These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

An alternative subscription option with/out training

Author
Ai Shun
#1 - 2012-02-08 20:30:50 UTC
I was pondering the idea of my trade alt today. Once the skill training for that character is completed I have no real desire to keep that account running; so I will likely transfer the character and have a dead slot on my main account. And then begin training something entirely different just for the fun of it or let that account lapse until I have something I want to train.

Now this is all well and good; but it made me wonder about the age old question of multiple characters training at the same time. I know this is a topic done to death; but I was wondering about subscription options at the same time. CCP and the CSM had discussed this during the latest summit (Microplex, etc.)

What if:

1. A base subscription costs $10 / PLEX equivalent.
2. For each character you want to train up to all 3; add $5 / PLEX equivalent.

This means if you wanted one character trainable, you'd pay $15 (Same as a current subscription). If you wanted all three training you'd pay $25 per month. On the longer duration subscriptions I think the $10 base price should be adjusted, but the $5 per character training fee should remain static.

There are two problems I see with this:

(a) It makes training multiple characters easier. This is primarily not desirable because it reduces the amount of interaction and reliance on other players. Easily circumvented by multiple accounts, but that has a commensurately higher cost.

(b) It is a relatively cheaper way to train additional characters. This may have a very negative impact on the character bazaar where a years' training sells for a few billion ISK. There is a disconnect between the character training cost in real world $ value and the value of the trained character.

In any event, one of those shower thoughts in the morning.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#2 - 2012-02-08 20:50:12 UTC
Not necessary -- if you want multiple accounts, you already have a "free" option through ingame purchases of PLEX...

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#3 - 2012-02-08 23:40:50 UTC
The current fee setup is simple: $15/month for each character you want to train. If you want to coalesce your flock of trained-up characters to one account, it's $20 per character to transfer to a different account.

Being able to train SP on a character is the service of value being supplied. Why would CCP cut off their money supply by giving you SP accumulation for less than $15/month? It's easy to see that SP accumulation is valuable, because there seems to be at least one suggestion a month for options that allow SP accumulation on multiple characters on an account for less than $15/month + $20 transfer fee.

Specialise your character, and you'll be meeting your goals by the time you have 20-30M SP trained. After that, every SP trained is gravy.
Ai Shun
#4 - 2012-02-08 23:59:01 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
The current fee setup is simple: $15/month for each character you want to train. If you want to coalesce your flock of trained-up characters to one account, it's $20 per character to transfer to a different account.

Being able to train SP on a character is the service of value being supplied. Why would CCP cut off their money supply by giving you SP accumulation for less than $15/month? It's easy to see that SP accumulation is valuable, because there seems to be at least one suggestion a month for options that allow SP accumulation on multiple characters on an account for less than $15/month + $20 transfer fee.

Specialise your character, and you'll be meeting your goals by the time you have 20-30M SP trained. After that, every SP trained is gravy.


Understand and agree to a point. The CSM has already proposed a price point of a PLEX to allow additional characters to train. E.g.

Quote:
The CSM suggested adding the option of allowing two (or three) characters to train on the same account for the price one PLEX per month for one extra character training. CCP responded that while having the option was a good idea it still would mean that less value would be gained from that PLEX than paying for a full account, as it would not be possible to use two characters on the same account at the same time. The CSM responded that it didn’t matter, this would be a valuable thing, especially since it would mean characters would not need to be transferred between accounts


So I wouldn't close my mind entirely to what format such a structure could take. There is also a case to be made for the lower cost in training multiple characters at once against the value of running multiple characters at the same time.

That said, in my personal case (no extrapolation on other players), I am unlikely to keep another account running once the trade alt is finished training in about 15 days. This would cost CCP one subscription. If I had the option of paying a < full account fee I would pay that.

Of course, the reverse could easily be the case as well with a commensurate loss of revenue as people who only maintain a second account for the additional training change their plans.

It does make me wonder though why there are three slots on an account? Are they actually used in-general?
Mag's
Azn Empire
#5 - 2012-02-09 00:04:19 UTC
When ever this idea comes up, (very often) people most always think they should pay less for training chars on the same account.

Even though this would benefit me greatly, I have to say hell no. I don't wish to reduce CCP's income with this idea ever. If they were to change it, then full price is what you should pay for each char training.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Ai Shun
#6 - 2012-02-09 00:08:50 UTC
Mag's wrote:
If they were to change it, then full price is what you should pay for each char training.


