These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Taranis vs Enyo

Author
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#1 - 2012-02-01 09:13:59 UTC
While in a fit of inebriation (always a good opening line) a thought came up.

The Taranis has always held a reputation as being one of the "heavyweights" of the frigate class... especially given the many fits that use dual props while still deal sizable amounts of DPS. With the recent changes to Assault Frigates I decided to do some EFT-warrioring (yes, yes... groan, groan, eyeroll) and came up with some interesting results.

[Taranis - Classic Dual-prop]

[Lows]
Damage Control II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Reactor Control II

[Mids]
Limited 1MN Microwarpdrive I
Experimental 1MN Afterburner I
Warp Scrambler II

[Highs]
Light Ion Blaster II (Antimatter)
Light Ion Blaster II (Antimatter)
Light Ion Blaster II (Antimatter)
(empty)

[Rigs]
Small Hybrid Collision Accelarator I
Small Hybrid Burst Aerator I

[Drones]
2x Hobgoblin IIs

Notes:
- with MWD it burns at ~3500 m/sec
- with AB it burns at ~1200 m/sec
- deals ~220 DPS
- has ~3800 EHP


Now...

[Enyo - Taranis Wannabe]

[Lows]
Damage Control II
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Reactive Plating II
Adaptive Plating II

[Mids]
Limited 1MN Microwarpdrive I
Experimental 1MN Afterburner I
Warp Scrambler II

[Highs]
Light Neutron Blaster II (Antimatter)
Light Neutron Blaster II (Antimatter)
Light Neutron Blaster II (Antimatter)
Light Neutron Blaster II (Antimatter)
(empty)

[Rigs]
Small Ancillary Current Router I
Small Hybrid Collision Accelerator I

[Drones]
1x Hobgoblin II

Notes:
- with MWD it burns at ~2200 m/sec
- with AB it burns at ~800 m/sec
- deals ~250 DPS
- has ~8000 EHP


I'm well aware my "Classic Taranis" fit may not be "optimal" (feel free to toss in your 'ranis fit), but that's not what I'm here to discuss...

TL;DR: Given it's significant EHP advantage... could the Enyo become the new "solo frigate" of Gallente buffs and effectively "replace" the Taranis? Shocked
Smabs
State War Academy
Caldari State
#2 - 2012-02-01 09:29:59 UTC
I've flown a web enyo for a bit and I have to say that it's really, really good. Like probably one of the best frigates now.

Being able to dualprop with neutrons is pretty awesome. I didn't realise it could do that. You've still got the problem of it being slow but the dps is amazing and you can hit all the way across scram range with null.
Wacktopia
Fleet-Up.com
Keep It Simple Software Group
#3 - 2012-02-01 10:08:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Wacktopia
ShahFluffers wrote:
TL;DR: Given it's significant EHP advantage... could the Enyo become the new "solo frigate" of Gallente buffs and effectively "replace" the Taranis? Shocked


No, it's too slow and cumbersome. You highlight the difference in EHP yet there is also a big difference in speed and agility between the two.

Just one example why this matters: Your 'Ranis fit can outrun a Vagabond but the Enyo cannot.

Edit: I actually think a dual prop AF is a good idea btw and I flew one the other day and loved it. However, it will not replace the fast, dual prop frigates in their role imo.

Kitchen sink? Seriousy, get your ship together -  Fleet-Up.com

ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#4 - 2012-02-01 10:23:40 UTC  |  Edited by: ShahFluffers
Wacktopia wrote:
You highlight the difference in EHP yet there is also a big difference in speed and agility between the two


Right... but once in scram-web range, and especially when outright brawling against other frigates, I feel the EHP amount would count more as it becomes a battle of attrition at that point.
After all... where would colorful 'ranis jokes like "try to deal more DPS than you have EHP" and "the fight 'really begins' when you hit hull" come from?


edit: It's not like many 'ranis or Enyo pilots would even stay in the area should a Vagabond appear (Vagas eat friggies... nomnomnom). And if one shows up while you're in the middle of a fight it's not like you'll have much time (if any) to disengage.
Jerick Ludhowe
Internet Tuff Guys
#5 - 2012-02-01 14:01:55 UTC
Obviously the Enyo is going to be a better brawler.... That's not rocket science, it's common senseRoll


Taranis holds a huge speed, sig, and agility advantage over the Enyo albeit one of the slowest Interceptors.
Korg Tronix
Mole Station Nursery
#6 - 2012-02-01 14:25:42 UTC
It depends on where and what situation you are going to use them in....although that rains fit should have neutrons on it for 300+ dps

Evil: If I were creating the world I wouldn't mess about with butterflies and daffodils. I would have started with lasers, eight o'clock, Day One! [zaps one of his minions accidentally, minion screams]

mama guru
Yazatas.
#7 - 2012-02-01 14:28:46 UTC
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:
Obviously the Enyo is going to be a better brawler.... That's not rocket science, it's common senseRoll


Taranis holds a huge speed, sig, and agility advantage over the Enyo albeit one of the slowest Interceptors.



