Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

unless i'm wrong here but these were announced almost a year ago at last fanfest and it was said that people attending would receive them first as a gift in commemoration of CCP's 20th. Than latter that year they would be available to everyone to obtain threw an in game event so can everyone please calm down

The frig reminds me of the head of an evangelion (EVEngelion :) ) .

WTF CCP, stop redesigning iconic ships into generic scifi nonsense. Some of us got into the game in part because of all the interesting ship designs: asymmetry, distinct racial designs, etc. And every time you redesign something you manage to make it worse. There's nothing wrong with the existing CONCORD hull designs, so leave them as they are. Stop trying to fix things that aren't broken.

(And requiring grinding sec status to 5.0 to use these ships effectively is a stupid mechanic, but at least that stupidity is limited by the limited number of these that will exist. Having to see the new CONCORD trash everywhere is not.)

The funniest part about all of this is the majority of the money that needed to be forked out the get the BS probably end up in the pockets of a major airline and a hotel holding corp even if you live next door to one of the events.

Typically Aerospace ships are required to fly within atmosphere and wings would greatly help with that function regardless of thrusters.

A wingless 'Aerospace' craft that has serious engine failure in atmospheric flight is subject to sudden impact with the ground aswell.

Also note that these designs do say Concord Aerospace along the nose.

i wish also ask for confirmation before i write something abaut this specs, are this specs for serius? ccp do sometimes wierd things so i taking this like joke in 50%

also there is one more nice pic at eve upadate site of cruiser

and if someone wish to see this frig model, it is actual on sisi, concord shuttle have this frig modeld, but rest of this ships are not yet there

In RL, de-commissioned police vehicles owned by the public, if used in public, need to cover up their official markings, to prevent impersonation. (This is not a problem in a garage / hanger / museum.)

So from Lore perspective, I don't think ex-CONCORD ships should display CONCORD logo's or markings. (Including the Council Diplomatic Shuttle.)

I tried that. It didn't work.

New design is better. Wings are explained by "Aerospace" designation.

I'm not opposed to asymmetrical designs, but the CONCORD Cruiser and Frigate looked like they were made just for the purpose of looking ridiculous. I'm not sure why designs that look impossible to believe are somehow "more creative" and "more authentic".

web + tackle bonus in 1 ship?

Nice P2W CCP.

Hey folks!

So for anyone who is still curious, this is not an April Fools joke. We are definitely interested in real feedback on these promo ships.

I made a pretty serious typo in the original post (which those of you who are watching the test server caught) in that the Enforcer slot layout is 6/5/5 rather than the 6/4/4 originally posted.

After reading through your initial feedback we've already made one tweak to help address some of your concerns, by reducing the tackle range bonuses on the Enforcer to 10% for webs and 5% for scrams/disruptors. The goal here is to avoid letting these ships become strong enough to make people feel they need to get them to compete. If needed we'll make more power reductions to reach that goal.

The security status rep bonus is indeed something quite odd, but it fits wonderfully with a promo ship released by CONCORD. The trick we're using here also gives us the ability to make ships that receive bonuses for having low security status in the future, which may fit well for some kind of pirate ships someday.

For people asking, these ships have 2 rigslots and 400 calibration like most other T2 ships and the Marshal has the same 4ly base jump range as the other Black Ops.

Thanks for the feedback so far and keep it coming!