These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Alpha bots lowering the value of LP.

First post
Author
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#81 - 2017-03-30 14:57:49 UTC  |  Edited by: NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:


Having read the moronic drivel of the OP, you're dam right, especially with the logical or evidenced part.



What is it exactly that you are too stupid to understand? The intelligent people in this thread seem to have no issue understanding the problem as explained. Is common sense really such a challenge for you?

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. It is logical, and practically common sense that botting level 4 couerier missions is worthwhile

Why would anyone need to provide proof that that the sky is blue? Open your eyes.


You must be quite the idiot if you expect anyone to take your baseless criticism seriously in light of all this.
guigui lechat
the no fock given
#82 - 2017-03-30 15:11:06 UTC
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin wrote:
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
guigui lechat wrote:
I always knew that Eve Online has nothing to do with mathematical, logical or evidenced !! #CCP


Having read the moronic drivel of the OP, you're dam right, especially with the logical or evidenced part.


You clowns really didn't think to say what it is you are even on about?

What is it exactly that you are too stupid to understand? The intelligent people in this thread seem to have no issue understanding the problem as explained. Evidence? Mathematics? LOL! Is common sense really such a challenge for you?

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, dumbass, and it is practically common sense that botting level 4 couerier missions is worthwhile


You must be quite the idiot if you expect anyone to take your baseless criticism seriously in light of all this.

please stop the insults. This is boring and makes your argument unreadable.
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#83 - 2017-03-30 15:13:08 UTC  |  Edited by: NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
guigui lechat wrote:

please stop the insults. This is boring and makes your argument unreadable.


Sorry. I edited it down a bit. It wasn't meant for, and didn't mean to include you.

Don't you think its ridiculous of these kids to ask for "proof" of what is logical, rational, and practically common sense?

Do i really need to make a video of of me botting level 4 courier missions in an alpha for them to get it?
Jacques d'Orleans
#84 - 2017-03-30 15:19:32 UTC
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin wrote:
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:


Having read the moronic drivel of the OP, you're dam right, especially with the logical or evidenced part.



What is it exactly that you are too stupid to understand? The intelligent people in this thread seem to have no issue understanding the problem as explained. Is common sense really such a challenge for you?

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, dumbass. It is logical, and practically common sense that botting level 4 couerier missions is worthwhile

Why would anyone need to provide proof that that the sky is blue? Open your eyes.


You must be quite the idiot if you expect anyone to take your baseless criticism seriously in light of all this.


Listen up dude,

When your able to write a sentence without insults, we can start a conversation, if that is beyond your mental horizon just eff off.
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#85 - 2017-03-30 15:26:24 UTC  |  Edited by: NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin wrote:
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:


Having read the moronic drivel of the OP, you're dam right, especially with the logical or evidenced part.



What is it exactly that you are too stupid to understand? The intelligent people in this thread seem to have no issue understanding the problem as explained. Is common sense really such a challenge for you?

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, dumbass. It is logical, and practically common sense that botting level 4 couerier missions is worthwhile

Why would anyone need to provide proof that that the sky is blue? Open your eyes.


You must be quite the idiot if you expect anyone to take your baseless criticism seriously in light of all this.


Listen up dude,

When your able to write a sentence without insults, we can start a conversation, if that is beyond your mental horizon just eff off.


Why would I care to converse with someone who is too incompetent to even understand the topic? You haven't provided any arguments, and have only brought baseless criticism. You are a joke.

I'll just call you out for your blatant display of stupidity and leave you looking the fool that you clearly are.

Thanks for the bumps
Jacques d'Orleans
#86 - 2017-03-30 15:38:17 UTC
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin wrote:
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin wrote:
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:


Having read the moronic drivel of the OP, you're dam right, especially with the logical or evidenced part.



What is it exactly that you are too stupid to understand? The intelligent people in this thread seem to have no issue understanding the problem as explained. Is common sense really such a challenge for you?

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, dumbass. It is logical, and practically common sense that botting level 4 couerier missions is worthwhile

Why would anyone need to provide proof that that the sky is blue? Open your eyes.


You must be quite the idiot if you expect anyone to take your baseless criticism seriously in light of all this.


Listen up dude,

When your able to write a sentence without insults, we can start a conversation, if that is beyond your mental horizon just eff off.


Why would I care to converse with someone who is too incompetent to even understand the topic? You haven't provided any arguments, and have only brought baseless criticism. You are a joke.

I'll just call you out for your blatant display of stupidity and leave you looking the fool that you clearly are.

Thanks for the bumps


Miner calm down!

