These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Questions about macroeconomics since the QEN

Author
CaldariLegion
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-02-12 15:03:22 UTC
Hi there,

for a while I have been watching the economy of EVE online. The different QENs have been very useful, that havn't been appearing anymore. Our Dr.EyjoG made his last Devblogentry on the 30th of August 2011.
One thing that interests me a lot, is what data is openly accesable and what isn't.
To me it seems that CCP releases small amounts of data, but very little on an up to date base.
Pricestability is one of my main interests, so 2 areas interest me the most.

1. Gross domestic product (GDP or GUP)

You can find small bits of information on this topic. These bits are all over the Internet and its very hard to understand what measurement method was used. Do you know places where I can find reliable data, that are up to date and transparent? Or at least a good alternative?
One goal is the BIP-Deflator, as an inflation indicator.

2. the different price indices (MPI, PPPI, SPPI, esp. the CPI)

These were an important part of the QENs. But even back then the origin were not made transparent. As an example in the CPI there is talk of "over 4000 individual items", but no word of what they are.
There are 2 different sides when it comes to Market Data (f.e. eve-markets.net, eve-central.com, jitonomic.com, evemarketeer.com) but they usually only reference one product - so microeconomics instead of macroeconomics is in the focus. Do you know any source where I can get reliable macroeconomic data?

sincerly CaldariLegion
Tekota
The Freighter Factory
#2 - 2012-02-12 15:42:12 UTC
Oddly enough I only commented on the lack of this info this morning.

Market indices have been on again / off again updated monthy since June 2011 but it seems these too are fading into unloved territory.

The only further info I am aware of is that the CPI index is purported not to include the price of PLEX, which would make sense given that the price of that is not entirely governed by the in game economy.
CaldariLegion
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#3 - 2012-02-12 17:27:35 UTC
Thanks for your answer Tekota.
I really like to know whats your intention respectively the market data is.
And did you ever find more precise data as the ones i already mentioned?
Do you think it's reasonable to send a mail to CCP or Dr. Ey regarding this topic?

sincerly CaldariLegion
Callean Drevus
Perkone
Caldari State
#4 - 2012-02-12 23:12:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Callean Drevus
Because I cannot resist trying it out when I see these kinds of posts:

Consumer Price Index
Mineral Price Index

Feedback is very welcome!

UPDATE: Feedback any other than that the Consumer Price Index is slow. It is, and it will not change until I start caching it. Two years of history for all market items takes a while to process Blink of course, this will have to be narrowed down, since some items are not relevant. Any ideas?

Developer/Creator of EVE Marketeer

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#5 - 2012-02-12 23:56:35 UTC
Callean I have a curious index in my mind: the ISKUSD currency pair (similar to Forex).

Basically it is simple: it's calculated by dividing 1 PLEX ISK value by the RL cost in dollars to purchase said PLEX, day by day, for the period examined.

I.e. if 1 PLEX = 500M ISK and buying 1 PLEX = 19 USD (*) then 1 USD = 26.3158M

(*) From my country I only see the cost = 19 euros so I am not sure.
The returned index would be in millions, with 4 decimal digits (to be standard).


This would show the evolution of ISK vs dollars over time and would show the decrease in purchasing value of ISK vs dollar.

It would be even nicer if that index was displayed like a regular item, including graphs, candle bars etc.
CaldariLegion
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#6 - 2012-02-13 04:29:53 UTC
Thanks to you both Vaerah Vahrokha and Callean Drevus.

But my old problem are still inherit inside these indices. Although i have now a span of 2 years (yay~) its Y-coordinate isn't labeled. But more important is: On which data relies this index? As you can see, we really lack of reliable data.

And the ISKUSD model is nice, but it won't help me in my situation. I want to gather informations related to the price level stability.

Thats why i asked if there are real reliable data sources with enough informations to call it scientific. It just seems that everybody loves graphs but nobody askes how they are build.

