These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Just saying

Author
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#21 - 2017-05-08 17:13:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Elsebeth Rhiannon
Miz;

You want to know why I talk now, even though I have no solutions, no way forward.

I speak now, because the silence has grown unbearable. I have held my tongue for years, but I cannot anymore. I cannot pretend the Parliament murders never happened. I cannot pretend an election with a single candidate and a record-low turnout is legitimate. I cannot pretend attacks on people who peacefully protest through art do not happen.

I speak now, because I have grown to believe it does not matter anymore. I never said a word when I believed we could still buy time with silence, when I still believed Shakor had a plan, even if a risky one. I was ready to fight a war - remember? We all were. In unity, even if desperately. But the war never came, and now it grows late.

And I speak now, because carrying this alone became too lonely. I might not know the solution. But maybe someone does who hears my words. Or maybe the government wakes up, hearing them, and we will fight our war. We might be going down, in flames or slowly crumbling. But at least I am not going down silent and alone.
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#22 - 2017-05-08 17:23:53 UTC
And there it is. Ell, I can give you no comforts but only one promise: Whether we succeed or go down in flames, you will not be alone.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#23 - 2017-05-08 17:51:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Arrendis
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:

1) I said that the outrage against Karin Midular dissolving the parliament was justified. My critique is about the fact that if dismissing those who disagree causes such an outrage, why does not murder without trial?


I was at PTS for these events, not out in a pod, so my perspective may be a little different from those of people who were already a step removed from the mobs, so to speak. And... there's a couple of pretty obvious answers to this.

When Midular dissolved the parliament, there was already a fair degree of civil unrest. I know we were seeing protests about the Starkmanir situaion on-station pretty consistently, and according to the news feeds, they weren't isolated at all. When parliament was dissolved, that just added a huge splash of 'oh crap what are we going to do there's all this unrest and now no central authority!' to the mix.

Now, you've cast it as "riots broke out" and Midular being taken to task for what she did, but from the baseliner perspective? The riots weren't a protest against the action. The riots were people who were already mobilized and protesting getting scared and losing their damned minds trying to secure whatever little bit of safety and 'I got mine, screw it!' they could. It was a pretty terrifying time all around. Nobody knew what was going on, nobody knew if RSS or the Fleet was going to be next...

I promise, people were not looting stores screaming 'IF THE PARLIAMENT ISN'T RESTORED, I'M GONNA KEEP STEALING CRAP'.

Now, when the attacks came... that wasn't 'Shakor orders bloody purge'. Nobody knew what was going on until well after it was over. And it was an attack. A violent, brutal attack. But it wasn't the entire parliament getting wiped out. It wasn't even a quorum of parliament killed. Only days later, Midular called for new elections. Midular and Yun togethercalled for the dissolution of the Gallente-style democracy..

And let me tell you, as a normal human being at Pator Tech School then? We were glad for it. All of the bickering, all of the dithering... put the Chiefs in a room and have them hash it out.

As for your critique of the younger Chief Midular... I notice you left off the second half of the description when implying she was part of a new, unified regime of Shakorian Dictatorship: "Acassa Midular served as clan chief for the Midular for 12 years and is known to have been a sharp critic of both the old parliamentary system and the transitional regime of Sanmatar Maleatu Shakor."

And yes, some violent nutjobs attacked a theater because they thought people were mocking the new leader. That's what violent, frightened people do: they lash out.

I know... believe me, I know, once you're out here in the goo, there's a lot of tendencies to see shadowy puppetmasters behind everything. I won't lie, my own organization does a lot to perpetuate that illusion. People have a tendency to want to think there's a master plan at work, that somehow, all of this chaos is 'under control'.

It's not. And there's no disconnect between the two sets of events you point out less than a month apart in Parliament. The riots were not protesting the dissolution, they were protests about the Starkmanir losing all semblance of order in the panic of 'there's no government', and the murders soon after stunned us all into shocked numbness, only to see us rally behind the unified voices of Karin Midular and Keitan Yun.
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#24 - 2017-05-08 17:56:16 UTC
So, let me get this straight: you are basically arguing that the demonstrations that were used to argua for and to pretty much force our hand to the "reform" were actually never about that?

