These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[The Purity War - The Age of Blood

Author
Graelyn
Aeternus Command Academy
#81 - 2017-05-26 13:59:18 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Not as impressive as it is to watch people trying to make hay on events that, as I've stated, were actually pretty beneficial on the whole, in our estimation.


When your enemy bleeds and screams "I'M FINE", you've hit an artery.

When your enemy falls and screams "Now I'm STRONGER", then you've hit brainstem.

Cardinal Graelyn

Amarr Loyalist of the Year - YC113

AEther Galatia
Celestial Eternity
#82 - 2017-05-26 16:18:12 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
If you think Napkins is 'the real enemy' you are even more of a fool than you have demonstrated yourself to be, recently. Napkins is nothing. He is an attention-hungry child, pulling on the sleeves of everyone around him.

Right now, the Caldari need only to ignore him. He threatens none of their people except the ones foolish enough to listen to him, and he offers them nothing that will help them become influential or spread his lies. The Matari slaves he plans to kill, tragic as their deaths are, would still be trapped, sitting in a cage, and waiting to be plucked from their lives for the whims of those who claim slavery is justifiable and noble.

Napkins wants your attention. And you're giving it to him. What exactly do you think you're going to cost him? All of those slaves are registered as possessions, as assets, right now. Upwell structures' cargo protections ensure that even if the facility is destroyed, he will be able to retrieve his 'assets'.

So what do you cost him? The structure itself, which he erects with the intent of seeing people come and attack it, seeing them come and demonstrate how much he matters, to them, because he cannot bear the thought of his own inconsequentialness? It's a deal he'll make time and again. It's a deal he has made, over and over.

The cost of setting up the Citadel is far less than the payoff of self-esteem and attention he gets from you. Blow it up. He'll build another, and it will cost him nothing.

Which is meet, really, because he is nothing. You call him 'the real enemy'. He's nothing of the sort. He's a symptom, and nothing more. Napkins is a persistent cough that you insist we need to focus on and root out. We must defeat the cough! Nevermind the cancer in the lungs, focus on the cough.

Until the true disease, this insane belief in an all-powerful invisible man who commands the most vile acts in the name of cultural purity, is ripped out by the roots... you will keep coughing. And he will keep building more temples to tug at your sleeve and dance around gleefully at how much you scowl and denounce him, at how much power you give him in your life. When you call him 'the real enemy', all you are doing is making him your god.



Arrendis, I have some terrible news. You are under Amarr slaver mind control drugs. Seek medical attention immediately, you are compromising the Goonswarm Federation. Take my word for it. I respect you as a directorate member and will do my best to protect you.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#83 - 2017-05-26 16:21:52 UTC
Graelyn wrote:
When your enemy falls and screams "Now I'm STRONGER", then you've hit brainstem.


Yup. Totally. Trust the platitudes, not the actual data, your Holiness.
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#84 - 2017-05-26 16:23:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Mizhara Del'thul
I have no words for how much I love and adore that turn of phrase, old man. It has an enviable sting to it. Still, she's actually right, even if only technically so. The goons themselves are at this point far stronger than they were in the north, having shed their worthless "Imperium" and folded some of the useful bits of it into their own organization. Their industrial and financial power is now significantly improved, and it's even possible - although unproven as that Sotiyo kill showed - that they can and will undock something other than interceptor fleets these days.

They are stronger now than during their height of power before and during WWB.

If this strength is sufficiently more than the paper slaver hound in the north remains to be seen. Sheer numbers and ISK is a quality on its own, but if it's their only quality at this point, they still have quite a lot of work to do.

Edit: Gosh, Arrendis. You're on slaver mind control drugs and won't even share!? So mean.
AEther Galatia
Celestial Eternity
#85 - 2017-05-26 16:30:53 UTC
Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
I have no words for how much I love and adore that turn of phrase, old man. It has an enviable sting to it. Still, she's actually right, even if only technically so. The goons themselves are at this point far stronger than they were in the north, having shed their worthless "Imperium" and folded some of the useful bits of it into their own organization. Their industrial and financial power is now significantly improved, and it's even possible - although unproven as that Sotiyo kill showed - that they can and will undock something other than interceptor fleets these days.

They are stronger now than during their height of power before and during WWB.

If this strength is sufficiently more than the paper slaver hound in the north remains to be seen. Sheer numbers and ISK is a quality on its own, but if it's their only quality at this point, they still have quite a lot of work to do.

Edit: Gosh, Arrendis. You're on slaver mind control drugs and won't even share!? So mean.


I'd hire you but I'm a "one man corp" that is apparently useless or whatever the hell. Keep your guns pointed at the enemy.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#86 - 2017-05-26 16:36:22 UTC
Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
Edit: Gosh, Arrendis. You're on slaver mind control drugs and won't even share!? So mean.


