These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Proposal] CCP Please allow supers to dock in Fortizars

Author
ImYourMom
Retribution Holdings Corp
Retribution.
#1 - 2017-06-26 19:54:24 UTC
CCP I sort of understand the reason to dock supers in Keepstars, but many many people now have Supers, without the ability or funds to every run or pay for a Keepstar.

It also puts off a lot of people when you have to have to pay full cost for a second account to have a Super, im not sure thats really right or fair anyway. (yes i know its been like that for years, doesnt make it right tho)



Given a Fortizar is not cheap anyway and can be a signficant investment for most corps average 20B with all services and fittings at least, shouldnt that 'really' allow supers to dock in?

Please consider this proposal
Axure Abbacus
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2017-06-26 21:42:49 UTC
Negative Ghost-rider. Its the sizes that matter and which structure serves which purpose.
Fortizars= EvE b4 Keepstars

I understand that Keepstars are expensive but you can at least be tethered to any* structure in your Super. Perhaps a smaller ask would be more reasonable? Can you access your stuff from a Fortizar? Would it help if you could or use the fitting? Just some thoughts.

It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid.

StarterrorPrime
Black Rose Fleet Strategics
#3 - 2017-06-26 21:58:51 UTC
Actually I kind of agree with this cause its stupid that I could manufacture a supercapital ship in a Fortizar but not dock one there, same goes with the Azbel in this regard.
Axure Abbacus
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2017-06-26 22:18:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Axure Abbacus
Yes, they can fit a super capital ship assembly array which is why I suggested a smaller ask.<---mY bAD negative)

It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid.

Axure Abbacus
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2017-06-27 04:33:15 UTC
The one angle I see is the tethering mechanic replaces tower shields. If you had a private station you could get get away with leaving your super teathered and parked out front while you leave the ship. I would say that current mechanics does not support this feature. That would be an option for you.

It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid.

Lyote Sharaia
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2017-06-27 04:39:00 UTC
A better solution i think would be service module that allows Supers and Titans to dock externally with the Fortizar with a smaller version for the Astrahaus' for taking Carriers and Rorquals.

Basically, your Super would gain access to the Fortizar as though it was docked, but remain locked in place (No bumping off) and tethered in space. Perhaps a limit to the number of supported Supers? {Docking request denied, no berths available}
Would allow you to reship, refit etc. With the caveat that the super remains visibly in space, though unable to be attacked directly.

What would the benefits be? Simple, smaller entities that can afford these capitals but cannot afford a Keepstar can "dock" their ships and be reasonably safe.
For those living in Wormholes, a Keepstar may not be a viable option in the first place. (As i understand it, you can build capitals in Wormholes, but cant fit the hulls through a Wormhole. I could be wrong)
A hostile entity will be able to see exactly how many Supers and Titans are "docked" at a given Fortizar and can attack it in the hopes of scoring kills on those ships by eliminating the Fortizar.
Or maybe the owners of the Fortizar forgot to refuel that day and .. Ohnoes, all those poor capitals are just floating in space waiting to be destroyed by an observant hostile.

Content generation. Not to mention that PoS' currently allow smaller entities to keep their supers more secure, but we wont have PoS' in the near future, so an alternative is required, particularly for Wormholers.
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#7 - 2017-06-27 04:54:04 UTC  |  Edited by: SurrenderMonkey
Axure Abbacus wrote:
Yes, they can fit a super capital ship assembly array which is why I suggested a smaller ask.


No, actually, they can't.

StarterrorPrime wrote:
Actually I kind of agree with this cause its stupid that I could manufacture a supercapital ship in a Fortizar but not dock one there, same goes with the Azbel in this regard.


You can't build supercaps in an Azbel, nor in a Fortizar, nor even in a Keepstar.

The only thing a standup supercap shipyard goes on is a Sotiyo.

Now that we've cleared up that little bit of fundamental misunderstanding, I guess there's no real need for this idea.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Axure Abbacus
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2017-06-27 05:51:12 UTC
Thank you surrender monkey. We all learned something.

It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid.