How's about the CCP Database? I'm not so used in Mysql so i weren't able to open it. Are there informations regarding macroeconomics?
Callean Drevus
Perkone
Caldari State
#7 - 2012-02-13 06:58:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Callean Drevus
The Y coordinate isn't labeled because it is meaningless. It's only there to compare the different levels.

These indices are based on the most accurate data we can easily obtain: The ingame market history data. Specifically the average values, as I think those are the best representation of the overal price.

I left out the last 14 days as those always seem to be a bit unstable due to CCP still modifying the data it seems.

At this moment, this is probably the most scientific approximation for generating these kinds of graphs.


@Vaerah: Yes, a good idea. Will be just graph at first, but giving the same stats as an item would be interesting.

Developer/Creator of EVE Marketeer

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#8 - 2012-02-13 08:22:47 UTC
Callean Drevus wrote:


@Vaerah: Yes, a good idea. Will be just graph at first, but giving the same stats as an item would be interesting.


You and your awesome website be blessed!

CCP should now hire you and have you implement your work in the official EvE.
Because EvE financial facilities are years behind the times and what you have done and alone, is what CCP should have done thru the years.

I really hope you'll keep playing the game and keep your website alive, it's really *that* good.


CaldariLegion wrote:
Thanks to you both Vaerah Vahrokha and Callean Drevus.

But my old problem are still inherit inside these indices. Although i have now a span of 2 years (yay~) its Y-coordinate isn't labeled. But more important is: On which data relies this index? As you can see, we really lack of reliable data.

And the ISKUSD model is nice, but it won't help me in my situation. I want to gather informations related to the price level stability.

Thats why i asked if there are real reliable data sources with enough informations to call it scientific. It just seems that everybody loves graphs but nobody askes how they are build.

How's about the CCP Database? I'm not so used in Mysql so i weren't able to open it. Are there informations regarding macroeconomics?


You have to ask yourself "why did CCP stop publishing the QEN and the indices"?

And "why do I would need to see those indices"? "Why do they have to be reliable"?
"Why CCP would be interested at giving me reliable data?" (this partially answers the question above).

Kandreath
De Re Metallica
#9 - 2012-02-13 09:19:38 UTC
I've been curious too. No QEN but promise of smaller data packets more often, then more nothing.

I am willing to forgive a slip on the lead up to Crucible as I'm sure the good Dr. was analysing his @ss off with the changes. However, that's over.... it just seems he's forgotten.

I appreciate the efforts of those above trying to get this data together using uploaded data, I will be reviewing it too.

I do think the fact the market is such an integral part of the game mechanic, it should be afforded enough respect and resource to publish the QEN or the smaller monthly historical data and some comments on indices and curios only visible to those with access to the full data set.

To be quite frank, my patience is starting to fray with the lack of love us marketeers are getting.
Buruk Utama
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#10 - 2012-02-13 09:49:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Buruk Utama
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Callean I have a curious index in my mind: the ISKUSD currency pair (similar to Forex).

Basically it is simple: it's calculated by dividing 1 PLEX ISK value by the RL cost in dollars to purchase said PLEX, day by day, for the period examined.

I.e. if 1 PLEX = 500M ISK and buying 1 PLEX = 19 USD (*) then 1 USD = 26.3158M

(*) From my country I only see the cost = 19 euros so I am not sure.
The returned index would be in millions, with 4 decimal digits (to be standard).


This would show the evolution of ISK vs dollars over time and would show the decrease in purchasing value of ISK vs dollar.

It would be even nicer if that index was displayed like a regular item, including graphs, candle bars etc.



