These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Is hatred vs. Amarr ingrained in Matari culture?

Author
Merdaneth
Angel Wing.
Khimi Harar
#41 - 2011-09-17 16:50:42 UTC
Rek Jaiga wrote:

Show me proof, and I will believe you Now if it's some Imperial slaver who got arrested for operating in Republic space...yeah, they're going to be imprisoned. Because it's a crime.


You might be surprised to realize that what is and what isn't considered a crime is different everywhere.

I don't think you be wanting to suggest that robbing someone from their freedoms because some government has considered it a crime is ok.
Manwe Todako
Disciples of Ston
#42 - 2011-09-17 16:51:47 UTC
I have waited to reply to this thread until I could process some observations from our recent rescue work. Hatred, when it exists, is a dominant emotion and tends to eclipse both other emotions and the capacity for reason. Hatred is difficult to disguise and quickly makes itself known. I think the perspective of recently rescued slaves would be a good place to look to discover if hatred is rife among the Matari.

I have not seen it so. We have rescued now hundreds of former slaves. Hatred is not the emotion that permeates, even after the trauma of crisis and the joy of rescue have faded. What emotion dominates, then? Grief! When these former captives begin to ponder the wonder of freedom, they inevitably feel the losses they have endured in the past. Grief predominates even anger. By that, I mean that anger is only a part of the early stages of grief. Part of our matriculation program is to provide in depth counseling to grieving people.

The Elders in our centers have been amazing. They have led the communities to focus on the development of positive energies toward establishing a new life. Hatred is not a part of that.

Hatred exists in every culture, free or enslaved, where men and women exist in a state of "spiritual enslavement." The cure for hatred is Divine Redemption by the One who is our creator.

SANKOFA

Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#43 - 2011-09-17 17:04:01 UTC
Merdaneth wrote:


You might be surprised to realize that what is and what isn't considered a crime is different everywhere.

I don't think you be wanting to suggest that robbing someone from their freedoms because some government has considered it a crime is ok.


I understand slavery is legal in the Empire. But it sure as hell isn't in the Republic, so I don't know why people get shocked when slavers (of any faction) are arrested whenever they engage in slave trading, breeding, or acquisition in Republic space.
Merdaneth
Angel Wing.
Khimi Harar
#44 - 2011-09-17 17:17:14 UTC
Rek Jaiga wrote:
Merdaneth wrote:


You might be surprised to realize that what is and what isn't considered a crime is different everywhere.

I don't think you be wanting to suggest that robbing someone from their freedoms because some government has considered it a crime is ok.


I understand slavery is legal in the Empire. But it sure as hell isn't in the Republic, so I don't know why people get shocked when slavers (of any faction) are arrested whenever they engage in slave trading, breeding, or acquisition in Republic space.


I am not shocked, I fully expect and agree with such slavers been punished.

However, sister Farel suggested the Republic also takes away the freedom of people. Your response suggested that was allright, as long as the people in question were convicted of a crime. I'm trying to point out that the Amarr Empire has a wide selection of criminal acts available. Acts that could lead to one's freedom taken away.

Slaves in the Empire don't have their 'freedom taken away' in spite of the law, but because of the law. They are criminals just like slave raiders in the Republic are.

Jason Galente
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#45 - 2011-09-17 17:22:24 UTC
Merdaneth wrote:
Rek Jaiga wrote:
Merdaneth wrote:


You might be surprised to realize that what is and what isn't considered a crime is different everywhere.

I don't think you be wanting to suggest that robbing someone from their freedoms because some government has considered it a crime is ok.


I understand slavery is legal in the Empire. But it sure as hell isn't in the Republic, so I don't know why people get shocked when slavers (of any faction) are arrested whenever they engage in slave trading, breeding, or acquisition in Republic space.


I am not shocked, I fully expect and agree with such slavers been punished.

However, sister Farel suggested the Republic also takes away the freedom of people. Your response suggested that was allright, as long as the people in question were convicted of a crime. I'm trying to point out that the Amarr Empire has a wide selection of criminal acts available. Acts that could lead to one's freedom taken away.

Slaves in the Empire don't have their 'freedom taken away' in spite of the law, but because of the law. They are criminals just like slave raiders in the Republic are.



You once again completely ignore the fact that people are born into slavery in your empire for no crime other than being of a different race, or of being the son or daughter of a criminal.

Only the liberty of the individual assures the prosperity of the whole. And this foundation must be defended.

At any cost

Merdaneth
Angel Wing.
Khimi Harar
#46 - 2011-09-17 17:29:46 UTC
Jason Galente wrote:

You once again completely ignore the fact that people are born into slavery in your empire for no crime other than being of a different race, or of being the son or daughter of a criminal.


Race has nothing to do with being a criminal. I suggested doing at least some basic research on Amarr culture before condemning it.

I'm not ignoring it, I'm well aware that the generational aspect of slavery is one of the major differences between say, regular imprisonement and slavery.

On the other hand, as I've understood cultures that practice imprisonement take the children away from their imprisoned parents to have them raised by outsiders chosen by their government. I'm sure you don't want to suggest that Amarr Empire makes it mandatory for slave children to be taken away from their parents.

