EVE General Discussion

being a highsec player, you should know this

entering password into computer requires too much brain function that your average highsec player has in critically short supply so must be limited to as few instances as possible. Password1 isnt getting easier to type

haha really?

I suggest you get an alt into a nullsec alliance and try this for yourself

Eve is, and has always been, a private club of null sec corps.
Whoever thinks different is just foolling him/herself.
You want to be part of the action? Join the club (if you are allowed. Most probably not, you carebear!).

The rest (high sec) are allowed there to mow the lawn, clean the dishes, and watch others have fun.

When null sec players need to disrupt incursions in high sec you are just seeing how much of a private club the game is. (And for the record, as long as it's a valid tactic, I don't care, I'm not an incursion runner). But please, don't start the risk/reward arguments. It's rather "it was hard to me, so it must be hard to you" problem.

So, if you are a carebear, you're not allowed to "play". If CCP gives you a way to be part of the game, it will be obliterated and it will be demanded that it be nerfed. No, you can't join the club. And we CAN influence CCP using the CSM, you don't know what you're doing, you carebear!

The sooner you know what kind of game it is, the better for you. At least you'll know the rules, and can adapt or leave.

"Not a game for wusses"
Jeez, you have to have some nerve to say that publicly. I almost fell off the chair when I read that.
If that's what the CSM is good for, I say get rid of it.

Or you could not subscribe to these robotic attempts to control the masses with a prescribed projection of how you choose to play in this "Sandbox".

Well thank you for being so captain obvious on your stance. Repetition isnt going to change my view though, a reasonable argument might.

I take a stance that EvE is perfectly capable of catering a number of different playstyles and shouldn't be just "funneled" or simply limited by those who wish to marginalise opinion for their own ends. Especially when there is significant representation from all those "paying" players towards those interests.

Apart from that as a personal view of both philanthropy in terms of game development that helps everyone on an equal footing aswell as simply seeing the possibility that the game is not the rightfull ownership of anyone over anothers. In this sense I'm capable of allowing for multiple playstyles, "EVEN" and this is the clincher, "EVEN" playstyles I might not personally agree with.

The biggest determining factor for that is not the null sec power blocs, but CCP's bank balance.