These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

T'amber for CSM 7 - Ship Paint Survey Results Posted
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#21 - 2012-02-07 19:58:21 UTC
yeah but you (The Mittani) have a goatee and look like some goof ball from the outsiders movie...Blink

too bad all the good goon leaders work for CCP now...

















There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#22 - 2012-02-07 19:59:48 UTC
rodyas wrote:
I am one of those constituents of the playing skill training online. Main questions is: I dont see any Adam in your post as you are claiming to do in the title. Just seems you are adding more eve to EVE. I.E small boobs, pink ships. CCP did add more adam to the game by renaming modules or giving them better names, but would like to hear what you would de before I vote. Thanks.


maybe this is a walking in stations thing... where i can insert adam into eve?

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
#23 - 2012-02-08 06:33:16 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
yeah but you (The Mittani) have a goatee and look like some goof ball from the outsiders movie...Blink

too bad all the good goon leaders work for CCP now...


Personally I'm not sure why what candidates look like seems to be an issue for some people, the Mittani isn't unpleasant to look at and I've see much worse facial hair in the mirror. He doesn't possess the breasts that I do but that's irrelevant too.

www.shipsofeve.com
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#24 - 2012-02-08 16:02:40 UTC
i guess how one looks is usually a projection of their personal convictions... look at most political races... Santorum all of a sudden got noticed when he put on a sweater vest...

Its a psychological subliminal thing... but in reality looks do count... moreover I enjoy razzing mittenz cuss chances are he will be chairman again…

What I am looking for a candidate is for them to:

1. support some sort of casual pvp via a contract system
2. enhance WIS
3. upgrade the mission system
4. make PI more like sim city
5. push to open up story lines for jove (possible WH expansion)
6. make FW include pirate missions like (kill so many people in system A)
7. make referendums for important CSM decisions… (if its real important we should all vote for it) this would be for major game changing things such as refocus and such
8. eliminate clone costs for players over 4 years old (to encourage pvp for old vets)
9. gethe fith subsystem for Tech III ships
10. kill all super caps (as in a real counter to them not this crap that I will only fly super caps now so give me back my sp cuss I cant use drones sh*t)
11. a way to integrate PI and ship crews and have an effect on your ships performance

Basically a CSM who represents the old vet casual pve/pvper

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.
Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#25 - 2012-02-08 16:07:18 UTC
The Mittani wrote:
i'm a little surprised to see 'i ragequit csm5 after being elected, resigned and deleted all my spacedudes, vote for me again i swear i won't quit midway through my term like sarah palin' as a platform

To be fair no where in the OP is there a promise not to quit midway through the term if elected.

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn
Largo Coronet
Perkone
Caldari State
#26 - 2012-02-08 21:51:25 UTC
I'm sorry, but I'm only voting for candidates that support a "Voit" option in the character creator. That's where the tatas are NBA regulation size.

This is my signature. There are many others like it, but this one is mine.

Someday, this signature may save my life.
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
#27 - 2012-02-09 07:05:28 UTC
Largo Coronet wrote:
I'm sorry, but I'm only voting for candidates that support a "Voit" option in the character creator. That's where the tatas are NBA regulation size.


I'm sorry I'm quite uneducated and have no clue as to what a "voit" or "tata" is?

www.shipsofeve.com
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#28 - 2012-02-09 07:13:23 UTC
Tata's are the things found on a woman's chest, they can be quite heavy, and sometimes cause them to drop out of a race or a job due to exhaustion. i.e see sara palin, t'amber

"voit" I am curios to that as well.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
ViperLok
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2012-02-09 21:57:25 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:
The Mittani wrote:
i'm a little surprised to see 'i ragequit csm5 after being elected, resigned and deleted all my spacedudes, vote for me again i swear i won't quit midway through my term like sarah palin' as a platform

To be fair no where in the OP is there a promise not to quit midway through the term if elected.