The only things the Ranis has going for it is speed and signature radius, and only that. The Enyo is superior now in every way, hell it'll replace my ishkur. Especially with the buffs to null.

EVE online is the fishermans friend of MMO's. If it's too hard you are too weak.

Dorian Tormak
RBON United
#8 - 2012-02-01 14:33:13 UTC
There are such a thing as speed modules. Your Enyo will still have amazing ehp without the armor resists on a mainly-hull-tanked-ship.

Holy Satanic Christ! This is a Goddamn Signature!

Ahrieman
Codex Praedonum
Divine Damnation
#9 - 2012-02-01 14:52:50 UTC
I think it is difficult to compare the two because of the unique roles that each fills, but for a 1v1 brawl (which seems to be the context you are comparing them in), then you are right that the Enyo is superior.

IMHO, the biggest winners from the AF buff (and hybrid rebalancing) are Enyo, Hawk, and Harpy. In that order.

Solo Rifter since 2009

Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-02-01 15:14:10 UTC
mama guru wrote:
Jerick Ludhowe wrote:
Obviously the Enyo is going to be a better brawler.... That's not rocket science, it's common senseRoll


Taranis holds a huge speed, sig, and agility advantage over the Enyo albeit one of the slowest Interceptors.



The only things the Ranis has going for it is speed and signature radius, and only that. The Enyo is superior now in every way, hell it'll replace my ishkur. Especially with the buffs to null.



Couple drones
Pinky Denmark
The Cursed Navy
#11 - 2012-02-01 15:16:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Pinky Denmark
You lost me when I saw a reactor control on a frigate...
And then I dont really care about you comparing an interceptor to an assault frigate?
Wacktopia
Fleet-Up.com
Keep It Simple Software Group
#12 - 2012-02-01 15:17:39 UTC
ShahFluffers wrote:
Wacktopia wrote:
You highlight the difference in EHP yet there is also a big difference in speed and agility between the two


Right... but once in scram-web range, and especially when outright brawling against other frigates, I feel the EHP amount would count more as it becomes a battle of attrition at that point.
After all... where would colorful 'ranis jokes like "try to deal more DPS than you have EHP" and "the fight 'really begins' when you hit hull" come from?


edit: It's not like many 'ranis or Enyo pilots would even stay in the area should a Vagabond appear (Vagas eat friggies... nomnomnom). And if one shows up while you're in the middle of a fight it's not like you'll have much time (if any) to disengage.


Ok lets not focus on the Vagabond example as it was merely that. My point is that at 2200 m/s the Enyo is slow and this is a significant difference to 3200 that the Taranis can do.

In a web/scram brawl between the two yeah the Taranis might win but again a 1v1 between the two is just one example.

Kitchen sink? Seriousy, get your ship together -  Fleet-Up.com

Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#13 - 2012-02-01 17:43:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Liang Nuren
Neither one of those fits rocks a nos. That's a big mistake IMO.

-Liang

Ed: Also, does the Enyo go 2km/s scrammed? I honestly haven't looked... but it seems like the Taranis should be faster than the Enyo.

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.

mxzf
Shovel Bros
#14 - 2012-02-01 17:51:54 UTC
Pinky Denmark wrote:
You lost me when I saw a reactor control on a frigate...
And then I dont really care about you comparing an interceptor to an assault frigate?


This is a good point.

To the OP, if you didn't know about them, check out MAPCs. +15% of the 35 grid on the Rannis is about 5 grid extra (what the RCU gives you), compared to the 12 grid that a T2 MAPC will give you (and the MAPC uses 2 less CPU on top of that). For ships with under 90 grid, the MAPC will be strictly better (AKA, pretty much all frigates).
Klown Walk
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#15 - 2012-02-01 22:41:09 UTC
[Taranis, ab mwd1]
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Damage Control II
Micro Auxiliary Power Core I

Limited 1MN MicroWarpdrive I
Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I
Experimental 1MN Afterburner I

Light Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S
Light Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S
Light Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S
[empty high slot]

Small Hybrid Burst Aerator I
Small Hybrid Collision Accelerator I


Hobgoblin II x2

290 dps, 329 dps oh.
mwd: 3650m/s, 5200m/s oh.
ab: 1300m/s, 1700m/s oh.

