These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New Ship

First post
Author
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#81 - 2012-02-03 05:29:30 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Nova Fox wrote:
lol

You can;t pay me enough to buid one for you I am sorry but I do reserve the right to deny customers.

Either way busy building the new fleet thanatos.


You clearly are building Thanatos ingame. They are selling below their mineral price currently.


You don't know Nova Fox yet?

He's a lolRPer who RPs that he's a shipyard.

The pictures are pretty, the explanations range between redundant and inane, and the stats are silly, but he seems to have fun with it.


I rarely engineer the stats though and when and if I do I bounce it off existing ships so at least they're not that... well... not belonging in the game at least. I would have to agree with explinations at times I just have issues with explaining things proper in short sweet and enough to the point that people could assume it can be balanced and useful without being over powered.

I mean I would love it if people would actually tear the stats apart but I appernatly dont have enough ship experts to go around and judge such ships performance or possibly decry a potential abuse. The only ships Ive managed to recently engineer in stats would be a bunch of civillian ships.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#82 - 2012-02-03 05:32:09 UTC
Nova Fox wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Nova Fox wrote:
lol

You can;t pay me enough to buid one for you I am sorry but I do reserve the right to deny customers.

Either way busy building the new fleet thanatos.


You clearly are building Thanatos ingame. They are selling below their mineral price currently.


You don't know Nova Fox yet?

He's a lolRPer who RPs that he's a shipyard.

The pictures are pretty, the explanations range between redundant and inane, and the stats are silly, but he seems to have fun with it.


I rarely engineer the stats though and when and if I do I bounce it off existing ships so at least they're not that... well... not belonging in the game at least. I would have to agree with explinations at times I just have issues with explaining things proper in short sweet and enough to the point that people could assume it can be balanced and useful without being over powered.

I mean I would love it if people would actually tear the stats apart but I appernatly dont have enough ship experts to go around and judge such ships performance or possibly decry a potential abuse. The only ships Ive managed to recently engineer in stats would be a bunch of civillian ships.


Biggest thing that I think you need to keep in mind is that "civillian ships" are meant to avoid combat through pilot cunning rather than being able to escape combat once engaged. That Idea for immunity to targeted points idea is the standout for insanity.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#83 - 2012-02-03 06:00:11 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:
Nova Fox wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:
Dinsdale Pirannha wrote:
Nova Fox wrote:
lol

You can;t pay me enough to buid one for you I am sorry but I do reserve the right to deny customers.

Either way busy building the new fleet thanatos.


You clearly are building Thanatos ingame. They are selling below their mineral price currently.


You don't know Nova Fox yet?

He's a lolRPer who RPs that he's a shipyard.

The pictures are pretty, the explanations range between redundant and inane, and the stats are silly, but he seems to have fun with it.


I rarely engineer the stats though and when and if I do I bounce it off existing ships so at least they're not that... well... not belonging in the game at least. I would have to agree with explinations at times I just have issues with explaining things proper in short sweet and enough to the point that people could assume it can be balanced and useful without being over powered.

I mean I would love it if people would actually tear the stats apart but I appernatly dont have enough ship experts to go around and judge such ships performance or possibly decry a potential abuse. The only ships Ive managed to recently engineer in stats would be a bunch of civillian ships.


Biggest thing that I think you need to keep in mind is that "civillian ships" are meant to avoid combat through pilot cunning rather than being able to escape combat once engaged. That Idea for immunity to targeted points idea is the standout for insanity.


Oh the module the one that wrecks the ship entirely to the point that if it is caught again its dead? yeah.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.

CCP Spitfire
C C P
C C P Alliance
#84 - 2012-02-03 06:31:27 UTC
Moved from "EVE General Discussion".

CCP Spitfire | Marketing & Sales Team @ccp_spitfire

Anderron Shi
Perkone
Caldari State
#85 - 2012-02-07 17:06:30 UTC
Vytoryn for CSM 6!

.

FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#86 - 2012-02-07 17:25:15 UTC
Satav wrote:
I agree that mining needs a buff either in a module or ship.


No, it doesn't.

What people don't seem to understand when they ask for the ability to mine more and more stuff is that they'll be handing that same ability to the bots, which will continue to flood the market with minerals and drive the prices that much lower. YOU CAN'T FIX MINING WITH BETTER YIELD.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#87 - 2012-02-07 17:30:29 UTC
FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
Satav wrote:
I agree that mining needs a buff either in a module or ship.


No, it doesn't.

What people don't seem to understand when they ask for the ability to mine more and more stuff is that they'll be handing that same ability to the bots, which will continue to flood the market with minerals and drive the prices that much lower. YOU CAN'T FIX MINING WITH BETTER YIELD.


DING DING

Nullsec Mining has a low income due to Drone Regions

HS Mining has a low income because it's incredibly safe and low effort (second only to Courier contracts, which are safer [freighter ganks for the lulz are rare] and take less effort [AP to station, check back in a few hours]).

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon