These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Out of Pod Experience

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Star Wars vs Star Trek

Author
Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#101 - 2012-02-04 04:08:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Merin Ryskin
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Borg Ships move at a similar pace.


So why does it take them so long to get anywhere? Why don't they travel to earth in a few days/hours and put an end to the Federation's sad existence?


(In Star Wars, ships travel across the entire galaxy within days/hours.)


Quote:
One very large Federation Fleet managed to fight off one single Borg Ship in first Contact using specially weapons and they took heavy, heavy losses.


Exactly. They fought it and took losses, but they were still able to fight it. If they had been outgunned by many orders of magnitude like the firepower difference between a star destroyer and the Enterprise, the "fight" would've been over in seconds and the Federation would have had absolutely no chance of success.

And of course that's ignoring Voyager and how far the Borg fell from even that mediocre level. Which I can entirely understand, I know I like to pretend that everything after DS9 was just a bad dream.

Quote:
That margin is not as big as you think against Borg Weaponry. As well the sources behind the Empires Weapons estimates seem to be of dubious Cannon. Especially since what is often shown seems in Movies, Television and in Star wars Books contradicts the far out and dubious sources of what is a very bias site that is more interested in proving one side wrong then looking at all options.


It appears to be biased because, unlike the author, you're not an engineer. Those numbers were calculated from the observed effects of star destroyer shots vaporizing asteroids. If you know a bit about physics, it's trivially easy to calculate the energy involved, and the number is far, far greater than the equivalent Star Trek weapons.

There's a very good reason that, back when there actually was still a debate about this, it ended with all of the scientists and engineers virtually unanimously agreeing that Star Wars wins by an obscene margin.
Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#102 - 2012-02-04 04:16:23 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
1. a Genesis probe destroying a planet


Err, what movie were YOU watching?

Quote:
2. a certain Soran destroying an entire star with a tiny little torpedo no bigger then a standard surface to air missile. Screw the need for something the size of a small moon. That is some epic nerdy fire Power!!!


There's a huge difference between the two:

The star-killing missile works by some technobabble trick that probably won't work outside of very specific circumstances (IOW, it's useless against at killing other ships).

The death star blows up a planet by simply applying unbelievably huge amounts of energy to it.


(Also, can we please stop mentioning that horrible "movie"? Until this thread I'd been pretty successful at forgetting the painful fact that it ever existed.)

Quote:
So... it would appear to me that the only reason why the federation does not have weapons FAR MORE POWERFUL then that of the empire, is do to their policies against the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.


Or because all of their superweapons are based on bizarre technobabble, and most of them are lost technology.

And since I really doubt that all of the OTHER races in Star Trek would be so generous to their opposition, their failure to develop instant-win weapons of their own seems to be pretty clear proof that widespread use of them is simply not possible.
Alara IonStorm
#103 - 2012-02-04 04:20:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Alara IonStorm
Merin Ryskin wrote:

So why does it take them so long to get anywhere? Why don't they travel to earth in a few days/hours and put an end to the Federation's sad existence?


(In Star Wars, ships travel across the entire galaxy within days/hours.)

They do. The reason they don't destroy the Federation is that they consider it pretty much a non issue.
Quote:

Exactly. They fought it and took losses, but they were still able to fight it. If they had been outgunned by many orders of magnitude like the firepower difference between a star destroyer and the Enterprise, the "fight" would've been over in seconds and the Federation would have had absolutely no chance of success.

Same result as a Borg Cube against the Enterprise.
Quote:

It appears to be biased because, unlike the author, you're not an engineer. Those numbers were calculated from the observed effects of star destroyer shots vaporizing asteroids. If you know a bit about physics, it's trivially easy to calculate the energy involved, and the number is far, far greater than the equivalent Star Trek weapons.

Yet those effects never seem to manifest themselves in other instances of Combat. That source is as poor as the one that showed a Photon Torpedo doing nearly 0 Dmg it is simply cheap special effects.

