These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Please voice specific suggestions for High Security Space

Author
Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#41 - 2012-01-29 17:01:54 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
A Goon asking for advice about what to do about High Sec ?

YOU are HIGH, dude...and so is anyone who replies.


Good God..........

You just insulted yourself, sir.

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn

Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#42 - 2012-01-29 17:15:58 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:
Please voice specific suggestions for High Security Space

Cover it in concrete and launch it into space.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)

Lickmyswang
LICK MY BALLS EXPRESS
#43 - 2012-01-29 17:16:53 UTC
Goons asking about highsec now I have seen it all. Goons can do my name nuff said lolz
Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#44 - 2012-01-29 17:33:59 UTC
Lickmyswang wrote:
Goons asking about highsec now I have seen it all. Goons can do my name nuff said lolz

omg exdee u so edgy and cool notatallaretardedalt gtfo

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)

Jake Warbird
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#45 - 2012-01-29 17:39:14 UTC
Lady Spank wrote:
Lickmyswang wrote:
Goons asking about highsec now I have seen it all. Goons can do my name nuff said lolz

omg exdee u so edgy and cool notatallaretardedalt gtfo


Not empty quoting.
EnslaverOfMinmatar
You gonna get aped
#46 - 2012-01-29 23:21:46 UTC
Remove the option to 'abandon all containers'. Wrecks can still be abandoned.

Move ice belts from hisec to lowsec.

Increase NPC corp tax from 11% to 20%

All freighters in hisec should carry fuel in the cargohold in order to jump through the gate due to their huge mass and hight volume of traffic. No fuel = can't go through the gate if both systems are hisec.

Every EVE player must read this http://www.eveonline.com/background/potw/default.asp?cid=29-01-07

Alexandra Delarge
The Korova
#47 - 2012-01-29 23:23:28 UTC
Can we stop 0.0 nasties coming into Hisec. If you do this i will vote for you with 10 alts.
Mr Morita
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#48 - 2012-01-29 23:28:34 UTC
Move to low-sec.
EnslaverOfMinmatar
You gonna get aped
#49 - 2012-01-30 00:07:10 UTC
Add queues to high sec gates that connect Amarr-minmatar and Caldari-Ghayllente space. The Navies are searching for spais, weapons of mass destruction and let only 1 ship jump through at a time every 30 seconds. First come, first served.

Every EVE player must read this http://www.eveonline.com/background/potw/default.asp?cid=29-01-07

tomd741
Pure Victory
#50 - 2012-01-30 00:10:50 UTC
You sounded great until I saw your a goonie. Never gonna vote for a goon. Your history and current actions tbh. Roll

Check out my Bio for the Ore Buyback Calculator

Umega
Solis Mensa
#51 - 2012-01-30 00:17:47 UTC
EnslaverOfMinmatar wrote:
Add queues to high sec gates that connect Amarr-minmatar and Caldari-Ghayllente space. The Navies are searching for spais, weapons of mass destruction and let only 1 ship jump through at a time every 30 seconds. First come, first served.


The principle idea behind this I find interesting.

But a game so heavily set upon it's own player driven economy.. that would pretty much create mini-jita's and isolate ppl even more so in highsec. As well as really cripple sigments of the economy. Would be really easy for ppl to exploit and create some seriously long days to weeks to months long waits at certain points.

The point of CSM, imo.. is to create a better game, keeping the core of EVE and how it should be a ruthless, consent or non-consent, direct or indirect felt ripples sandbox. Pure player driven game in every aspect.

A 30 second, one at a time border patrol. Eh. I forsee mass problems and negative results upon EVE with that.

Why not implement something similiar that gives FW players that kind of power?
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#52 - 2012-01-30 01:22:29 UTC
Same stuff I always say:

Incursions: http://stinkinguplocal.wordpress.com/2012/01/23/fixing-eve-incursions/

I've got a blog post I'm working on to put together my thoughts on wardecs, here's what I've got so far:

Wardecs should remain attached to their original target, whether it's a corporation or alliance. This would stop dec scraping and POS protection as holding corps could be targeted directly, making it futile to drop them out of an alliance to protect assets.

Neutral logis should inherit aggression timers so they cannot dock or jump.

Neutral fleet boosters should get war aggression (but not concord or can flipping aggression, because that would be too easy to grief) and an accompanying warning when they attempt to activate gang links that would cause the aggression to transfer.

There should be a definite drawback to being in an NPC corp beyond a minor tax on bounties.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Lyris Nairn
Perkone
Caldari State
#53 - 2012-01-30 01:58:13 UTC
tomd741 wrote:
You sounded great until I saw your a goonie. Never gonna vote for a goon. Your history and current actions tbh. Roll

Regardless of whether or not you vote for me, you lose nothing by voicing specific suggestions for high security space in this thread; moreover, in the event that I am elected to the CSM despite you not voting for me, it would be in your better interest if the people representing you to CCP know what you would like to see in the game. That's all I am asking for here: not an affirmation or promise to vote for me, not a token of friendship, nor endorsement of my affiliation. Just a list of things you want to see.

