These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

The Lifecycle of a CEO/Director (CCP PLEASE READ)

First post
Author
Dowla Daupor
Deltole Deltole Deltole
#21 - 2012-01-31 19:04:02 UTC
What is this thread about?
E man Industries
SeaChell Productions
#22 - 2012-01-31 20:17:26 UTC  |  Edited by: E man Industries
CEO's, Officers and FC's.

Thank you.

Anything that can be done to make these guys lives easier and more fun is a good thing. How many PvP alliance's would have dailly roams without the few FC's who are on each night organizing and leading these fleets? How many would log on without the FC's, Officers and CEO's?

Support your leaders and say thanks!


As for things that would help....better FC tools is where I would start. Let FC's better see there fleet comps, locations of scouts, some intuative map of where there scouts are, what system's they are in. Some way for scouts to label things on the FC's map.
The dot lan maps a great and far better than those in game, thinking a map shoing everything within 5 jumps or within 3 jumps of a planned route auto generated with fleet embers noted on them and scouts can ping the map and add labels on the fly.

For scouts maybe a better warping system...want to warp 300 from a gate? okay select that rather than needing to go out and create 100's of bookmarks for systems you roam in.

Just spitballing but better tools would be huge!
Skywalker
TEMPLAR.
The Initiative.
#23 - 2012-01-31 21:20:05 UTC
In our alliance anyone can be their own CEO.
If you read the recruit post you will see it's a win-win situation, and in the end about to have fun without obligations.
Wouldn't work ofc for space holding alliances.
Zimmy Zeta
Perkone
Caldari State
#24 - 2012-01-31 21:52:33 UTC
just wondering....putting CCP-PLEASE READ!!! after the title of your post...has that ever worked to get a dev-response?

I'd like to apologize for the poor quality of the post above and sincerely hope you didn't waste your time reading it. Yes, I do feel bad about it.

CCP Spitfire
C C P
C C P Alliance
#25 - 2012-02-01 06:32:04 UTC
Zimmy Zeta wrote:
just wondering....putting CCP-PLEASE READ!!! after the title of your post...has that ever worked to get a dev-response?


I've read this thread, although not exactly because of the title. Smile Thread cleaned of offtopic posts; please keep it civil. I agree that the corporation management system could use some love (putting it mildly) and would be happy to hear your ideas and suggestions and pass them along to the dev team.

CCP Spitfire | Marketing & Sales Team @ccp_spitfire

RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#26 - 2012-02-01 07:20:22 UTC
The Mittani wrote:
use a team structure so you don't have single person dependencies in key positions, learn how to delegate, stop micromanaging

voila


I thought Single Person dependancies were the best kind. Especially when your sov bill wallet is controlled by a guy on vacation.

Yes, I read your articles (and enjoy them).

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

NightCrawler 85
Phoibe Enterprises
#27 - 2012-02-01 09:14:42 UTC
I have been the recruitment director and diplomat for a corp for several years now. Because of this im also well aware over how easy it is to get burned out. There is no real sulotion to it sadly.

The recruitment is what took the hardest toll on me.
Lets face it. Recruitment is not fun which is why so few people want the job,and those that do want it normally just wants a fancy title to brag about. Its first the half year or so i started to assign roles to other people in the corp so that they could help me out. Its rather simple. All they can do is accept applications,nothing else.

They have their own seperate section on our forums where they can list the people they talk to,their interests and basic information and ofc gets trained on what to look for and what kind of people i want them to recruit.

But ofc as most people will know,if your a director you wont just have to deal with the roles you are assigned. There are so many other small things you have to deal with. So and so member is unhappy because of this thing,that member is unhappy about something else,this guy is pissed because of something completely different. The sad truth is,even in a game,you can never make everyone happy and you need to adjust to the idea that you will get yelled at,you will have people bitching at you and ofc everyone expects you to have a magic wand you can wave around and make all their problems go away.

So many people come into the role and say "I can do this! I would be awesome at it!",you decide to give them a chanse and 3 months later they ragequit because of pure exhaustion. Small hint to you new CEO's out there..never ever give director roles to the person who asks for them,or tries to pressure you into giving it to them. It will just end bad for everyone involved.

During my 8 years or so in EVE i have taken a total of 3 breaks. Im guessing it almost comes up to a half year total. During this time i have done nothing but change skills and some very basic stuff. Sadly if you loose a director like this,especially in a role that is hard to replace,this can be very bad for the corp. Thus i needed to find a way around it.

