These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

RE-ELECT DARIUS III FOR CSM 7

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Darius III
Interstellar eXodus
The Initiative.
#21 - 2012-02-13 13:56:53 UTC
Two step wrote:


This man speaks truth.


Your voice is muffled when you speak from the end of Mittanis digestive tract. Because I don't feel the need to be part of your Polly Pretty Pants Tea Party in Skype doent mean I didn't participate. Coming from a guy whose campaign focus was on the fact the he lived in a wormhole I take your tears as a sure sign I am doing things right. As you are one of the herd blindly following Mittani's every suggestion, I have to ask-did he ask you to post here? thanks for your interest in my campaign-D3

Hmmm
Waveism
Karkand Kampa
#22 - 2012-02-13 13:57:45 UTC
+1 A fair and excellent candidate.
Vile rat
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#23 - 2012-02-13 13:58:54 UTC
Cyzlaki wrote:
You can't have a D3 thread without a few fireworks. It seems current CSM members are intent on slandering Fair Darius' campaign early. Let me just say this reeks of petty jealousy- and if you feel so threatened by Darius' popularity as to try and slander his good name on here then no one is going to think very highly of you. At all.




He's welcome to present his case listing his accomplishments and how his 'unique' brand of csm'ing gets things done.
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#24 - 2012-02-13 14:01:26 UTC
Cyzlaki wrote:
You can't have a D3 thread without a few fireworks. It seems current CSM members are intent on slandering Fair Darius' campaign early. Let me just say this reeks of petty jealousy- and if you feel so threatened by Darius' popularity as to try and slander his good name - then no one is going to think very highly of you.

Darius had an uphill battle before two of the most trustworthy CSMs came out with the revelation that he couldn't even be bothered to show up.

Cognitive dissonance posting doesn't make that any less disturbing a point.
Darius III
Interstellar eXodus
The Initiative.
#25 - 2012-02-13 14:03:30 UTC
Courthouse wrote:


Cognitive dissonance posting doesn't make that any less disturbing a point.


Them there is pretty big words from a goon.

Hmmm
Cyzlaki
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2012-02-13 14:05:36 UTC
It's obvious now Goons have a clear agenda based on slandering Darius' CSM7 campaign. If Goons feel so threatened by D3 then in my mind he is definitely doing something right.
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#27 - 2012-02-13 14:06:53 UTC
Darius III wrote:
Courthouse wrote:


Cognitive dissonance posting doesn't make that any less disturbing a point.


Them there is pretty big words from a goon.

Ah red me a gud book dis one tahm. Had purdy picteures an errythan. Also shoed up ta mah job like I sez I wud.
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#28 - 2012-02-13 14:09:18 UTC
2bhammered wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
Breaking NDA isn't a reason not to vote for somebody honestly. That's a legal determination and between CCP and the CSM member. Being a CSM who never participated and was largely AWOL for the vast majority of his term is a bigger reason to not consider him.



Ok finally someone who speaks with reason then. To me NDA is a company thing, not something I care for as a gamer, I'd rather have more insight than less into what CSM and CCP does than the opposite.

So you are saying Darius never did a good job basically?


Yeah as a gamer, some people do take the game serious, as in knowing what the next flavor of the month ship is early on and training for it would give it an unfair edge. Or if you are industrial knowing of future changes to game mechanics or ships and building them early for many profits.

If you dont mind other players getting unfair advantages over you breaking the NDA doesnt matter at all. Just some people hate seeing people make ISK too easy and get ahead too easy, so they dont like it when the NDA is broken.

Companies dont like breaking NDA cause they lose money and subscribers maybe. Players hate breaking NDA since other players will have an unfair advantage and get ahead to easily.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
Darius III
Interstellar eXodus
The Initiative.
#29 - 2012-02-13 14:09:54 UTC
Vile rat wrote:
Breaking NDA isn't a reason not to vote for somebody honestly. That's a legal determination and between CCP and the CSM member. Being a CSM who never participated and was largely AWOL for the vast majority of his term is a bigger reason to not consider him.



