These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

RE-ELECT DARIUS III FOR CSM 7

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Karadion
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#41 - 2012-02-13 14:32:14 UTC
Cyzlaki wrote:
Fair Darius III for CSM.

Don't hate him cuz you aint him. Keep doing you Darius! You'll make a great CSM!

That implies he never was a CSM before. But when your CSM guy was absent for pretty much most of the CSM meetings, how does that make him so great? Great that he takes up a spot and doesn't do his job?
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#42 - 2012-02-13 14:33:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Courthouse
Two step wrote:
Darius III wrote:

Your voice is muffled when you speak from the end of Mittanis digestive tract. Because I don't feel the need to be part of your Polly Pretty Pants Tea Party in Skype doent mean I didn't participate. Coming from a guy whose campaign focus was on the fact the he lived in a wormhole I take your tears as a sure sign I am doing things right. As you are one of the herd blindly following Mittani's every suggestion, I have to ask-did he ask you to post here? thanks for your interest in my campaign-D3


Lots of work get s done on Skype. You don't participate.

I'm not sure what my campaign focus has to do with you not doing work. Can you explain the relationship?

Nobody asked me to post here. I posted here because I don't want people to think that Vile rat has some problem with you, and because you running on your so called accomplishments on CSM 6 is laughable.


https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=798131#post798131

ruh roh raggy!

edit: heh, I'll just quote it here too:

Quote:
Seleene wrote:
Doctor Eezee wrote:
Hey Seleene,

could you comment on THIS post in the Darius III campaign thread?
Vile Rat and Two Step claim that Darius did pretty much nothing while he was in the CSM. D3 then argues that they just say that because they are in love with Mittens.

Since there are no official records of what each member of the CSM did during their time in office, it would be helpful to hear the opinions of some of the other CSM members.


Vile isn't even running and, Goon or not, is one if the most stand up guys I've ever dealt with in or out of game. Two Step's work on the CSM was exemplary. D3 can't even stand in thier shadow. Take them at thier word and add mine to theirs.
Doctor Eezee
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#43 - 2012-02-13 14:33:53 UTC
I asked some of the other current CSM members what they think about your activity during CSM6.

Seleene said:

Seleene wrote:


Vile isn't even running and, Goon or not, is one if the most stand up guys I've ever dealt with in or out of game. Two Step's work on the CSM was exemplary. D3 can't even stand in thier shadow. Take them at thier word and add mine to theirs.



So THREE members of the current Council think you did a subpar job. Maybe you should reevalutate your decision to run again. I'll post other opinions as they come in.

"My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov
2bhammered
Cyberpunk 2077
#44 - 2012-02-13 14:37:38 UTC
Interesting development, but I will support whomever will advocate making low-sec as viable as other parts of EVE.

Now is there one candidate out there willing to push for the removal of local chat?? As in displaying all who are in system. If there is they got my support*
Doctor Eezee
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#45 - 2012-02-13 14:41:24 UTC
2bhammered wrote:
Interesting development, but I will support whomever will advocate making low-sec as viable as other parts of EVE.

Now is there one candidate out there willing to push for the removal of local chat?? As in displaying all who are in system. If there is they got my support*


While I don't think there is a candidate who wants to remove of local outright, Elise Randolph has some ideas to mitigate the problem.

"My rule is: If you meet the weakest vessel, attack; if it is a vessel equal to yours, attack; and if it is stronger than yours, also attack..." - Admiral Stepan O. Makarov
2bhammered
Cyberpunk 2077
#46 - 2012-02-13 14:49:53 UTC  |  Edited by: 2bhammered
Doctor Eezee wrote:
2bhammered wrote:
Interesting development, but I will support whomever will advocate making low-sec as viable as other parts of EVE.

Now is there one candidate out there willing to push for the removal of local chat?? As in displaying all who are in system. If there is they got my support*


While I don't think there is a candidate who wants to remove of local outright, Elise Randolph has some ideas to mitigate the problem.