Thank you for proving my point about your mental horizon. You should try YouTube, it is more appropriate for your low par trolling level.

Otoh, could it be that all those botters only exist in your head, I mean, like the obvious voices do?
After the insult laden rampage from you in this thread, I would assume it is highly likely.



guigui lechat
the no fock given
#87 - 2017-03-30 15:43:13 UTC  |  Edited by: guigui lechat
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:

Miner calm down!


please stop your insults too, unless of course you enjoy his insults.
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#88 - 2017-03-30 15:44:23 UTC
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:


Miner calm down!

Thank you for proving my point about your mental horizon. You should try YouTube, it is more appropriate for your low par trolling level.

Otoh, could it be that all those botters only exist in your head, I mean, like the obvious voices do?
After the insult laden rampage from you in this thread, I would assume it is highly likely.





Wow, great argument. You totally redeemed yourself.Roll

Do you realize you haven't made a single valid point,and that you haven't made a single post that did not contain insults?

Thanks for proving me right about you.Cool

Haven't you embarrassed yourself enough?


Jacques d'Orleans
#89 - 2017-03-30 15:45:28 UTC
guigui lechat wrote:
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:

Miner calm down!


please stop your insults too, unless of course you enjoy his insults.


Miner is a profession, not an insult. Blink
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#90 - 2017-03-30 15:46:27 UTC  |  Edited by: NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
guigui lechat wrote:
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:

Miner calm down!


please stop your insults too, unless of course you enjoy his insults.


Miner is a profession, not an insult. Blink


clown confirmed.

Did I call it, or did I call it? Cool

I would actually like to hear an argument that would explain why I am wrong, but I can see that will never happen from this lot.
Jacques d'Orleans
#91 - 2017-03-30 15:47:03 UTC
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin wrote:

Do you realize you haven't made a single valid point,and that you haven't made a single post that did not contain insults?



That coming from you? Oh, the irony!

Roll
guigui lechat
the no fock given
#92 - 2017-03-30 15:48:10 UTC  |  Edited by: guigui lechat
The way you use it is an insult. And being a profession does not prevent to use it as an insult, as you do.

You are downlooking on people and only this already explains all the insults you got before.
So stop being a smartass. I tell you, you are insulting. I'm not your parent to explain you why calling people names is insulting.
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#93 - 2017-03-30 15:49:57 UTC  |  Edited by: NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin wrote:

Do you realize you haven't made a single valid point,and that you haven't made a single post that did not contain insults?



That coming from you? Oh, the irony!

Roll


Other people in the the thread have agreed with me. You aren't even capable of forming an argument or even explain what it is exactly that you don't agree with.

Don't you have something better to do than troll by acting like a total moron?

guigui lechat wrote:
The way you use it is an insult. And being a profession does not prevent to use it as an insult, as you do.

You are downlooking on people and only this already explains all the insults you got before.
So stop being a smartass. I tell you, you are insulting. I'm not your parent to explain you why calling people names is insulting.



Thank you, gui. Your accurate posts have been the most redeeming quality of this thread. I mean that.

I hope you will excuse me when I have to put the trash in its place.
guigui lechat
the no fock given
#94 - 2017-03-30 15:53:39 UTC  |  Edited by: guigui lechat
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin wrote:
Other people in the the thread have agreed with me. You aren't even capable of forming an argument or even explain what it is exactly that you don't agree with.


please, nobody agreed totally with you. the goal of a discussion is to find the agreement and disagreement points.



For example I only agree there may be a problem ; however I don't think it exists. But just thinking is in no way an argument so I don't expose it as one.

I also agree that L4 bot is easy to do and so can be profitable more easily than mining bot.

However I dont't think the bots are crashing the market - but again I don't have any argument, just my feeling.


Also, you started insulting again. This leads nowhere.
Jacques d'Orleans
#95 - 2017-03-30 15:55:22 UTC
guigui lechat wrote:
The way you use it is an insult. And being a profession does not prevent to use it as an insult, as you do.

You are downlooking on people and only this already explains all the insults you got before.
So stop being a smartass. I tell you, you are insulting. I'm not your parent to explain you why calling people names is insulting.


You're new to the meta game, are you?

Also obligatory: Do you have a mining permit? There is a spring action sale, one mining permit is just 10 M isk, valid for one year. A real bargain if you ask me. Cool
guigui lechat
the no fock given
#96 - 2017-03-30 15:55:55 UTC  |  Edited by: guigui lechat
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
guigui lechat wrote:
The way you use it is an insult. And being a profession does not prevent to use it as an insult, as you do.

