These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Have Multiboxers and Botting ruined Eve Online?

Author
Trebon Luap
Hard Rock Mining Inc.
#1 - 2017-03-26 01:22:39 UTC


I, personally am at the end of my rope with Eve. I have played on and off for 4+ years., but I find myself at a crossroads.


Background....

I admit that most of my experiences have been in High Sec. Space.( Mining) Not all of it, but most of it.

I am finding that there are so many Bot fleets and so many Multiboxer fleet around that EvE has become "unfun" to play.
I have no problem with the "Ganker" fleets that come and go in Eve. They are a basic part of game play here; I can make, in the context of Eve, a build that works against them, that works, or does not work ; That is what the game is about.....!!!!

What I am having the most difficulty with is the Bot Fleets and the MultiBoxer fleets.........

THERE IS NO "IN GAME" WAY TO DEAL WITH THEM.

They have circumvented the rules of the game, for the average player to compete against them.

On average there is what? 24000 pilots online? With the Botts and the Multiboxers added into this number there is what? only 18000 to 16000 individual players online? (Or less?)

CCP, you want to know why there are fewer number of players involved in Eve now-a-days? Botts and Multiboxers have taken over your game and people see this. No new players are willing to pay a sub fee for an experience that they are doubly penalised against, right off the start.

Multiboxers and Bot fleets, May, pay a sub fee for Some of their accounts, but they are driving away the diversity of the player base. You are losing ground on the diversity of your player base more and more every day. You will not survive on the income provided by Multiboxers and the Bot fleets. This is a very short term gain, and I use the term gain in a sarcastic way. You will reach a tipping point that no MMO can recover from.

ApexDynamo
Neurosurgical Reconstruction Centre
#2 - 2017-03-26 01:29:43 UTC
I wish ccp would get rid of bot use in trade hubs, or make a block all button,
TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#3 - 2017-03-26 01:32:27 UTC
There's two ways to look at this, and sadly they are connected.

1. Without the introduction of PLEX, this game would have probably died off a long time ago due to RMT running rampant. The economy would have been wrecked, players would have quit and CCP could not afford to keep developing the game.

2. PLEX facilitates large scale multi boxing on a scale never seen before PLEX was introduced. It rakes in the cash for CCP so we can keep enjoying the game, but multi boxing is absolutely one of the worst things in EVE at the moment. Sadly it is the lesser of two evils and there is no way CCP will ever limit anyone to x number of accounts when it creates this much revenue.

I agree though, seeing a single guy vacuuming up an asteroid belt with 20 accounts is pretty frustrating. And I wish there was something that could be done about it. But alas, there is not. As long as it is profitable and practical to PLEX 20 accounts in one way or another, people will be doing it.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Trebon Luap
Hard Rock Mining Inc.
#4 - 2017-03-26 01:49:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Trebon Luap
TigerXtrm wrote:
There's two ways to look at this, and sadly they are connected.

1. Without the introduction of PLEX, this game would have probably died off a long time ago due to RMT running rampant. The economy would have been wrecked, players would have quit and CCP could not afford to keep developing the game.

2. PLEX facilitates large scale multi boxing on a scale never seen before PLEX was introduced. It rakes in the cash for CCP so we can keep enjoying the game, but multi boxing is absolutely one of the worst things in EVE at the moment. Sadly it is the lesser of two evils and there is no way CCP will ever limit anyone to x number of accounts when it creates this much revenue.

I agree though, seeing a single guy vacuuming up an asteroid belt with 20 accounts is pretty frustrating. And I wish there was something that could be done about it. But alas, there is not. As long as it is profitable and practical to PLEX 20 accounts in one way or another, people will be doing it.



I really hate to say this, but it seems...... The only thing a person can do is multibox as much as the guy next to you or suffer the consequences.... But all that does is keep Eve on life support... No brain function just the heart and lungs being artificially kept alive....Sad
Voddick
AFK
#5 - 2017-03-26 01:50:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Voddick
@Trebon,

I know how you feel. Back when IS boxer was still authorized I used to mine belt ice, there was a 25 pilot fleet that would warp in unison and start/stop in the same instant. I was really disenfranchised as a miner after seeing that.