I prefer my slaves to raise their own children if they are able to do so responsibly. I think it teaches the parents valuable life lessons, and also provides them with joy and humility.


Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#47 - 2011-09-17 17:51:24 UTC
Merdaneth wrote:


Slaves in the Empire don't have their 'freedom taken away' in spite of the law, but because of the law. They are criminals just like slave raiders in the Republic are.



What crime did the Matari people commit nearly a thousand years ago, when the fleets of Athra descended upon Matar?
Sirna Maleto
Doomheim
#48 - 2011-09-17 20:37:03 UTC
Generational slavery must and will come to an end, until then regulations must be introduced. This is unlikely however, and more hatred will be aimed at the empire which I have made my home
Kazzzi
Heathen Legion
Iron Men of the Hood
#49 - 2011-09-17 22:03:02 UTC
Myrhial Arkenath wrote:
But if it makes you feel better, here have a Cartel rant: "boo hiss Empire you are stealing our thunder, we're the biggest and the best and you know it, not to mention we're clearly the sexiest for having the prettiest ship hulls.". Happy now?


Yeah I feel pretty good now. Really good actually. Like as good as when I put on clothes fresh and warm from the dryer, or when I walk into the breakroom and somebody brought donuts for everyone and my favorite kind are there.

wurblewind
Filthy Peasants
Intergalactic Space Hobos
#50 - 2011-09-18 08:03:42 UTC
Rek Jaiga wrote:
Merdaneth wrote:


Slaves in the Empire don't have their 'freedom taken away' in spite of the law, but because of the law. They are criminals just like slave raiders in the Republic are.



What crime did the Matari people commit nearly a thousand years ago, when the fleets of Athra descended upon Matar?


Rek, my friend, I believe Lord Merdaneth is referring to the present policies for legal enslavement, not those of the past, when a random priest could shout "Deus Vult!" and find an armada fully prepped within the hour. Needless to say, the Empire's slavery laws have changed quite a bit since Athra's reign.

[center]Keep low, fly fast, die well.[/center]

Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#51 - 2011-09-18 09:05:01 UTC
wurblewind wrote:
Rek, my friend, I believe Lord Merdaneth is referring to the present policies for legal enslavement, not those of the past, when a random priest could shout "Deus Vult!" and find an armada fully prepped within the hour. Needless to say, the Empire's slavery laws have changed quite a bit since Athra's reign.
This would mean that the majority of the present Minmatar slaves are enslaved with no criminal charge, still contradicting his statement.

Not to mention that the Empire still regularly enslaves people with no criminal charge; no one asks what a slave on the market did, and "he is not a criminal" will not free any slave.
Merdaneth
Angel Wing.
Khimi Harar
#52 - 2011-09-18 11:21:52 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:

Not to mention that the Empire still regularly enslaves people with no criminal charge; no one asks what a slave on the market did, and "he is not a criminal" will not free any slave.


Rest assured that the papers of each slave need to be in proper order, and everything transaction concerning slaves is report to the proper authorities and filed.

The only illegally captured slaves that can enter the Empire legally are those that are sold to Amarr slave traders by non-citizens. If a Caldari trader sells slaves to an Amarr, obviously that Caldari is not held to the Amarr registration and trade laws. Similarly, the buyer doesn't need to concern itself If the trade is legal by Caldari law is, that is the responsibility of the seller.
Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#53 - 2011-09-18 11:29:34 UTC
Merdaneth wrote:
The only illegally captured slaves that can enter the Empire legally are those that are sold to Amarr slave traders by non-citizens. If a Caldari trader sells slaves to an Amarr, obviously that Caldari is not held to the Amarr registration and trade laws. Similarly, the buyer doesn't need to concern itself If the trade is legal by Caldari law is, that is the responsibility of the seller.
Ah, that's how it goes.

Your Navy enslaves others, gives them as a donation to some Caldari, and he sells them back to you.

Do you really think your God is that stupid?
Merdaneth
Angel Wing.
Khimi Harar
#54 - 2011-09-18 11:47:57 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
Merdaneth wrote:
The only illegally captured slaves that can enter the Empire legally are those that are sold to Amarr slave traders by non-citizens. If a Caldari trader sells slaves to an Amarr, obviously that Caldari is not held to the Amarr registration and trade laws. Similarly, the buyer doesn't need to concern itself If the trade is legal by Caldari law is, that is the responsibility of the seller.
Ah, that's how it goes.

Your Navy enslaves others, gives them as a donation to some Caldari, and he sells them back to you.

Do you really think your God is that stupid?


That would be on obvious subversion of justice. Sadly, not one that is traceable on the slave's papers. The perpetrators of course will be punished by God, but I don't believe you or the illegally captured slaves will find much comfort in that.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#55 - 2011-09-18 11:54:14 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
Why do you think I misunderstood them?


Because this subject was the core of the recent discussions revolving around slavery. On the rest, I agree with you : this is not the central issue.

Arkady Sadik wrote:
Plural, not singular.