You are downlooking on people and only this already explains all the insults you got before.
So stop being a smartass. I tell you, you are insulting. I'm not your parent to explain you why calling people names is insulting.


You're new to the meta game, are you?

Also obligatory: Do you have a mining permit? There is a spring action sale, one mining permit is just 10 M isk, valid for one year. A real bargain if you aks me. Cool


go away, this is for people discuting, not for children blabering.
If you have nothing to say, don't say anything.

When you'll be over 12 you may understand life but for now you still need your parents to think for you. So don't post unless they correct your post.
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#97 - 2017-03-30 16:05:00 UTC  |  Edited by: NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
guigui lechat wrote:


please, nobody agreed totally with you. the goal of a discussion is to find the agreement and sisagreement points.

For example I only agree there may be a problem ; however I don't think it exists. But just thinking is in no way an argument so I don't expose it as one.

I also agree that L4 bot is easy to do and so can be profitable more easily than mining bot.

However I dont't think the bots are crashing the market - but again I don't have any argument, just my feeling.


What part did you disagree with?

I guess it depends on what you view as problematic. Do you believe that if someone is able to cheat and earn LP effortlessly, while others do it legit, that it is unfair to those players who earn LP legit, and thus becomes problematic for those players?

Can they lower the value of LP for some players without crashing the market?

If you say yes to these questions, then i think you do totally agree with me.

It may not be a significant problem for a lot of people, but it is still a problem for some people. And we seem to be thinking of this only in terms of how it effects other players and ignoring the fact that players are breaking the EULA and cheating.

Most of the commenters seem to be thinking of things only pertaining their own perspective, rather than how this effects others.
Jacques d'Orleans
#98 - 2017-03-30 16:05:58 UTC
guigui lechat wrote:
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
guigui lechat wrote:
The way you use it is an insult. And being a profession does not prevent to use it as an insult, as you do.

You are downlooking on people and only this already explains all the insults you got before.
So stop being a smartass. I tell you, you are insulting. I'm not your parent to explain you why calling people names is insulting.


You're new to the meta game, are you?

Also obligatory: Do you have a mining permit? There is a spring action sale, one mining permit is just 10 M isk, valid for one year. A real bargain if you aks me. Cool


go away, this is for people discuting, not for children.
If you have nothing to say, don't say anything.

When you'll be over 12 you may understand life but for now you still need your parents to think for you. So don't post unless they correct your post.


Oh, your losing your temper.
See, how easy it is to step down to the OP's level of impotent rage.
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
State War Academy
Caldari State
#99 - 2017-03-30 16:07:05 UTC  |  Edited by: NofriendNoLifeStilPostin
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
guigui lechat wrote:
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
guigui lechat wrote:
The way you use it is an insult. And being a profession does not prevent to use it as an insult, as you do.

You are downlooking on people and only this already explains all the insults you got before.
So stop being a smartass. I tell you, you are insulting. I'm not your parent to explain you why calling people names is insulting.


You're new to the meta game, are you?

Also obligatory: Do you have a mining permit? There is a spring action sale, one mining permit is just 10 M isk, valid for one year. A real bargain if you aks me. Cool


go away, this is for people discuting, not for children.
If you have nothing to say, don't say anything.

When you'll be over 12 you may understand life but for now you still need your parents to think for you. So don't post unless they correct your post.


Oh, your losing your temper.
See, how easy it is to step down to the OP's level of impotent rage.



No, hes right. Nobody even knows what you are about, and can't possibly take you seriously.

Haven't you made an idiot of yourself enough?
guigui lechat
the no fock given
#100 - 2017-03-30 16:10:57 UTC  |  Edited by: guigui lechat
NofriendNoLifeStilPostin wrote:

What part did you disagree with?

I guess it depends on what you view as problematic. Do you believe that if someone is able to cheat and earn LP effortlessly, while others do it legit, that it is unfair to those players who earn LP legit, and thus becomes problematic for those players?

Can they lower the value of LP for some players without crashing the market?

If you say yes to these questions, then i think you do totally agree with me.

It may not be a significant problem for a lot of people, but it is still a problem for some people.

Most of the commenters seem to be thinking of things only pertaining their own perspective, rather than how this effects others.

I consider your point of view plausible but I do not think it bo be the reality.
I do not "disagree", I just have a different opinion(but no argument to share as I said)

and everybody sees things with his own perspective, when discussing we need to share our perspectives. Without insults and without looking down on people.

BTW I just report Jacques and won't answer this kid anymore, better things to spend my time on.