I petitioned the user, but then deleted it before a GM response. Instead, I EVEmailed the pilot (1 of 25) and started a convo. Basically, I realized that he was maximizing his hardware and running as many accounts as he could to maximize isk.

Long story short: EVE was a large part of his life. ... very large.

Mom always said: "there is always someone better, faster, smarter, or stronger. Just be the best person you can be and stop worrying about everyone else."

I almost lost interest in EVE after that...especially after reading on EVE News24 about a botter ratting billions each day with a new injector type bot...I forget the name.

What helped me was I remembered that EVE is different for everyone. I enjoy playing my character for who he is. I achieve goals and have no doubt outlasted countless bots and burned out multi boxers. (I did quit for two years due to RL). But here I am, enjoying my slice of New Eden along with the 100 or 18,000 other actual humans playing the game. In the end, there is nothing else like EVE. No game comes close. You are already a part of it wheather you quit forever or move on to a major null industry corp. Just enjoy the game...it's fun and beautiful.

EDIT: I do have two primary omega accounts...and can't imagine playing without both of them.
Dark Lord Trump
Infinite Point
Pandemic Horde
#6 - 2017-03-26 01:51:52 UTC
Can't you just shoot him or something?

I'm going to build a big wall that will keep the Gallente out, and they're going to pay for it!

Trebon Luap
Hard Rock Mining Inc.
#7 - 2017-03-26 01:54:17 UTC
Dark Lord Trump wrote:
Can't you just shoot him or something?



place a bounty on each of his 10 member fleet, then go after him.... This might be an option...
Dark Lord Trump
Infinite Point
Pandemic Horde
#8 - 2017-03-26 01:57:19 UTC
Trebon Luap wrote:
Dark Lord Trump wrote:
Can't you just shoot him or something?



place a bounty on each of his 10 member fleet, then go after him.... This might be an option...

Don't bother with bounties, they're a waste of money. Just nuke him.

I'm going to build a big wall that will keep the Gallente out, and they're going to pay for it!

Piugattuk
Litla Sundlaugin
#9 - 2017-03-26 02:13:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Piugattuk
This topic has been going on and on forever in eve, multi boxers ruining the game, so every so often someone or group gears up and doo doo's on offensive mining ships, and for years James 415 or something and the cool-aid drinkers have been pooing all over this "Menace" to the game...but as always things just keep going, miners mine and multi boxers box and the same topic comes up and the gankers gank, bottom line is that you shouldn't let it bother you and carry on, there's a multitude of ways to make ISK, but if mining is the only thing you do you need to get outside of the box of caldari space and you will find your rocks.
Mina Sebiestar
Minmatar Inner Space Conglomerate
#10 - 2017-03-26 02:13:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Mina Sebiestar
Quote:
there is not


If mining wasn't possible to do while in coma than i hazard to guess seeing 20 alts sucking belt away wouldn't be that much of an issue.

you don't see 20 alts running l4 mission

You choke behind a smile a fake behind the fear

Because >>I is too hard

Trebon Luap
Hard Rock Mining Inc.
#11 - 2017-03-26 02:20:18 UTC
Piugattuk wrote:
This topic has been going on and on forever in eve, multi boxers ruining the game, so every so often someone or group gears up and doo doo's on offensive mining ships, and for years James 415 or something and the cool-aid drinkers have been pooing all over this "Menace" to the game...but as always things just keep going, miners mine and multi boxers box and the same topic comes up and the gankers gank, bottom line is that you shouldn't let it bother you and carry on, there's a multitude of ways to make ISK, but if mining is the only thing you do you need to get outside of the box of caldari space and you will find your rocks.



And as the sub base has gone down in the same time frame.... would you you not say that the issue is not playing out?
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#12 - 2017-03-26 02:22:35 UTC
TBH, leave highsec and go try something else in the game.

I'm not saying that in any anti-highsec or anti-mining sense; just in the sense that if something frustrating, a change is as good as a holiday.

There are a lot of other activities to do in the game and lots of other space to explore and learn about.

No need to let others **** you off, when you can do something else entirely and not be bothered by them at all.
Trebon Luap
Hard Rock Mining Inc.
#13 - 2017-03-26 02:22:42 UTC
Mina Sebiestar wrote:
Quote:
there is not


If mining wasn't possible to do while in coma than i hazard to guess seeing 20 alts sucking belt away wouldn't be that much of an issue.

you don't see 20 alts running l4 mission



Correct, but it is an aspect of EvE that is affected; an aspect that ties into all other aspects of Eve, as all the game is connected in subtle and sometimes not so subtle ways.
Trebon Luap
Hard Rock Mining Inc.
#14 - 2017-03-26 02:24:47 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
TBH, leave highsec and go try something else in the game.

I'm not saying that in any anti-highsec or anti-mining sense; just in the sense that if something frustrating, a change is as good as a holiday.

There are a lot of other activities to do in the game and lots of other space to explore and learn about.

No need to let others **** you off, when you can do something else entirely and not be bothered by them at all.



I can't argue against what you say, but to ignore a problem,is it not just as damaging as taking part in the offence?
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#15 - 2017-03-26 02:27:27 UTC
Trebon Luap wrote:
I can't argue against what you say, but to ignore a problem,is it not just as damaging as taking part in the offence?

Why is it a problem though, except in terms of creating frustration for you?
Trebon Luap
Hard Rock Mining Inc.
#16 - 2017-03-26 02:30:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Trebon Luap
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Trebon Luap wrote:
I can't argue against what you say, but to ignore a problem,is it not just as damaging as taking part in the offence?

Why is it a problem though, except in terms of creating frustration for you?



If this was just affecting me I would not of even posted in the forum.

If You have not been affected by this though, do you have a basis for a reply to this topic?

As https://forums.eveonline.com/profile/Piugattuk said., this is an ongoing issue.

Issues need to be discussed, don't they?
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#17 - 2017-03-26 02:35:03 UTC
Trebon Luap wrote:
If You have not been affected by this though, do you have a basis for a reply to this topic?

Ah ok.

Sorry, I didn't realise asking a question to try to understand would be a problem and I have no basis for asking for information.

Fair enough. Hope you find what you are looking for out of this thread.
Trebon Luap
Hard Rock Mining Inc.
#18 - 2017-03-26 02:38:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Trebon Luap
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Trebon Luap wrote:
If You have not been affected by this though, do you have a basis for a reply to this topic?

Ah ok.

Sorry, I didn't realise asking a question to try to understand would be a problem and I have no basis for asking for information.

Fair enough. Hope you find what you are looking for out of this thread.



Sorry if i misunderstood your question, but it came across as more of a dismissal of my concerns than of an actual quest for information.

As for the "problem" please read my OP.
Soel Reit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2017-03-26 02:39:27 UTC
making mining more interactive can resolve this problem?
basically changing the "semi-afk" style that is required right now to mine :)

through minigames or whatever
Mina Sebiestar
Minmatar Inner Space Conglomerate
#20 - 2017-03-26 02:40:02 UTC
Trebon Luap wrote:
Mina Sebiestar wrote:
Quote:
there is not


If mining wasn't possible to do while in coma than i hazard to guess seeing 20 alts sucking belt away wouldn't be that much of an issue.

you don't see 20 alts running l4 mission



Correct, but it is an aspect of EvE that is affected; an aspect that ties into all other aspects of Eve, as all the game is connected in subtle and sometimes not so subtle ways.


What i am saying is to change mining game play that require you to use your keyboard and mice and brain cells at the same time and alt mining will drop due to it not being easy to do any more thru game mechanic not nerfs limitations or you know removing mining from high sec nothing moronic like that.

You choke behind a smile a fake behind the fear

Because >>I is too hard

123Next pageLast page