Well, that fits.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#25 - 2017-05-08 18:10:42 UTC
I'm saying the demonstrations about the inaction on the Starkmanir issue were about the inaction on the Starkmanir issue, and not as you've presented them, a response to the dissolution of Parliament.

Were they a call for reform? After a fashion. More a 'get off your butts and DO something', really. But you've presented them as protests about a thing that happened after the protests were underway, even according to your own citation.

Quote:

When Karin Midular dissolved the parliament to advance the goals of the tribes, riots broke out and she was - rightfully, mind you - called on it [12]
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#26 - 2017-05-08 18:16:35 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
I'm saying the demonstrations about the inaction on the Starkmanir issue were about the inaction on the Starkmanir issue, and not as you've presented them, a response to the dissolution of Parliament.

Were they a call for reform? After a fashion. More a 'get off your butts and DO something', really. But you've presented them as protests about a thing that happened after the protests were underway, even according to your own citation.

I apologize for my less than accurate wording. I did not mean to imply that everything was just peachy until then; I meant to say that she was rightfully called on the dissolution decision. I, again, point to the fact that I am not criticizing anyone for protesting at that point.
Valerie Valate
Church of The Crimson Saviour
#27 - 2017-05-08 18:18:37 UTC
And this is why the Federation must be destroyed.

Doctor V. Valate, Professor of Archaeology at Kaztropolis Imperial University.

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#28 - 2017-05-08 20:08:22 UTC
Valerie Valate wrote:
And this is why the Federation must be destroyed.

The... what?
Charles Cambridge Schmidt
Nadire Security Consultants
Federation Peacekeepers
#29 - 2017-05-08 20:31:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Charles Cambridge Schmidt
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:
Valerie Valate wrote:
And this is why the Federation must be destroyed.

The... what?


Recent meme from our resident dim-witted Provist-supporting terrorist poorly masquerading as an honorable soldier in the State Protectorate. Val, on the other hand, is just trying to be funny.

I don't care what you think, as long as it's about me.

Challis Drant
Gradient
Electus Matari
#30 - 2017-05-08 20:37:43 UTC
Ayallah wrote:
You should write drifter conspiracies.


The Sanmatar in your world must be the most brilliant dictator of all time. I do not know how he ever has time to actually mediate dispute in the Tribal Council or appear in public when he is so busy organizing everything from the bombing of empty theatres to the assassination of The Ray of Matar.



He does not have to do anything - he can sit there and claim that the threat of the Amarr is the reason he acts, and while that threat hangs over our head we cannot go forward. He can enact any legislation or give any decree and as long as he claims it is for the protection of the Republic - Those that would protest politically are silenced by the simple rebuttal - " Well how do we stop the Amarr from crossing our border if we even look like we are weak? "

Hells - those who could do something about the Amarr are busily fighting a toy war - pretending it makes a difference - nicely sidelined out of the way. How many times have we asked for military co-operation with the fleet, and how many times have they said yes.

Others have left the toy war to do other things with other corps for good or ill.

Sometimes I think that the so called toy war is perfect stagnation - whilst we have it - we cannot go forward and those in power are going to do all they can to make sure it never ends. No one in their right minds wants 3000 + capsuleers to suddenly have nothing better to do - for they know just how shallow their control is over pod pilots.

Victoria Grey
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#31 - 2017-05-08 20:38:29 UTC
There is a lot here but before I dive deep into it, I must say that I deeply respect you Pilot Rhiannon for bringing this up. If I am correct here, the message here really is is that you are sick of the silence and inactivity and the "keeping your head down" mentality as you call it. And that, despite holding political views very nearly diametrically opposed to my own, is something I whole heartedly agree on.

Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:

Here are some things that have been suggested:

...

3) Fight the toy war, keep your head down. and hope for the best.
The Ushra'Khan way.