Most instances of use show a much, much weaker weapon
Merin Ryskin wrote:

And since I really doubt that all of the OTHER races in Star Trek would be so generous to their opposition, their failure to develop instant-win weapons of their own seems to be pretty clear proof that widespread use of them is simply not possible.

They do and they are used like the Thalaron Radiation Emmiter or the Black Hole Generator seen in the latest movie. Their are a tn of Super Weapons in Star Trek that get used all the time. Twice in DS9 did they use devices to make Stars go Super Nova.
Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#104 - 2012-02-04 04:28:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Merin Ryskin
Alara IonStorm wrote:
They do. The reason they don't destroy the Federation is that they consider it pretty much a non issue.


So why do they keep trying?

Quote:
Same result as a Borg Cube against the Enterprise.


No, it's not. If the Federation fleet can successfully fight a Borg cube, then difference in firepower between a single Federation ship and a Borg cube is much, much less than the difference in firepower between a Federation ship and a star destroyer. FFS, why is this so hard to understand?

If you are outgunned 10-1, you can bring a fleet of 15 ships and win with heavy casualties.

If you are outgunned 1000000000000000000000000000000-1, all you can do is die.


Quote:
Yet those effects never seem to manifest themselves in other instances of Combat. That source is as poor as the one that showed a Photon Torpedo doing nearly 0 Dmg it is simply cheap special effects.

Most instances of use show a much, much weaker weapon.


Like what? The only examples of starship weapon effects in Star Wars are:

1) Starship weapons hitting a shielded starship, where we have no real world standard to compare it to (due to the slight problem of not having shields in the real world).

2) Starship weapons hitting a starship with military-level armor and possibly shields (for example, the attack on the first death star's surface), where we see massive damage but don't really have a standard to compare it to since we don't know the composition of that armor.

3) Starship weapons hitting asteroids, where we see asteroids vaporized entirely by capital ship weapons or (AotC) blasted into rubble in a huge radius by starfighter weapons.

The third case is the only one where we can get useful information, and in both cases we see massive firepower.

Alara IonStorm wrote:
They do and they are used like the Thalaron Radiation Emmiter or the Black Hole Generator seen in the latest movie. Their are a tn of Super Weapons in Star Trek that get used all the time. Twice in DS9 did they use devices to make Stars go Super Nova.


Let me make this nice and simple for you: if these superweapons and their related technology were as easy to develop as you say, and only the Federation's ethical rules prevent them from doing so, the Romulans/Borg/whoever would build them, effortlessly wipe out the entire Federation fleet, and then start destroying planets until the Federation surrendered and accepted a position of eternal slavery. The "war" would be over in a single TV episode.

The fact that we do not see this happen is indisputable proof that the Star Trek races are not capable of developing Star Wars level firepower as anything more than one-time technobabble plot devices.
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#105 - 2012-02-04 04:32:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
Merin Ryskin wrote:

Err, what movie were YOU watching?


I guess you are not a treky then?
How well versed can you be if you don't know about the genesis probe?


Merin Ryskin wrote:

There's a huge difference between the two:

The star-killing missile works by some technobabble trick that probably won't work outside of very specific circumstances (IOW, it's useless against at killing other ships).

The death star blows up a planet by simply applying unbelievably huge amounts of energy to it.


A feat untouched by anything in the star wars universe.


Merin Ryskin wrote:


their failure to develop instant-win weapons of their own seems to be pretty clear proof that widespread use of them is simply not possible.


Why exactly could they not generate a gigantic Phaser capable of the death star's output If they so desired to do so? Clear proof? Maybe it means something different to you then it does to the rest of us. Big smile


Merin Ryskin wrote:


Exactly. They fought it and took losses, but they were still able to fight it. If they had been outgunned by many orders of magnitude like the firepower difference between a star destroyer and the Enterprise, the "fight" would've been over in seconds and the Federation would have had absolutely no chance of success..




I suspect that Spock would just throw red matter at the superstar destroyer, covert it into a black hole and annihilate the entire imperial fleet all at once. Since you know, he went back in time and altered the flow of normal history. He brought with him knowledge of red matter and all kinds of new technologies.