Spread lies, it is the only recourse you have. Of course I cant defend myself by posting my many suggestions made in the official forums.Future CSM members will be able to see through your cheap veneer of lies and slander.

Lets talk about poor performance. You failed to show at the most important summit, then made poor excuses about it. Unfortunately what you say about me being largely absent is not true. Unfortunately, I cannot link my posts made as CSM that prove just how active I was during that time. With over 120 suggestions made, and some of them implemented as current gameplay, I feel just fine about my level of participation as CSM member.

Regarding the NDA: It is a very important agreement that allows CCP to speak to the CSM about future developments that can not, and should not, be made public until they have been flushed out. There was never an NDA breach, not "an insignificant breach."

The fact that Test and GSF have a CTA to post on my candidacy forum post tells just how important it is for them to try and spread their hate and tell lies in my campaign thread.

Fact is, the CSM don't like me because I was the only one not permanently lodged in the end organ of Mittani's digestive system. The same Mittani who wrongfully excluded me from the Skype discussion and removed me from said discussion three times without cause. Clearly a vote for Darius III is a vote against Mittani and the rest of the establishment.

2bhammered wrote:


What is your stance on low-sec?


I think that Lowsec should should get the most love of any segment in Eve. I have a few hundred kills there-and it is a bad place. I did write about lowsec getting a buff via the new deadspace Invuls, but it way too little, way too late.

I think Supercarriers and Titans should be nerfed in Low security space. I think that Fighter Bombers and Titan guns shouldnt be able to fire in Lowsec, or NPC nullsec for that matter. Supercapital proliferation has excluded most small and mid-sized alliances from having much of a chance in nullsec, which is a shame.

Hmmm
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#30 - 2012-02-13 14:12:44 UTC
Cyzlaki wrote:
It's obvious now Goons have a clear agenda based on slandering Darius' CSM7 campaign. If Goons feel so threatened by D3 then in my mind he is definitely doing something right.


Hey, since we're posting buddies now I'll clue you in on a little secret: I'm the CSM boogeygoon. See, every CSM season I come out and start posting a whole lot about certain candidates. What this does is takes all the belligerantly anti-goon voters, like yourself, and solidifies them for the candidates that they've stupidly aligned themselves with. Now, combine that with doing it to several candidates and what you'll find happens is that not a single anti-goon candidate can get enough cohesive votes to even get noticed, let alone elected.

Rational voters who look to these threads to see how candidates present their cases, handle questions, respond to trolls and deflect the obvious muckraking aren't generally impressed by the 'nom nom moar tears' type of responses, so thankfully D3 has done like 80% of my job for me. The rest is about solidifying all of the fervently anti-goon morons to vote exclusively for him so that he manages to get a solid 250-300 votes out of the pools of other potential chairman candidates like Seleene, or up-and-comers like Hans.
knobber Jobbler
State War Academy
Caldari State
#31 - 2012-02-13 14:13:41 UTC
Rambo Bloodstain wrote:
You tried to hold space in null sec. You failed. It's understandable, it's a rough place.

You tried to go after carebears in incursions with your gimmick attempt to draw attention to yourself. You failed horribly. In fact, the carebears put aside their differences and turned your MOM liberation fleets into a prolific joke over and over again. They had lots of fun hearing your fleets burn, your ships go pop and your members cry about not getting paid. Now nobody trusts you in a leadership role (well, the smart ones can see through your steaming pile of stupid).

YOU FAILED AGAINST CAREBEARS AND THEY DRANK YOUR TEARS WITH PROLIFIC ORGASMIC LUST. This is unacceptable.

I couldn't care about the CSM until I heard about your infamous demonstration of incompetence. I'm going to throw all my votes on Drapo Llasa because if he wins and you don't, you will cocoon yourself into a pod in the fetal position and try to inject yourself into any womb that would support your poison presence. EVE will laugh and toast as another terrible representative of the human race is removed with a justified abortion.

Keep being you, but the jester cannot be king.


