Jita Park Speakers Corner

Posting in the hope for a candidacy view on the following: Bounty Hunting

A year ago, the idea of a Goon having a place on the CSM with any kind of real power in affecting the direction of the game was a thought that terrified me, but after seeing the things you achieved as chairman of the CSM in the past year, I would not have the slightest bit of concern in voting for your re-election to the CSM and for a second term as chairman.

You have my vote, now just to decide who gets my other (we still get 2 right.)

you're who????

Irrelevant

Back to EVE!

Your sig says:

"All griefers are lazy cowards with the current climate of broken player policing systems."

Get out of my thread.

I guess then this implies I'm not allowed a personal view on the subject?

Can I similarly then simply assume you support griefing? Largely a rhetorical question given your stance on the game.

Please don't feel compelled to repsond however, I understand your denial of any viewpoint that doesn't support your own is of no relevance or concern to you or your campaign interests.

As a champion of "griefers" the very fact that you have not bothered to answer since you are scared by a players stance simply supports my signatures comment.

Its who he is, and what he does, like it or leave it. I'd much rather call him a **** than give him my vote, its up to the players to see Mittens for what he is and whats really on his agenda, and no, it is not for the good of the players but for his alliance. He is corrupt, cares very little for you or I, or the new player. He cares only about getting his way by proposing changes in the game that benefits only him and his alliance/coalition.

Tell me how much you care about the new player, akelorian of finfleet

You get what you get from me. I've been entirely consistent in fighting for issues that are core to my constituents over the past year, and unlike any CSM in memory I've brought results. Someone who whines about 'griefers' isn't going to vote for me anyway.

It's unlikely that my views on nullsec priorities will do an abrupt about-face in the middle of CSM7.

There's an amusing misconception among some about the CSM elections. If I, a flaming leftie, go visit a bible-banging conservative representative who happens to have won my district, he's not going to hear my views on 'maybe we should stop bombing people all the time', he's going to laugh me out of the office. I don't represent consensual PvP, I don't represent people who are afraid of griefers, and I certainly don't represent those obsessed with e-honour.

Deal with it. vOv

The funny thing is that there's basically no difference in policy between GSF and Finfleet on null issues, unless it's titan gun tracking or if Raiden is Literally The Only Alliance Who Likes Tech The Way It Is.

Anyway, I just found out that the angry NPC alt who hates griefers ran, not walked, to the ~fire mttens~ thread to write a wall of text about how I am a 'punk' because I didn't represent his anti-griefing views.

'heh'

I have you have my support but....

be careful of making eve the one way to play only.
the reworking of the Drone lands just so they are the same as all other region. As I have been told it is worthless space but the CSM wants to Nerf it making it like every other region.


I WANT MORE NON CONSENSUAL PVP BUT ALSO MORE
I am a Carebare at heart to increase my type op player:
Ie i believe there should be an added option of Consensual PVP like In game mechanic for fight simulators, or in game tournament mechanic to automate something similar to our Alliance tournaments.

But Don't remove the current non consensual PVP
Suicide Ganking, wardecs, etc.... I mine in Null sec, it is exciting to be the mouse in a house of cats
If you are a smart mouse you begin to learn ways to protect your self, in PVP servers I can't play because I can't make my self safe.

Though EVE needs to expanded Non Consensual PVP so the suicide gangker can't hide behind concord.
Ie Goon ganks a Miner, who won't have any skill to fight back, in a throw away ship. Then gets into his expensive ship to fly around with little risk of retaliation. Care Bears should have the right to transfer "or sell" Their kill rights" to another. Now we have true non Consensual PVP as Care Bears are given the tools to fight back.

-->I like my pants but I don't need more , I want the opportunity to interact with other avatars even with limited mechanics.
Role Playing.
-->I want more marketing control, I want to open shop to sell to my choice of customers, giving me more control on who gets my goods, not some red buying my stock of damage controls, Even if it is off a tab in the Hanger UI
I want more ships
--> I want t3 Frigate, but I also want to have some new Industry ships or more industrial options for current combat ships.
I love being hunted

In Summary.
Eve is more than just SHIP PVP.
-Market PVP, Asset Denial, Politics. Roleplaying, Inflated Egoes this is what makes eve great!!

so Don't be scraping what pants I got. Though I don't need more
Don't be taking the sand our of my Sand box, put more in it!