Now I know your strategy Lyris :D
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
#30 - 2012-02-12 04:47:03 UTC
Results as of 11:45 11/02/2012

Which of the following answers best describes how you feel about Ship Customisation?
  • I'd like to be able to customise my ship's visual appearance but not at the expense of server load (71.6%)
  • I'd like to be able to customise my ship's visual appearance and I don't care how its done or what it costs, aslong as it happens (15.9%)
  • I'm not interested in ship customisation but I don't mind if they introduced it to the game (8.7%)
  • I'm not interested in ship customisation, CCP's time would be best spent elsewhere. (3.8%)


Customisation Options
  • The colour options you can chose from to paint your ship should be restricted by the hulls class or race so that Eve's art integrity is left intact (54.8%)
  • There should be an unrestricted amount of colour options for repainting my ship(23.1%)
  • There should be an unrestricted amount of colour options for repainting my ship excluding colour reserved for t2 variants of that hull (16.3%)
  • Paint options should be restricted to pre-designed themes made by CCP staff Members (5.8%)

Customisation Availability
  • I should be able to customise any ship (81.3%)
  • Only T1 hulls should be able to have custom paintjobs (9.6%)
  • A limited amount of existing ships should be able to be customised (5.3%)
  • A new type or class of ship based off existing hulls should be created and only those can be customised (1.9%)
  • A new type or class of ship should be created and only they can be customised (1.9%)

Payment Methods
  • I should be able to pay for this service directly with isk (54.8%)
  • This service should not be restricted to a specific model (19.7%)
  • This service should use a mixed payment method (14.4%)
  • This service should cost Aurum only (9.6%)
  • This service should use a Plex payment model only (1.4%)

Ship Destruction
  • Ship destruction should completely destroy any custom designs applied to it (57.7%)
  • Ship destruction destroys the ship but not any custom designs applied to it, so they can be used on another ship later (42.3%)

Customisation and Design Rights
  • Everyone should have the same rights to designs and colouring options (53.8%)
  • Pilots, Corporations and Alliances should be able to buy the rights to a specific design with upkeep costs (46.2%)

Client Options
  • Pilots should be able to turn this feature off (60.6%)
  • Pilots should be able to turn off so me features, but it should still be obvious that a ship has been customised (26.1%)
  • Pilots should not able to turn this feature off (13.4%)

The Market
  • Customised ships should be able to be sold or traded (82.3%)
  • Customised ships should not be able to be sold or traded (17.7%)

Manufacturing

  • I should be able to customise my ship with new items that are tradable on the market, can be fit onto new slots on my ship, and created using normal manufacturing methods. (34.5%)
  • You should only be able to design a custom ship from within a specially designed menu (27.3%)
  • I don't know how the mechanics of this feature would work, I trust CCP to figure it out (22.3%)
  • I don't care how its done as long as I can customise my ship (15.8%)

www.shipsofeve.com
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#31 - 2012-02-15 20:36:44 UTC
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
#32 - 2012-02-15 22:21:55 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting


Hi Grumpy, presentally at work but when I return we can discuss this, Definately a topic of interest.

www.shipsofeve.com
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
#33 - 2012-02-16 06:05:12 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting


There have been so many good suggestions for Bounty Systems and still we've yet to see a viable solution implimented to both secure the system from abuse and to create a "proper" mini profession out of Bounty Hunting. Alot of CSMs candidates have supported various Bounty ideas but they're still sitting rotting in the to-do vault at a secret location in the CCP lair.

As a supporter of mini professions this topic interests me and I'm definately willing to support it again. Two interesting conversations with Dierdra Vaal and Evelgrivion who've both come up with similar ideas on Bounty Hunting last week reignited my hope that there is a solution - and Evel's idea from his blog follows:

Evelgrivion wrote:
Fixing the Bounty system
It occurred to me the other day that everything that is wrong with the bounty system can be expressed in a single sentence:

"Bounties don't work because the payouts are worth more than the clones."

Now that implants are included in pod-mails, the market value of a destroyed clone is public knowledge; this has created an opportunity to implement a new bounty system. As the nature of the current problem is that a friend or an alt can claim an outstanding bounty, the fix is actually relatively straightforward; change the mechanics of bounty payment to only supply a portion of the value of each clone and treat the total bounty on a pilot's head as a payout pool.

With a proportional payout pool, pilots will no longer be able to take a bounty for themselves without suffering more in losses than payouts. By supplying small payments rather than a lump sum, a new incentive is created to keep podding a given pilot as long as there's money in the bounty pool.

Voila! The eternally broken bounty system is fixed!


Combined with suggestions from posters like Malcanis and Lana Torrin (whos original thread alot of us supported during CSM4 and CSM5) we've got a pretty solid foundation for a decent system. As I'm not a professional bounty hunter nor have I spent much time in this profession (although I've been on the recieving end ) I must rely on others who do and I'm open to suggestions from those in the know aslong as they're relevant. While all these suggestions could be potential fixes to the current system theres possibly some room left for increasing the viability of this being a fulltime profession if a pilot so wished - some sort of non-isk but i have a big penis reward that can be shown off to all and sundry.

Do you have any suggestions you'd like to share?

www.shipsofeve.com
ThisIsntMyMain
Doomheim
#34 - 2012-02-16 06:08:43 UTC
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:

Once I've finished internalising a really complicated situation in my head


Hey Bro, Monique says you're dumb.
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#35 - 2012-02-16 06:20:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Grumpy Owly
ty for your responce regarding BH. Have posted your views in the linked thread.

T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:
Do you have any suggestions you'd like to share?


I originally posted a number of concerns about the complaicancy and lack of credibility to a responce to criminal behaviour and how it afforded a bias of care and afforded lack of risk and adaption by the criminal.

Whilst at the same time hoping to promote a missing element of the game that had been overlooked for sometime that could expand on gameplay and encourage more fun into EvE.

If anything to make the process more interactive and consequential with some validity.

This was as I was aware of numerous postings in the feature and ideas forum to the extent of repairing the BH process.

As a result Malcanis posted his thread during that dialouge and it seemed to represent my thoughts to a potential soultion. As such I was happy to use it as a basis of understanding rather than re-invent the wheel for the same purposes.

As such happy to generate further dialouge and refinement. But my goal is to afford awareness ultimatley to CCP to address what I feel is an issue that has been swept under the carpet for such a long time that people have become apathetic to it as an issue yet whilst still having a significant understanding that the current system is ineffective and exploitable.

Bounty Hunting - Soon (™): Retribution (Winter 2012)

It's just criminal - Smuggling
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
#36 - 2012-02-16 06:35:33 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
ty for your responce regarding BH. Have posted your views in the linked thread.

T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:
Do you have any suggestions you'd like to share?


I originally posted a number of concerns about the complaicancy and lack of credibility to a responce to criminal behaviour and how it afforded a bias of care and afforded lack of risk and adaption by the criminal.

Whilst at the same time hoping to promote a missing element of the game that had been overlooked for sometime that could expand on gameplay and encourage more fun into EvE.

If anything to make the process more interactive and consequential with some validity.

This was as I was aware of numerous postings in the feature and ideas forum to the extent of repairing the BH process.

As a result Malcanis posted his thread during that dialouge and it seemed to represent my thoughts to a potential soultion. As such I was happy to use it as a basis of understanding rather than re-invent the wheel for the same purposes.

As such happy to generate further dialouge and refinement. But my goal is to afford awareness ultimatley to CCP to address what I feel is an issue that has been swept under the carpet for such a long time that people have become apathetic to it as an issue yet whilst still having a significant understanding that the current system is ineffective and exploitable.


Would you like to write all my posts from now on? :) You have a particular style of writing that I find highly agreeable and makes me think of germans for some reason :| I do love germans.


www.shipsofeve.com
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#37 - 2012-02-16 06:46:31 UTC
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon wrote:
Would you like to write all my posts from now on? :) You have a particular style of writing that I find highly agreeable and makes me think of germans for some reason :| I do love germans.


I doubt you need a press secretary really. Though be interested in offers seeing as we are now talking about head hunting in more than one way. ;)

Can't really comment on your other associations unless you qualify them.

Bounty Hunting - Soon (™): Retribution (Winter 2012)

It's just criminal - Smuggling
Mintrolio
Doomheim
#38 - 2012-02-16 08:35:56 UTC
MeBiatch wrote:
yeah but you (The Mittani) have a goatee and look like some goof ball from the outsiders movie...Blink

too bad all the good goon leaders work for CCP now...


http://wp.me/P2bQOG-1f

JUST LEAFIGN THESE HEAR.

MINTROLIO FUR CSM7
T'amber Anomandari Demaleon
#39 - 2012-02-16 20:57:45 UTC
Mintrolio wrote:
MeBiatch wrote:
yeah but you (The Mittani) have a goatee and look like some goof ball from the outsiders movie...Blink

too bad all the good goon leaders work for CCP now...


http://wp.me/P2bQOG-1f

JUST LEAFIGN THESE HEAR.


/o\

www.shipsofeve.com
Sverige Pahis
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#40 - 2012-02-16 22:24:37 UTC
I'll vote for you if you can arrange this tasty http://images.cdn1.eveonline.com/Character/91544161_512.jpg character to spend the evening with me.