After my last break this summer i realized that i have to stop putting all my time into EVE. I need something else on the side,no matter what it is,just something that i can play where i actually enjoy my self. I know it sounds silly but honestly when you take on a director role you wont have the abilety to have fun in EVE like you used to Blink
Think my record has been 4 months or so where i never had the chanse to actually undock because there was always something that needed to be taken care off.

The scary thing is that if i now resigned,i wouldent know what to do with all my spare time in EVE. I would undock and feel completely lost lol.

So here is my advice. If your a director or the CEO,dont let EVE run your life. Do something that you find fun once in a while. If you have good corp members and directors they will be able to pick up teh slack the two days a week you take to do something else. Weather or not this is a weekend vecation with your better half,or decide to go fishing on some cabin or just taking a long drive across the country,or playing a completely different game. For me Unreal tournament was a blessing a few years back. Was always nice immagioning that it was pesky corp members heads you blew off P

Now for those that are thinking about starting a corp or taking this role. Think really hard about what your getting your self into. Remember that it might look easy,but there is so many things going on in the background that you as a member are spared of seeing and never have to worry about or consider. Being a director or the CEO is not easy,and its not a job that anyone can do.
Jarnis McPieksu
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2012-02-01 09:27:46 UTC
CCP Spitfire wrote:
Zimmy Zeta wrote:
just wondering....putting CCP-PLEASE READ!!! after the title of your post...has that ever worked to get a dev-response?


I've read this thread, although not exactly because of the title. Smile Thread cleaned of offtopic posts; please keep it civil. I agree that the corporation management system could use some love (putting it mildly) and would be happy to hear your ideas and suggestions and pass them along to the dev team.


Would "nuke it from orbit, it is the only way to be sure" and "kill it with fire. now." qualify?

(Yes, it would imply that someone needs to re-program another system that does what the current corp management interface desperately tries to do)
Jack Paladin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#29 - 2012-02-01 10:53:14 UTC
CCP Spitfire wrote:

I've read this thread, although not exactly because of the title. Smile Thread cleaned of offtopic posts; please keep it civil. I agree that the corporation management system could use some love (putting it mildly) and would be happy to hear your ideas and suggestions and pass them along to the dev team.


Many thanks for the response.

I will make a detailed post in the next 24-48 hours outlining my ideas.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#30 - 2012-02-02 00:56:38 UTC
Jack Paladin wrote:
CCP Spitfire wrote:

I've read this thread, although not exactly because of the title. Smile Thread cleaned of offtopic posts; please keep it civil. I agree that the corporation management system could use some love (putting it mildly) and would be happy to hear your ideas and suggestions and pass them along to the dev team.


Many thanks for the response.

I will make a detailed post in the next 24-48 hours outlining my ideas.


Who wants to set a wager on the quality of the ideas?

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Terminal Insanity
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#31 - 2012-02-02 01:16:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Terminal Insanity
Yeah, many alliances/corporations turn the game into a chore/job. That is the major problem.

You're required to fill a quota, whatever it is, and your entire corporation stresses over filling the quota each month.

I've personally been booted from Dreddit and u-208, not because of the Corporation but because of the ALLIANCE
u-208/BLADE guys didnt want to boot me, they had no choice. It was an ultimatum by the alliance leader, Daniel Jedi because i sold him a 15 mil anathema ("ripping off the alliance")

And then i was booted from Dreddit/TEST because i hang out in a channel with an ex corpmate, who's now in PL (and actually i think he's quit or been banned from the game, i havent seen him in like a year)



Anyway, my point is, theres too many people making this game into a chore, and not enough people having fun. SOV warfare isnt much different then rock chewing most of the time (nobody shows up to defend the POS)

Almost all the alliances i've been in, have very similar roams: 50 people undock, jump about 40-70 systems around the area, find 2 or 3 kills. return. Bleh. Theres no incentive to fight anymore. My corp has been in situations where we would evemail our enemies and beg them to fight us, giving them fair or better odds... Agreeing on fleet compositions and everything... sometimes they'd accept out of mutal bordom! WTF?

if its 50 vs 50, chances are AT LEAST one side will run home frightened of the odds. People dont fight unless they are convinced they will win.

Safespot Bookmarks around every single 0.0 gate makes 0.0 travel nearly guarenteed. (100% guarenteed if you send your alt in a rifter first)


There are far too many ways to avoid combat, and nowhere near enough ways to actually gank people.

Intercepter lands on a blob? jump gate! hold 15 seconds, reapproach+mwd, jump, repeat until you get away... or until your enemy gets bored and leaves

Too bad that intercepter was the scout for the only other pvp gang in the area, and now they wont come fight you because they see you're ballzy enough to gatecamp

Part of me is scared to say this next bit, im horrified at the prospect and realize it does 'destroy eve', but... pvp on SiSi is a lot more fun... people actually fight there. Because their ship cost them 100 isk instead of 100,000,000 isk.