Somewhat close to where I stand but 15-30 sec delay for showing up in local is not near good enough. It needs to go away and I have given it considerable thought over many years on this and every time I end up with the conclusion that more is gained by removing it than lost. Having local the way it is today would be as if WoW PVP server would have it or other MMOs. It is kinda funny that EVE Online, the pvp game and the game known for hardcore gaming has a tool anyone can use without penalty to be able to have more safety than in WoW on a PVP realm.

Can I accept perhaps and allow alliances to have a local working the way it does today if in a system where they have sovereignty, yes. Consider it a perk and reward for taking and defending it. Empire has no reason for it, even during war between corps and alliances. In many ways, the strongest and griefers benefit more from having local than the little guy.
Darius III
Interstellar eXodus
The Initiative.
#47 - 2012-02-13 14:50:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Darius III
If this thread is too much to read, I'll simplify it a bit for you.

I posted that I would be running for CSM, and Test and Goons are butthurt and trying to derail it. Also they mad because no one broke NDA. Then Test/Goons called a CTA to get their forum warriors to lie. Pretty lulsy affair really.

Hmmm
knobber Jobbler
State War Academy
Caldari State
#48 - 2012-02-13 14:51:16 UTC
2bhammered wrote:
Interesting development, but I will support whomever will advocate making low-sec as viable as other parts of EVE.

Now is there one candidate out there willing to push for the removal of local chat?? As in displaying all who are in system. If there is they got my support*


There is also a guy from NOIR running, who's wanting to improve small gang PVP etc. He might be more up your street.
2bhammered
Cyberpunk 2077
#49 - 2012-02-13 14:53:37 UTC
knobber Jobbler wrote:
2bhammered wrote:
Interesting development, but I will support whomever will advocate making low-sec as viable as other parts of EVE.

Now is there one candidate out there willing to push for the removal of local chat?? As in displaying all who are in system. If there is they got my support*


There is also a guy from NOIR running, who's wanting to improve small gang PVP etc. He might be more up your street.



I don't know NOIR, have a link to the guys thread?
Rocketman2
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#50 - 2012-02-13 14:58:21 UTC
2bhammered
Cyberpunk 2077
#51 - 2012-02-13 14:58:29 UTC  |  Edited by: 2bhammered
Courthouse wrote:
2bhammered wrote:
Not if we all get the info, or do you think the CSMs don't tell their friends within corp/alliance over TS etc? RIGHT!Roll


Neither The Mittani or Vile Rat leaked NDA protected information in even private channels that I'm in with them. In fact more often than not they refused to speak even broadly on a topic for fear that it would approach NDA limits too closely.


I'll believe it when I see a change in fleet doctrine that would affect those alliances adversely Roll
Vile rat
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#52 - 2012-02-13 15:02:43 UTC
2bhammered wrote:

I'll believe it when I see a change in fleet doctrine that would affect those alliances adversely Roll


Man I'd love to see somebody break our fleet doctrine which is "a bunch of one kind of ship mostly". I totally agree that this is an unhealthy direction eve took a long time ago but it's going to take redesigning the combat engine for this to really be fixed properly.
Boris Lachenkov
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#53 - 2012-02-13 15:04:23 UTC
We have a CTA to post on here?

Must've missed it, can you direct me to it so I can get my orders D3?
Blawrf McTaggart
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#54 - 2012-02-13 15:07:51 UTC
~pretty lulsy affair~
2bhammered
Cyberpunk 2077
#55 - 2012-02-13 15:11:24 UTC  |  Edited by: 2bhammered
Vile rat wrote:
2bhammered wrote:

I'll believe it when I see a change in fleet doctrine that would affect those alliances adversely Roll


Man I'd love to see somebody break our fleet doctrine which is "a bunch of one kind of ship mostly". I totally agree that this is an unhealthy direction eve took a long time ago but it's going to take redesigning the combat engine for this to really be fixed properly.



It will? Sure? I mean balancing would help a lot. But maybe you are right.

Question is, who is willing to push for that change after having thousands of people train for a specific ship and fit just in order to be most effective and qualify for ship replacement program and entry to fleet.