When are you running for CSM? I need to be able to vote for you. Best post of 2012.
Sirref Naes
Spacial 8 Xchange
#32 - 2012-02-13 14:14:52 UTC
Goons definitely have an attraction to this thread. It's sorta sick that they only seem to care about the "Brick Squad." part in his title and nothing more. Any CSM/pilot posting about an alliance vs alliance issue seem to only care about the influence on the map and nothing more.
2bhammered
Cyberpunk 2077
#33 - 2012-02-13 14:16:04 UTC
rodyas wrote:
2bhammered wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
Breaking NDA isn't a reason not to vote for somebody honestly. That's a legal determination and between CCP and the CSM member. Being a CSM who never participated and was largely AWOL for the vast majority of his term is a bigger reason to not consider him.



Ok finally someone who speaks with reason then. To me NDA is a company thing, not something I care for as a gamer, I'd rather have more insight than less into what CSM and CCP does than the opposite.

So you are saying Darius never did a good job basically?


Yeah as a gamer, some people do take the game serious, as in knowing what the next flavor of the month ship is early on and training for it would give it an unfair edge. Or if you are industrial knowing of future changes to game mechanics or ships and building them early for many profits.

If you dont mind other players getting unfair advantages over you breaking the NDA doesnt matter at all. Just some people hate seeing people make ISK too easy and get ahead too easy, so they dont like it when the NDA is broken.

Companies dont like breaking NDA cause they lose money and subscribers maybe. Players hate breaking NDA since other players will have an unfair advantage and get ahead to easily.



Not if we all get the info, or do you think the CSMs don't tell their friends within corp/alliance over TS etc? RIGHT!Roll
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#34 - 2012-02-13 14:18:57 UTC
2bhammered wrote:
Not if we all get the info, or do you think the CSMs don't tell their friends within corp/alliance over TS etc? RIGHT!Roll


Neither The Mittani or Vile Rat leaked NDA protected information in even private channels that I'm in with them. In fact more often than not they refused to speak even broadly on a topic for fear that it would approach NDA limits too closely.
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#35 - 2012-02-13 14:19:53 UTC
Sirref Naes wrote:
Goons definitely have an attraction to this thread. It's sorta sick that they only seem to care about the "Brick Squad." part in his title and nothing more. Any CSM/pilot posting about an alliance vs alliance issue seem to only care about the influence on the map and nothing more.

I think a TEST guy mentioned the brick thing. The rest of us are on top of him for being a douchebag and absentee CSM.
Sirref Naes
Spacial 8 Xchange
#36 - 2012-02-13 14:22:15 UTC
Courthouse wrote:
Sirref Naes wrote:
Goons definitely have an attraction to this thread. It's sorta sick that they only seem to care about the "Brick Squad." part in his title and nothing more. Any CSM/pilot posting about an alliance vs alliance issue seem to only care about the influence on the map and nothing more.

I think a TEST guy mentioned the brick thing. The rest of us are on top of him for being a troll CSM.


So he fulfilled his promise as CSM? Can any other CSM say the same?
rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#37 - 2012-02-13 14:25:23 UTC
I think I have only heard of one case so far, another case but the official reason for their dismisal from CSM was released.

On the first case I dont think anyone else was told. But CCP did a fast crack down on him for breaking it. Usually CCP does fast crackdowns on those things, but players drama is players drama and its never fully quenched.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne
Courthouse
Perkone
Caldari State
#38 - 2012-02-13 14:26:35 UTC
Sirref Naes wrote:
Courthouse wrote:
Sirref Naes wrote:
Goons definitely have an attraction to this thread. It's sorta sick that they only seem to care about the "Brick Squad." part in his title and nothing more. Any CSM/pilot posting about an alliance vs alliance issue seem to only care about the influence on the map and nothing more.

I think a TEST guy mentioned the brick thing. The rest of us are on top of him for being a troll CSM.


So he fulfilled his promise as CSM? Can any other CSM say the same?

Well, no, because as you can plainly see you edited my comment poorly in an attempt to make an invalid point.

