These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Mass-test feedback - February 7

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
CCP Habakuk
C C P
C C P Alliance
#1 - 2012-02-07 19:46:55 UTC
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 7th February, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version:
  • CPU:
  • GPU:
  • RAM:
  • How many clients were you running at the same time?
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in:
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
  • Did you see any problems with the UI?
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)

Bug reporting | Mass Testing
Nazarius Ozymandias
Exploraton and Extraction Small Time Operations
#2 - 2012-02-07 20:44:28 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Windows 7 Professional
CPU: Intel i5 CPU 750 @ 2.67GHz 2.79GHz
GPU: Ati radeon HD 4800
RAM: 4 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium/high


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: crashed before that
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 6-14
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 2
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? crashed at 20:15 right after got command to warp to POS becon
Did you see any problems with the UI? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Crashed at 20:15 , before that was fine. I think its a memory thing, got prints screens, minidump, and logs from logger
skitso juggalo
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2012-02-07 20:57:35 UTC
OS version: Windows vista ultimate
CPU: AMD Phenom 9850 Quad - core 2.51GHz
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4800
RAM: 4.00 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? - 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) - 6
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? - yes after ship loss on gate fight
Did you see any problems with the UI? - no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
it was a bit laggy for me during gate fight other than that it ran fine
SumBok3
Matterhorn.
#4 - 2012-02-07 20:58:43 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows Vista Home
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo CPU 2.26 Ghz
GPU: Nvidia 9600GT
RAM: 4GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 3
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Did you see any problems with the UI? Overview didn't seem to filter correctly
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Pretty laggy
PredatorGT
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-02-07 20:58:47 UTC
CCP Habakuk wrote:
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 7th February, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows7 Professional 64bit
  • CPU: AMD Athlon64X2 6000+
  • GPU: NVidia GeForce 9600GT MATRIX 512MB
  • RAM:4GB DDR2
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in:4
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)4
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
  • Did you see any problems with the UI? no
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: sometimes i have big lags

Jacob Straven
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#6 - 2012-02-07 21:00:51 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Win Vista SP2 32 bit
  • CPU: Intel Core2Duo T6600
  • GPU: ATI Radeon HD4570
  • RAM: 4GB
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 22
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
  • Did you see any problems with the UI? Some graphic glitches when changing window focus (eg items hanger to masstesting channel)
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Overview is faster but there are still bugs when listed ships change state (eg icon remains, but all other fields are blank)

emik0 emik0
Doomheim
#7 - 2012-02-07 21:01:58 UTC
OS version: os x Lion
CPU: Intel i7 CPU 750 @ 2.93GHz
GPU: Ati radeon HD 5750
RAM: 8 GB
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium/high


User Experience


Average FPS 15
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 6-14
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? crashed about 4 times
Did you see any problems with the UI? no
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Rebuild bubble effect, crashed twice in it.

Screens http://db.tt/TEQYdEAR


Thanx for great fun EVEr))
Alex Cortex
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#8 - 2012-02-07 21:02:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Alex Cortex
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Windows 7 64-bit
CPU: Intel i5 750
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5970
RAM: 16 GBs
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: I never had my brackets disabled, but enabled the FPS was around 5-10 FPS
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 10-20 FPS (during combat, normal non-massive-fleet gameplay is 60+ FPS)
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) Probably a 7?
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Yes, shortly after firing at the POS, my client froze and crashed.
Did you see any problems with the UI? Maybe - during the fight in Poitot my overview had several blank entries with what looked like drone icons (I have drones turned off).
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

Fairly smooth until the POS shootout, then my FPS dropped to 5 FPS. Also during the fight in Poitot.
Askgar Elzoop
Knights of Nii
The 20 Minuters
#9 - 2012-02-07 21:04:44 UTC
OS version: Win 7
CPU:Core 2 Duo P9600 - 2.66GHZ
GPU: Nvidia GeForce 9400M G
RAM: 8gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): All on low


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10-20
Average FPS - Zoomed in:5-15
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 6 No worse than on TQ, but never been in big fleet fight before.
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Did you see any problems with the UI? Web browser UI was broken, everything seemed badly alligned
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

http://i42.tinypic.com/6fp5yt.jpg
Sarah Schneider
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2012-02-07 21:05:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Sarah Schneider
Operating System: Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit (6.1, Build 7600) (7600.win7_rtm.090713-1255)
Language: English (Regional Setting: English)
System Manufacturer: Unknow
System Model: Unknow
BIOS: Phoenix - AwardBIOS v6.00PG
Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4600+ (2 CPUs), ~2.4GHz
Memory: 2048MB RAM
Available OS Memory: 2046MB RAM
Page File: 2659MB used, 2455MB available