Hence the CSM's suggestion of an additional PLEX / equivalent (?) for full training. It will be interesting to see how this pans out and if CCP acts on the CSM discussion; especially considering their discussions around master accounts, etc.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#7 - 2012-02-09 00:44:12 UTC
Ai Shun wrote:
It does make me wonder though why there are three slots on an account? Are they actually used in-general?


I have all three slots filled with active, productive characters on all my accounts. Anyone engaged in industry will have alts for research, invention, and manufacturing. The number of jobs you can have active encourages spreading the load over multiple characters. The other two character slots are useful for specialist services too: for example the NPC corp alt who can fly a freighter load of supplies to your hisec station without being intercepted by the corporation that is currently wardeccing your industrial corp.

People who live in w-space will have a number of alts flying covops frigates with probes living permanently in their system, as insurance against accidentally getting shut out of the w-space system they call "home".

The two other characters on my account are trained for research, invention and manufacturing. That training time was taken away from my own schedule, including the time to train up learning skills back in the day. I managed to train those characters without having conniptions about my "main" not accruing SP.

Perhaps other people have to look at the value proposition of having the alts accruing SP instead of the "main". Why do they want to train that character? Would it be cheaper to buy a suitable character from someone else? Will they really miss that 10M SP from their main?

If you're not enjoying playing your main right now, why is that? Are you fixated on flying something you can't fly yet? Why aren't you looking at what you can do, rather than what you can't do? Why do you feel the urge to fly that ship which will take a solid year of training? Why aren't you looking at what fun you can have with the ships you can fly?

One option I would accept is the ability to "unlock" multiple training on your account through spending a PLEX or three. Then you would pay one PLEX a month for each slot that you want to have training this month (over the 1 active training character we already have). That's still cheaper than running a second account and transferring the character over (4 PLEX to transfer characters into the two vacant slots).

What it boils down to, from my perspective, is that suggestions about training multiple characters on an account are a short-sighted attempt to bypass the 2 PLEX transfer expense. Training a significant amount of SP on a character will take significantly longer than two months, so the 2 PLEX to transfer back to the main account is minor compared to the cost of the accumulated SP. Thus the people who are suggesting ways of bypassing the 2 PLEX transfer cost are displaying a deep lack of planning capacity.

These people who cannot plan further forward than three minutes really need to HTFU and develop some life skills. Go to the kitchen and boil an egg. Sit and watch it boil, time it for 2 minutes. If you start getting impatient and distracted by thoughts of other things (such as how much you'd prefer to be playing EVE or chasing the dragon than watching this egg boil), you really should seek professional help because you are likely suffering from attention deficit disorder, psychosis, or perhaps are displaying the symptoms of addiction.

The CSM support the idea of multiple characters training because there is a direct benefit to them for doing so. These are the same people who suggested wormhole stabilisers, who believed that a jump bridge nerf would destroy null sec, who believe that nerfing super caps will destroy null sec, who believe that Faction Warfare (being a non-nullsec activity) is a great place to beta test sovereignty mechanics (because then it won't break null sec while Sov 3.0 is being developed and tested). They are only motivated by what brings them benefit in-game.
Ai Shun
#8 - 2012-02-09 00:47:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Ai Shun
Mara Rinn wrote:
These people who cannot plan further forward than three minutes really need to HTFU and develop some life skills. Go to the kitchen and boil an egg. Sit and watch it boil, time it for 2 minutes. If you start getting impatient and distracted by thoughts of other things (such as how much you'd prefer to be playing EVE or chasing the dragon than watching this egg boil), you really should seek professional help because you are likely suffering from attention deficit disorder, psychosis, or perhaps are displaying the symptoms of addiction.


That was a bit uncalled for, don't you think? We were having a reasonable discussion up to this point - then you had to throw your toys out of the cot.

Mara Rinn wrote:
What it boils down to, from my perspective, is that suggestions about training multiple characters on an account are a short-sighted attempt to bypass the 2 PLEX transfer expense. Training a significant amount of SP on a character will take significantly longer than two months, so the 2 PLEX to transfer back to the main account is minor compared to the cost of the accumulated SP. Thus the people who are suggesting ways of bypassing the 2 PLEX transfer cost are displaying a deep lack of planning capacity.


Not at all. I, for one, am unconcerned about the real world costs (To a point). To drop a few hundred dollars a month on a hobby is not a problem; I do dislike the idea of wasted money though and will seek to optimise expenditure.

In other words, I am reasonable enough to recognise that there are trade-offs to any system. A system that allows multiple characters on one account to train has a trade-off in that only one can be actively used. That is a penalty one can accept, but to achieve a win-win scenario there would need to be a benefit that outweights that penalty.

