Intergalactic Summit

Why would I need to do that? Perhaps you misunderstood; prove to me you know what the significance is. As of this moment, you either have no idea and are grasping at straws, or you poorly formed your initial response.

Prove you are not simply some poor gambler who inadvertently tips all his hands. I would wager you don't have a card trick I haven't seen, dear, and seen done better.

So obviously you must understand my concerns. This data is public knowledge. There is nothing insightful in your post, and you are simply repeating information others have given.

Here is the dilemma: I know what you are talking about. You think you know what you are talking about. Others most likely understand what you are talking about. The problem is that you seem to believe that the anti-social behavior you are partaking in will somehow open eyes.

I was where you were. I truly was. Of course, I was doing it in a misguided belief that I had seen the end of the world coming and could do nothing to stop it. Time and distance can change perspectives. So let me give you a little advice.

Speak plainly. Overcome the limits of your 'Amarrian' upbringing. How hard is it to state something that is said by others? Easy. How hard is it to formulate your own theory and support your evidence? Far harder.

It's good to see others trying to open eyes. However, you and others who seem to believe they have some sort of "insider knowledge" fail to prove anything new that was not readily verifiable with available information. That's the real issue isn't it? The information has been obfuscated certainly, but not hidden away from public sight. You have taken it a step in the right direction; you have provided a basis for understanding, but I am asking you to do what you should have done from the beginning. It is also, as you have pointed out in reference to Julianus Soter's analysis, "rubbish". Random links are fine for you, fine for me, but if you truly want others to understand you must do so in a reasoned, logical manner.

Lay out the evidence, highlight the dangers, and allow others to form their own opinion.

If you gain nothing else from my responses, please let that enter your thought process. Aria Jenneth, Julianus Soter, and a few others have haphazardly begun the process in their own unique ways. Instead of relying on their (obviously to you, non?) clouded perceptions, why not present your viewpoint? It is easy to say "Sleepers are a great threat", it is quite hard to say so with authority backed by hard evidence. I believe Evanda Char made quite a huge stride forward in this area of research quite a while ago, if I am to remember correctly. She made some very valid points in her report on Memetic Infection, though I feel you may have some further insights on the matter, non?

You may wish to seem like the next Macaper, but I am calling your little bluff. As I've said to others, "I recognize your meme". Time to lay the cards on the table and play with the high rollers, or you are wasting everyone's time including yours. I have the patience to wait. You obviously are reaching the end of yours. Don't you grow tired of seeing them scramble in the dark for such an obvious answer? Then again, what is the question?

Do you truly understand what is going on?

I know, isn't that tiresome?