Like you haven't been bogarting the good stuff your corp hooks you up with. P

We should get Samira and have a total drugged out hedonism night. It'll be like old times! Only, with drugs. And hedonism. And nobody trying to kill themselves or one another. Or tas-oh, who am I kidding, you'll still get me with the taser.
AEther Galatia
Celestial Eternity
#87 - 2017-05-26 16:40:31 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Graelyn wrote:
When your enemy falls and screams "Now I'm STRONGER", then you've hit brainstem.


Yup. Totally. Trust the platitudes, not the actual data, your Holiness.


Wonder who made you write this? (quoted in case you edit it.)
Arrendis
TK Corp
#88 - 2017-05-26 16:43:44 UTC
AEther Galatia wrote:
Wonder who made you write this? (quoted in case you edit it.)


Why would I edit my snark?
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#89 - 2017-05-26 16:43:58 UTC
Correctional Electrical Attitude and Behaviour Adjustment Signal* and you're saving up for one hell of a doozy.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#90 - 2017-05-26 16:50:20 UTC
Maybe I'll stop by sometime next month when I get a little time off.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#91 - 2017-05-26 16:50:40 UTC
AEther Galatia wrote:
Arrendis wrote:
Graelyn wrote:
When your enemy falls and screams "Now I'm STRONGER", then you've hit brainstem.


Yup. Totally. Trust the platitudes, not the actual data, your Holiness.


Wonder who made you write this? (quoted in case you edit it.)


Ironic use of a title is still use of a title. But also still ironic.

Especially when it's the wrong title.






(A cardinal is properly addressed as, "your Eminence," I think.)
Ayallah
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#92 - 2017-05-26 16:50:57 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
No, we've been farming the Blood Raiders. Like threshing grain. You don't 'battle' the grain. You're not 'at war' with the grain. You simply go out and mow it all down with the large industrial reaper-thresher and there is nothing the grain can do to stop it.
Let us not go to far, they kill a lot of goons too.

Goddess of the IGS

As strength goes.

Arrendis
TK Corp
#93 - 2017-05-26 16:53:31 UTC
Ayallah wrote:
Let us not go to far, they kill a lot of goons too.


Industrial accidents happen. Can't help it if the idiots fall into the thresher. Compare the numbers, see if the 'a lot' really stacks up.
AEther Galatia
Celestial Eternity
#94 - 2017-05-26 16:53:36 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
AEther Galatia wrote:
Arrendis wrote:
Graelyn wrote:
When your enemy falls and screams "Now I'm STRONGER", then you've hit brainstem.


Yup. Totally. Trust the platitudes, not the actual data, your Holiness.


Wonder who made you write this? (quoted in case you edit it.)


Ironic use of a title is still use of a title. But also still ironic.

Especially when it's the wrong title.






(A cardinal is properly addressed as, "your Eminence," I think.)


Thanks. That is very wise of you and was my point but I did not say it directly.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#95 - 2017-05-26 16:55:38 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Ironic use of a title is still use of a title. But also still ironic.

Especially when it's the wrong title.






(A cardinal is properly addressed as, "your Eminence," I think.)


You know what I love about names? They're unique. They're singular. Oh, I don't mean 'Aria' or 'Arrendis'... I mean a name is the only thing you can take away from someone by not using it. Titles, especially the wrong ones... they're so generic.
Valerie Valate
Church of The Crimson Saviour
#96 - 2017-05-26 16:57:46 UTC
I always address Cardinal Graelyn as Cardinal Graelyn, following an agreement with him.

Since it bugged him when I addressed him as "Snookums".

Like, totally bugged him.

Doctor V. Valate, Professor of Archaeology at Kaztropolis Imperial University.

AEther Galatia
Celestial Eternity
#97 - 2017-05-26 16:58:27 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Ironic use of a title is still use of a title. But also still ironic.

Especially when it's the wrong title.






(A cardinal is properly addressed as, "your Eminence," I think.)


You know what I love about names? They're unique. They're singular. Oh, I don't mean 'Aria' or 'Arrendis'... I mean a name is the only thing you can take away from someone by not using it. Titles, especially the wrong ones... they're so generic.


Yup I'm with you. Just remember, even if your *intended* audience is not your spoken to audience, to the layman your spoken to audience is the one getting the praise and not your intended audience.
Graelyn
Aeternus Command Academy
#98 - 2017-05-26 17:02:00 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Yup. Totally. Trust the platitudes, not the actual data, your Holiness.


"We didn't want Pator anyways."

Try a spin that isn't older than I am.

Cardinal Graelyn

Amarr Loyalist of the Year - YC113

Arrendis
TK Corp
#99 - 2017-05-26 17:02:24 UTC
AEther Galatia wrote:

Yup I'm with you. Just remember, even if your *intended* audience is not your spoken to audience, to the layman your spoken to audience is the one getting the praise and not your intended audience.


Do you think I particularly care?
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#100 - 2017-05-26 17:03:58 UTC
Not what she's arguing, is it Old Man? I'll be first in line to smack her upside the head when she tries that particular line, but when she's saying they've grown stronger than before that defeat, she's actually right.