ImYourMom
Retribution Holdings Corp
Retribution.
#9 - 2017-06-27 09:51:29 UTC
SurrenderMonkey wrote:
Axure Abbacus wrote:
Yes, they can fit a super capital ship assembly array which is why I suggested a smaller ask.


No, actually, they can't.

StarterrorPrime wrote:
Actually I kind of agree with this cause its stupid that I could manufacture a supercapital ship in a Fortizar but not dock one there, same goes with the Azbel in this regard.


You can't build supercaps in an Azbel, nor in a Fortizar, nor even in a Keepstar.

The only thing a standup supercap shipyard goes on is a Sotiyo.

Now that we've cleared up that little bit of fundamental misunderstanding, I guess there's no real need for this idea.


What are you so against? really im struggling to understand why someone would be against having to have a second account and be unable to dock a super. I dont get that mentality. Its like being awkward for awkward sake.

Tethering, mooring has been talked about before, but what if you log off how does that work? but again im struggling to understand why just simple docking is an issue. and that we have to complicate it by having mooring type idea.

if someone can provide a valid argument against it, then fine i am all ears.

Facts are as stated

1) many many people now have supers, not just large nullsec alliances, small corps and even just individuals
2) Is it really right you should pay FULL price just to have a second account to fly a ship? really?
3) Many of those corps and individuals could never afford a keepstar, nevermind defend it when its anchored. In fact what in the whole of eve about 4 Keepstars?
4) Fortizars are still pretty expensive but in reach of most people, and tbh they are still big citadels!
5) All points will actually stop players having supers, thus a decrease in the overall eve experience and that sandbox we all love to talk about.

Therefore i think its important to stop putting restrictions on things that have no place in the game anymore.

Axure Abbacus
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2017-06-27 12:31:16 UTC
A:|> Before Keepstars, that was the Cost of having the big ship. Those has been the deal since Super Capitals were introduced in 2005. Plenty of playtime and pilots dealt with having two accounts.
B:|>...Yeah supers are expensive and CCP offers no account discounts for being one of the cool kids. YOu may want' to put it to work or get a Rorqual too.
C:|>Blue up...recruit, or join a keepstar owning alliance?
D:|>Large are still outpost's still has not Super parking.
E;|>Awesome..you can trade your supercarrier/Titan for a dozen or so Carriers/Drednaughts and they will fit in your Fortizar. Plus you no longer have a the expense of flying what you can't afford to USE / lose.

o7

It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid.

Cade Windstalker
#11 - 2017-06-27 13:19:13 UTC
StarterrorPrime wrote:
Actually I kind of agree with this cause its stupid that I could manufacture a supercapital ship in a Fortizar but not dock one there, same goes with the Azbel in this regard.


This has literally always been the case. You can manufacture Capitals at a POS that can't store them, and you can manufacture Supers at a POS that can't dock them at all.

The only thing missing off of Citadels for Supers at present compared to a POS or Outpost is some kind of bumping protection on Tethering, and CCP have indicated they're working on that.
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#12 - 2017-06-27 14:45:20 UTC  |  Edited by: SurrenderMonkey
ImYourMom wrote:


1) many many people now have supers, not just large nullsec alliances, small corps and even just individuals


So you're saying that supercap proliferation should actually be curtailed, instead of accommodated. Sounds good!

Quote:
2) Is it really right you should pay FULL price just to have a second account to fly a ship? really?


You don't have to. Nobody held a gun to your head and made you fly a supercap you can't afford to park.

Quote:
3) Many of those corps and individuals could never afford a keepstar, nevermind defend it when its anchored. In fact what in the whole of eve about 4 Keepstars?


lolwat. I think we have that many in Deklein alone. Last I checked there are a few public ones as well (Aunenen? Maila?). Can't imagine how many Delve has. HK had two on the same grid, last I heard.

This is just an argument for living within your means.

Quote:
4) Fortizars are still pretty expensive but in reach of most people, and tbh they are still big citadels!


Fortizars are cheap enough that people throw them down on a lark. They cost less than an SC hull. Nope.

Quote:
5) All points will actually stop players having supers, thus a decrease in the overall eve experience and that sandbox we all love to talk about.