Remember that big ship that Nero was flying (the one that destroyed vulcan) was only a "mining ship" of the era, which would be assumed to possess no threat to other weaponized starships of the day. It would appear that star trek could surmise all kinds of "trickery" to do both ingenious and unexpected things.

The Empire lost to Rebel forces remember? They were much smaller and far less equipped and they still won. Death Stars seem to be made out of paper... they keep exploding. Fighters seem to be taking down superstar destroyers... so... why cant entire star ships do the same? Especially when they employ, as you said, technological trickery? So again, where is your "clear proof"?? I don't see any.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Mina Sebiestar
Minmatar Inner Space Conglomerate
#106 - 2012-02-04 04:41:57 UTC
Hi my name is Q.

*swipe hand and turn whole empire in low quality rubber/helium voice singing dildos Shocked

You choke behind a smile a fake behind the fear

Because >>I is too hard

Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#107 - 2012-02-04 04:45:30 UTC
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
I guess you are not a treky then?
How well versed can you be if you don't know about the genesis probe?


Of course I know about the genesis probe, I just watched the version of the movie where it collapses a nebula (a net release of energy) and creates an unstable planet which eventually technobabbles itself apart. Maybe you have the special edition where Khan hijacks the ship and uses the genesis torpedo to blow up earth, but I don't think that's a very relevant one to discuss.

Quote:
A feat untouched by anything in the star wars universe.


Well, for certain unconventional definitions of "untouched"...

Quote:
Why exactly could they not generate a gigantic Phaser capable of the death star's out put If they so desired to do so? Clear proof? Maybe it means something different to you then it does to the rest of us. Big smile


Because there are several different factions in Star Trek that would be very eager to build that gigantic phaser and use it against the Federation if it was actually possible to do so. Since we don't see this happen, the only reasonable conclusion is that it isn't possible.

Quote:
I suspect that Spock would just throw red matter at the superstar destroyer, covert it into a black hole and annihilate the entire imperial fleet all at once. Since you know, he went back in time and altered the flow of normal history. He brought with him knowledge of red matter and all kinds of new technologies.


Back in time into an alternate universe, which explicitly exists in a different canon from the rest of Star Trek.

Quote:
Remember that big ship that Nero was flying (the one that destroyed vulcan) was only a "mining ship" of the era, which would be assumed to possess no threat to other weaponized starships of the day. It would appear that star trek could surmise all kinds of "trickery" to do both ingenious and unexpected things.


A mining ship with additional weapons added. And we'll note that despite the huge difference in size between the two, the mining ship had trouble destroying even a small Federation ship from hundreds of years earlier, and lost its fight against the Klingon fleet.

Conclusion: Nero's ship only does so well because it is from hundreds of years in the future, and even "modern"-era Star Trek ships would probably obliterate it effortlessly. Against a star destroyer, it would only be worse.
Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#108 - 2012-02-04 04:45:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Merin Ryskin
Quote:
The Empire lost to Rebel forces remember? They were much smaller and far less equipped and they still won. Death Stars seem to be made out of paper... they keep exploding. Fighters seem to be taking down super star destroyers... so... why cant entire star ships do the same?


Because a Star Wars fighter has firepower comparable to a Star Trek capital ship? Because the super star destroyer was only lost after suffering concentrated fire from the entire Rebel capital fleet (including miles-long battleships) which allowed the fighters to accomplish anything?

And I should also point out that the Rebels may have been smaller, but they still had the same base level of technology, and the ability to build mile-long capital ships, swarms of fighters, etc. Star Trek has none of these advantages.
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#109 - 2012-02-04 04:53:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
Merin Ryskin wrote:


Because there are several different factions in Star Trek that would be very eager to build that gigantic phaser and use it against the Federation if it was actually possible to do so. Since we don't see this happen, the only reasonable conclusion is that it isn't possible.
.



I fail to see why I should bother trying to argue this failure of logic, lol. Star Trek Dyson Sphere seems to clearly state that far more is capable in their fictional world.



