These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

I need a reliable CSM candidate

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
#21 - 2012-02-11 01:09:25 UTC
You brought up my off topic comment about learning skills and compared it to T2 BPOs not me. Atleast you see your prior error where you claimed noone lost anything. So I'm glad you agree and we can put that to rest.

Your invention and your daily revenue isn't a issue. I never stated that invention can't make isk.

The game is unbalanced and unfortunately for some this means somone will loose their market advantage they have to day if this get fixed.

Unbalance because: T2 Ship invention vs. T2 Ship BPO. Compare the material cost of the (sucky ME) BPC vs the (Near perfect ME) BPO and you see what I am on about. Don't act more stupid then you really are.

If you are afraid somone will get their feeings too hurt or whatever then re-seed at microscopic rate and the changes will happen slowly. So if you wan't out, sell and recover most of your investment.

Good things can't last forever.
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#22 - 2012-02-11 10:52:07 UTC
Quote:
Like learning skills? They got removed even though a lot of people had invested a lot of time into perfectionizing their toons and invested in books. But thank god this happened coz now the time to get a bot up and running is shorter then ever. Permaban??? No problem!!!


kinda think you brought learning skills up dude.

the game is unbalanced, its ment to be that way as this is not hello kitty online. should i have an advantage over a new player after 7 years playing, fuckinghell yeh i should. can that new play compeat with me after a few months, yes they can and should be able to.

ship invention needs a look at i will agree, but reseeding or removal of t2 ship bpo's isnt the way, buffing return rates and/or me of returned prints is the way to go.
bpo do not effect the market as much as you seam to think they do. morons that mine 'free' mins are more to blame for low margins.

anyhow enough titfortat with you, back to me randomly liking all dudes running for csm withless than 100 likes. i am that bored this morning

OMG when can i get a pic here
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
#23 - 2012-02-11 13:04:51 UTC
Smoking Blunts wrote:
Quote:


/Off Topic

Like learning skills? They got removed even though a lot of people had invested a lot of time into perfectionizing their toons and invested in books. But thank god this happened coz now the time to get a bot up and running is shorter then ever. Permaban??? No problem!!!

/Back on topic



kinda think you brought learning skills up dude.


For the last time, IT WAS AN OFF TOPIC REMARK.

Smoking Blunts wrote:

the game is unbalanced, its ment to be that way as this is not hello kitty online. should i have an advantage over a new player after 7 years playing, fuckinghell yeh i should. can that new play compeat with me after a few months, yes they can and should be able to.


Nice you finally show your true engagement in this issue. My reply would be Should I have the same advantages as all other players after playing the game for 5 years? According to you NO. COZ YOU ARE THE SUPREEME AND NOONE MUST THREATEN YOUR SUPERIORITAYYHHH!!!

Btw, you threw the "your doing it wrong" card in your first post, now your throwing the "hello kitty" card because you think it makes the game so much better because you have something others can't have. Tell the truth, these "cards" are thrown in the same way as the "racist" card is thrown whenever someone want's to discuss emigration politics even though everybody knows it's ****** up noone dares to speak up. It simply means you can't defend your stand on this and try to act cool instead.

Smoking Blunts wrote:

ship invention needs a look at i will agree, but reseeding or removal of t2 ship bpo's isnt the way, buffing return rates and/or me of returned prints is the way to go.
bpo do not effect the market as much as you seam to think they do. morons that mine 'free' mins are more to blame for low margins.


Removing/reseeding T2 BPOs are the way. Then we can talk about buffing return rates or make those 55 science skills count for something.
Smoking Blunts
ZC Omega
#24 - 2012-02-11 14:03:29 UTC
you make me laugh.

OMG when can i get a pic here
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
#25 - 2012-02-11 17:37:02 UTC
Good.
Jinli mei
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#26 - 2012-02-11 17:42:43 UTC
The simplest way to affect the effectiveness of T2 bpos is to buff invention.

Removing T2 bpos is not the answer (neither is removing supercaps or whatever you don't like next week a bloo bloo bloo).
Schmacos tryne
Norsk Testosteron
#27 - 2012-02-11 19:48:52 UTC
Jinli mei wrote:
The simplest way to affect the effectiveness of T2 bpos is to buff invention.

Removing T2 bpos is not the answer (neither is removing supercaps or whatever you don't like next week a bloo bloo bloo).


The simplest way to affect the effectiveness of T2 BPOs is to delete them.

Buffing invention is not the answer (Neither is adding more suprcaps or whatever you like next wee a bloo bloo bloo).



See what I did there?
Previous page12