These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Rage with the CSM.

Author
Maelle LuzArdiden
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#141 - 2012-01-24 11:34:51 UTC
I think the problem was more that there simply was no credible hisec candidate who could execute a campaign and rally the hisec residents behind him/her. Next time there might be, people seem more conscious of CSM, and hopefully there will be more votes in total.

I personally value general knowledge of EVE as a whole more than representing a certain interest group. I voted knowledge and experience, not security status. The main task of CSM is to give feedback on CCP's ideas, and filter and relay messages from the player base to CCP. And if you look just at the facts, CSM6 has been very successful in this, and the recent and future developments look blatantly :awesome: in my honest opinion.

And obviously CSM members deserve their individual freedom to write, comment, troll and keep playing the game as they please, just like we all have the right. Darius III and the Mittani are by far some of the best trollers this community has, would be a shame to lose them!



The Snowman
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#142 - 2012-01-24 11:53:29 UTC
Since the CSM clearly have more power to effect CCP than its customers do Eve players must now negotiate with CSM, not CCP anymore.

No matter which side of the fence you sit on with the whole incursions thing its no longer a CCP problem, its a CSM problem since they are now abusing their position and standing within the community to effect the game. The last CSM member to do that was dismissed, but this time they are proclaimed heroes.

In addition Incarna has proved that when problems are afoot.. CCP calls the CSM, and CCP has allowed CSM to take purchase on CCP's accountability.

I lost any scrap of respect for the CSM when I read the part about CSM demanding Hilmar answer the question "what have you learned?" How arrogant of CSM to presume that he would say something to them that he hasn't already said. Its like they just want to humiliate him even more!

What despicable examples of human behavior.
Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#143 - 2012-01-24 11:54:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Lors Dornick
If you have an issue with the current CSM, elect a better one the next time.

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

Atreides Leto
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#144 - 2012-01-24 12:16:03 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:

Couldn't this very same question be asked about those who voted a new USA president the day before?





That very same question could be asked in an infinite number of occasions, yes.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#145 - 2012-01-24 12:39:14 UTC
The Snowman wrote:
No matter which side of the fence you sit on with the whole incursions thing its no longer a CCP problem, its a CSM problem since they are now abusing their position and standing within the community to effect the game. The last CSM member to do that was dismissed, but this time they are proclaimed heroes.

Um. How did you go from incursions to CSM? Are you talking about Darius III's shooting of the mothership?

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Renan Ruivo
Forcas armadas
Brave Collective
#146 - 2012-01-24 22:07:03 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
Um. How did you go from incursions to CSM? Are you talking about Darius III's shooting of the mothership?


Apparently, Darius III only got to do everything he did because he is a CSM. Otherwise he would be completely incapable of doing it.

I.E he used his CSM position to shoot motherships, and not his ship's weapons.


Didn't you know that the CSM chair has a massive DPS?

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Honnete Du Decimer
#147 - 2012-01-24 22:10:20 UTC
Cyzlaki wrote:
In all fairness, they're doing a good job and some of them actually care about the game and want to make it better.

Vote Darius III for CSM!


Blink

PMS [:p]

Issler Dainze
Tadakastu-Obata Corporation
The Honda Accord
#148 - 2012-01-24 22:13:22 UTC
I never like to brag but when I was a CSM I discovered we were make invincible and could gank anyone with what ever we flew. Why I once took down a dread with a civilian fit Mammoth......

OK, not.

But to the topic of the CSM rage, I hope there is more attention this next election a few folks that represented the players I sought to make it to CSM 7.

Issler
Nephilius
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#149 - 2012-01-25 01:45:23 UTC
mkint wrote:
every CSM proposed change was to promote nullbears solidifying their empires, defending their RMT from any threats, and reducing the overall quality of the game for anyone who's not them. And some of the decision makers are going along with it. God help us all.


Like the OP, I have nothing personal against them either. They may be some of the greatest people I have never met in real life. But we aren't really talking about real life, are we?

I daresay that every player in Eve loves Eve like a child. They want to protect it, see it grow into something far greater than they could have ever hoped for. They want to present this child to others, proudly extolling its virtues, in the hopes that others will share in this child's life. And it seems that just like a child, there have been moments of faltering and falling down, but it always seemed to get back up and keep on going, reaching for the stars and dreaming.

But there is something very dark and foreboding within this child now, a malignancy that slowly claws at it over time. For all those who love this child and want it to become a bright and shining example, there are those who would use the child for their own nefarious purposes. They seek to advance only themselves, even at the cost of the child's life if necessary. They introduce viral infections into the child, milking the essence of the child for their gains. They have no affection for the child, it has become a means to an end to them, nothing more.