Quote:
Maybe you have the special edition where Khan hijacks the ship and uses the genesis torpedo to blow up earth, but I don't think that's a very relevant one to discuss.



Also: Genesis Torpedo

Could be clearly seen impacting a planet in the beginning of the film. Just because Kahn detonated it as a make shift self destruct, does not mean that was it's original intention. The Klingons wanted it as a space to planet based weapon system of mass destruction.



So considering all of those basic failures in your logic (and memory) I don't see why I should have to bother arguing the rest of your points which equally boarder on lunacy.


U mad yet Big smile

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#110 - 2012-02-04 04:57:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
Merin Ryskin wrote:


A mining ship with additional weapons added. And we'll note that despite the huge difference in size between the two, the mining ship had trouble destroying even a small Federation ship from hundreds of years earlier, and lost its fight against the Klingon fleet..


Actually, I don't remember this part. I thought that the Klingon fleet was engaged by, and destroyed by, said ship as spoken of by Uhura? And I thought that was part of the driving theme that allowed Kirk to convince the then captain of the enterprise it was a trap in orbit around Vulcan? I was also under the impression, after watching the film, that Nero's ship was tearing apart entire fleets with very little effort.


Did I miss something?



Oh yea, & U mad yet? Big smile

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#111 - 2012-02-04 05:18:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Merin Ryskin
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Star Trek Dyson Sphere


Which was built by a species that disappeared a long time ago, and, to the best of everyone's knowledge, no longer exists in the Star Trek universe.

Quote:
Could be clearly seen impacting a planet in the beginning of the film. Just because Kahn detonated it as a make shift self destruct, does not mean that was it's original intention. The Klingons wanted it as a space to planet based weapon system of mass destruction.


That was an in-universe CGI promotional video, not a recording of an actual event. And it didn't destroy the planet, it only made some changes to the planet's surface.

And yes, the Klingons wanted it, but all we know is that they believed that it would be a powerful weapon. Even assuming they weren't mistaken (not hard to imagine given that they were working without any direct knowledge of the genesis project), "weapon of mass destruction" leaves a huge range of firepower. It's way too vague to conclude anything.

Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Did I miss something? ]


The fact that Nero was imprisoned by the Klingons, which kind of implies that they were able to beat his ship.

Or how about the fact that a single ship was able to stall him long enough to get the evacuation shuttles to a safe distance, and then ram his super-ship and cause significant damage?
Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
#112 - 2012-02-04 05:55:57 UTC
Merin Ryskin wrote:


Also, the fact that they can't deal with melee weapons means that plain old bullets (which use the same damage mechanism as a knife) would be hilariously effective. Too bad Starfleet's security forces don't seem to be smart enough to replicate themselves a few machine guns...




Picard did. Led a couple of Borg onto the holodeck and disabled the safety protocols, then proceeded to go all OG gangster on them with a Tommy gun. Warf just busted out his Klingon sword.

Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel **IG OOPE **

Merin Ryskin
Peregrine Industries
#113 - 2012-02-04 06:01:27 UTC
Micheal Dietrich wrote:
Picard did. Led a couple of Borg onto the holodeck and disabled the safety protocols, then proceeded to go all OG gangster on them with a Tommy gun. Warf just busted out his Klingon sword.


Ok, Picard did it once, but that just proves my point: despite guns being clearly effective against the Borg, nobody else ever uses them. And despite the fact that the Borg must have faced projectile weapons in the past, they completely fail to adapt to them and die. If the Federation had any sense at all, as soon as the Borg show up all of the redshirts would be carrying shotguns.

Not that this has anything to do with which universe wins, it's just amusing stupidity.
Micheal Dietrich
Kings Gambit Black
#114 - 2012-02-04 06:09:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Micheal Dietrich
Merin Ryskin wrote:
Micheal Dietrich wrote:
Picard did. Led a couple of Borg onto the holodeck and disabled the safety protocols, then proceeded to go all OG gangster on them with a Tommy gun. Warf just busted out his Klingon sword.


Ok, Picard did it once, but that just proves my point: despite guns being clearly effective against the Borg, nobody else ever uses them. And despite the fact that the Borg must have faced projectile weapons in the past, they completely fail to adapt to them and die. If the Federation had any sense at all, as soon as the Borg show up all of the redshirts would be carrying shotguns.

Not that this has anything to do with which universe wins, it's just amusing stupidity.



Well I would suggest putting howitzers on the ships hull first but that's just me......

Edit: I would like to point out that we did in fact adapt to the borg without having to go backwards in technology. For crew members, they were assigned new phasers that would constantly modulate their frequency making it harder for the Borg to adapt.
On a ship to ship scale the Defiant was made specifically to counter Borg cubes. It packed modulating shields for defense, modulated turbo phasers for offense (and included the new Quantum Torpedoes), an oversize powerplant for speed and maneuverability far above any starfleet ship currently in use, and was the first federation ship to utilize the cloak under a treaty agreement with the Klingons. The issue was that after the first cube was defeated they stopped production on any more versions because the politicians felt it wasn't needed. Most Starfleet ships are designed for general purpose but the Defiant was made for battle.

Out of Pod is getting In the Pod - Join in game channel **IG OOPE **

Jhagiti Tyran
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#115 - 2012-02-04 08:46:21 UTC
Bah, Imperium of Man> Star Wars Empire. The Empire couldn't even stamp out a handful of rebels where as the Imperium of Man has as many ships, can throw millions of soldiers at a problem and generally has much more powerful equipment. (Titans Vs AT-ATs lol) The average battleship carries as much fire-power as a Death Star with smaller ships like cruisers being closer to a SSD than a Star Destroyer.

Some of the individual technology's seem crude but some of its more advanced than anything from either universe, like levels of cybernetics that the Borg would be envious of.
Eternum Praetorian
Doomheim
#116 - 2012-02-04 13:49:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Eternum Praetorian
Merin Ryskin wrote:
Eternum Praetorian wrote:
Star Trek Dyson Sphere


Which was built by a species that disappeared a long time ago, and, to the best of everyone's knowledge, no longer exists in the Star Trek universe.


So what your saying is stuff like that can in fact be built in the fictional universe of star trek. Thank you for confirming my assertion.


Merin Ryskin wrote:
That was an in-universe CGI promotional video, not a recording of an actual event. And it didn't destroy the planet, it only made some changes to the planet's surface.


Genesis Device was not a promotional video LOL. It was a computer simulation of the actual Genesis wave. A simulation, not a promotional video hahaha. Man you will say anything to try and be right wont you?



Merin Ryskin wrote:
The fact that Nero was imprisoned by the Klingons, which kind of implies that they were able to beat his ship.

Or how about the fact that a single ship was able to stall him long enough to get the evacuation shuttles to a safe distance, and then ram his super-ship and cause significant damage?



Ummm.... I REALLY don't know why I have to say this. I REALLY DON'T but wouldn't they have to be advanced Klingons of the future, in future ships? UghUgh Because this is what happened in the movie that I watched.

[quote]In 2258, the Romulan mining vessel Narada from the 24th century of an alternate reality, commanded by Nero, attacked the Klingon prison planet. It then destroyed an armada of 47 Klingon warbirds


U like the crack pipe or something Merin? Lol


Also, I just popped in this movie. Looks like the very first shot breached their shields and knocked out the warp drive and their weapons. The second breached their hull and ejected people out into space. Ofc for some reason their phasers got magically fixed for the cinematic sequence at the end, but the point is made clear when a dozen or so, similar star ships warp into orbit around Vulcan later on in the film.

So it's a mining ship with weapons added, that would not be able to match the actual warships of the same era. True weapons ships do not fear modified mining ships LOL. suuuuuch faaaaaiiiil logic.... It BURNS MY BRAIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Spock carried all of this future technology into the past, and would be able to manifest it as needed, should it ever be needed. The rebels seemed to have done it with far less.