4) Ignore the unpleasantness, keep your head down, and keep on building and preparing in the Republic. (Use toy war for practice.)
The Electus Matari way.

...

6) Have political debates and otherwise keep on talking about it, because capsuleers can somewhat safely voice objections that baseliners might be unable to.
Talk is cheap and I have plenty of it in stock. Risks for baseline kin are obvious, however. Also see point no 2.


I agree that action needs to be taken. I agree that there needs to be a solution besides the above (albeit curated) responses. I've said this before but the Toy War deeply troubles me in its ability to completely dismantle any action that we may take and it only further dilutes our own self image as brothers and sisters of Matar. I say this as one who once flew with Ushra'Khan as a proud member of Masuat'aa Matari. I left soon after they dived straight into the Toy War.

What can we really do? Unify and Discuss. So really a merging of all three options. This isn't a solution so much as a first step to a resolution. I have no say in anything that the various Matari aligned corps and alliances want but from my viewpoint, why not combine efforts of both Electus Matari and Ushra'Khan?

I know that I may not be addressing the right people to suggest this but my honest opinion is the same as someone else on this thread: We need someone(s) influential/in the thick of things to come forward. And that would be Electus Matari and Ushra'Khan. If neither of those organizations are willing to do something to do something, how can any of us individuals, especially those of us disillusioned with the Toy War?

Ioannis Sepphiros wrote:

...

Those that matter/are in the thick of it should step up and be beacons of hope and unity Captain Rhiannon, I dont harbor such false notions about myself nor I could contribute in a fundamental manner given my youth as a capsuleer within this topic. I can only state what I would like to see from a personal viewpoint and thats as far as I can go about this given how I would be disrespectful to the rest before me that have done so much about the Republic, each to his/her own capacity and will.

...

Hope, unity and pragmatism Captain that are the tools I can only think of. No civil wars, no assasinations, not going away and so on. Just hope, unity and pragmatism.

Pilot Sepphiros, you are who I was referring to above. I very much agree with everything you said.

Arrendis wrote:
...

That doesn't mean I don't agree with your larger position regarding the military situation between the Empire and the Republic, though. I also tend to agree with Miz, though, on the inevitability of the question: Ok, so now what?

I don't know that I've got an answer, either. I think there's broad agreement on principals... the security of the Tribes, freedom fro our people, etc, but how we go about getting that...

...

Anyone got any ideas?


This, I believe is the heart of your topic.

Sinti Vailatti wrote:
Ok...

...

3. The U'K way is attractive and romantic and good for sharpening combat skills. But it's a waste of time and resources. This is the bad part of CONCORD. They keep us so tied up in this that we can't take care of things that deserve more attention.

4. Sorry to be blunt...but this is slave mentality. I know this from personal experience. You just do the work and hope things will change...but it never really does. You gotta be an agent of change.

...

6. This. This we can do and do a lot. This used to be a thing here and it isn't as much as it was. Republican Tribals, Ammantar, Angels, Thukkers, Wormholers, NullSeccers and Amarrians....those of Matar are still Matari. We used to talk a lot. And it often got loud. I think maybe it's time for us be noisy again?



Again, another person I wholeheartedly agree with. Bolded the especially important bits.

Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
And there it is. Ell, I can give you no comforts but only one promise: Whether we succeed or go down in flames, you will not be alone.


Another agree. Suggestions? Talk to Electus Matari leadership about further actions. See if a dialogue can be opened. Call for a summit between Electus Matari and U'K.

We are not devoid of options here and talking has a lot more power than you would think.
Valerie Valate
Church of The Crimson Saviour
#32 - 2017-05-08 20:47:34 UTC
Charles Cambridge Schmidt wrote:
Val's just trying to be funny.


I'm not trying very hard though.

Doctor V. Valate, Professor of Archaeology at Kaztropolis Imperial University.

Arrendis
TK Corp
#33 - 2017-05-08 22:08:23 UTC
Ioannis Sepphiros wrote:

Those that matter/are in the thick of it should step up and be beacons of hope and unity Captain Rhiannon, I dont harbor such false notions about myself nor I could contribute in a fundamental manner given my youth as a capsuleer within this topic. I can only state what I would like to see from a personal viewpoint and thats as far as I can go about this given how I would be disrespectful to the rest before me that have done so much about the Republic, each to his/her own capacity and will.


