These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Mass-test feedback - February 7

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Thycoon
Patrician Space Incorporation
Patrician Space Incorporation Holding Alliance
#21 - 2012-02-08 04:42:25 UTC
Masstest from 07. February 2012
Machine Info and Settings
OS version: MS WindowsXP Prof. x64 Edition (Desktop)
CPU: Intel[R] Pentium[R] D 3.40GHz (2 CPU's)
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 440, 2048 MB RAM
RAM: 8.00 GB of RAM
How many clients were you running at the same time? 3 clients
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

User Experience
Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 15-20
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 10-15

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7 comparing to the masstests before - have not participated in big fleets on TQ

Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None

Did you see any problems with the UI? The Overview sometimes messed up - to many players - could not scroll up and down properly for getting targets of any kind. Otherwise no problems.

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: In the beginning at the POS slightly lag while all shooting, but nothing comparable to the tests before. Means, I'm still able to navigate, target and shoot and warp with all 3 clients.
Se nErv
Silliness Inc
#22 - 2012-02-08 11:18:29 UTC
Machine Info and Settings:
OS version: Windows 7 64-bit SP1
CPU: Intel c2d E8400 @ 3GHz
GPU: Radeon HD 4850
RAM: 4GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): ~Low

User Experience:
Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot - Zoomed out: 9
Average FPS - Zoomed in: didn't record since the zoomed out fps was low as it was
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Did you see any problems with the UI? None that jumped out on me
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: From the view of someone not often experiencing heavy overview load on TQ this test seemed to go well.
Smiles Jr
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2012-02-08 11:42:56 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Windows 7 Home Premium
CPU: Intel i7-2630QM CPU @ 2.00 GHz
GPU: GeForce GTX 560M
RAM: 12GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 58
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 36
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Did you see any problems with the UI? Gang members would show when they shouldn't
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: lagged at pos and fleet engagement, but that was probably largely on my end
Jocho
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#24 - 2012-02-08 12:31:17 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Windows 7 64 bit
CPU: Phenom II X4
GPU: GTX 560 Ti OC
RAM: 8GB DDR2 800 Mhz CL4
How many clients were you running at the same time: 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Both on high, windowed 1024


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30 fps
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 23 fps
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): NA
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Did you see any problems with the UI? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

With brackets off there was an increase of roughly 3 fps. However the overview did not always automatically refresh which meant I had to scroll to update it.
Rick Dastardly
Sacred Templars
Fraternity.
#25 - 2012-02-08 16:50:57 UTC
OS version: Windows 7 32 bit
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+
GPU: GeForce GT 520
RAM: 3GIG DDR3
How many clients were you running at the same time: 2
Graphic setting of the client (High / High / High): Both on high,

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30 fps
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 23 fps
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): NA
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Did you see any problems with the UI? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

With brackets off there was an increase of roughly 5 fps. However the overview did not always automatically refresh which meant I had to scroll to update it.
Previous page12