Sky Captain of Your Heart

Reddit: lyris_nairn Skype: lyris.nairn Twitter: @lyris_nairn

EnslaverOfMinmatar
You gonna get aped
#54 - 2012-01-30 02:04:47 UTC  |  Edited by: EnslaverOfMinmatar
Umega wrote:
EnslaverOfMinmatar wrote:
Add queues to high sec gates that connect Amarr-minmatar and Caldari-Ghayllente space. The Navies are searching for spais, weapons of mass destruction and let only 1 ship jump through at a time every 30 seconds. First come, first served.


The principle idea behind this I find interesting.

But a game so heavily set upon it's own player driven economy.. that would pretty much create mini-jita's and isolate ppl even more so in highsec. As well as really cripple sigments of the economy. Would be really easy for ppl to exploit and create some seriously long days to weeks to months long waits at certain points.

The point of CSM, imo.. is to create a better game, keeping the core of EVE and how it should be a ruthless, consent or non-consent, direct or indirect felt ripples sandbox. Pure player driven game in every aspect.

A 30 second, one at a time border patrol. Eh. I forsee mass problems and negative results upon EVE with that.

Why not implement something similiar that gives FW players that kind of power?


They could sit at a gate for a while or form a fleet to go a few jumps through lowsec. Maybe hire mercs to escort them through lowsec.... who could gank them lol.

Alternatively they could go to any custom office in the system, get scanned, pay a customs tax like a few % of their cargo's worth and get a 5 minute permission to jump without waiting. This way they won't have too much time to dock up and grab a bunch of cargo. The pass could dissapear if they dock, so whoever doesn't want to pay the fee would be dumping cargo in space and picking it up after they got the pass. 50% of the tax collected goes to the FW players signed up for that empire.
Sec status of these systems should be high so cans can't be anchored.

Every EVE player must read this http://www.eveonline.com/background/potw/default.asp?cid=29-01-07

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#55 - 2012-01-30 04:04:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Umega wrote:
EnslaverOfMinmatar wrote:
Add queues to high sec gates that connect Amarr-minmatar and Caldari-Ghayllente space. The Navies are searching for spais, weapons of mass destruction and let only 1 ship jump through at a time every 30 seconds. First come, first served.

But a game so heavily set upon it's own player driven economy.. that would pretty much create mini-jita's

Hey, CCP wants that right? Because their one server for Jita is a solution that only goes so far until Jita grows beyond that.

Perhaps you could say they are looking for suicidal maniacs who blow up ships. But of course CONCORD will not be at the gate (there is more than one gate in a system usually), so people lining up might just get ganked while waiting to go through.

Oh well.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Samantha Utama
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#56 - 2012-01-30 06:45:36 UTC
Lyris 2012 Attention
Jovius Marginus
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#57 - 2012-01-30 11:11:48 UTC
Well, I have something I would like to raise. In one of the eve events in Iceland, CCP said they were planning a new feature where if you scan someone down with contraband in their cargo, you get killrights on them. Also, that the gates no longer scan your cargo. This obviously will bring a while new dynamic into Highsec. But ever since then I havent heard anything about it and I thought that this was an incredibly good idea. Smuggling will become a trade that will be profitable with added risk. This is just my 2cents.
Zixie Draco
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#58 - 2012-01-30 16:35:10 UTC
Lyris Nairn wrote:
Zixie Draco wrote:


There's a special tinfoil hat for a goon that wants to know what the needs of the high sec constituency are. That's why I'm voting for Skippermonkey...he already knows the woes and actually cares.

That's just fine. I don't think ill of you at all for having another candidate in mind. But since the possibility exists that I will be elected to the CSM over your objection, and thereby put into a position of representing you whether you like it or not, is it not in your better interest to be sure that I understand the issues that you personally find important? Engaging me in discussion here in this thread is not an affirmation to vote for me, and I don't see how you have anything to lose by voicing your specific suggestions for High Sec.


I feel threatened

Would you like a kitten?

PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#59 - 2012-01-30 16:53:45 UTC
I for one have always felt very concerned about the lack of warp disruption bubbles on hi sec stargates. In my experience, the mark of a healthy and active system is a large population of mobile warp disruptors basking in the warmth of a nearby stargate. These 'bubbles', as they are affectionately called by locals, enjoy a symbiotic relationship with the capsuleer populations of both wh's and nullsec, but have been hunted to extinction in high security space.

What steps would you take to rectify this ecological disaster and restore this proud species to its rightful home?
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#60 - 2012-01-30 17:00:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Vimsy Vortis
Tarsus Zateki wrote:
Yes, Goonswarm is interested in destroying the game we enjoy playing Roll.

Its part of a secret plot within goonswarm to get goons to quit EVE and play STO instead so that Dental can be rebuilt.