A question on this: precisely who are you referring to when you say 'those that matter are in the thick of it'?

Challis Drant wrote:
Sometimes I think that the so called toy war is perfect stagnation - whilst we have it - we cannot go forward and those in power are going to do all they can to make sure it never ends. No one in their right minds wants 3000 + capsuleers to suddenly have nothing better to do - for they know just how shallow their control is over pod pilots.


Well, that is exactly what the Pendulum is designed to be, yes.
Gaven Lok'ri
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#34 - 2017-05-09 04:30:38 UTC
The funny thing is that while the CEWPA war is an absolute dead end for the Matari State, it is a perfect source of power for the usurpers of the Republic. A constant state of crisis is a wonderful thing for a regime that lacks any legitimacy whatsoever.

The best hope the Matari have at this point is to start working in good faith for a lasting and sincere peace. Of course, the second that occurs, the current government is likely to be strung up by their own people, so the current government has no incentive to work towards peace. And for that matter, the current government would not be trusted (with good reason!) to be working in good faith. This means that they have to be removed for the Matari to survive as an independent state. If they stay in power, I expect it is only a matter of time before they do something (else) that is monumentally stupid. Whether that ends up being alienating the Federation or attempting another all or nothing invasion, or some other insanity, doesn't really matter so much as the fact that those actions strengthen the Amarr warhawk argument for outright invasion rather than the current situation of suppression.

The largest place in which I disagree with your analyses, obvious cultural differences aside, is that I cannot imagine a more surefire way to destroy the Matari State than opening a full scale war. Amarr has been at the forefront of technological innovation recently and our navy has more practical recent experience fighting large scale engagements than any of the others. The material cost of the Blood Raider War, Sansha's War, and the Drifter incursions has certainly been high, but we can afford those costs better than the other empires. More importantly, the combat experience that we have gained from those actions is invaluable. Those who survived the trials of the last decade are the most combat experienced of naval forces. When you combine that with our edge in resources and manpower, a full scale war with Amarr would only end with catastrophe for the Matari. You might hurt us quite a bit as you died, but you would not survive doing so, and you might strengthen the very aspects of Amarr society that you most despise.

So, if we accept the following statements: 1. The CEWPA war hurts the Matari more than the Amarr in relative terms. 2. Total war would almost certainly end in Matari destruction and 3. The usurpers have no domestic incentive to end the CEWPA war with a peace, then the only conclusion I can see is that the usurpers must be removed from power as soon as possible and a new regime that is not invested in a losing war must take their place.

This then raises the question of what conditions need to be in place for a change of government in the Republic to a rational government that is be willing to make the compromises needed to create a lasting peace. As you have mentioned, either a civil war or a simple assassination would be a poor idea if the goal is the survival of the republic. Such an event would strengthen the Amarr hawk factions and create a strong argument for a real invasion to end the threat to Amarr.

So that cannot be the answer. But they need to go. What mechanisms exist that could remove them from power?

One obvious one from my, admittedly foreign and hostile, perspective is the CEWPA war. So long as the Matari have occasional victories in the CEWPA war, the usurpers can spin those victories into domestic support. They can create the illusion that the CEWPA war can be sufficiently victorious that it actually ends up strengthening the Matari state. This will never happen, but the hope that it could keeps dissent down.

One question I would raise is "what happens if the Matari were unequivocally losing the CEWPA war?" The actual harm to the state would not be significantly higher than the current situation, the CEWPA war is pretty limited in that respect, but the political effect would be to remove the war as a support for the Usurpers. I would suggest that by fighting to help the Matari in the CEWPA war, you directly lower the probability of the survival of the Matari state in the future.