I mean, you didn't even wait like a page or two so the original post wasn't so blatantly obviously there.
2bhammered
Cyberpunk 2077
#39 - 2012-02-13 14:27:17 UTC  |  Edited by: 2bhammered
Darius III wrote:
Vile rat wrote:
Breaking NDA isn't a reason not to vote for somebody honestly. That's a legal determination and between CCP and the CSM member. Being a CSM who never participated and was largely AWOL for the vast majority of his term is a bigger reason to not consider him.



Spread lies, it is the only recourse you have. Of course I cant defend myself by posting my many suggestions made in the official forums.Future CSM members will be able to see through your cheap veneer of lies and slander.

Lets talk about poor performance. You failed to show at the most important summit, then made poor excuses about it. Unfortunately what you say about me being largely absent is not true. Unfortunately, I cannot link my posts made as CSM that prove just how active I was during that time. With over 120 suggestions made, and some of them implemented as current gameplay, I feel just fine about my level of participation as CSM member.

Regarding the NDA: It is a very important agreement that allows CCP to speak to the CSM about future developments that can not, and should not, be made public until they have been flushed out. There was never an NDA breach, not "an insignificant breach."

The fact that Test and GSF have a CTA to post on my candidacy forum post tells just how important it is for them to try and spread their hate and tell lies in my campaign thread.

Fact is, the CSM don't like me because I was the only one not permanently lodged in the end organ of Mittani's digestive system. The same Mittani who wrongfully excluded me from the Skype discussion and removed me from said discussion three times without cause. Clearly a vote for Darius III is a vote against Mittani and the rest of the establishment.

2bhammered wrote:


What is your stance on low-sec?


I think that Lowsec should should get the most love of any segment in Eve. I have a few hundred kills there-and it is a bad place. I did write about lowsec getting a buff via the new deadspace Invuls, but it way too little, way too late.

I think Supercarriers and Titans should be nerfed in Low security space. I think that Fighter Bombers and Titan guns shouldnt be able to fire in Lowsec, or NPC nullsec for that matter. Supercapital proliferation has excluded most small and mid-sized alliances from having much of a chance in nullsec, which is a shame.




Nice,now you got my interest!Cool Let's talk, I love low-sec, former pirate corp leader, pirate alliance FC and it was my best times in EVE. 0.0 and empire bore me to death but have their place and roles same with worm-holes. My biggest issue is low-sec is just filler space between empire and 0.0 Now coupled with bad market, ****** mining, no reason to mission, bad market and only NPC stations, all activity centered around choke point gates with dead space etc. I am unhappy to say the least. There need to be more reason for care-bears to visit as well as people to live there and make it their home.

Right now either stay in empire and make sick amount of ISK or move to 0.0 and make sick amount of ISK. I want love for low-sec, I want it to be a place one dares to risk going to even to mine because it is in ones interest while not be as dangerous and alliance centered/forced as 0.0 is, but not 100% safe as empire pretty much is. Empire should just be market and enough ISK for someone licking their wounds or to prepare for low-sec and or 0.0 and to travel through, a newbie zone!

I also agree on your points by the way.

I had a thread awhile ago in general about boring PVP. I feel pvp is more boring today than 5 years ago. Solo and small gangs are almost dead and or useless, not enough random battles either.
Two step
Aperture Harmonics
#40 - 2012-02-13 14:30:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Two step
Darius III wrote:
Two step wrote:


This man speaks truth.


Your voice is muffled when you speak from the end of Mittanis digestive tract. Because I don't feel the need to be part of your Polly Pretty Pants Tea Party in Skype doent mean I didn't participate. Coming from a guy whose campaign focus was on the fact the he lived in a wormhole I take your tears as a sure sign I am doing things right. As you are one of the herd blindly following Mittani's every suggestion, I have to ask-did he ask you to post here? thanks for your interest in my campaign-D3


Lots of work gets done on Skype. You don't participate.

I'm not sure what my campaign focus has to do with you not doing work. Can you explain the relationship?

Nobody asked me to post here. I posted here because I don't want people to think that Vile rat has some problem with you, and because you running on your so called accomplishments on CSM 6 is laughable.

CSM 7 Secretary CSM 6 Alternate Delegate @two_step_eve on Twitter My Blog