It´s still the best t2 frigate imo. The speed alone makes it better.
Chief Cheeba
Doomheim
#16 - 2012-02-02 00:38:40 UTC
you really want a nos on both of these ships imo esp the taranis

taranis dual prop w/ nos

magnetic field stabilizer II
micro auxiliary power core II
pseudoelectron containment field I

limited 1mn microwarpdrive I
j5b phased prototype warp scrambler I
1mn afterburner II

small knave energy drain
light neutron blaster II
light neutron blaster II
light neutron blaster II

small ancillary current router I
small hybrid burst aerator I

hob x 2


also i fit up this enyo for lulz...only has an ab but its a p cheap fit...if you can get in scram range it should do ok but the harpy outclasses it in general imo

enyo ab only w/ nos

F85 Peripheral Damage System I
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
F-aQ Phase Code Tracking Subroutines
Small 'Accommodation' Vestment Reconstructer I

Initiated Harmonic Warp Scrambler I
'Langour' Drive Disruptor I
Experimental 1MN Afterburner I

Small 'Knave' Energy Drain
Light Neutron Blaster II
Light Neutron Blaster II
Light Neutron Blaster II
Light Neutron Blaster II

Small Anti-Explosive Pump I
Small Hybrid Burst Aerator I

hob x 1

i think the taranis is still more useful in general but the enyo is a lot better than it was
Jerick Ludhowe
Internet Tuff Guys
#17 - 2012-02-02 01:22:41 UTC
Dorian Tormak wrote:
There are such a thing as speed modules. Your Enyo will still have amazing ehp without the armor resists on a mainly-hull-tanked-ship.


If you're hull tanking your Enyo you're doing it wrong. Btw Enyo does not have "amazing" ehp... You're looking at maybe 7k generally with an explosive hole if you're using your cpu for a mag stab and dcu. Sure you can drop the mag stab for an explosive hardener however you may as well just fly an Ishkur as it will fulfill this role better.


Honestly the whole comparison here is rather pointless...

If you want speed, and gtfo capability fly a ceptor.... If you want a brawling frig fly an AF...
Annie Anomie
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2012-02-02 01:47:39 UTC
The Ranis has been obsoleteish for a while tbh.
Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#19 - 2012-02-02 09:30:09 UTC
Personal experience these days with Enyo, had also some time on SISI before the changes hit TQ for tests, this little beast starts with ganky fit T2 littel over 300dps no implants or boosters/fleet bonus to get the amazing theoretical 500dps with faction fit and still EHP over the ranis less the speed.

The tanky version (my favourite) goes straight to 8k EHP +/- no implants/boosters/fleet bonus, uses 75mm gatling T2 rails "I never miss you" with long range ammo about 180dps (up to 35km) and around 250+ with short range ammo and still a very decent range of engagement/ dps application.

This being said, I get the feeling the ranis is really good when well flown by a competent pilot.

Wol/Jaguar still excellent frigs with a lot more fight options but a little less dps -very small difference negated by the simple distance where this dmg can be applied, selectable dmg type (hail vs frigs anyone? -if not you're doing it wrong)

I really need to finish this silly PI stuff and get ASAP caldari frig 5 and have fun with Harpie. Hated frigs before these changes but now I'm completely fan. Excellent for new players as older ones.

Kn1v3s 999
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-02-02 16:32:56 UTC
Klown Walk wrote:
[Taranis, ab mwd1]
Magnetic Field Stabilizer II
Damage Control II
Micro Auxiliary Power Core I

Limited 1MN MicroWarpdrive I
Faint Epsilon Warp Scrambler I
Experimental 1MN Afterburner I

Light Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S
Light Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S
Light Neutron Blaster II, Caldari Navy Antimatter Charge S
[empty high slot]

Small Hybrid Burst Aerator I
Small Hybrid Collision Accelerator I


Hobgoblin II x2

290 dps, 329 dps oh.
mwd: 3650m/s, 5200m/s oh.
ab: 1300m/s, 1700m/s oh.

It´s still the best t2 frigate imo. The speed alone makes it better.


This is the basic dual-prop btw
the one with nos (i made the same one on eft) is too expensive for what it offers.


Btw, even before the AF buff, the Comet can do everything better, dual-prop +nos and rep, +ehp, +dps, more drones and so on