Jita Park Speakers Corner

My Proposal: As a member of the CSM it will be my primary goal to replace the current antiquated representational CSM with a more modern direct Democratic one.

This system would allow members to more directly communicate with the developers (The reason the council was created). This system would be remarkably easy to implement for the company and I will illustrate how it would work with the VERY limited tools available to my candidacy.

Current Proposal: Please give a “like” for your choice

Link 1: Eliminate area effect weapons in high and low security space, i.e. smart bombs, as is already the case with regular bombs or...... (Link to choice 2)

Link 2: Keep current system of area effect weapons in high and low security space or.... (Link to choice 1)

For implementing this system we could use these current threads, as I plan to do when elected, or, preferably, have a way of voting in game . Now their are flaws to this system but non that couldn’t be readily addressed with a little bit of programing (And until it was implimented I have ad hoc solutions for my own term in office).

By using this more modern method we would be able to exploit the advantages of group input far more readily then the current antiquated one. Until this system was put into place my seat on the CSM would give those who desire this more modern form of governance an opportunity to actually have such a system while either A) CCP works on implementing a better version or B) Give those wanting the more modern system an opportunity to use direct Democracy (Albeit on a smaller scale.) while slowly convincing others of the drawbacks of the old one. After all, when was the last time a CSM "representative" asked for your input?

So to sum things up: A thumbs up for this thread is literally a vote for direct Democracy. Thank you for your time and I hope I can count on your support .

Yeah more of an Iphone guy, too bad the goons blew up Steve Jobs retriever in the ice field. (also ice mining works really well with a one button mouse)

As a new miner I support this vague and baseless platform and will give you my vote as I feel you're addressing my interests specifically, perhaps even at the expense of other more pressing issues and without regard to game mechanics.

+1 m8 07 fly safe

That's possibly the whiniest, weakest, most pathetic political reply I have ever seen. You are AHARM for goodness sake not "If you play in my playground I'm going to sit here and sulk" Goons. Pathetic but now for the OP ...........

Actually, considering the degree to which votes are going to be split, Two step has a very valid point and it's an entirely reasonable question to ask. But don't let that stop you from publicly demonstrating your political acumen, such as it is.

Now excuse me, I have some sitting and sulking to do.

Congratulations you just managed to choose to politically represent the EvE equivalent of Israel and Palestine. One doesn't like, doesn't represent and has nothing at all to do with the other in any way shape or form.




Last time I checked AHARM had a representative, in fact he is the whiny post above my first. As far as high sec mining goes it's all about experience. You have any? You lost a Retriever in Friggi once but then it looks like you converted to losing your industrials in WH's. More curious none of them are the same WH so I don't see any experience living in either situation.

Who is our? Who is we? Are you already on the CSM as an alt or are you about to say something on behalf of the CSM before actually being on it?

HE DID!! He went ahead and completed the manifesto for everyone on the CSM. Lovely.


You meant ensure right, please tell me ensure, you're not really going to bring insurance to your local WH POCO are you? New miner ganks are unavoidable, a necessity to enhance what is the EvE learning curve and totally impossible to monitor save 2 options a) Make a mining barge owned by a player under 9 months old completely invulnerable or b) Make it an RL punishable offence to shoot any miner in a mining ship or industrial. Which is your play?
Sorry were you involved in the removal of that "moral hazzard" (thanks for pointing out the industry insider term for us plebs. The masses truly love a pious politician) because, if you were, then link that stuff. We want to see you for who you are! Post your countless threads started by you, give us examples of your courage in the face off CCP adversity. Oh wait, I just searched your name, there are two. One about you having a WH wet dream in Sell Orders And one about you listing low sec pirate gate camps and having others report them to you with the promise of hot drops (Neither of which are appealing to the demographics you say you are going to stand for). Link << Where you also list your "Combat main" Dabasir.
Let's draw a conclusion just from this thread alone. You publicly advertised a Low Sec Gate Camp service to low sec pirates to the entire eve community so whatever you drop on them can be overwhelmed by them, their friends, anyone wanting to have a big fight, large alliances and anyone else wanting to whore on you, your corp and your alliance's deaths and you want us to vote for you???
Be a good lad and move along son. Leave the politics to the ones who think they are grown ups.

Wouldn't it be more constructive to showcase the reason why we should vote for you in stead of him. While I can see your point I'd much rather vote for a candidate that shows he is superior in substance and ideas then claim the other guy is inferior voter base excludes him from running on a platform that is similar to your own.

Just remember Mr. Phoneman... When your campaign is pointed, warp stabs won't save it.

* adds another contact to the J-man alt list.

I too would like to know what you could bring to the table above and beyond what two step has done and undoubtedly will do if he's re-elected. How will you differ, what do you have in common (other than both having silly names)?