A few issues to consider:

PLEX can have varying prices depending on how they are purchased. If someone is really stupid enough to buy them directly from CCP and buy less than the 6 bulk, then the PLEX price will cost over $17.495/PLEX up to $19.95/PLEX. If they purchase the 6 bulk+ then the price is $17.495 unless CCP puts on a promotion to lower it as currently all bulk purchases equal $17.495/PLEX (I do see 10bulk on sale for $14.999/PLEX). If PLEX is purchased via GTC conversion then the price is $17.495 as you get 2 PLEX. So do you just go with $17.495 PLEX or assume people are really stupid and will only buy one here and there to convert?

edit: for Euro do you get charged VAT in the transaction? If so, will the VAT cost be included in the currency swap?

For the second currency in the pairing how do you determine its value and from which trade hub? High sec PLEX are worth X; low sec PLEX Y, null sec Z. Intra-alliance PLEX have another price, including free. I know one method is to determine volume by hub and average out accordingly. Though I would like to hear your thoughts as it's an interesting subject to determine exactly how much ISK a PLEX is truly worth.

Would be very interesting to see CCP numbers on how many customers they intentionally overcharge with the single/double PLEX purchases.

Edit: once the above is worked out then you can compare the Eur/Usd value and determine which currency is better to purchase PELX or which one CCP is favoring.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#11 - 2012-02-13 11:02:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Buruk Utama wrote:

A few issues to consider:

PLEX can have varying prices depending on how they are purchased. If someone is really stupid enough to buy them directly from CCP and buy less than the 6 bulk, then the PLEX price will cost over $17.495/PLEX up to $19.95/PLEX. If they purchase the 6 bulk+ then the price is $17.495 unless CCP puts on a promotion to lower it as currently all bulk purchases equal $17.495/PLEX (I do see 10bulk on sale for $14.999/PLEX). If PLEX is purchased via GTC conversion then the price is $17.495 as you get 2 PLEX. So do you just go with $17.495 PLEX or assume people are really stupid and will only buy one here and there to convert?

edit: for Euro do you get charged VAT in the transaction? If so, will the VAT cost be included in the currency swap?


The choice of which PLEX bundle is o(ISK / USD) enough to make it unimportant for a price analysis.

If PLEX = 500M and you pay $19.95 then you'd get 25.0626M ISK per dollar.
If PLEX = 500M and you pay $17.495 then you'd get 28.5795M ISK per dollar.

While a 13% variation is tangible it does not invalidate the one relevant trading information about ISKUSD going up or down.
It's just a fixed a coefficient, Callean could just put an edit box where you put the dollars you spent and the resulting graph would not change a bit, except for a parametric offset.
The choice of single PLEX is because it's the most available, "first pick", a term of comparison.

Second thing, Euro is bad for this kind of analysis because Euro volatility is up to 200+ pips a day and currently being manipulated. Plus Euro players have each of theirs countries doing WTF they want about VAT and whatever stupid other additional economy gimping initiatives they take. USD varies less and has less socialistic political garbage attached into it so it's a better term of comparison.


Buruk Utama wrote:

For the second currency in the pairing how do you determine its value and from which trade hub? High sec PLEX are worth X; low sec PLEX Y, null sec Z. Intra-alliance PLEX have another price, including free. I know one method is to determine volume by hub and average out accordingly. Though I would like to hear your thoughts as it's an interesting subject to determine exactly how much ISK a PLEX is truly worth.

Would be very interesting to see CCP numbers on how many customers they intentionally overcharge with the single/double PLEX purchases.

Edit: once the above is worked out then you can compare the Eur/Usd value and determine which currency is better to purchase PELX or which one CCP is favoring.


Once again, you want simplicity for these things.
In EvE it means Jita price, period.

In RL they chose London to fix prices on certain commodities, we see 2 (and not 5-10) listings for crude oil and so on.

Simplicity gives market analysis that works. Obfuscating price with complex variables creates unreliable analysis.

I.e. how much does low sec PLEX market actually affect "global price"? Who is the authority (since CCP won't do it) to exactly measure the effective traded volumes and thus how much to weigh low sec PLEX price vs Jita price?

In the end, once again, what we need is a tool to work with. It's not important whether we see 500M or 495 or 510M a plex but the fact that we reached a range market with double top.

The exact statistics are nice of course but they should not affect a currency pair. They would be workable with a specific for those who are interested in a certain niche. I.e. given parameter 1 = PLEX cost = 17.495 and area = low sec => create your analysis for that so you have it exact.
All the others will just see the super standard Jita PLEX price vs super standard 1 PLEX dollar value and can perform informed analysis that will cover what's needed: to buy low and sell high.
TheSmokingHertog
Julia's Interstellar Trade Emperium
#12 - 2012-02-13 11:42:36 UTC
As said by "Vaerah Vahrokha" the comparison of the "first pick" is enough for the purpose of the made graph at that point.

Then the EUR / USD price, I would say that the grapic result diffences between those 2 would be neglectable, including VAT and currency changes. Besides that I assume economic players will have enough knowledge based on an USD / ISK graph to approximate what that means on an EUR / ISK scale, as seen being a Europe based player.

"Dogma is kind of like quantum physics, observing the dogma state will change it." ~ CCP Prism X

"Schrödinger's Missile. I dig it." ~ Makari Aeron

-= "Brain in a Box on Singularity" - April 2015 =-

Kandreath
De Re Metallica
#13 - 2012-02-14 09:22:17 UTC
TheSmokingHertog wrote:
As said by "Vaerah Vahrokha" the comparison of the "first pick" is enough for the purpose of the made graph at that point.

Then the EUR / USD price, I would say that the grapic result diffences between those 2 would be neglectable, including VAT and currency changes. Besides that I assume economic players will have enough knowledge based on an USD / ISK graph to approximate what that means on an EUR / ISK scale, as seen being a Europe based player.


What about an aggregated currency based on the mean price of both USD/EUR weighted by the relative number of subscribers from each region....or is it getting silly now?
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#14 - 2012-02-14 09:39:37 UTC
Kandreath wrote:
TheSmokingHertog wrote:
As said by "Vaerah Vahrokha" the comparison of the "first pick" is enough for the purpose of the made graph at that point.

Then the EUR / USD price, I would say that the grapic result diffences between those 2 would be neglectable, including VAT and currency changes. Besides that I assume economic players will have enough knowledge based on an USD / ISK graph to approximate what that means on an EUR / ISK scale, as seen being a Europe based player.


What about an aggregated currency based on the mean price of both USD/EUR weighted by the relative number of subscribers from each region....or is it getting silly now?


Ok let's split the topic in the 2 halves it consists of.

One half wants "pretty indices" because they are curious, they want to steer their wholesale manufacturing into the promising niches, because they heard that pro-economists use indices even to cure headache. I.e. several different purposes for them.

One half wants precise market data because they want to pinpoint certain markets, because they want to read price evolution and analyze the single markets changes in supply and demand.


Now, the first half will go at great lengths to produce the "fairest index" that covers all the possible situations while the latter want a simple, unequivocable, trader quality market tool.

The ISKUSD pair is the latter kind. No frills, not fair, not all encompassing but gives out PRICE for ONE market and in THE place where most traders make their living. Anything beyond that, will take precise and unequivocable price action out of the data and thus invalidates the whole analysis.
Scrapyard Bob
EVE University
Ivy League
#15 - 2012-02-14 11:22:31 UTC
Working without caffeine yet this morning, but:

Using the market history data, would it be useful to graph out the total ISK value traded in Jita each day and see that as a standard "how healthy is the economy?" chart?

Maybe with a 2nd version that is based off of the (4) main market hubs (in total) and a 3rd based off of all empire regions (but not sure that there's enough good data for all empire regions to make this useful).

(I'm still curious how the various market regions stack up against each other on a regional basis, such as which are the top 10 regions for traded ISK value. And also which are the top 10 systems in terms of traded ISK value per day/week.)