As to planning capacity, that is a terrible assumption. If a person had a two year plan mapped out across multiple accounts, would you suggest that is a deep lack of planning capacity?

Of course not. But, I suppose you are relying on emotive arguments rather than logical ones at this point and trying to allude to defects in other people; rather than addressing the issue.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#9 - 2012-02-09 01:52:41 UTC
Ai Shun wrote:
In other words, I am reasonable enough to recognise that there are trade-offs to any system. A system that allows multiple characters on one account to train has a trade-off in that only one can be actively used. That is a penalty one can accept, but to achieve a win-win scenario there would need to be a benefit that outweights that penalty.


The benefit to the system proposed/supported by the CSM is the lack of requirement to pay the account transfer fee once the training is completed. The penalty is that the character you only ever log in to update the skill plan for, can't be logged in at the same time as any other character on that account. This is not really a penalty for people raising industrial alts, hauling alts, research alts, or alts being raised to be sold on the character market.

Ai Shun wrote:
As to planning capacity, that is a terrible assumption. If a person had a two year plan mapped out across multiple accounts, would you suggest that is a deep lack of planning capacity?


Why would a person with a 24 month plan consider the transfer fee to be a significant penalty, after having spent 24 PLEX keeping that account running? Why would someone who doesn't balk at investing hundreds of dollars on their hobby balk at the cost of character transfer? The transfer fee is a barrier to entry in the business of accruing SP on multiple characters simultaneously. Since the barrier is there, there is a clear advantage to those willing to accept the penalty. Removal of that barrier would surely lead to more people training multiple characters on one account.

The market that would benefit the most from the "parallel training" ideas would be the people with less than 6 months of training planned: industrial alts, w-space emergency probing alts, and so forth. These are the people I'm referring to with my egg-boiling impatience scenario. The impact of such a feature on the game will be felt by industrialists, researchers, haulers, w-space invaders, and character traders.

The current penalties are either accepting a character transfer fee, or halting training on the "main" character in order to train up the "alt". These are very small penalties to pay for the advantage of an alt that is useful for something.

Having a benefit that outweighs the penalty is not a "win-win" situation, it's a profit situation. Who are you in contest with that you are "losing" due to the character transfer fee or one-character-training being a greater penalty than any benefit you might gain?

Perhaps a fairer solution would be to remove the two extra character slots?
Misanthra
Alternative Enterprises
#10 - 2012-02-09 03:47:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Misanthra
Want to train...want to pay....jsut run a 2nd account. At full price.

Lets get them devs and the admin and support stuff that make this game possible regular paychecks lol. They have been good to us of late. Patching is much better (look at at Tor....they have yet to release jsut one patch, its patch one then patch t2 to fix what patch 1 broke). And crucible actually had content added....content most players actually wanted or said well its a start. I'd like to see them get paid for that. The value of dual boxing alone gets you a nice bonus to the monthly fee.


Or if the game leans towards training 2-3 chars on one account.....full price and I'd accept that maybe. No discounts, this game has for years had people break down for a full pay 2nd or more account. As an altaholic...I wanted them bad enough to run 2-3 accounts at full price, if that motivated for alts, be motivated to pay the same as years of eve players have.

I know....some will say I can't play 2 chars at once so I am getting less for my money. Exactly. Read above. several accounts and you get dual boxing ability, win win really.
AFK Hauler
State War Academy
#11 - 2012-02-09 06:23:31 UTC
TL;DR -

Simple math for me... $25 for three character to sell on the bizarre vs $45 for three of the same qualified SP characters.
Same goes for using PLEX as payment, except that PLEX (as of right now) cannot be broken into smaller parts.

PLEX cannot be used to acquire long term price reductions in subscription fees. PLEX discussion are for breaking it into smaller chunks for payment on partial fee items, not combining PLEX for 12 month subscription discounts.

Character bizarre would be overrun with alts that can fly a Tengu payed for with cheaper than normal rates for a better profit.
It would be a major win for me, and PLEX becomes more inflated that it already is.
Baaa Shakiel
Kinnah Incorporated
#12 - 2012-02-11 20:22:51 UTC
I don't like tis idea. If it gets implemented, CCP will lose REVENUE and Eve will shut down.

Yeah it would be super convenient but I think the fundamental economics and business model behind this idea is rather upside down and will kill CCP.

Who Said that Noob Ships SuCK? http://eve.battleclinic.com/killboard/killmail.php?id=15091146#lostLoadout

Buddy Program Available - Start off with Millions of Isk! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=9874&p=10