These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

To: The Developers (Ability To Support A Faction In The Factional War)
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Fifty Three
Doomheim
#1 - 2017-05-22 05:45:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Fifty Three
1.
A person can build ships/Structures/Equipment or whatever and donate them to A faction or Multiple Factions to go towards the Factional Wars.

Whatever is donated to a faction, can be accessed and used by people who signed up for Factional War, and who are Plexed/have Omega status only.

Note: An individual has to sign up for "Factional War" to even begin to donate to a faction..

Note: Right clicking on a ship/structure/equipment/item otherwise, if you are signed up for factional war, will give an additional option to "Donate" then a screen pops up to choose the faction to give to.

2.
Each Faction has the possibility to be Conquered. If a faction defeats all the other 3 factions, in all their owning system, then the galaxy resets in Traditional Factional setting. The winners(Those who signed up for Factional warfare+is of the winning Faction) will get, for conquering the other factions, a bonus, when the Galaxy resets . They can get a bonus of 500 plex/2 billion Isk/Medal for Galaxy conquer(including the date)/Skin for a ship, something like one of those.

Note: Null+Low Sectors are unaffected by this. Only factional space is.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#2 - 2017-05-22 05:50:19 UTC
1... you can already do this


2 exploitable beyond belief

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
Rhaegon Aesir
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2017-05-22 06:19:02 UTC
To: The OP (Please stop posting ideas for areas of space that you do not live in and do not have any understanding of)

1: Already essentially exists in the game.

2: Everyone will join one single faction and steamroll all the others continuously for infinite ISK.
Fifty Three
Doomheim
#4 - 2017-05-22 06:27:14 UTC
No. you can make it so that if there is an imbalance, of population,then they get no bonus if the factions are defeated. Also, you can make it that More NPC(perhaps even with a bit more bonuses) are created automatically to counter the overwhelming, human players, if they mostly went to a particular faction.
Marika Sunji
Perkone
Caldari State
#5 - 2017-05-22 06:40:47 UTC
Fifty Three wrote:
No. you can make it so that if there is an imbalance, of population,then they get no bonus if the factions are defeated. Also, you can make it that More NPC(perhaps even with a bit more bonuses) are created automatically to counter the overwhelming, human players, if they mostly went to a particular faction.

1. Alts are a thing.
2. If you think non-invulnerable npcs can offer any sort of lasting resistance against players, may I direct you to look at the blood raiders sotiyo.
Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale
#6 - 2017-05-22 06:53:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Linus Gorp
Fifty Three wrote:
If a faction defeats all the other 3 factions, in all their owning system, then the galaxy resets in Traditional Factional setting.

What the ****? How ******* **** are you? Do you understand how EVE works at the most basic level? Why it's so special compared to other games?

And why the **** would Gallente and Matari or Amarr and Caldari fight each other? They are allies.

Do the world a favor and move your **** **** *** to the biomass tubes and never come back.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.
Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale
#7 - 2017-05-22 06:56:56 UTC
Quote:
Bounty placed on you
From: CONCORD
Sent: 2017.05.22 06:56

Fifty Three placed 2,000,000 ISK in bounty on your head.

Cute.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#8 - 2017-05-22 06:58:32 UTC
aw how come he gets a bounty and i dont?

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale
#9 - 2017-05-22 07:00:19 UTC
Lugh Crow-Slave wrote:
aw how come he gets a bounty and i dont?

Maybe you didn't hurt its feelings. Swear more.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#10 - 2017-05-22 07:04:14 UTC
and to be fair amarr and caldari are less allies and more just have mutual defense. outside of lore most in FW would like it to be a four war FFA because the current mechanics make it that way as it is just with ****** overviews

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
mkint
#11 - 2017-05-22 12:39:31 UTC
I only click on this guy's ideas as an experience in dadaism. Somehow they are more dadaist than real life.

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.
Donnachadh
United Allegiance of Undesirables
#12 - 2017-05-22 12:51:04 UTC
Fifty Three wrote:
Note: Null+Low Sectors are unaffected by this. Only factional space is.

A refresher course in EvE 101 seems to be in order here.

1. Faction war has ZERO affect on the game as a whole.
2. Faction war does not even affect the entire system in which faction war takes place, it only affects the faction war sites themselves.
3. Low sec IS FACTION space and it always has been so your idea would only affect nul and worm holes because that is the only non-faction space in the game. And good luck getting your idea past the groups that "own" nul sec or the corps that have claimed a worm hole.
Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale
#13 - 2017-05-22 13:32:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Linus Gorp
mkint wrote:
I only click on this guy's ideas as an experience in dadaism. Somehow they are more dadaist than real life.

Wtf is dadaism?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYqjcHYTQgQ

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#14 - 2017-05-22 13:35:02 UTC
Lol don't feel bad i don't thunk many people use that term anymore

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale
#15 - 2017-05-22 13:41:52 UTC
The only thing that came up was something about an informal art movement. I fail to see how that would apply here.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#16 - 2017-05-22 13:58:40 UTC
In short it's a sort of surreal and absurd humor. Try neo-dadaism or dadaist humor

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
mkint
#17 - 2017-05-22 15:11:13 UTC
Unless I'm completely misinformed, which really, I probably am, the point of dadaism is its pointlessness. Case in point, the Italian film, "The bicycle thief." It's a movie about a guy who has a bike that he needs to get to work and it gets stolen, so desperate he steals someone else's bike but gets caught and goes to jail, the end. A story without a plot. Words without meaning. A post without content.

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.
Lugh Crow-Slave
#18 - 2017-05-22 15:23:24 UTC
... you just described the plot of a movie you then said had no plot i mean hell it even had a moral

BLOPS Hauler
The 16.8km Bubble
mkint
#19 - 2017-05-22 15:49:31 UTC
*shrug* I'm not the one who classified it as dadaist, or came up with the phrase "story without a plot." That's just where I found out about dadaism and that's what came up when I looked it up. the point is the pointlessness. Things just happen one after the other without any hero's journey or other structure, without really resolving anything. I'm not any kind of film or art expert so I'm probably way off base, but the idea of having a thing that is a nothing kinda stuck with me.

And to keep at least some semblance of being on topic, the point is that OPs posts are full of words with no thought. Absurd indeed.

Maxim 6. If violence wasn’t your last resort, you failed to resort to enough of it.
Linus Gorp
Ministry of Propaganda and Morale
#20 - 2017-05-22 18:14:57 UTC
Interesting. Interesting indeed. Thanks for explaining.

When you don't know the difference between there, their, and they're, you come across as being so uneducated that your viewpoint can be safely dismissed. The literate is unlikely to learn much from the illiterate.
12Next page