These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Low-sec Hopes and Changes
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Soel Reit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#421 - 2017-03-20 22:18:11 UTC


calm down miners Cool
Salvos Rhoska
#422 - 2017-03-20 22:18:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Lan Wang wrote:
this is what happens when carebears get stupid ideas about pvp mechanics


No, this is what happens when entitled pricks get so full of their own crap, they cant tell what is what anymore.

Wtf are you even doing in LS, relying on cynos and caps?
Are you afraid to fight without them, even in LS?

Frankly its pathetic to try and justify cynos/caps in 817 LS systems, when there are 3400+ NS systems to use them in without restrictions.

Wtf are you even doing in LS?
Gtfo to NS.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#423 - 2017-03-20 22:24:39 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
this is what happens when carebears get stupid ideas about pvp mechanics


No, this is what happens when entitled pricks get so full of their own crap, they cant tell what is what anymore.

Wtf are you even doing in LS, relying on cynos and caps?

Frankly its pathetic to try and justify cynos/caps in 817 LS systems, when there are 3400+ NS systems to use them in without restrictions.

Wtf are you even doing in LS?
Gtfo to NS.


calm down miner im in lowsec enjoyin my game camping gates and dropping on retards like you Lol

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#424 - 2017-03-20 22:25:38 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
this is what happens when carebears get stupid ideas about pvp mechanics


No, this is what happens when entitled pricks get so full of their own crap, they cant tell what is what anymore.

Wtf are you even doing in LS, relying on cynos and caps?

Frankly its pathetic to try and justify cynos/caps in 817 LS systems, when there are 3400+ NS systems to use them in without restrictions.

Wtf are you even doing in LS?
Gtfo to NS.


you don't get to decide that though. the game is made so we can have Caps in low, stop shaming people who are clever enough to use the tools available. It is allowed so makes no sense you call us out for using caps tbh. Why the anger, salvos?

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker
Salvos Rhoska
#425 - 2017-03-20 22:33:12 UTC
sero Hita wrote:
[Protecting the highsec entrances for our alliance logistics is relevant. Killing them unexpectedly with a cyno so they have a big loss, and fear every ship will be a cyno will make them move to another gate. Scaring them off with a big fleet, keeps them away when they see a big fleet. When the fleet dock they are there again. And you are ****** at the timezones where you don´t have fleet big enough to scare them off.


Jesus christ, man.
Wtf are you on about?

You dont need cynos or caps for that.

Just secure the gate with subcaps and camp it yourself.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Salvos Rhoska
#426 - 2017-03-20 22:35:16 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
this is what happens when carebears get stupid ideas about pvp mechanics


No, this is what happens when entitled pricks get so full of their own crap, they cant tell what is what anymore.

Wtf are you even doing in LS, relying on cynos and caps?

Frankly its pathetic to try and justify cynos/caps in 817 LS systems, when there are 3400+ NS systems to use them in without restrictions.

Wtf are you even doing in LS?
Gtfo to NS.


calm down miner im in lowsec enjoyin my game camping gates and dropping on retards like you Lol


Im not a miner.

Weak post, shill.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#427 - 2017-03-20 22:36:14 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
sero Hita wrote:
[Protecting the highsec entrances for our alliance logistics is relevant. Killing them unexpectedly with a cyno so they have a big loss, and fear every ship will be a cyno will make them move to another gate. Scaring them off with a big fleet, keeps them away when they see a big fleet. When the fleet dock they are there again. And you are ****** at the timezones where you don´t have fleet big enough to scare them off.


Jesus christ, man.
Wtf are you on about?

You dont need cynos or caps for that.

Just secure the gate with subcaps and camp it yourself.


What I am on about is covered in the quote. you not understanding it not my problem

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker
Soel Reit
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#428 - 2017-03-20 22:41:32 UTC
calm down pvpers Cool
Salvos Rhoska
#429 - 2017-03-20 22:44:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
sero Hita wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
this is what happens when carebears get stupid ideas about pvp mechanics


No, this is what happens when entitled pricks get so full of their own crap, they cant tell what is what anymore.

Wtf are you even doing in LS, relying on cynos and caps?

Frankly its pathetic to try and justify cynos/caps in 817 LS systems, when there are 3400+ NS systems to use them in without restrictions.

Wtf are you even doing in LS?
Gtfo to NS.


you don't get to decide that though. the game is made so we can have Caps in low, stop shaming people who are clever enough to use the tools available. It is allowed so makes no sense you call us out for using caps tbh. Why the anger, salvos?


"Stop shaming"
What? Do you think this is Tumblr?