Maybe you have a size matters complex, and that is why you think bigger is always better no matter what?
It's ok, I hear if smaller people use it with better skill, most women won't notice.

[center]The EVE Gateway Blog[/center] [center]One Of EVE Online's Ultimate Resources[/center]

Pod Potato
Gluttonous Hungers Inc.
#117 - 2012-02-10 19:35:09 UTC
Well, if it wasn't for Star Trek:TNG we wouldn't have this little YouTube gem. That's something at least.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ReOw_2f4lpY

☻/ /▌ / \ This is Bob, post him into your forum sig and help him conquer the forums.

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#118 - 2012-02-19 20:39:25 UTC
Merin Ryskin wrote:
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Borg Ships move at a similar pace.


So why does it take them so long to get anywhere? Why don't they travel to earth in a few days/hours and put an end to the Federation's sad existence?


(In Star Wars, ships travel across the entire galaxy within days/hours.)


Quote:
One very large Federation Fleet managed to fight off one single Borg Ship in first Contact using specially weapons and they took heavy, heavy losses.


Exactly. They fought it and took losses, but they were still able to fight it. If they had been outgunned by many orders of magnitude like the firepower difference between a star destroyer and the Enterprise, the "fight" would've been over in seconds and the Federation would have had absolutely no chance of success.

And of course that's ignoring Voyager and how far the Borg fell from even that mediocre level. Which I can entirely understand, I know I like to pretend that everything after DS9 was just a bad dream.

Quote:
That margin is not as big as you think against Borg Weaponry. As well the sources behind the Empires Weapons estimates seem to be of dubious Cannon. Especially since what is often shown seems in Movies, Television and in Star wars Books contradicts the far out and dubious sources of what is a very bias site that is more interested in proving one side wrong then looking at all options.


It appears to be biased because, unlike the author, you're not an engineer. Those numbers were calculated from the observed effects of star destroyer shots vaporizing asteroids. If you know a bit about physics, it's trivially easy to calculate the energy involved, and the number is far, far greater than the equivalent Star Trek weapons.

There's a very good reason that, back when there actually was still a debate about this, it ended with all of the scientists and engineers virtually unanimously agreeing that Star Wars wins by an obscene margin.


The borg like to learn first about you when the meet you. Then after they learn enough about you, they try to absorb you. This is when the resistance is futile kicks in. If you refuse to be absorbed, they fight you until they force you to be absorbed into the borg collective.

So they would fly to earth, study it, then try to absorb it. They propably wouldn't fly straight there, then blow it up, no absorbtion of it.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

rodyas
Tie Fighters Inc
#119 - 2012-02-19 20:44:05 UTC
Merin Ryskin wrote:
Micheal Dietrich wrote:
Picard did. Led a couple of Borg onto the holodeck and disabled the safety protocols, then proceeded to go all OG gangster on them with a Tommy gun. Warf just busted out his Klingon sword.


Ok, Picard did it once, but that just proves my point: despite guns being clearly effective against the Borg, nobody else ever uses them. And despite the fact that the Borg must have faced projectile weapons in the past, they completely fail to adapt to them and die. If the Federation had any sense at all, as soon as the Borg show up all of the redshirts would be carrying shotguns.

Not that this has anything to do with which universe wins, it's just amusing stupidity.


The Borg and the Federation use similiar strategies. The federation like to learn about you and your society, then try to help you improve or move forward. The Borg like to learn about you then use that to help absorb you into the collective and use you.

The guns are effective for a short while against the Borg, until they adapt to it, then they are useless. I think in one episode though they set the guns, so the frequency of the lazor would change between shots, so it was hard for the Borg to adapt to it.

The federation when attacked like to learn about what you were to doing, to counterattack or stop you and borg does the same. Why tech advances are nice in a war, keeps the enemies on their toes.

Signature removed for inappropriate language - CCP Eterne

Andre II
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#120 - 2012-02-20 05:32:18 UTC
Dear god.. What have I done.. I've created a never ending argument powered by sci-fi enthusiasts. OH THE HUMANITY

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=47868