Therefore i think its important to stop putting restrictions on things that have no place in the game anymore.



Pretty much anything that stops plebes who can't really afford supers from having supers is okay by me.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

ImYourMom
Retribution Holdings Corp
Retribution.
#13 - 2017-06-27 16:14:41 UTC
honestly im literallyy sat here shaking my head and thinking are people seriously they dont support this. Eve n worse that some of you are actually happy to pay for another account just to fly a super? Have you got your head tested?
Some people in eve i just find weird or really negative.

Why would you NOT want to be able to dock your super and WHY would you want to pay for another account. I dont get it
SurrenderMonkey
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#14 - 2017-06-27 16:17:59 UTC  |  Edited by: SurrenderMonkey
ImYourMom wrote:
honestly im literallyy sat here shaking my head and thinking are people seriously they dont support this. Eve n worse that some of you are actually happy to pay for another account just to fly a super? Have you got your head tested?
Some people in eve i just find weird or really negative.

Why would you NOT want to be able to dock your super and WHY would you want to pay for another account. I dont get it



1. Not everyone has, or even wants, a super.

2. If you do want a super, how you're going to park the thing is a question you should address before committing to buying a super. I have numerous keepstars available to me. You, apparently, do not. This is a personal problem, and it's up to you to deal with it. If that's such an overwhelming problem for you, perhaps you should sell your super and fly a ship that's a little more suitable for your limited resources.

"Help, I'm bored with missions!"

http://swiftandbitter.com/eve/wtd/

Old Pervert
Perkone
Caldari State
#15 - 2017-06-27 16:39:28 UTC
So.. you bought a titan without thinking about where you were going to put it. Now your choices are to use it as a space coffin for your pilot, or buy a structure big enough to contain it.

Or you bought it a long time ago, and feel that it is unfair you buy the biggest structure for the biggest ship in the game?

The other suggestions have it right:

1) Buy a keepstar
2) Blue up with someone that has a keepstar
3) Join a corp/alliance/coalition with a keepstar

Honestly, if you can afford a titan, a keepstar really shouldn't be out of reach. If it is, you really shouldn't have bought your titan.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#16 - 2017-06-27 16:47:50 UTC
ImYourMom wrote:
honestly im literallyy sat here shaking my head and thinking are people seriously they dont support this. Eve n worse that some of you are actually happy to pay for another account just to fly a super? Have you got your head tested?
Some people in eve i just find weird or really negative.

Why would you NOT want to be able to dock your super and WHY would you want to pay for another account. I dont get it


You bought a sport car but didn't think about where you would park it during winter. That's your own damn fault.

If you are not happy about the "upkeep" requirement of your super, just sell the damn thing.
Cade Windstalker
#17 - 2017-06-27 17:23:57 UTC
ImYourMom wrote:
honestly im literallyy sat here shaking my head and thinking are people seriously they dont support this. Eve n worse that some of you are actually happy to pay for another account just to fly a super? Have you got your head tested?
Some people in eve i just find weird or really negative.

Why would you NOT want to be able to dock your super and WHY would you want to pay for another account. I dont get it


Oh oh! I can answer these!

So, it's not about whether or not someone wants to be able to easily dock their Super, it's about whether or not they think it's balanced overall to be able to dock a Super in a structure that costs less than that ship, and about whether or not they want their enemies to be able to do that.

Also it's fairly common among people able to afford a Super Carrier to have multiple accounts. Cost wise it generally costs less to PLEX and account for 12 months than it does to set up a Fortizar so the math is pretty simple, and then you don't have to worry about moving your Super around and making it vulnerable to use other ships, or about not being able to use your Super for some operation because your one character is off ratting or something elsewhere.

Really overall both of these things make a lot of sense if you stop and think about it from other perspectives for even half a minute.
Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries
VOID Intergalactic Forces
#18 - 2017-06-27 17:34:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Agondray
if you can afford to have super caps, you can afford to pool resources for the base.

"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith

Axure Abbacus
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2017-06-27 20:22:46 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGGhLihDmFk

Negative ghost rider, the pattern is full.

It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid.