but make blanket statements, Endeavour. The majority, if not all, of his responses have been screaming goon conspiracy against him.


As he already knows I don't give a damn about any of that. My #1 Issue is incursions and how his actions have shown to me personally that he does not have the right mindset to represent them in the next CSM. Yet to be fair I want to nitty gritty of his plan.

Whatever rumored goon conspiracy there was his actions with the Ammzi were far worse in my book.
DurrHurrDurr
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#228 - 2012-02-18 08:22:04 UTC
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Maru Utama wrote:
He won't do anything but make blanket statements, Endeavour. The majority, if not all, of his responses have been screaming goon conspiracy against him.


As he already knows I don't give a damn about any of that. My #1 Issue is incursions and how his actions have shown to me personally that he does not have the right mindset to represent them in the next CSM. Yet to be fair I want to nitty gritty of his plan.

Whatever rumored goon conspiracy there was his actions with the Ammzi were far worse in my book.


It always depresses me that there are still idiots who believe in space honour in a game where one of the marketing points is scamming and betrayal.
Ziranda Hakuli
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#229 - 2012-02-18 09:04:27 UTC
Darius III wrote:
Third Flower wrote:
Darius III wrote:
Of course I won't break the NDA, but theres a lot I can now talk openly about now


A threat to break the NDA, because .



Gotta love these morons. +1


You know Darius calling folks morons after you called everyone in your fleet idiots does show only one thing. the you are a drooling moron. This is a game after all and fluffing your ego and tossing it around like a beacghed whale is not good. well then again if you are a beached whale thats all you can do.

as for the NDA maybe you should just let CCP pass out the info but you got your ego thing the size of Jita.

Maybe it would be best you disappeared into the shadows and stay there with mittans
Headerman
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#230 - 2012-02-18 10:10:29 UTC
Boris Lachenkov wrote:
You verbally abused me in local after I gave a "Hello, brick squad" to you and your friends, I have never done anything to spite you or your alliance. You should be ashamed of attacking a person who's only attribute you know of is their alliance and basing your assumptions and abuse on that.

You don't deserve my vote or the votes of the citizens of EVE.


Quote:
Test Alliance Please Ignore


TBH i think everyone in this alliance deserves all the **** everyone heaps on them. Smile

I would vote for darious if Wusti wasnt going for CSM

Australian Fanfest Event https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=90062
Headerman
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#231 - 2012-02-18 10:15:57 UTC
DurrHurrDurr wrote:
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
Maru Utama wrote:
He won't do anything but make blanket statements, Endeavour. The majority, if not all, of his responses have been screaming goon conspiracy against him.


As he already knows I don't give a damn about any of that. My #1 Issue is incursions and how his actions have shown to me personally that he does not have the right mindset to represent them in the next CSM. Yet to be fair I want to nitty gritty of his plan.

Whatever rumored goon conspiracy there was his actions with the Ammzi were far worse in my book.


It always depresses me that there are still idiots who believe in space honour in a game where one of the marketing points is scamming and betrayal.


Dood i hope my free DG X-large shield booster is still keeping u strong?

Australian Fanfest Event https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=90062
Headerman
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#232 - 2012-02-18 10:19:36 UTC
Third Flower wrote:
Xenuria wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
Breaking NDA isn't a reason not to vote for somebody honestly. That's a legal determination and between CCP and the CSM member. Being a CSM who never participated and was largely AWOL for the vast majority of his term is a bigger reason to not consider him.


Your one to talk...


It'd be nice if you didn't.


Wocha gunna do about it, crack a fat or something?

Australian Fanfest Event https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=90062
Headerman
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#233 - 2012-02-18 10:34:28 UTC
Third Flower wrote:
Darius III wrote:
Third Flower wrote:
Darius III wrote:
Of course I won't break the NDA, but theres a lot I can now talk openly about now


A threat to break the NDA, because .



Gotta love these morons. +1


Darius III - I was glad to hear about your decision to drop out of the race. I feel we are all - every player in EvE - in a much better position without your campaign and your input. In any matters.

As a candidate, your qualifications and insights compare unfavorably to those of a modest collection of growths from a perennial barked plant. Although you can both be accurately described with the same (unfairly) censored term, I'd altogether rather vote for the bundle of kindling. Its complete lack of participation in the process doesn't come with threats of breaking the NDA (again) - and that alone puts it far ahead of you.

Keep reaching for the stars, kid - there's always next time. (don't run next time)


did you ever go to school, or did your daddy teach you?

Australian Fanfest Event https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=90062
Darius III
Interstellar eXodus
The Initiative.
#234 - 2012-02-18 15:05:52 UTC
Headerman wrote:



I would vote for darious if Wusti wasnt going for CSM


Headerman-Thanks for the support even if I am not getting your vote. I don't know you from Adam-except for your posts I read on these forums. And most of them are great. Means a lot to me when someone I respect as much as you gives even token support-if not their vote. Thanks man, made my day.

Endeavour Starfleet wrote:
My name is ENDEVOR STARFLEET AND I AM THE WORST POSTER ON THESE FORUMS[quote]
You go girl!

Maru Utama wrote:
He won't do anything but make blanket statements, Endeavour. The majority, if not all, of his responses have been screaming goon conspiracy against him.


There is a Goon conspiracy against me, and I want to fix Eve's problems.

Hmmm
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#235 - 2012-02-18 15:56:52 UTC
Darius III wrote:
Maru Utama wrote:
He won't do anything but make blanket statements, Endeavour. The majority, if not all, of his responses have been screaming goon conspiracy against him.


There is a Goon conspiracy against me, and I want to fix Eve's problems.


The best way for Darius to fix the game's problems is to continue doing what he did during the last CSM. c/d?

[b]Don't worry about posting with your main!  Post with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."[/b]
Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#236 - 2012-02-18 17:25:05 UTC
Lapine Davion wrote:
Darius III wrote:
Maru Utama wrote:
He won't do anything but make blanket statements, Endeavour. The majority, if not all, of his responses have been screaming goon conspiracy against him.


There is a Goon conspiracy against me, and I want to fix Eve's problems.


The best way for Darius to fix the game's problems is to continue doing what he did during the last CSM. c/d?

c wasting a bunch of idiot pubbie votes and bouncing someone who would show up but say stupid things out of a slot, so mittens can continue acting unimpeeded
Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#237 - 2012-02-18 17:31:02 UTC
and the hilarious thing is darius and everyone who supports him are so dumb we can be completely open about this and they won't catch on
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#238 - 2012-02-18 17:32:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Lapine Davion
Retar Aveymone wrote:
Lapine Davion wrote:
Darius III wrote:
Maru Utama wrote:
He won't do anything but make blanket statements, Endeavour. The majority, if not all, of his responses have been screaming goon conspiracy against him.


There is a Goon conspiracy against me, and I want to fix Eve's problems.


The best way for Darius to fix the game's problems is to continue doing what he did during the last CSM. c/d?

c wasting a bunch of idiot pubbie votes and bouncing someone who would show up but say stupid things out of a slot, so mittens can continue acting unimpeeded


I was really hoping for an answer from Darius, but I guess this is okay too.

I've literally seen only 5 people who aren't in Brick squad who support him.

[b]Don't worry about posting with your main!  Post with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."[/b]
Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#239 - 2012-02-18 18:14:02 UTC
darius is apparently so lazy he forgot to submit the application

get off the couch buddy we got votes to waste
Endeavour Starfleet
#240 - 2012-02-18 19:12:04 UTC
Considering your lack of willingness to answer questions on your so called incursion platform I look forward to seeing you defeated in the upcoming elections. Also nice job of the libel quote you made. Real CSM like.

In my opinion you do not have what it takes to represent incursions as part of CSM7 or the rest of EVE for that matter considering the posts here about your actions. I gave you a fair chance to express your platform so I can expect nothing more if you are somehow reelected.