I have a hard time believing any alliance leader would dare doing that. Or if he would that one would not prepare his alliance for that change in any way he can get away with.

But I digress, I want a candidate who wants to make low-sec more viable than empire and yet different than 0.0 but worth it as"endgame" (for lack of a better word, since this is EVE.)

And for the love of god, is there no candidate who realize and wants local removed and fracking gone already? Or did the rest of my lobby group leave years ago.
2bhammered
Cyberpunk 2077
#56 - 2012-02-13 15:17:17 UTC
Pirating use to mean something and it was both fun and viable. It also made game more balanced and diverse.
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#57 - 2012-02-13 15:19:03 UTC
2bhammered wrote:
Question is, who is willing to push for that change after having thousands of people train for a specific ship and fit just in order to be most effective and qualify for ship replacement program and entry to fleet.

I have a hard time believing any alliance leader would dare doing that. Or if he would that one would not prepare his alliance for that change in any way he can get away with.


We did that. If you look at our Delve-era videos and propaganda, we were using Apocs almost exclusively. Now we use Maelstroms and Drakes. Before both of those we favored Rokhs/Megathrons. Alliances adapt.

Quote:
But I digress, I want a candidate who wants to make low-sec more viable than empire and yet different than 0.0 but worth it as"endgame" (for lack of a better word, since this is EVE.)

And for the love of god, is there no candidate who realize and wants local removed and fracking gone already? Or did the rest of my lobby group leave years ago.


Local is gone in wormholes. There's also a lot of non-consentual PVP that goes on there. It may be a better fit for you than lowsec.

That said, mittens did pitch an idea for a lowsec revamp a few years ago at EVE Vegas. He wrote about it in one of his early blogs: http://www.tentonhammer.com/node/67950/page/3
Unforgiven Storm
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
#58 - 2012-02-13 15:24:26 UTC
** popcorn**

Please post more

Unforgiven Storm for CSM 9, 10, 11, 12 and 13. (If I don't get in in the next 5 years I will quit trying) :-)
2bhammered
Cyberpunk 2077
#59 - 2012-02-13 15:29:11 UTC
Courthouse wrote:
2bhammered wrote:
Question is, who is willing to push for that change after having thousands of people train for a specific ship and fit just in order to be most effective and qualify for ship replacement program and entry to fleet.

I have a hard time believing any alliance leader would dare doing that. Or if he would that one would not prepare his alliance for that change in any way he can get away with.


We did that. If you look at our Delve-era videos and propaganda, we were using Apocs almost exclusively. Now we use Maelstroms and Drakes. Before both of those we favored Rokhs/Megathrons. Alliances adapt.

Quote:
But I digress, I want a candidate who wants to make low-sec more viable than empire and yet different than 0.0 but worth it as"endgame" (for lack of a better word, since this is EVE.)

And for the love of god, is there no candidate who realize and wants local removed and fracking gone already? Or did the rest of my lobby group leave years ago.


Local is gone in wormholes. There's also a lot of non-consentual PVP that goes on there. It may be a better fit for you than lowsec.

That said, mittens did pitch an idea for a lowsec revamp a few years ago at EVE Vegas. He wrote about it in one of his early blogs: http://www.tentonhammer.com/node/67950/page/3



Ok, fair enough on first reply. I was not aware of that and credit is due when deserved so, respect! Big smile

As for the second part, why was it dropped and let go? 5 years ago I was part of a lobby fighting for it, we got some support even had a delay for awhile if I remember right, then it was over, it was not removed in the end, I and others quit, played other games, here I am and it is still in-game... sad.

Wormhole, weeee, if anything that should now be the model for the rest of the game. Instead of some thing on the side.
Walter Stine
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#60 - 2012-02-13 15:34:56 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Phantom
Hey Darius the Third. You seem to constantly be missing the point. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt by believing it's not out of willful ignorance. Let me break it down for you.

Vile Rat and Two Step aren't attacking you about the NDA. They aren't attacking your alliance.

They are attacking you because you're negligent.