Unfortunately, it is generally viewed that some of those who should be the greatest caretakers of all are complicent in these dark tidings. Also unfortunate is the fact that not much can be done now, even with the knowledge of the crimes all but in hand. Because we hold these caretakers to a higher standard, we have a far more focused and angered response. Add to that the general consensus that the playerbase does not feel as though it is being represented and it's like tinder on a fire.

Looking back, I am surprised that I did not recognize the signs sooner. I truly believe that the first ripples of what could be a nasty revolution have finally hit us. Eve players are, for the most part, an intelligent lot. They have seen some things, heard some whispers that have some root in reality and they are becoming very put out by the state of things. When they are silenced by the powers that be, it does not reassure them, it only makes them more suspicious of foul play and angrier that they are being marginalized.

I don't know alot about the CSM, I wager not many people could name more than two or three within reading this sentence. The ones that they can readily are the ones that they feel lead the vanguard of this cancer. Whether or not it's 100% true has become irrelevent. Enough has been said and done that it makes anything to stifle it a bad response. The mob has its hackles up now, they're grabbing pitchforks and torches. Things like this don't help:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=15467

Take it as you will. I've actually read the original post concerning that, though I have searched for the last thirty minutes and have come up empty now. Some things have been changed since then, so I am not going to have much luck, I do believe.

It's things like these that are causing all the really nasty feelings to boil to the surface. Thiings like these don't really help to make everyone calmer. And the response lately has been to silence the criticism, which only makes it worse. So yeah, that might explain the yucky feeling people are having concerning the CSMs.
"If."
oustade Habalu
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#150 - 2012-01-25 12:27:36 UTC
Renan Ruivo wrote:
Words at Random



Dude your face... Shocked

Is it because you have it so up into Darius ass? If it is better get out a bit a catch some air... Just for a little while, you may then proceed to stick it in his ass again... Bear

Or is it that you are d2 or d1 or wtf D's alt??

Don't tell me, let me guess... You gonna say you are a fabulous forum poster and I'm not because of our likes amiright? Blink

GTFO man, every crap your pixels writes is garbage, I've seen graphite in the Favelas better then the sh*t you type.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#151 - 2012-01-25 12:33:03 UTC
The Snowman wrote:
I lost any scrap of respect for the CSM when I read the part about CSM demanding Hilmar answer the question "what have you learned?" How arrogant of CSM to presume that he would say something to them that he hasn't already said. Its like they just want to humiliate him even more!

What despicable examples of human behavior.


who would have thought that the CSM, a body representing the most vocal of CCP's customers, doesn't lick Hilmar's boots

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Comrade Commizzar
Eve Revolutionary Army
#152 - 2012-01-25 15:24:37 UTC
Nephilius wrote:
mkint wrote:
every CSM proposed change was to promote nullbears solidifying their empires, defending their RMT from any threats, and reducing the overall quality of the game for anyone who's not them. And some of the decision makers are going along with it. God help us all.


Like the OP, I have nothing personal against them either. They may be some of the greatest people I have never met in real life. But we aren't really talking about real life, are we?

.........

Things like this don't help:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=15467

Take it as you will. I've actually read the original post concerning that, though I have searched for the last thirty minutes and have come up empty now. Some things have been changed since then, so I am not going to have much luck, I do believe.

It's things like these that are causing all the really nasty feelings to boil to the surface. Thiings like these don't really help to make everyone calmer. And the response lately has been to silence the criticism, which only makes it worse. So yeah, that might explain the yucky feeling people are having concerning the CSMs.


The corruption goes even deeper than that.... The RMT Cartel, which is probably run by third parties that actually have investment interests in CCP itself, are milking both ends of the cow. Subscription fees plus RMT gives a pretty good ROI if you can swng it without raising the ire of your subscriber base. Blink


Prince Kobol
#153 - 2012-01-25 15:31:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Renan Ruivo wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
Um. How did you go from incursions to CSM? Are you talking about Darius III's shooting of the mothership?


Apparently, Darius III only got to do everything he did because he is a CSM. Otherwise he would be completely incapable of doing it.

I.E he used his CSM position to shoot motherships, and not his ship's weapons.


Didn't you know that the CSM chair has a massive DPS?


Okay.. I'm am idiot and I need this to be explained in depth to me.

How does Darius destroying Motherships in incurious have anything to do with him being on the CSM, and how would he not be able to destroy motherships by not being on the CSM?

If we use your argument then nobody can simply fly into an incursion and do what Darius is doing without being on the CSM.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#154 - 2012-01-25 15:33:53 UTC
Didn't you see the hilarious rage when we began the blue ice interdiction?

"RAWR RAWR MITTENS IS ABUSING HIS POWER AS CSM RAWR RAWR DEPOSE HIM AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA KILL KILL AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA"

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#155 - 2012-01-25 15:35:58 UTC
"CSM members are not playing within my arbitrary bounds they should be removed (("

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Prince Kobol
#156 - 2012-01-25 15:45:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Comrade Commizzar wrote:
Nephilius wrote:
mkint wrote:
every CSM proposed change was to promote nullbears solidifying their empires, defending their RMT from any threats, and reducing the overall quality of the game for anyone who's not them. And some of the decision makers are going along with it. God help us all.


Like the OP, I have nothing personal against them either. They may be some of the greatest people I have never met in real life. But we aren't really talking about real life, are we?

.........

Things like this don't help:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=15467

Take it as you will. I've actually read the original post concerning that, though I have searched for the last thirty minutes and have come up empty now. Some things have been changed since then, so I am not going to have much luck, I do believe.

It's things like these that are causing all the really nasty feelings to boil to the surface. Thiings like these don't really help to make everyone calmer. And the response lately has been to silence the criticism, which only makes it worse. So yeah, that might explain the yucky feeling people are having concerning the CSMs.


The corruption goes even deeper than that.... The RMT Cartel, which is probably run by third parties that actually have investment interests in CCP itself, are milking both ends of the cow. Subscription fees plus RMT gives a pretty good ROI if you can swng it without raising the ire of your subscriber base. Blink



I've done the whole RMT to death but I just feel I need to point something out.

Yes RMT goes on within Eve, that goes without saying, just a quick 5 minutes on google and you will there is literately nothing that isn't for sale, and yes some null sec alliances must be involved as if I am right, you can only build Titans in Sov space (yes you can buy Titans for RL Money)

However when asked nobody would say or could prove that any particular alliance was involved.

So what if an alliance has a standing order not to report botters who are blue, this can simply mean that they can not be bothered with the ***** fighting that will happen when somebody has been accused, of course it could also mean that they encourage botting, however it doesn't actually prove ****.

For me the whole RMT issue is one of CCP's making and so far I have seen nothing to suggest that they are serious about tackling the problem.

If there is an exploit / bug in Eve, then you can be damn sure there will be people to exploit it to the max, that is how people work, anything to gain an advantage.

Also if you are going to make it easy for people RMT, then logic dedicates they will.

As for the CSM stance on RMT and botting, of course they will say they hate it and everything should be done to remove it and make it harder, what else do you expect them to say.

Behind closed doors are the CSM members involved, only the CSM knows for sure and perhaps CCP, it depends if you like conspiracy theories or not.

Personally I just go with the most simplest option and that is when it comes to RMT and botting, CCP are just inept.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#157 - 2012-01-25 16:18:08 UTC
Occam's razor.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Othran
Route One
#158 - 2012-01-25 16:39:02 UTC
I confess I haven't read the last 7 pages but....

....shouldn't the thread title be "Rage AGAINST the CSM"?

If you're raging with them then you agree with them Blink

Edit - oh pedant mode off P
Nephilius
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#159 - 2012-01-25 16:54:26 UTC
Andski wrote:
"CSM members are not playing within my arbitrary bounds they should be removed (("


*gasp* What a shocking answer from a goonie!

I particularly like what some else said in another post...

Politicians do it in real life, so why shouldn't it happen in Eve too?
"If."
Chiggy W
Hard-Luck Industries
#160 - 2012-01-25 17:46:29 UTC
The amount of dumb in this thread is astonishing. What has become of my beloved Eve?

It's simple, don't like the current CSM? When the next round comes up, vote for the canidate that represents your interests. Get your friends to vote for the same canidate, and maybe, just maybe you'll find you get the representation you voted for. If you don't vote, you have no right to complain

Darius III - D3 is not exploiting the game in any way shape or form, he is using ingame mechanics, set out by CCP, to have fun. I'm not sure why people are foaming at the mouth about a CSM member playing the game in a valid way, using mechanics as intended.

Moon Goo - There seems to be a huge amount of sperging going with regards to moon goo, and so many people don't seem to have any idea what they are talking about. Whilst I agree it needs balancing, to claim that it's an ISK faucet and "unfair" in someway shows how bad people really are at this game.

Hint - want you're own moon goo ISK faucet? Get some buddies together, form a coalition, use diplomacy or military might and take some for yourself! What, you don't want to go through the hassle and effort that the current holders have had too? Well we should just get rid of it then, obviously because you can't achive something big, means that no-one else should either.

I'm amazed at the amount of baseless, un-educated/un-informed sperging that is going on. Everyone in this game starts with the following:

a pod
a noobship
a civvie mining lazer
a civvie gun
some basic skills/SP


What you do with those 5 things is up to you, but please don't get upset at others because you're unable to achive what others have, or their playstyle is something you disagree with