Again, it is about the Amarr, not about me.

Rek Jaiga wrote:


Lyn Farel wrote:

Then as I said, the typicial Matari should use his head a little more.

Why do you say that?


For the same reason I started to elaborate an index on slavery. To avoid confusions and general misconceptions.

Rek Jaiga wrote:

Show me proof, and I will believe you Now if it's some Imperial slaver who got arrested for operating in Republic space...yeah, they're going to be imprisoned. Because it's a crime.


Yes indeed, your prisons. Like any jail.

Then it is as much as a problem revolving (again) on the definition of freedom, and the definition of crime.

A Bloody Hand of Matar member blowing up a whole theater like it was the case in Pashanai, is also something that can be considered as a crime by some cultures, while other cultures will see it as a symbol of freedom and liberation from oppression.

A rogue imperial navy fleet enslaving citizens in the Republic will also be seen as a crime by the locals, while it might be seen as a retribution by the opposing culture.

All is matter of perspective, which you do seem to have lost since the days you were still working for the Nation, as weird as it may sound.

By the way, my perspective is mostly concerned as to consider both to be crimes against humanity.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#56 - 2011-09-18 11:58:51 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
Please do not equate prisoners with slaves. The two are not the same, and confusing the two will not further any dispute about the situation of either.


I am not sure to whom you were adressing, but in doubt, I never did such a thing.

In any case, Mr Jaiga seems now to put all the slaves in the same basket and issuing blanket statements on slavery in general, which I pointed out.
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#57 - 2011-09-18 21:16:00 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:

Yes indeed, your prisons. Like any jail.

Then it is as much as a problem revolving (again) on the definition of freedom, and the definition of crime.

A Bloody Hand of Matar member blowing up a whole theater like it was the case in Pashanai, is also something that can be considered as a crime by some cultures, while other cultures will see it as a symbol of freedom and liberation from oppression.

A rogue imperial navy fleet enslaving citizens in the Republic will also be seen as a crime by the locals, while it might be seen as a retribution by the opposing culture.

All is matter of perspective, which you do seem to have lost since the days you were still working for the Nation, as weird as it may sound.

By the way, my perspective is mostly concerned as to consider both to be crimes against humanity.


I'd consider the Bloody Hand member to be a terrorist and outlaw, as their methods disagree with the very purpose of emancipation: freedom and the pursuit of life. To kill innocents is to take away both their freedom and their life, which is much worse than enslavement.

I'd consider the "rogue" Imperial Navy fleet conducting slave-raids in Republic space to also be criminals. And so I'd agree with you that both would be crimes against humanity.

I'm not making blanket statements, either. I fully respect the Empire's right to enforce law and punish criminals accordingly within their own space. But it is as Arkady pointed out: a contradiction exists, and people continue to be taken without reason other than theology (which one should never assume to be infallible, particularly if it warrants the suffering of an entire race) and economics.
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#58 - 2011-09-19 11:01:16 UTC
If I qualified your first message of blanket statement, it was for the very reason that you compared Nation slavery with Cartel slavery, and with Amarr slavery, then calling them the same for the only reason that they share the same term and they "spoil people out of their freedom".

It is the exact same thing that comparing water to metal for the only reason that both can boil given a certain temperature. And this is the very problem of broad and general terms as slavery. People have to be more accurate when using the word, unless they want of course be the source of cascading misunderstandings and offended egos.
Rek Jaiga
Teraa Matar
#59 - 2011-09-19 11:27:12 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
If I qualified your first message of blanket statement, it was for the very reason that you compared Nation slavery with Cartel slavery, and with Amarr slavery, then calling them the same for the only reason that they share the same term and they "spoil people out of their freedom".

It is the exact same thing that comparing water to metal for the only reason that both can boil given a certain temperature. And this is the very problem of broad and general terms as slavery. People have to be more accurate when using the word, unless they want of course be the source of cascading misunderstandings and offended egos.


With slavery being defined as the state of being the property of another person, yeah those three factions are quite comparable in their practices.

In the Empire, human beings are owned for the stated purpose of bringing them enlightenment and salvation.

In the Cartel, human beings are owned for monetary gain and economic reasons.

In Nation, human beings are owned by Kuvakei and tied directly to his will.

Notice any similarities? You're telling me they're not comparable? Give me a break.

Your analogy of me comparing the factions' slave systems and one comparing water to metal is faulty. "Spoiling people out of their freedom" is the salient feature of slavery, not just one of many physical properties of matter. Whenever there are questions of morality involved, paying attention to a system's salient features is surely a wise thing to do.
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#60 - 2011-09-19 12:21:10 UTC
Rek Jaiga wrote:
Merdaneth wrote:


Slaves in the Empire don't have their 'freedom taken away' in spite of the law, but because of the law. They are criminals just like slave raiders in the Republic are.



What crime did the Matari people commit nearly a thousand years ago, when the fleets of Athra descended upon Matar?


They committed the crime of turning away from God's path.

But let us remember that Matar was beset by a natural disaster at the time, and without the Amarrian intervention many of the population may not have survived.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori