These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

A voice of reason in the Wilderness CSM7 candidate.

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Sollana
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#21 - 2012-02-09 21:19:44 UTC
Retar Aveymone wrote:
seriously who on earth would want to play this game and why


There are people here who play this game for its economic PVP, theyre are people who play for faction war, there are people who play for the research and profitability it brings, people play to kill all who are not there allies. There are some that just want to play EVE there way, because it not the normal agressive sadistic moronic way most people play eve, does not mean it is wrong.

As part of Goonswarm is that not how you play. You play the game how Goons want to play. Is that not what your reputation is built upon?

Yes you have superior fleets, membership, Fleet commanders, resources and numbers of people you call enemies, but do you not play the game your way, your style no matter what others might say.

That is how I perceive my proposals. NRDS is a way of life, building stations and infrastructure rather than SC's and Titans os how we play the game.
Mykael Skychild
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2012-02-09 21:22:42 UTC
Sollana wrote:

0.0 space does not have to be war ridden and constantly changing, In the past year we have seen the fall of the Northern Coalition, We have seen the mighty powerblocks, stumble and fall. All because greed and power overcame them all.



Yes it does. War is the engine that drives the eve economy. Die you terrible pubbie communist scum.
Tabernack en Chasteaux
Phoibe Enterprises
#23 - 2012-02-09 21:22:53 UTC
Sollana wrote:
I propose that cloaking devices require fuel to operate, for example ozone. a small amount based on ship mass required to power the device. this would make them have a vulnerability that they currently do not have.

Was this by any chance inspired by a recent thread on Reddit?
Sollana
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#24 - 2012-02-09 21:24:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Sollana
Osabojo wrote:
What's your position on being able to purchase a robe and wizard hat with micro transactions?


I do feel that if micro transactions are to be applied then so be it, but it should be for cosmetic reasons only. And if players want to play space barbie, why shouldn't they. Hey people make in game money in EVE playing Space farmville with PI and Pos's.

Whatever floats your boat.

I feel these proposals, and future ideals are about making the sandbox more challenging than just shooting stuff up, would be mice for the stuff to shoot back and make harrassment have more of a risk factor.
Sollana
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#25 - 2012-02-09 21:26:16 UTC
Tabernack en Chasteaux wrote:
Sollana wrote:
I propose that cloaking devices require fuel to operate, for example ozone. a small amount based on ship mass required to power the device. this would make them have a vulnerability that they currently do not have.

Was this by any chance inspired by a recent thread on Reddit?


in fact no, it was inspired by a post made by a colleague on my alliance forums, if you have a link I would be interested in looking it over. Obviously this is something that other believe could work too.
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#26 - 2012-02-09 21:31:59 UTC
What? No. Automated gate camps (which the gate guns are if you turn them hostile on anyone who enter) should not be a common place in zero sec.

While your small zero sec alliance might benefit from it so will all the major zero sec power blocks. And how do automated defences, that are mostly a hazzle to small gangs, promote small gang warfare?

Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook 

Mykael Skychild
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#27 - 2012-02-09 21:36:23 UTC
Jowen Datloran wrote:
What? No. Automated gate camps (which the gate guns are if you turn them hostile on anyone who enter) should not be a common place in zero sec.

While your small zero sec alliance might benefit from it so will all the major zero sec power blocks. And how do automated defences, that are mostly a hazzle to small gangs, promote small gang warfare?


Agreed, it's a terrible idea. All of his ideas are just terrible...
Tabernack en Chasteaux
Phoibe Enterprises
#28 - 2012-02-09 21:40:11 UTC
Sollana wrote:
in fact no, it was inspired by a post made by a colleague on my alliance forums, if you have a link I would be interested in looking it over. Obviously this is something that other believe could work too.


Here you go.
Hexentanz
The Eden Trading International Corporation
#29 - 2012-02-09 21:56:03 UTC
I fully support Sollanas toughts and ideas Smile

+1
Sollana
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#30 - 2012-02-09 21:56:48 UTC
Jowen Datloran wrote:
What? No. Automated gate camps (which the gate guns are if you turn them hostile on anyone who enter) should not be a common place in zero sec.

While your small zero sec alliance might benefit from it so will all the major zero sec power blocks. And how do automated defences, that are mostly a hazzle to small gangs, promote small gang warfare?


but for you i see this would be a problem...NBSI alliances would see this as a problem. NRDS alliances would not as neutrals are free to come and go as they please.

Only reds would need to fear them, I think this would encourage more use of Black ops (I also think we need more of these types of ships), more away from gate fighting.

This is an Idea, LOwsec/Highsec guns have 150km range, this could be reduced for 0.0
Sollana
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#31 - 2012-02-09 21:59:24 UTC
Tabernack en Chasteaux wrote:
Sollana wrote:
in fact no, it was inspired by a post made by a colleague on my alliance forums, if you have a link I would be interested in looking it over. Obviously this is something that other believe could work too.


Here you go.



Thank you, I agree wholeheartedly with the post, something like this would work.
Maximille Biagge
Hydra Eternal
#32 - 2012-02-09 22:01:47 UTC
Hail Sollana! :D

gets my vote.
Bigbadh Wolf
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#33 - 2012-02-09 22:03:28 UTC
+1
and goats, we need goats! the repopulation of providence can not be successfull without these. genetical enhanced livestock is just not the same. ask your parents what a true goat was like.
cincer
Forsaken Cats
#34 - 2012-02-09 22:14:46 UTC
Hi Soll,

gets my Vote +1 ---- you know that you owe us some vodka shots next time we see you in london or maybe iceland? P

cheers
cinc
Krawitter vonHedion
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#35 - 2012-02-09 22:15:06 UTC
+1 for Sollana
Julius CaesarSa
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2012-02-09 22:21:17 UTC
Sálve!!

Quod est absolute victoria!!
Arquimedes Tesla
Sapientia Auro PT
#37 - 2012-02-09 22:28:49 UTC
Force and energy!!! You have my vote!!!

IdeaIdeaIdeaAttentionAttention
Seriousone
The Eden Trading International Corporation
#38 - 2012-02-09 22:29:42 UTC
well, except for the gatgun thing sollana has my full support

+1
Eyrai Urelo
Sapientia Auro PT
#39 - 2012-02-09 22:34:18 UTC
Let's do it .... here is my voteCoolCool
Zmaster BloodLust
BloodLust Enterprises
Amarr Locals Alliance.
#40 - 2012-02-09 22:34:30 UTC
Apocalyps Now. is with you Sollana!

Regards, Z