I'm sure there are other pillars to their power that are opaque to me from my position on the other side of the battle lines, and probably ones that are less problematic to deal with than the CEWPA war. But, whatever they are, they need to be removed one by one so that the usurpers lose their hold on the mechanism of the Matari state. This needs to happen relatively peacefully, and the new government needs to offer an olive branch to our new government. I do not see any other way to avoid catastrophe.

Admiral of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore 24th Imperial Crusade

Holder. Vassal of the Emperor Family

Arrendis
TK Corp
#35 - 2017-05-09 05:11:43 UTC
Couple of problems with this.

First there's the claim that the Empire's been at the forefront of military technology, as though there hasn't been pretty much exact parity. In fact, in subcapital engagements (as the majority of the fighting would be), the Lif is a far superior choice when compared to the Apostle. The thing that keeps the Lif from being more or less the Force Auxiliary of choice in the crucible of capital warfare in nullsec is the Energy Transfer range.

In subcapital warfare, however, this is far less of a consideration, and the local repair capabilities and capacitor warfare resistance of the Lif, along with the ability to be configured to work with a fleet of armor- or shield-based subcapitals, make it a significantly more capable ship than the Apostle. And I say this as someone who owns and flies both.

Second, your assessment about 'what if the Matari were unequivocally losing the CEWPA war?' Well, we saw that for a number of years, beginning in late YC 114. It didn't seem to matter. At all. Now, I could draw the obvious 'the CEWPA doesn't matter. At all' conclusion, but I don't think that's accurate, either. I think that fighting as underdogs, fighting the hopeless conflict and being driven back, actually helps the situation from the viewpoint of many Matari loyalists and politicos.

Let's face it, we're used to being outnumbered and outgunned, and feeling like our backs are to the wall. Perpetuating that, in an environment where the Republic loyalists can't be eradicated? It's only going to harden resolve. The more interesting question would be: What if the Matari were to unequivocably win the CEWPA war? Not just 'get their medal' type win, but a long-term, sustained control of the entire warzone without Amarr capsuleer incursions to attempt to drive them back?

Losing just means there's more need to resist, to strike back.

What if we won, and there was no-one left to shoot? What happens then in an environment where the political red meat has focused on 'first the warzone, and then the rest', when 'the rest' can't even be considered, or CONCORD will shut them down?

Which brings up the third, and most elemental issue: The simple fact is no matter what course of regime change anyone attempts, there will be, there can be no lasting peace so long as the Empire holds Matari slaves. Until then... more bullets.
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#36 - 2017-05-09 05:36:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Elsebeth Rhiannon
Victoria Grey wrote:
What can we really do? Unify and Discuss. So really a merging of all three options. This isn't a solution so much as a first step to a resolution. I have no say in anything that the various Matari aligned corps and alliances want but from my viewpoint, why not combine efforts of both Electus Matari and Ushra'Khan?

I know that I may not be addressing the right people to suggest this but my honest opinion is the same as someone else on this thread: We need someone(s) influential/in the thick of things to come forward.

Combine their efforts to do what? Which way is forward?

I'm sorry if I am contrary and keep on coming back to this - but it is really at the heart of the issue. Combined forces doing ineffective things is just two times zero.

Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
paraphrased: "I suggest you just pack up your toys and surrender"

Nice try, Admiral.

It is however by now a clearly established fact that if one side holds the complete field, exactly nothing happens. Handing you the Bleaks on a plate would also change nothing.

We of course also have no way whatsoever to enforce a ban on fighting, so even moral and efficiency concerns aside, your suggestion is not practical.

Challis Drant wrote:
Sometimes I think that the so called toy war is perfect stagnation

Yes. And there is the fact that at its time, the Militia Act was a somewhat clever move: it allowed us to de-escalate from a full-out war after the Elder Fleet's actions. As a permanent solution, however, it will be the death of us.
Gaven Lok'ri
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#37 - 2017-05-09 10:51:10 UTC
That is a remarkable misread of my analysis, Elsebeth. Some points:

1. Holding the complete field is strategically irrelevant. The only things that matter are relative cost to each state in the long term and the domestic political environment at any moment of defeat. It's simplistic to expect a single moment of defeat that was not accompanied by a domestic crisis to be enough to topple a government. My analysis office suggests that it would take several years without any moments of victory in the CEWPA war for the war on its own to topple the Usurpers. A more likely scenario is that a domestic crisis unrelated to the war in a moment at which the war looks grim could cause a failure cascade that topples the government, but such a thing would require a perfect storm.

2. You seem to be after a silver bullet that will reset the situation to before the usurpation. The Matari states problems are far too systemic for such a thing to occur. For the Usurpers to be replaced without a civil war will require a rather large set of conditions to be in place, most of which are domestic. You are not going to engineer a perfect solution, but the first step towards working towards those conditions is to refuse to do anything that strengthens the Usurpers.

3. You seem to be looking for the sting in anything I say. Reasonable enough, given history. Perhaps it will help if I elaborate on why I am interested in a solution to your problem that does not involve an Amarr invasion. As you probably correctly assume, I do not care in the slightest about what happens to the Matari state or its people. My concern is Amarr and the people it is my duty to protect, including Amarr of Matari descent. The Matari state under Usurper leadership is, however, remarkably unpredictable and as such is dangerous. It poses a low to nonexistent existential threat to Amarr, but if the Matari do something stupid the cost will still be high. It will also strengthen factions in Amarr that I consider dangerous for the prosperity of the people I defend. I wish to see this threat removed at the lowest cost to Amarr possible. Right now, the absolute best case scenario seems to rest on the hope that enough Matari will turn on the Usurpers to remove them from power. It is not the only solution, but it is the cheapest, for both sides.

Admiral of the Praetoria Imperialis Excubitoris

Divine Commodore 24th Imperial Crusade

Holder. Vassal of the Emperor Family

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#38 - 2017-05-09 11:14:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gaven Lok'ri wrote:
My analysis office suggests that it would take several years without any moments of victory in the CEWPA war for the war on its own to topple the Usurpers.

Your analysis office should advice you that this is completely unfeasible. There are always people willing to fight, and nothing to stop them. Even if everyone currently in space agreed to simply stop (which is implausible in itself), new captains will come from the academies every day with their eyes shining with the recruiter's promises of glory and isk.

Quote:
You seem to be after a silver bullet that will reset the situation to before the usurpation.

I don't know what is the matter with people. I have said, repeatedly, that I do not think a solution exists. Yet some keep on asking me one, and others criticizing me of believing in silver bullets.

I am also not looking to go back to what we were. First, what has happened is part of our living tradition now, and you cannot just pretend it never happened - and second, it's not like we did not have problems those days too.

No, with "solution" I mean pretty much anything that is possible and does not mean the end of us as a free people.

Quote:
You seem to be looking for the sting in anything I say. Reasonable enough, given history. Perhaps it will help if I elaborate on why I am interested in a solution to your problem that does not involve an Amarr invasion.

Your concern for the safety of what you see as "your people" has never been in question or unclear in my eyes.

Quote:
The Matari state under Usurper leadership is, however, remarkably unpredictable and as such is dangerous.

Maybe it is of some consolation to you then that they have been nothing but predictable for almost ten years now.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#39 - 2017-05-09 11:46:09 UTC
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:

I am also not looking to go back to what we were. First, what has happened is part of our living tradition now, and you cannot just pretend it never happened - and second, it's not like we did not have problems those days too.


And a fair number of us, both non-capsuleers then, and capsuleers now, really would be fairly disgusted by the Republic trying to go back to Gallente-style mob rule. As the Ray of Matar said: we tried it. It wasn't for us.

Quote:
Maybe it is of some consolation to you then that they have been nothing but predictable for almost ten years now.


Oh, I don't know. I don't think many people predicted Shakor turning up for the Empress' coronation.
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#40 - 2017-05-09 12:02:13 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:
Maybe it is of some consolation to you then that they have been nothing but predictable for almost ten years now.

Oh, I don't know. I don't think many people predicted Shakor turning up for the Empress' coronation.

Ok, I give you that.

And also thanks for actually making me laugh.