"War declarations are never officially considered griefing and are not a bannable offense, and it has been repeatedly stated by the developers that the possibility for non-consensual PvP is an intended feature." - CCP

Nehlaki Hedion
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#32 - 2012-02-02 01:39:20 UTC
Terminal Insanity wrote:
Part of me is scared to say this next bit, im horrified at the prospect and realize it does 'destroy eve', but... pvp on SiSi is a lot more fun... people actually fight there. Because their ship cost them 100 isk instead of 100,000,000 isk.


So, basically, you're saying turn SiSi into the PVP server and TQ into the PVE server?

trollface.jpg

Well, wouldn't that be kinda ironic?

I love it

Kai'Ckul
Solar Storm
#33 - 2012-02-03 00:53:21 UTC
As a former burnout myself, I fully know what Jack is on about, tho he spends many words saying it Lol

Having a close leader team as many have pointed out, is definitely one of the ways to ensure your corporation stays operational and able to function, but it also has it's challenges.

A small team is quite vulnereable once RL issues occur. EVE life can be hard to combine with family life, 90 hour work weeks, or just the occational trip out from your EVE lair in dark corner of the basement, so you want to put in place an organization that can handle these scenarios

How do you allow people to prove themselves without giving them access ? How do you know the nice chap won't clean out the coffers once you give him access to stuff ? How do you empower your members gradually and give them a sense of accomplishment and responsibility ?

The last bit especially is hard to accomplish in EVE, especially in a corporation with a broad range of activities. The roles and access matrix in EVE can cope with a few main activities such as f.ex a pure mining corp, but is not adequately suited for more diversified activites. Take something such as hangar access. You're either based at, at HQ, or Other... and every damned POS you own is Other Oops Container access is another nifty example. You can password protect a can, so you can give different access to different cans in the hangar, but since the containers themselves cannot be locked down in that hangar, it kind of defeats the purpose.

Basically EVE lacks the mechanisms on a corporate level to gradually empower the corp members in a diversified corp, without risking very many expensive eggs in one basket. The common workaround: Alt-Corps. Wallet Corp, T2 Corp, Capproduction Corp, etc etc. Which in turn gives directors and CEO a character overload....
Nephilius
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#34 - 2012-02-03 01:00:01 UTC
Which is why I have determined that I am better off playing all by my lonesome. Just have too much going on without having to worry about things like this.
"If."
Ravenal
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#35 - 2012-02-03 02:00:41 UTC
easy peasy stuff - just allow your members to govern themselves.

Someone will have an idea to do stuff, facilitate ... and encourage them to pick their own helpers.

If you are doing too much you are trying too hard. NEVER forget to have fun. If someone complaints just tell them to forget about it and do whatever they think is fun.

Forced hand (war decs, pos fuelling crap ...) --- Anyone who doesn't like it can just lay low and do something else (leave the corp to avoid the dec or whatever) and come back when they feel better.

Seriously, don't do serious. Do fun and allow people just to have fun.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#36 - 2012-02-03 20:45:51 UTC
Has anybody tried anarchy yet?


Just saying.


Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Jack Paladin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#37 - 2012-02-03 21:52:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Jack Paladin
Yeah so that previous 24-48 hours promise I made didn't go according to plan. Work has been really busy and havn't been able to post as promised! But it's the weekend :P

I will likely post them in separate threads in the ideas forum and then provide links in this thread.

Stay tuned ... I have not abandoned ...
Deen Wispa
Sheriff.
United Caldari Space Command.
#38 - 2012-02-03 22:00:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Deen Wispa
I too was once a CEO and suffered from some burnout. There have been many positive responses so far in this thread on corp management, so I will not regurgitate what has already been said.

One feature I would like to request is to have a role that would allow you to send a corp mail out. As it currently stands, anyone can send email out.

TBH, I always felt that CCP neglected the corp management features purposely because they have been quoted as saying that like to see more drama and so not allowing certain features for corp management would certainly create that. I always thought that was a horrible view of looking at things because more productive things would be accomplished if they iterated on these features rather than the occasional lolz that would occur without it.

High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve .

Jack Paladin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#39 - 2012-02-09 11:07:19 UTC
CCP Spitfire wrote:


I've read this thread, although not exactly because of the title. Smile Thread cleaned of offtopic posts; please keep it civil. I agree that the corporation management system could use some love (putting it mildly) and would be happy to hear your ideas and suggestions and pass them along to the dev team.


Suggestions are up - https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=776770#post776770
Previous page12