Card name: NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT
Manufacturer: NVIDIA
Chip type: GeForce 9500 GT
DAC type: Integrated RAMDAC
Device Key: Enum\PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0640&SUBSYS_00000000&REV_A1
Display Memory: 1776 MB
Dedicated Memory: 1009 MB
Shared Memory: 767 MB
Current Mode: 1360 x 768 (32 bit) (60Hz)
Monitor Name: Generic PnP Monitor
Monitor Model: SyncMaster
Monitor Id: SAM0598
Native Mode: 1360 x 768(p) (60.015Hz)
Output Type: HD15
Driver Name: nvd3dum.dll,nvwgf2um.dll,nvwgf2um.dll
Driver File Version: 8.17.0012.8562 (English)
Driver Version: 8.17.12.8562
DDI Version: 10
Driver Model: WDDM 1.1
Driver Attributes: Final Retail
Driver Date/Size: 10/15/2011 15:53:00, 13205312 bytes
WHQL Logo'd: n/a
WHQL Date Stamp: n/a
Device Identifier: {D7B71E3E-4500-11CF-C242-0C201FC2C535}
Vendor ID: 0x10DE
Device ID: 0x0640
SubSys ID: 0x00000000
Revision ID: 0x00A1
Driver Strong Name: oem9.inf:NVIDIA_SetA_Devices.NTx86.6.1:Section005:8.17.12.8562:pci\ven_10de&dev_0640
Rank Of Driver: 00E60003

User Experience :
Average FPS during fight : 7-10 (lower than the previous masstest, using the same settings), the new brackets doesn't affect fps as much as it used to be, so, good job CCP!
FPS/Performance comparison : 9/10 (far lighter than TQ, imo), turning on brackets on huge fights normally drops the fps significantly, on this test it's hardly noticable, GJ.
no disconnects/crashes

Problems : almost 30% of the overview details doesn't load, it just shows empty rows during fights (right after gate jump), the brackets seems to work as normal tho.

"I'd rather have other players get shot by other players than not interacting with others" -CCP Soundwave
Guss Yassavi
Allied Operations
Mechanicus Macabre Immortale
#11 - 2012-02-07 21:05:20 UTC
#1Posted: 2012.02.07 19:46
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 7th February, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows Vista Home Premium
CPU: AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 6000+ 3,10 GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
RAM: 8gigs
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:10
Average FPS - Zoomed in:4
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
Did you see any problems with the UI? none
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: i got poded durring the pvp fight and it toke longer than needed, i missed the npc fight
Lithalnas
Dirt 'n' Glitter
Local Is Primary
#12 - 2012-02-07 21:11:12 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: win 7 pro
CPU: A8 -3850
GPU: A8 -3850 (yes you read that right)
RAM: 8GB 1600Mhz DDR3
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): all on high

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 15
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
3, TQ and sisi have same fps however i found more UI wonkyness in the sisi test. People would not show up. The list did not update as frequently causing things to jump around.
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Did you see any problems with the UI? Missing people in the UI, I would see their brackets nut not their names/shiptypes
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: My bombs were actually really responsive. When they detonated my client did not freeze. I did have some wonkyness having to do with warping to the gate. Often I would warp to 50 and land at 10.

https://www.facebook.com/RipSeanVileRatSmith shoot at blue for Vile Rat http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=73406
Seamus Donohue
EVE University
Ivy League
#13 - 2012-02-07 21:14:44 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Mac OS 10.6.8
  • CPU: 2.66 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon
  • GPU: ATI Radeon 4870
  • RAM: 6 GB 1066MHz DDR3
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 - I came late to the test, so I didn't have time to get today's patch for all three clients.
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: Untested. I lost my ship soon after arrival.
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 6 FPS, brackets on.
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) - 3, somewhat worse than Tranquility, but I don't participate in large battles. This might be better than previous mass-tests, but my previous participation was with three clients and I only had time to set up one, today, so a direct comparison is tricky. That said, this does look promising.
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No crashes or disconnects.
  • Did you see any problems with the UI? The Overview seems to have weird minimum-width restrictions on columns.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: If players are being asked to reship when losing a ship in a mass-test, then warp interdiction bubbles should be prohibited and auto-destroyed so that people can warp their pods out and clear the session change timer before going to the massmoveme channel. Also, general reminders should be given that massmoveme can still be used to reship during the test.

Survivor of Teskanen.  Fan of John Rourke.

I have video tutorials for EVE Online on my YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/SeamusDonohueEVE
Vladimir Reyes
We Don't Mess With Goats
#14 - 2012-02-07 21:16:45 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

OS version: Windows Vista 64 bit
CPU: AMD FX 8120 Eight Core
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4800
RAM: 8 gigs
How many clients were you running at the same time? - 1
Graphic setting of the client medium

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: - 40
Average FPS - Zoomed in: - 30
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) - 3 but on tq I am generally not involved in 400 man fights
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 2 crashes
Did you see any problems with the UI? negative
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: It was fun and interesting other than the lag outs/ crashes after getting logged back in though and adjusting the settings everything seemed to work fine
Victor Jangid
Doomheim
#15 - 2012-02-07 21:23:27 UTC
Machine Info and Settings:-

OS version - Windows 7 64bit
CPU - Intel Core 2 Deo 2.4Ghz
GPU - Nvidia GTS 450 1GB
RAM - 4GB DDR2
Number clients running at the same time - 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): - med/high

My Experience:-

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, brackets enabled - zoomed out:- 20-30fps
Average FPS - Zoomed in - 6-10fps
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) - hmm it was my first fleet fight sorry can't say
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? - NO (lucky)
Did you see any problems with the UI? - Had some screen flashes at the beginning.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:- I had client restart 3 times before i could join you guys at destination SS.What?
Capella Nightsong
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2012-02-07 21:34:41 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Windows 7 x64
CPU: Core i7-930
GPU: Radeon HD 6970
RAM: 12GB DDR3
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 15
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Did you see any problems with the UI? No
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
Gaia Ma'chello
Photosynth
#17 - 2012-02-07 21:51:00 UTC
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: OSX 10.6.8
CPU: Intel core i7, 2.66 GHz
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330m
RAM: 8 Gig
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10-15 average 12
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5-15 average 7

FPS would vary wildly

Brackets on Zoomed out say 10, zoomed in say 4 (sometimes down to 2)

On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5. Its almost fast enough to feel comfortable in a big fight. Another factor of 2 in speed and you got it.
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Did you see any problems with the UI?

Oh yes. Text was a splotchy mess. Bug reported, already came back "known issue"
Sometimes the overview would have items not display (an empty line) or items greyed out. I made sure I did not have control pressed; issue still there.
When the FC tagged a target, that target would not be tagged in the overview. It would float to the top of the overview, just no tag.
When jumping into warp, leaving a well populated grid, the FPS would drop to zero for several seconds. Even in warp the FPS was quite choppy.

Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

Note: During the first part of the test I was selecting "show all brackets" and seeing no brackets. I bug reported it, then discovered I had "hide all brackets" set. Oops, not a bug, just me messing up.

I switched overview tabs back and forth several times. In past mass tests this would result in a utterly lagged out client. In this test the client stayed responsive!
Agaetis Byrjun Endalaust
#18 - 2012-02-07 21:53:47 UTC
OS version: win7 64bit
CPU: Phenom II X4 3.4 Ghz
GPU: nvidia GTX560 ti Twin Frozr II
RAM: 16Gb DDR3 1333
How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium/high

User Experience

Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 15-20
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 8-10
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 2 - on tq I'm stable at 60 but I've never been in huge fleets such as here
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes on one of the 2 clients after jumping in poitot
Did you see any problems with the UI? lag aside? guess not
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

__________________________ just because you're paranoid it doesn't mean they're not after you
Scoggs117
Revenant Industrial Werks
#19 - 2012-02-07 22:40:55 UTC
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Windows 7 64-bit
  • CPU: Intel i7 2600k @ 4.6GHz
  • GPU: EVGA/Nvidia GTX580SC
  • RAM:16GB 1600Mhz
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 30
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 12-15
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 5
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? : No
  • Did you see any problems with the UI? : Upon Entering XBV-98 my overview showed that there were ships there but no info on them. Screenshot here
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: I have more fun during mass tests than on Tranquility lol

Drosstein Fitch
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-02-07 23:02:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Drosstein Fitch
Machine Info and Settings


OS version: Win Vista Business 32
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo T9400
GPU: Intel GMA 4500
RAM: 3 Gb
How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low


User Experience


Average FPS during fight at the gate in Poitot, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 2.9
Average FPS - Zoomed in: 2.9
On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3
Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
Did you see any problems with the UI? Yes partial text drop outs, but was experiencing this prior to today's test. Filed BR No. 127135. Problems using the IGB scroll bars; cursor has to be very near the edge or the moveable scroll bar to be able grab and scroll , when place in middle of the scroll bar,the cursor grabs the whole window and drags.
Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: On the whole very "laggy" during the engagements, in terms of both trying to interact with targets, ship modules etc and also the overview when filtering.
12Next page