These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Another Marauder buff topic.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Xolve
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#21 - 2012-02-06 20:42:54 UTC
Ager Agemo wrote:
ok, they do PVE relatively ok, compared to T1 ships... for 10 times the price, assuming same tech level modules. of course any ship will look all awesome if you fit 31 bill on it fitting wise... and you manage to not get kamikaze owned.

and yeah... i know is harder to balance, but thats more of CCP problem not ours :P we pay, they make our game awesome.



Price has everything to do with the difficulty/quality of materials required to produce the ship, not its relative effectiveness. Regardless as to how ineffective you think Marauders are. you opinion holds no merit to the Moon Materials/Reactions required for the building of the ship.
Ager Agemo
Rainbow Ponies Incorporated
#22 - 2012-02-06 20:56:23 UTC
Xolve wrote:
Ager Agemo wrote:
ok, they do PVE relatively ok, compared to T1 ships... for 10 times the price, assuming same tech level modules. of course any ship will look all awesome if you fit 31 bill on it fitting wise... and you manage to not get kamikaze owned.

and yeah... i know is harder to balance, but thats more of CCP problem not ours :P we pay, they make our game awesome.



Price has everything to do with the difficulty/quality of materials required to produce the ship, not its relative effectiveness. Regardless as to how ineffective you think Marauders are. you opinion holds no merit to the Moon Materials/Reactions required for the building of the ship.



so lets change it to, a ship that costs 10 times more material wise, is not really holding onto the effectiveness expected.
Previous page12