Jita Park Speakers Corner

In this letter, I will try to describe CCP D Mod's revenge fantasies in such a way that my language will not offend and yet will still convey my message that Mod's whitewash of the issue offers no real analysis of the situation that resulted in his improvident ultimata in the first place. Consider this letter not as a monologue but rather as a joint effort between writer and reader. Together we shall enable adversaries to meet each other and establish direct personal bonds that contradict the stereotypes they rely upon to power their pouty rejoinders. Together we shall make the world safe for democracy. And together we shall oppose Mod and all he stands for.

I, hardheaded cynic that I am, must point out that back when our policemen were guardians, not enforcers, they would have protected us from Mod's crime syndicate. Today, it seems that most officers of the law are content to sit back and let Mod crush any semblance of opposition to his sadistic prank phone calls. That's why we must nourish children with good morals and self-esteem. Not to change the subject or anything, but if we keep our courage up then the sea of phallocentrism, on which he so heavily relies, will begin to dry up. Mod preys on the rebellious and disenfranchised, tricking them into joining his posse. Their first assignment usually involves barring people from partaking in activities that cannot be monitored and controlled. The lesson to draw from this is that there are two things we need to do right away. First, we need to indicate in a rough and approximate way the two combative tendencies that I believe are the main driving force of modern denominationalism. Second—and this is critical so get out your highlighter—we need to educate the public on a range of issues. Once those two things are accomplished we can finally start discussing how Mod asserts that he's inflexibly honest, thoroughly patriotic, and eminently solicitous to promote, in all proper ways, the public good. Most reasonable people, however, recognize such assertions as nothing more than baseless, if wishful, claims unsupported by concrete evidence.

I, for one, like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: Mod has created for himself premier victim status. He uses this status to shield himself from scrutiny whenever he's caught inculcating intrusive lamentations. Mod's victim status also means that Mod's opponents have to be cautious when saying that his encomiasts believe that character development is not a matter of "strength through adversity" but rather, "entitlement through victimization". Although it is perhaps impossible to change the perspective of those who have such beliefs, I wish nevertheless to let him know, in no uncertain terms, that a theme that appears repeatedly in his deeds concerns his desire to subject human beings to indignities. In summary, it is my prayer that people everywhere will join me in my quest to criticize CCP D Mod's reports publicly for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power.

Why is CCP editing posts with content, as well as deleting serious threads regarding corruption and an attempt to interfere in the CSM process?

Do not let attempts to suppress your freedom to speak words stop you from speaking your mind.


Free the Posters, 2012.

I am not like you. I do not let suppression of free speech stop me from speaking my mind. Even if this thread is deleted I will continue/

Forum moderation discussions are not allowed on the forums.

Thread locked.