Jita Park Speakers Corner

The voices in my head say you're all crazy

E: And that's a good thing!

I just want to say I think Seleene did try very heard to stay in communication with the players while serving in the CSM 6 and I appreciate that alot!

Issler

I am talking about "CSM 7 must be about moar nullsec iterations" Seleene and "try-to-don't-choke-yourself-laughing, but, I am all for newbies" Mittani.

Thank you for the attention, even if you have nothing with saying

Ron Paul would actually be a reasonable "small Government" candidate if he wasn't a flaming hypocrite.

As for Seleene's comments about "getting things done" — yes, at least under this CSM the trains ran on time. Pity noone knew where the stations where, what time the trains ran, or where the damned things were going.

Hey, he's all about newbies. Soon one should see more newbies in blackbirds about because of something really nice we got recently. To each according to his need! Enemies with uber T2 guns really don't need to use them on our friends, so please stop.

Yes, I know, this is about a subset, but really, dealing with the sigma field of the whole space is pretty hard.

no man they are telling you that you are so stupid it is honestly a god damn wonder that you can type readable sentences

Yes... of course, maybe with CSM 8... or 9... or 10... it would be so terrible that CCP now began spreading efforts between all players, right?

See, the 18 months took a toll on everybody's gameplay. But now all in a sudden CCP only caters to nullsec, and guess what? That happens with you, the nullsec CSM, in charge. And what you swear if you get elected for CSM7? That you will make sure that the iteration effort (NULLSEC iteration, that is) is not derailed by anything else. Like, our non-nullsec interests.

I insist: Crucible did NOTHING for me and many other players like me. And your goal is that the CSM goes for more Crucible and only more Crucible.

I wonder how difficult or insanely crazy would be that each gameplay got an expansion a year -say, summer 80% nullsec, 20% hisec, then winter 80% hisec, 20% nullsec. A BALANCED approach so CCP doesn't essentially tells that, after neglecting everyone for 18 months, now they will keep neglecting the hisec majority and catering to the ubernoisy nullsec minority until 2013 at least... And the CSM, who should speak for ALL players, is A-OK with it and finds funny how the silent majority tries to organize and forward someone to speak for them with only a slim chance to succeed.


Addenda: well, CCP is not completely neglecting hisec... they're gonna nerf incursions after -amazingly- the "winner takes all" completion mechanic has ended up with uberprofessional incursion grinders pumping ISK like crazies and nobody else ever bothering to try. Sharing rewards the same as incursion runners share risk would have been so much un-CCP...

Mara and some other howlers have an amusing point - I don't communicate with the tiny group of eve-o posters much. However I communicate all the goddamned time with my constituents and those I represent.

If you think Crucible is awful and bad and did nothing for you, then yeah - I don't represent you, and I'm not sorry about it.

This is the false argument that is always offered to support the anti-ambulation platform of many of the CSM 6 and the ambulation haters.

No one is suggesting ambulation be prioritized over FiS. Many, however want it to remain in plan and get some reasonable amount of resources applied to it.

The currentl CSM seemed however to want a stake dirven through the heart of ambulation, somehow trying to make the argument that it can't be worked on in any way without destroying FiS. Of course most of these same folks would like CCP working on all manner of nul sec mechanics and features that 80% of the Eve player base couldn't care less about while ignoring most FiS content those 80% would love to see.

Issler Dainze
Voice of Reason Party CSM 7 Candidate.