Your arguments and positions are shameful.
If you want cyno/caps play, fk off to NS where ir belongs and you get punched back in unrestricted space.

LS doesnt need caps/cynos, nor are they justified there.
If you want to defeat an LS gatecamp, engage it with subcaps.
If they run off, the path is clear.
Its that simple.

The rest of your nonsense makes no sense.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#430 - 2017-03-20 22:46:52 UTC  |  Edited by: sero Hita
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


The rest of your nonsense makes no sense.
because you don't understand the mechanics and strategies of lowsec alliances.

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#431 - 2017-03-20 22:51:09 UTC
salvos, cynos and caps are allowed in lowsec, telling us to fck off to nullsec every 10minutes isnt going work just makes you sound like a spoiled little child, you sound like a total entitled prick yourself. if you have such an issue with us being in lowsec, guess what, bring a fleet down and "chase us away"

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
Salvos Rhoska
#432 - 2017-03-20 23:02:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
sero Hita wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


The rest of your nonsense makes no sense.
because you don't understand the mechanics and strategies of lowsec alliances.


Oh, I do understand.

Do you understand that in a no cyno/cap mechanic, you simply have to hold the gate with subcaps till material is transported?

LS doesnt need cynos/caps for anything.
If you want cynos/caps, go to NS where they are actually justified by content and unrestricted rules.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Salvos Rhoska
#433 - 2017-03-20 23:04:05 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
cynos and caps are allowed in lowsec,


Protip: Check the topic of the thread.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
sero Hita
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#434 - 2017-03-20 23:08:31 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
sero Hita wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


The rest of your nonsense makes no sense.
because you don't understand the mechanics and strategies of lowsec alliances.


Oh, I do understand.

Do you understand that in a no cyno/cap mechanic, you simply have to hold the gate with subcaps till material is transported?

LS doesnt need cynos/caps for anything.
If you want cynos/caps, go to NS where they are actually justified by content and unrestricted engagement.


But you can also do it by killing the gatecamp with a cyno, which is more pirate like. How about we agree upon some artistic freedom to do what we want?

"I'm all for pvp, don't get me wrong. I've ganked in Empire, blobed in low sec. Got T-shirts from every which-where.. But to be forced into a pvp confrontation that I didn't want is wrong ccp." RealFlisker
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#435 - 2017-03-20 23:09:30 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
cynos and caps are allowed in lowsec,


Protip: Check the topic of the thread.


i have and people from lowsec and nullsec have given reasons why cynos and caps are in lowsec, dont bother asking for these reasons again because you are not goldfish and dont need to be told the same thing over and over again

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#436 - 2017-03-20 23:11:16 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
cynos and caps are allowed in lowsec,


Protip: Check the topic of the thread.


I checked it. It does not mean CCP should implement stupid changes like your idea.
Salvos Rhoska
#437 - 2017-03-20 23:14:29 UTC
sero Hita wrote:
But you can also do it by killing the gatecamp with a cyno, which is more pirate like. How about we agree upon some artistic freedom to do what we want?


Cyno drop of caps is pirate like?
In LS?

First it was "sending a signal".
Now its "artistic freedom".

What is this bullshit?

If you want cyno/cap action, go to the 3400+ NS systems.

LS can work just fine with subcaps and without cyno.
If you w,ant to clear the gate, bring a fleet and clear it.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#438 - 2017-03-20 23:16:59 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
sero Hita wrote:
But you can also do it by killing the gatecamp with a cyno, which is more pirate like. How about we agree upon some artistic freedom to do what we want?


Cyno drop of caps is pirate like?
In LS?

First it was "sending a signal".
Now its "artistic freedom".

What is this bullshit?

If you want cyno/cap action, go to the 3400+ NS systems.

LS can work just fine with subcaps and without cyno.
If you w,ant to clear the gate, bring a fleet and clear it.


good luck burning 33 jumps in subcaps from tama to rancer to chase pirates to ping off the gate, such engaging gameplay

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*
Salvos Rhoska
#439 - 2017-03-20 23:17:10 UTC
Frostys Virpio wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
cynos and caps are allowed in lowsec,


Protip: Check the topic of the thread.


I checked it. It does not mean CCP should implement stupid changes like your idea.


Wrong alt, sis.

It does mean this is a thread for discussing LS CHANGE.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Salvos Rhoska
#440 - 2017-03-20 23:19:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Lan Wang wrote:
good luck burning 33 jumps in subcaps from tama to rancer to chase pirates to ping off the gate, such engaging gameplay


Then dont be 33 jumps away.

PS:Those pirates are also playing the same game.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent